The spatial distance rule in the moving and classical rubber hand illusions

Consciousness and Cognition

Volumn 30, Issue , 2014, Pages 118-132

  Kalckert, Andreas ^a   Ehrsson, H Henrik ^a  

^a KAROLINSKA INSTITUTE   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Agency; Body perception; Motor control; Multisensory integration; Ownership; Rubber hand illusion; Self recognition

Indexed keywords

RUBBER;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISTANCE PERCEPTION; FEMALE; FINGER; HAND MOVEMENT; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MOTOR CONTROL; NORMAL HUMAN; PROPRIOCEPTION; QUESTIONNAIRE; RECOGNITION; RUBBER HAND ILLUSION; SENSORY FEEDBACK; SPACE; SPATIAL BEHAVIOR; TACTILE STIMULATION; ADOLESCENT; BODY IMAGE; DEPTH PERCEPTION; HAND; ILLUSION; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; PHYSIOLOGY; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; BODY IMAGE; FEMALE; HAND; HUMANS; ILLUSIONS; MALE; MOTION PERCEPTION; PROPRIOCEPTION; SPACE PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84907569385     PISSN: 10538100     EISSN: 10902376     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2014.08.022     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Armel K.C., Ramachandran V.S. Projecting sensations to external objects: Evidence from skin conductance response. Proceedings Biological Sciences/the Royal Society 2003, 270(1523):1499-1506. 10.1098/rspb.2003.2364.
2. Avillac M., Denève S., Olivier E., Pouget A., Duhamel J.-R. Reference frames for representing visual and tactile locations in parietal cortex. Nature Neuroscience 2005, 8(7):941-949. 10.1038/nn1480.
3. Bays P.M., Wolpert D.M. Computational principles of sensorimotor control that minimize uncertainty and variability. The Journal of Physiology 2006, 578(2):387-396. 10.1113/jphysiol.2006.120121.
4. Bekrater-Bodmann R., Foell J., Diers M., Flor H. The perceptual and neuronal stability of the rubber hand illusion across contexts and over time. Brain Research 2012, 1452:130-139. 10.1016/j.brainres.2012.03.001.
5. Botvinick M., Cohen J. Rubber hands "feel" touch that eyes see. Nature 1998, 391(6669):756. 10.1038/35784.
6. Brozzoli C., Ehrsson H.H., Farnè A. Multisensory representation of the space near the hand: From perception to action and interindividual interactions. The Neuroscientist: A Review Journal Bringing Neurobiology, Neurology and Psychiatry 2013, 10.1177/1073858413511153.
7. Brozzoli C., Gentile G., Ehrsson H.H. That's near my hand! Parietal and premotor coding of hand-centered space contributes to localization and self-attribution of the hand. Journal of Neuroscience 2012, 32(42):14573-14582. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2660-12.2012.
8. Costantini M., Haggard P. The rubber hand illusion: Sensitivity and reference frame for body ownership. Consciousness and Cognition 2007, 16(2):229-240. 10.1016/j.concog.2007.01.001.
9. David N., Newen A., Vogeley K. The "sense of agency" and its underlying cognitive and neural mechanisms. Consciousness and Cognition 2008, 17(2):523-534. 10.1016/j.concog.2008.03.004.
10. Duhamel J.R., Colby C.L., Goldberg M.E. Ventral intraparietal area of the macaque: Congruent visual and somatic response properties. Journal of Neurophysiology 1998, 79(1):126-136.
11. Dummer T., Picot-Annand A., Neal T., Moore C. Movement and the rubber hand illusion. Perception 2009, 38(2):271-280.
12. Edin B.B., Abbs J.H. Finger movement responses of cutaneous mechanoreceptors in the dorsal skin of the human hand. Journal of Neurophysiology 1991, 65(3):657-670.
13. Edin B.B., Johansson N. Skin strain patterns provide kinaesthetic information to the human central nervous system. The Journal of Physiology 1995, 487(Pt 1):243-251.
14. Ehrsson H.H. The concept of body ownership and its relation to multisensory integration. The new handbook of multisensory processes 2012, 775-792. MIT Press (Cambridge), MA. B.E. Stein (Ed.).
15. Ehrsson H.H., Spence C., Passingham R.E. That's my hand! Activity in premotor cortex reflects feeling of ownership of a limb. Science 2004, 305(5685):875-877. 10.1126/science.1097011.
16. Gabel S.F., Misslisch H., Gielen C.C.A.M., Duysens J. Responses of neurons in area VIP to self-induced and external visual motion. Experimental Brain Research 2002, 147(4):520-528. 10.1007/s00221-002-1268-5.
17. Gentile G., Guterstam A., Brozzoli C., Ehrsson H.H. Disintegration of multisensory signals from the real hand reduces default limb self-attribution: An fMRI study. Journal of Neuroscience 2013, 33(33):13350-13366. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1363-13.2013.
18. Gentile G., Petkova V.I., Ehrsson H.H. Integration of visual and tactile signals from the hand in the human brain: An FMRI study. Journal of Neurophysiology 2011, 105(2):910-922. 10.1152/jn.00840.2010.
19. Graziano M.S.A. Where is my arm? The relative role of vision and proprioception in the neuronal representation of limb position. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 1999, 96(18):10418-10421.
20. Graziano M.S.A., Botvinick M. How the brain represents the body: Insights from neurophysiology and psychology. Common mechanisms in perception and action: Attention and performance XIX 2002, 136-157. Oxford University Press, Oxford, England. W. Prinz, B. Hommel (Eds.).
21. Graziano M.S.A., Cooke D.F., Taylor C.S. Coding the location of the arm by sight. Science 2000, 290(5497):1782-1786.
22. Graziano M.S.A., Hu X.T., Gross C.G. Visuospatial properties of ventral premotor cortex. Journal of Neurophysiology 1997, 77(5):2268-2292.
23. Guterstam A., Gentile G., Ehrsson H.H. The invisible hand illusion: Multisensory integration leads to the embodiment of a discrete volume of empty space. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2013, 25(7):1078-1099. 10.3758/BF03198798.
24. Haggard P. Conscious intention and motor cognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2005, 9(6):290-295. 10.1016/j.tics.2005.04.012.
25. Haggard P., Jundi S. Rubber hand illusions and size - Weight illusions: Self-representation modulates representation of external objects. Perception 2009, 38(12):1796-1803. 10.1068/p6399.
26. Holmes N.P., Spence C. Multisensory integration: Space, time and superadditivity. Current Biology 2005, 15(18):R762-R764. 10.1016/j.cub.2005.08.058.
27. Ide M. The effect of "anatomical plausibility" of hand angle on the rubber hand illusion. Percept 2013, 42:103-111. 10.1068/p7322.
28. Jeannerod M. The mechanism of self-recognition in humans. Behavioural Brain Research 2003, 142(1-2):1-15.
29. Johansson R.S., Flanagan J.R. Coding and use of tactile signals from the fingertips in object manipulation tasks. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2009, 10(5):345-359. 10.1038/nrn2621.
30. Kalckert A., Ehrsson H.H. Moving a rubber hand that feels like your own: A dissociation of ownership and agency. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 2012, 6.
31. Kalckert A., Ehrsson H.H. The moving rubber hand illusion revisited: Comparing movements and visuotactile stimulation to induce illusory ownership. Consciousness and Cognition 2014, 26(C):117-132. 10.1016/j.concog.2014.02.003.
32. Kilteni K., Normand J.-M., Sanchez-Vives M.V., Slater M. Extending body space in immersive virtual reality: A very long arm illusion. PLoS ONE 2012, 7(7):e40867. 10.1371/journal.pone.0040867.s006.
33. Klam F., Graf W. Discrimination between active and passive head movements by macaque ventral and medial intraparietal cortex neurons. The Journal of Physiology 2006, 574(2):367-386.
34. Lloyd D.M. Spatial limits on referred touch to an alien limb may reflect boundaries of visuo-tactile peripersonal space surrounding the hand. Brain and Cognition 2007, 64(1):104-109. 10.1016/j.bandc.2006.09.013.
35. Makin T.R., Holmes N.P., Ehrsson H.H. On the other hand: Dummy hands and peripersonal space. Behavioural Brain Research 2008, 191(1):1-10. 10.1016/j.bbr.2008.02.041.
36. Petkova V.I., Ehrsson H.H. When right feels left: Referral of touch and ownership between the hands. PLoS ONE 2009, 4(9):e6933. 10.1371/journal.pone.0006933.
37. Preston C. The role of distance from the body and distance from the real hand in ownership and disownership during the rubber hand illusion. Actpsy 2013, 142(2):177-183. 10.1016/j.actpsy.2012.12.005.
38. Proske U., Gandevia S.C. The proprioceptive senses: Their roles in signaling body shape, body position and movement, and muscle force. Physiological Reviews 2012, 92(4):1651-1697. 10.1152/physrev.00048.2011.
39. Riemer M., Kleinböhl D., Hölzl R., Trojan J. Action and perception in the rubber hand illusion. Experimental Brain Research 2013, 1-11. 10.1007/s00221-012-3374-3.
40. Rizzolatti G., Scandolara C., Matelli M., Gentilucci M. Afferent properties of periarcuate neurons in macaque monkeys. I. Somatosensory responses. Behavioural Brain Research 1981, 2(2):125-146.
41. Rizzolatti G., Scandolara C., Matelli M., Gentilucci M. Afferent properties of periarcuate neurons in macaque monkeys. II. Visual responses. Behavioural Brain Research 1981, 2(2):147-163.
42. Sanchez-Vives M.V., Spanlang B., Frisoli A., Bergamasco M., Slater M. Virtual hand illusion induced by visuomotor correlations. PLoS ONE 2010, 5(4):e10381. 10.1371/journal.pone.0010381.
43. Shimada S., Qi Y., Hiraki K. Detection of visual feedback delay in active and passive self-body movements. Experimental Brain Research Experimentelle Hirnforschung Experimentation Cerebrale 2009, 201(2):359-364. 10.1007/s00221-009-2028-6.
44. Stein B.E., Stanford T.R. Multisensory integration: Current issues from the perspective of the single neuron. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2008, 9(4):255-266. 10.1038/nrn2331.
45. Synofzik M., Vosgerau G., Newen A. I move, therefore I am: A new theoretical framework to investigate agency and ownership. Consciousness and Cognition 2008, 17(2):411-424. 10.1016/j.concog.2008.03.008.
46. Tsakiris M., Haggard P. The rubber hand illusion revisited: Visuotactile integration and self-attribution. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception and Performance 2005, 31(1):80-91. 10.1037/0096-1523.31.1.80.
47. Tsakiris M., Prabhu G., Haggard P. Having a body versus moving your body: How agency structures body-ownership. Consciousness and Cognition 2006, 15(2):423-432. 10.1016/j.concog.2005.09.004.
48. van Beers R.J., Wolpert D.M., Haggard P. When feeling is more important than seeing in sensorimotor adaptation. Current Biology 2002, 12(10):834-837.
49. Zopf R., Savage G., Williams M. Crossmodal congruency measures of lateral distance effects on the rubber hand illusion. Neuropsychologia 2009, 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.10.028.