Spatial limits on the nonvisual self-touch illusion and the visual rubber hand illusion: Subjective experience of the illusion and proprioceptive drift

Consciousness and Cognition

Volumn 22, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 613-636

  Aimola Davies, Anne M ^a,b   White, Rebekah C ^a   Davies, Martin ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^b AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Action; Alignment; Body; Distance; Location of illusion; Proprioception; Proprioceptive drift; Rubber hand illusion; Self touch illusion; Sensory integration

Indexed keywords

RUBBER;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; ILLUSION; MALE; PERSONAL EXPERIENCE; PROPRIOCEPTION; PROSTHESIS; TIME; TOUCH; VISION;

EID: 84877032691     PISSN: 10538100     EISSN: 10902376     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2013.03.006     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Aimola Davies A.M., White R.C. A sensational illusion: Vision-touch synaesthesia and the rubber hand paradigm. Cortex 2013, 49:806-818.
2. Aimola Davies A.M., White R.C., Thew G., Aimola N.M.V., Davies M. Visual capture of action, experience of ownership, and the illusion of self-touch: A new rubber hand paradigm. Perception 2010, 39:830-838.
3. Albrecht M.A., Martin-Iverson M.T., Price G., Lee J., Iyyalol R., Waters F. Dexamphetamine effects on separate constructs in the rubber hand illusion test. Psychopharmacology 2011, 217:39-50.
4. Armel K.C., Ramachandran V.S. Projecting sensations to external objects: Evidence from skin conductance response. Proceedings of the Royal Society of LondonB 2003, 21:1499-1506.
5. Botvinick M., Cohen J. Rubber hands 'feel' touch that eyes see. Nature 1998, 391:756.
6. Capelari E.D.P., Uribe C., Brasil-Neto J.P. Feeling pain in the rubber hand: Integration of visual, proprioceptive, and painful stimuli. Perception 2009, 38:92-99.
7. Costantini M., Haggard P. The rubber hand illusion: Sensitivity and reference frame for body ownership. Consciousness and Cognition 2007, 16:229-240.
8. De Domenico G., McCloskey D.I. Accuracy of voluntary movements at the thumb and elbow joints. Experimental Brain Research 1987, 65:471-478.
9. Dijkerman H.C., de Haan E.H. Somatosensory processes subserving perception and action. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2007, 30:189-201.
10. Durgin F.H., Evans L., Dunphy N., Klostermann S., Simmons K. Rubber hands feel the touch of light. Psychological Science 2007, 18:152-157.
11. Ehrsson H.H., Holmes N.P., Passingham R.E. Touching a rubber hand: Feeling of body ownership is associated with activity in multisensory brain areas. The Journal of Neuroscience 2005, 25:10564-10573.
12. Ehrsson H.H., Rosén B., Stockselius A., Ragnö C., Köhler P., Lundborg G. Upper limb amputees can be induced to experience a rubber hand as their own. Brain 2008, 131:3443-3452.
13. Ehrsson H.H., Spence C., Passingham R.E. That's my hand! Activity in premotor cortex reflects feeling of ownership of a limb. Science 2004, 305:875-877.
14. Eshkevari E., Rieger E., Longo M.R., Haggard P., Treasure J. Increased plasticity of the bodily self in eating disorders. Psychological Medicine 2012, 42:819-828.
15. Fogassi L., Gallese V. Action as a binding key to multisensory integration. The handbook of multisensory processes 2004, 425-442. MIT Press, Cambridge MA. G. Calvert, C. Spence, B.E. Stein (Eds.).
16. Fogassi V., Gallese L., Fadiga G., Luppino M., Matelli M., Rizzolatti G. Coding of peripersonal space in inferior premotor cortex (area F4). Journal of Neurophysiology 1996, 76:141-157.
17. Fuentes C.T., Bastian A.J. Where is your arm? Variations in proprioception across space and tasks. Journal of Neurophysiology 2010, 103:164-171.
18. Haans A., IJsselsteijn W.A., de Kort Y.A.W. The effect of similarities in skin texture and hand shape on perceived ownership of a fake limb. Body Image 2008, 5:389-394.
19. Holle H., McLatchie N., Maurer S., Ward J. Proprioceptive drift without illusions of ownership for rotated hands in the "rubber hand illusion" paradigm. Cognitive Neuroscience 2011, 2:171-178.
20. Holmes N.P., Snijders H.J., Spence C. Reaching with alien limbs: Visual exposure to prosthetic hands in a mirror biases proprioception without accompanying illusions of ownership. Perception and Psychophysics 2006, 68:685-701.
21. Ijsselsteijn W.A., de Kort Y.A.W., Haans A. Is this my hand I see before me? The rubber hand illusion in reality, virtual reality, and mixed reality. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 2006, 15:455-464.
22. Iriki A., Tanaka M., Iwamura Y. Coding of modified body schema during tool use by macaque postcentral neurones. NeuroReport 1996, 7:2325-2330.
23. Jacob P., Jeannerod M. Ways of seeing: The scope and limits of visual cognition 2003, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
24. Jones L.A. Kinesthetic sensing. Human and machine haptics 2000, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. M. Cutkosky, R. Howe, K. Salisbury, M. Srinivasan (Eds.).
25. Kammers M.P.M., de Vignemont F., Verhagen L., Dijkerman H.C. The rubber hand illusion in action. Neuropsychologia 2009, 47:204-211.
26. Kammers M.P., van der Ham I.J., Dijkerman H.C. Dissociating body representations in healthy individuals: Differential effects of a kinaesthetic illusion on perception and action. Neuropsychologia 2006, 44:2430-2436.
27. Kontaris I., Downing P.E. Reflections on the hand: The use of a mirror highlights the contributions of interpreted and retinotopic representations in the rubber-hand illusion. Perception 2011, 40:1320-1334.
28. Lackner J.R. Some proprioceptive influences on the perceptual representation of body shape and orientation. Brain 1988, 111:281-297.
29. Lloyd D.M. Spatial limits on referred touch to an alien limb may reflect boundaries of visuo-tactile peripersonal space surrounding the hand. Brain and Cognition 2007, 64:104-109.
30. Longo M.R., Schüür F., Kammers M.P.M., Tsakiris M., Haggard P. What is embodiment? A psychometric approach. Cognition 2008, 107:978-998.
31. Makin T.R., Holmes N.P., Ehrsson H.H. On the other hand: Dummy hands and peripersonal space. Behavioural Brain Research 2008, 191:1-10.
32. Miles, E. (2008). What can the rubber hand illusion tell us about body representation in people with unexplained symptoms. In Symposium conducted at the body representation workshop. UK: University of Nottingham.
33. Milner A.D., Goodale M.A. The visual brain in action 1995, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
34. Morgan H.L., Turner D.C., Corlett P.R., Absalom A.R., Adapa R., Arana F.S., et al. Exploring the impact of ketamine on the experience of illusory body ownership. Biological Psychiatry 2011, 69:35-41.
35. Niebauer C.L., Aselage J., Schutte C. Hemispheric interaction and consciousness: Degree of handedness predicts the intensity of a sensory illusion. Laterality: Asymmetries of Body, Brain and Cognition 2002, 7:85-96.
36. Obayashi S., Tanaka M., Iriki A. Subjective image of invisible hand coded by monkey intraparietal neurons. NeuroReport 2000, 11:3499-3505.
37. Ocklenburg S., Rüther N., Peterburs J., Pinnow M., Güntürkün O. Laterality in the rubber hand illusion. Laterality 2011, 16:174-187.
38. Oldfield R.C. The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh Inventory. Neuropsychologia 1971, 9:97-113.
39. Paillard J., Brouchon M. Active and passive movements in the calibration of position sense. The neuropsychology of spatially oriented behaviour 1968, 37-56. Dorsey Press, Illinois. S.J. Freedman (Ed.).
40. Pavani F., Spence C., Driver J. Visual capture of touch: Out-of-body experiences with rubber gloves. Psychological Science 2000, 11:353-359.
41. Petkova V.I., Ehrsson H.H. When right feels left: Referral of touch and ownership between the hands. PLoS One 2009, 4(9):e6933.
42. Rohde M., Di Luca M., Ernst M.O. The rubber hand illusion: Feeling of ownership and proprioceptive drift do not go hand in hand. PLoS One 2011, 6(6):e21659.
43. Schütz-Bosbach S., Tausche P., Weiss C. Roughness perception during the rubber hand illusion. Brain and Cognition 2009, 70:136-144.
44. Shimada S., Fukuda K., Hiraki K. Rubber hand illusion under delayed visual feedback. PLoS One 2009, 4(7):e6185.
45. Slater M., Perez-Marcos D., Ehrsson H.H., Sanchez-Vives M.V. Towards a digital body: The virtual arm illusion. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 2008, 2(6). doi: 10.3389/neuro.09.006.2008.
46. Tsakiris M., Carpenter L., James D., Fotopoulou A. Hands only illusion: Multisensory integration elicits sense of ownership for body parts but not for non-corporeal objects. Experimental Brain Research 2010, 204:343-352.
47. Tsakiris M., Haggard P. The rubber hand illusion revisited: Visuotactile integration and self-attribution. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2005, 31:80-91.
48. Tsakiris M., Hesse M.D., Boy C., Haggard P., Fink G.R. Neural signatures of body ownership: A sensory network for bodily self-consciousness. Cerebral Cortex 2007, 17:2235-2244.
49. Tsakiris M., Prabhu G., Haggard P. Having a body versus moving your body: How agency structures body-ownership. Consciousness and Cognition 2006, 15:423-432.
50. van Beers R.J., Sittig A.C., Denier van der Gon J.J. The precision of proprioceptive position sense. Experimental Brain Research 1998, 122:367-377.
51. Wann J.P., Ibrahim S.F. Does limb proprioception drift?. Experimental Brain Research 1992, 91:162-166.
52. White R.C., Aimola Davies A.M., Davies M. Two hands are better than one: A new assessment method and a new interpretation of the non-visual rubber hand illusion. Consciousness and Cognition 2011, 20:956-964.
53. Zopf R., Savage G., Williams M.A. Crossmodal congruency measures of lateral distance effects on the rubber hand illusion. Neuropsychologia 2010, 48:713-725.