Replication protein A prevents promiscuous annealing between short sequence homologies: Implications for genome integrity

BioEssays

Volumn 37, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 305-313

  Deng, Sarah K ^a   Chen, Huan ^b   Symington, Lorraine S ^a,b  

^a Department of Medicine   (United States)

^b Columbia University ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

Chromosome rearrangements; DNA replication; End joining; Homologous recombination; Mre11; Rad51; RPA; Sae2

Indexed keywords

DNA BINDING PROTEIN; NUCLEASE; REPLICATION FACTOR A;

ANNEALING; ARTICLE; CHROMOSOME; CHROMOSOME REARRANGEMENT; GENE AMPLIFICATION; GENOME; GROSS CHROMOSOME REARRANGEMENT; HOMOLOGOUS RECOMBINATION; HUMAN; NONHUMAN; PHYSICAL PHENOMENA; PROTEIN DEGRADATION; PROTEIN DEPLETION; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN SECONDARY STRUCTURE; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY; ANIMAL; BASE PAIRING; CONFORMATION; DNA REPAIR; DNA REPLICATION; GENOMIC INSTABILITY; PHYSIOLOGY;

EUKARYOTA;

ANIMALS; BASE PAIRING; DNA REPAIR; DNA REPLICATION; GENOMIC INSTABILITY; HOMOLOGOUS RECOMBINATION; HUMANS; NUCLEIC ACID CONFORMATION; REPLICATION PROTEIN A; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY, NUCLEIC ACID;

EID: 84925635331     PISSN: 02659247     EISSN: 15211878     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/bies.201400161     Document Type: Article

References (101)

1. Fanning E, Klimovich V, Nager AR. 2006. A dynamic model for replication protein A (RPA) function in DNA processing pathways. Nucleic Acids Res 34: 4126-37.
2. Wold MS. 1997. Replication protein A: a heterotrimeric, single-stranded DNA-binding protein required for eukaryotic DNA metabolism. Annu Rev Biochem 66: 61-92.
3. Wold MS, Kelly T. 1988. Purification and characterization of replication protein A, a cellular protein required for in vitro replication of simian virus 40 DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 85: 2523-7.
4. Brill SJ, Stillman B. 1991. Replication factor-A from Saccharomyces cerevisiae is encoded by three essential genes coordinately expressed at S phase. Genes Dev 5: 1589-600.
5. Zou L, Elledge SJ. 2003. Sensing DNA damage through ATRIP recognition of RPA-ssDNA complexes. Science 300: 1542-8.
6. Fan J, Pavletich NP. 2012. Structure and conformational change of a replication protein A heterotrimer bound to ssDNA. Genes Dev 26: 2337-47.
7. Bochkarev A, Bochkareva E, Frappier L, Edwards AM. 1999. The crystal structure of the complex of replication protein A subunits RPA32 and RPA14 reveals a mechanism for single-stranded DNA binding. EMBO J 18: 4498-504.
8. Bochkarev A, Pfuetzner RA, Edwards AM, Frappier L. 1997. Structure of the single-stranded-DNA-binding domain of replication protein A bound to DNA. Nature 385: 176-81.
9. Bochkareva E, Frappier L, Edwards AM, Bochkarev A. 1998. The RPA32 subunit of human replication protein A contains a single-stranded DNA-binding domain. J Biol Chem 273: 3932-6.
10. Bastin-Shanower SA, Brill SJ. 2001. Functional analysis of the four DNA binding domains of replication protein A. The role of RPA2 in ssDNA binding. J Biol Chem 276: 36446-53.
11. Brill SJ, Bastin-Shanower S. 1998. Identification and characterization of the fourth single-stranded-DNA binding domain of replication protein A. Mol Cell Biol 18: 7225-34.
12. Gibb B, Silverstein TD, Finkelstein IJ, Greene EC. 2012. Single-stranded DNA curtains for real-time single-molecule visualization of protein-nucleic acid interactions. Anal Chem 84: 7607-12.
13. Gibb B, Ye LF, Gergoudis SC, Kwon Y, et al. 2014. Concentration-dependent exchange of replication protein A on single-stranded DNA revealed by single-molecule imaging. PLoS One 9: e87922.
14. Binz SK, Sheehan AM, Wold MS. 2004. Replication protein A phosphorylation and the cellular response to DNA damage. DNA Repair 3: 1015-24.
15. Toledo LI, Altmeyer M, Rask MB, Lukas C, et al. 2013. ATR prohibits replication catastrophe by preventing global exhaustion of RPA. Cell 155: 1088-103.
16. Dou H, Huang C, Singh M, Carpenter PB, et al. 2010. Regulation of DNA repair through deSUMOylation and SUMOylation of replication protein A complex. Mol Cell 39: 333-45.
17. Ira G, Pellicioli A, Balijja A, Wang X, et al. 2004. DNA end resection, homologous recombination and DNA damage checkpoint activation require CDK1. Nature 431: 1011-7.
18. Krogh BO, Symington LS. 2004. Recombination proteins in yeast. Annu Rev Genet 38: 233-71.
19. Mimitou EP, Symington LS. 2008. Sae2, Exo1 and Sgs1 collaborate in DNA double-strand break processing. Nature 455: 770-4.
20. Symington LS, Gautier J. 2011. Double-strand break end resection and repair pathway choice. Annu Rev Genet 45: 247-71.
21. Barlow JH, Lisby M, Rothstein R. 2008. Differential regulation of the cellular response to DNA double-strand breaks in G1. Mol Cell 30: 73-85.
22. Jazayeri A, Falck J, Lukas C, Bartek J, et al. 2006. ATM- and cell cycle-dependent regulation of ATR in response to DNA double-strand breaks. Nat Cell Biol 8: 37-45.
23. Jinks-Robertson S, Michelitch M, Ramcharan S. 1993. Substrate length requirements for efficient mitotic recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol 13: 3937-50.
24. Jensen RB, Carreira A, Kowalczykowski SC. 2010. Purified human BRCA2 stimulates RAD51-mediated recombination. Nature 467: 678-83.
25. New JH, Sugiyama T, Zaitseva E, Kowalczykowski SC. 1998. Rad52 protein stimulates DNA strand exchange by Rad51 and replication protein A. Nature 391: 407-10.
26. Shinohara A, Ogawa T. 1998. Stimulation by Rad52 of yeast Rad51-mediated recombination. Nature 391: 404-7.
27. Sung P. 1997. Function of yeast Rad52 protein as a mediator between replication protein A and the Rad51 recombinase. J Biol Chem 272: 28194-7.
28. Yang H, Li Q, Fan J, Holloman WK, et al. 2005. The BRCA2 homologue Brh2 nucleates RAD51 filament formation at a dsDNA-ssDNA junction. Nature 433: 653-7.
29. Ferguson DO, Holloman WK. 1996. Recombinational repair of gaps in DNA is asymmetric in Ustilago maydis and can be explained by a migrating D-loop model. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93: 5419-24.
30. Sarbajna S, West SC. 2014. Holliday junction processing enzymes as guardians of genome stability. Trends Biochem Sci 39: 409-19.
31. Chiruvella KK, Liang Z, Wilson TE. 2013. Repair of double-strand breaks by end joining. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 5: a012757.
32. Foster SS, Balestrini A, Petrini JH. 2011. Functional interplay of the Mre11 nuclease and Ku in the response to replication-associated DNA damage. Mol Cell Biol 31: 4379-89.
33. Bennardo N, Cheng A, Huang N, Stark JM. 2008. Alternative-NHEJ is a mechanistically distinct pathway of mammalian chromosome break repair. PLoS Genet 4: e1000110.
34. Boboila C, Alt FW, Schwer B. 2012. Classical and alternative end-joining pathways for repair of lymphocyte-specific and general DNA double-strand breaks. Adv Immunol 116: 1-49.
35. Ma JL, Kim EM, Haber JE, Lee SE. 2003. Yeast Mre11 and Rad1 proteins define a Ku-independent mechanism to repair double-strand breaks lacking overlapping end sequences. Mol Cell Biol 23: 8820-8.
36. Truong LN, Li Y, Shi LZ, Hwang PY, et al. 2013. Microhomology-mediated end joining and homologous recombination share the initial end resection step to repair DNA double-strand breaks in mammalian cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110: 7720-5.
37. Audebert M, Salles B, Calsou P. 2004. Involvement of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 and XRCC1/DNA ligase III in an alternative route for DNA double-strand breaks rejoining. J Biol Chem 279: 55117-26.
38. Liang L, Deng L, Nguyen SC, Zhao X, et al. 2008. Human DNA ligases I and III, but not ligase IV, are required for microhomology-mediated end joining of DNA double-strand breaks. Nucleic Acids Res 36: 3297-310.
39. Simsek D, Brunet E, Wong SY, Katyal S, et al. 2011. DNA ligase III promotes alternative nonhomologous end-joining during chromosomal translocation formation. PLoS Genet 7: e1002080.
40. Wang M, Wu W, Wu W, Rosidi B, et al. 2006. PARP-1 and Ku compete for repair of DNA double strand breaks by distinct NHEJ pathways. Nucleic Acids Res 34: 6170-82.
41. Lee K, Lee SE. 2007. Saccharomyces cerevisiae Sae2- and Tel1-dependent single-strand DNA formation at DNA break promotes microhomology-mediated end joining. Genetics 176: 2003-14.
42. Brunet E, Simsek D, Tomishima M, DeKelver R, et al. 2009. Chromosomal translocations induced at specified loci in human stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106: 10620-5.
43. Simsek D, Jasin M. 2010. Alternative end-joining is suppressed by the canonical NHEJ component Xrcc4-ligase IV during chromosomal translocation formation. Nat Struct Mol Biol 17: 410-6.
44. Liu P, Carvalho CM, Hastings PJ, Lupski JR. 2012. Mechanisms for recurrent and complex human genomic rearrangements. Curr Opin Genet Dev 22: 211-20.
45. Stephens PJ, McBride DJ, Lin ML, Varela I, et al. 2009. Complex landscapes of somatic rearrangement in human breast cancer genomes. Nature 462: 1005-10.
46. Stephens PJ, Greenman CD, Fu B, Yang F, et al. 2011. Massive genomic rearrangement acquired in a single catastrophic event during cancer development. Cell 144: 27-40.
47. Cejka P, Cannavo E, Polaczek P, Masuda-Sasa T, et al. 2010. DNA end resection by Dna2-Sgs1-RPA and its stimulation by Top3-Rmi1 and Mre11-Rad50-Xrs2. Nature 467: 112-6.
48. Niu H, Chung WH, Zhu Z, Kwon Y, et al. 2010. Mechanism of the ATP-dependent DNA end-resection machinery from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature 467: 108-11.
49. Cannavo E, Cejka P, Kowalczykowski SC. 2013. Relationship of DNA degradation by Saccharomyces cerevisiae exonuclease 1 and its stimulation by RPA and Mre11-Rad50-Xrs2 to DNA end resection. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110: E1661-8.
50. Sung P. 1994. Catalysis of ATP-dependent homologous DNA pairing and strand exchange by yeast RAD51 protein. Science 265: 1241-3.
51. Sugiyama T, Kowalczykowski SC. 2002. Rad52 protein associates with replication protein A (RPA)-single-stranded DNA to accelerate Rad51-mediated displacement of RPA and presynaptic complex formation. J Biol Chem 277: 31663-72.
52. Gibb B, Ye LF, Kwon Y, Niu H, et al. 2014. Protein dynamics during presynaptic-complex assembly on individual single-stranded DNA molecules. Nat Struct Mol Biol 21: 893-900.
53. Hays SL, Firmenich AA, Massey P, Banerjee R, et al. 1998. Studies of the interaction between Rad52 protein and the yeast single-stranded DNA binding protein RPA. Mol Cell Biol 18: 4400-6.
54. Milne GT, Weaver DT. 1993. Dominant negative alleles of RAD52 reveal a DNA repair/recombination complex including Rad51 and Rad52. Genes Dev 7: 1755-65.
55. Mortensen UH, Bendixen C, Sunjevaric I, Rothstein R. 1996. DNA strand annealing is promoted by the yeast Rad52 protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93: 10729-34.
56. Shinohara A, Shinohara M, Ohta T, Matsuda S, et al. 1998. Rad52 forms ring structures and co-operates with RPA in single-strand DNA annealing. Genes Cells 3: 145-56.
57. Lao JP, Oh SD, Shinohara M, Shinohara A, et al. 2008. Rad52 promotes postinvasion steps of meiotic double-strand-break repair. Mol Cell 29: 517-24.
58. Sugawara N, Haber JE. 1992. Characterization of double-strand break-induced recombination: homology requirements and single-stranded DNA formation. Mol Cell Biol 12: 563-75.
59. Sugiyama T, New JH, Kowalczykowski SC. 1998. DNA annealing by RAD52 protein is stimulated by specific interaction with the complex of replication protein A and single-stranded DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95: 6049-54.
60. Longhese MP, Plevani P, Lucchini G. 1994. Replication factor A is required in vivo for DNA replication, repair, and recombination. Mol Cell Biol 14: 7884-90.
61. Santocanale C, Neecke H, Longhese MP, Lucchini G, et al. 1995. Mutations in the gene encoding the 34kDa subunit of yeast replication protein A cause defective S phase progression. J Mol Biol 254: 595-607.
62. Umezu K, Sugawara N, Chen C, Haber JE, et al. 1998. Genetic analysis of yeast RPA1 reveals its multiple functions in DNA metabolism. Genetics 148: 989-1005.
63. Wang X, Haber JE. 2004. Role of Saccharomyces single-stranded DNA-binding protein RPA in the strand invasion step of double-strand break repair. PLoS Biol 2: E21.
64. Kantake N, Sugiyama T, Kolodner RD, Kowalczykowski SC. 2003. The recombination-deficient mutant RPA (rfa1-t11) is displaced slowly from single-stranded DNA by Rad51 protein. J Biol Chem 278: 23410-7.
65. Deng SK, Gibb B, de Almeida MJ, Greene EC, et al. 2014. RPA antagonizes microhomology-mediated repair of DNA double-strand breaks. Nat Struct Mol Biol 21: 405-12.
66. Soustelle C, Vedel M, Kolodner R, Nicolas A. 2002. Replication protein A is required for meiotic recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 161: 535-47.
67. Firmenich AA, Elias-Arnanz M, Berg P. 1995. A novel allele of Saccharomyces cerevisiae RFA1 that is deficient in recombination and repair and suppressible by RAD52. Mol Cell Biol 15: 1620-31.
68. Smith J, Rothstein R. 1995. A mutation in the gene encoding the Saccharomyces cerevisiae single-stranded DNA-binding protein Rfa1 stimulates a RAD52-independent pathway for direct-repeat recombination. Mol Cell Biol 15: 1632-41.
69. Smith J, Rothstein R. 1999. An allele of RFA1 suppresses RAD52-dependent double-strand break repair in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 151: 447-58.
70. Villarreal DD, Lee K, Deem A, Shim EY, et al. 2012. Microhomology directs diverse DNA break repair pathways and chromosomal translocations. PLoS Genet 8: e1003026.
71. Chen C, Umezu K, Kolodner RD. 1998. Chromosomal rearrangements occur in S. cerevisiae rfa1 mutator mutants due to mutagenic lesions processed by double-strand-break repair. Mol Cell 2: 9-22.
72. Chen C, Kolodner RD. 1999. Gross chromosomal rearrangements in Saccharomyces cerevisiae replication and recombination defective mutants. Nat Genet 23: 81-5.
73. Wang Y, Putnam CD, Kane MF, Zhang W, et al. 2005. Mutation in Rpa1 results in defective DNA double-strand break repair, chromosomal instability and cancer in mice. Nat Genet 37: 750-5.
74. Daley JM, Wilson TE. 2005. Rejoining of DNA double-strand breaks as a function of overhang length. Mol Cell Bbiol 25: 896-906.
75. Decottignies A. 2007. Microhomology-mediated end joining in fission yeast is repressed by pku70 and relies on genes involved in homologous recombination. Genetics 176: 1403-15.
76. Hass CS, Gakhar L, Wold MS. 2010. Functional characterization of a cancer causing mutation in human replication protein A. Mol Cancer Res 8: 1017-26.
77. Ray BL, White CI, Haber JE. 1991. Heteroduplex formation and mismatch repair of the "stuck" mutation during mating-type switching in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol 11: 5372-80.
78. Zierhut C, Diffley JF. 2008. Break dosage, cell cycle stage and DNA replication influence DNA double strand break response. EMBO J 27: 1875-85.
79. Chen H, Lisby M, Symington LS. 2013. RPA coordinates DNA end resection and prevents formation of DNA hairpins. Mol Cell 50: 589-600.
80. Bae KH, Kim HS, Bae SH, Kang HY, et al. 2003. Bimodal interaction between replication-protein A and Dna2 is critical for Dna2 function both in vivo and in vitro. Nucleic Acids Res 31: 3006-15.
81. Lisby M, Barlow JH, Burgess RC, Rothstein R. 2004. Choreography of the DNA damage response: spatiotemporal relationships among checkpoint and repair proteins. Cell 118: 699-713.
82. Golub EI, Gupta RC, Haaf T, Wold MS, et al. 1998. Interaction of human rad51 recombination protein with single-stranded DNA binding protein, RPA. Nucleic Acids Res 26: 5388-93.
83. Schwartz EK, Heyer WD. 2011. Processing of joint molecule intermediates by structure-selective endonucleases during homologous recombination in eukaryotes. Chromosoma 120: 109-27.
84. Lobachev KS, Gordenin DA, Resnick MA. 2002. The Mre11 complex is required for repair of hairpin-capped double-strand breaks and prevention of chromosome rearrangements. Cell 108: 183-93.
85. Trujillo KM, Sung P. 2001. DNA structure-specific nuclease activities in the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Rad50*Mre11 complex. J Biol Chem 276: 35458-64.
86. Cannavo E, Cejka P. 2014. Sae2 promotes dsDNA endonuclease activity within Mre11-Rad50-Xrs2 to resect DNA breaks. Nature 514: 122-5.
87. Hanada K, Budzowska M, Davies SL, van Drunen E, et al. 2007. The structure-specific endonuclease Mus81 contributes to replication restart by generating double-strand DNA breaks. Nat Struct Mol Biol 14: 1096-104.
88. Couch FB, Bansbach CE, Driscoll R, Luzwick JW, et al. 2013. ATR phosphorylates SMARCAL1 to prevent replication fork collapse. Genes Dev 27: 1610-23.
89. Ragland RL, Patel S, Rivard RS, Smith K, et al. 2013. RNF4 and PLK1 are required for replication fork collapse in ATR-deficient cells. Genes Dev 27: 2259-73.
90. Overmeer RM, Moser J, Volker M, Kool H, et al. 2011. Replication protein A safeguards genome integrity by controlling NER incision events. J Cell Biol 192: 401-15.
91. Tsaalbi-Shtylik A, Moser J, Mullenders LH, Jansen JG, et al. 2014. Persistently stalled replication forks inhibit nucleotide excision repair in trans by sequestering Replication protein A. Nucleic Acids Res 42: 4406-13.
92. Maringele L, Lydall D. 2004. Telomerase- and recombination-independent immortalization of budding yeast. Genes Dev 18: 2663-75.
93. Rattray AJ, Shafer BK, Neelam B, Strathern JN. 2005. A mechanism of palindromic gene amplification in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genes Dev 19: 1390-9.
94. Rattray AJ, McGill CB, Shafer BK, Strathern JN. 2001. Fidelity of mitotic double-strand-break repair in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: a role for SAE2/COM1. Genetics 158: 109-22.
95. Voineagu I, Narayanan V, Lobachev KS, Mirkin SM. 2008. Replication stalling at unstable inverted repeats: interplay between DNA hairpins and fork stabilizing proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105: 9936-41.
96. Freudenreich CH, Kantrow SM, Zakian VA. 1998. Expansion and length-dependent fragility of CTG repeats in yeast. Science 279: 853-6.
97. Paeschke K, Bochman ML, Garcia PD, Cejka P, et al. 2013. Pif1 family helicases suppress genome instability at G-quadruplex motifs. Nature 497: 458-62.
98. Piazza A, Serero A, Boule JB, Legoix-Ne P, et al. 2012. Stimulation of gross chromosomal rearrangements by the human CEB1 and CEB25 minisatellites in Saccharomyces cerevisiae depends on G-quadruplexes or Cdc13. PLoS Genet 8: e1003033.
99. Ribeyre C, Lopes J, Boule JB, Piazza A, et al. 2009. The yeast Pif1 helicase prevents genomic instability caused by G-quadruplex-forming CEB1 sequences in vivo. PLoS Genet 5: e1000475.
100. Zhang Y, Saini N, Sheng Z, Lobachev KS. 2013. Genome-wide screen reveals replication pathway for quasi-palindrome fragility dependent on homologous recombination. PLoS Genet 9: e1003979.
101. Zhang Y, Shishkin AA, Nishida Y, Marcinkowski-Desmond D, et al. 2012. Genome-wide screen identifies pathways that govern GAA/TTC repeat fragility and expansions in dividing and nondividing yeast cells. Mol Cell 48: 254-65.