RPA antagonizes microhomology-mediated repair of DNA double-strand breaks

Nature Structural and Molecular Biology

Volumn 21, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 405-412

  Deng, Sarah K ^a   Gibb, Bryan ^a   De Almeida, Mariana Justino ^a   Greene, Eric C ^a   Symington, Lorraine S ^a  

^a Department of Neurology and the Taub Institute for Research on Alzheimer's Disease and the Aging Brain   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DOUBLE STRANDED DNA; REPLICATION FACTOR A; SINGLE STRANDED DNA;

ARTICLE; BUDDING; CONTROLLED STUDY; DNA BINDING; DNA END JOINING REPAIR; DOUBLE STRANDED DNA BREAK; HOMOLOGOUS RECOMBINATION; IN VITRO STUDY; MICROHOMOLOGY MEDIATED END JOINING; MUTANT; NONHUMAN; POINT MUTATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN SECONDARY STRUCTURE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; STEADY STATE; WILD TYPE; YEAST;

SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

DNA BREAKS, DOUBLE-STRANDED; DNA END-JOINING REPAIR; DNA, SINGLE-STRANDED; HOMOLOGOUS RECOMBINATION; REPLICATION PROTEIN A; RNA POLYMERASE I; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS;

EID: 84897968795     PISSN: 15459993     EISSN: 15459985     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nsmb.2786     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Lieber, M.R. NHEJ and its backup pathways in chromosomal translocations. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 17, 393-395 (2010
2. McVey, M. & Lee, S.E. MMEJ repair of double-strand breaks (director's cut): Deleted sequences and alternative endings. Trends Genet. 24, 529-538 (2008
3. Boboila, C., Alt, F.W. & Schwer, B. Classical and alternative end-joining pathways for repair of lymphocyte-specific and general DNA double-strand breaks. Adv. Immunol. 116, 1-49 (2012
4. Ma, J.L., Kim, E.M., Haber, J.E. & Lee, S.E. Yeast Mre11 and Rad1 proteins define a Ku-independent mechanism to repair double-strand breaks lacking overlapping end sequences. Mol. Cell. Biol. 23, 8820-8828 (2003
5. Symington, L.S. Role of RAD52 epistasis group genes in homologous recombination and double-strand break repair. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 66, 630-670 (2002
6. Symington, L.S. & Gautier, J. Double-strand break end resection and repair pathway choice. Annu. Rev. Genet. 45, 247-271 (2011
7. Mimitou, E.P. & Symington, L.S. Sae2, Exo1 and Sgs1 collaborate in DNA double-strand break processing. Nature 455, 770-774 (2008
8. Shim, E.Y. et al. Saccharomyces cerevisiae Mre11/Rad50/Xrs2 and Ku proteins regulate association of Exo1 and Dna2 with DNA breaks. EMBO J. 29, 3370-3380 (2010
9. Zhu, Z., Chung, W.H., Shim, E.Y., Lee, S.E. & Ira, G. Sgs1 helicase and two nucleases Dna2 and Exo1 resect DNA double-strand break ends. Cell 134, 981-994 (2008
10. Mimitou, E.P. & Symington, L.S. DNA end resection: Many nucleases make light work. DNA Repair (Amst.) 8, 983-995 (2009
11. Buis, J. et al. Mre11 nuclease activity has essential roles in DNA repair and genomic stability distinct from ATM activation. Cell 135, 85-96 (2008
12. Langerak, P., Mejia-Ramirez, E., Limbo, O. & Russell, P. Release of Ku and MRN from DNA ends by Mre11 nuclease activity and Ctp1 is required for homologous recombination repair of double-strand breaks. PLoS Genet. 7, e1002271 (2011
13. Sartori, A.A. et al. Human CtIP promotes DNA end resection. Nature 450, 509-514 (2007
14. Bennardo, N., Cheng, A., Huang, N. & Stark, J.M. Alternative-NHEJ is a mechanistically distinct pathway of mammalian chromosome break repair. PLoS Genet. 4, e1000110 (2008
15. Lee-Theilen, M., Matthews, A.J., Kelly, D., Zheng, S. & Chaudhuri, J. CtIP promotes microhomology-mediated alternative end joining during class-switch recombination. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 18, 75-79 (2011
16. Truong, L.N. et al. Microhomology-mediated end joining and homologous recombination share the initial end resection step to repair DNA double-strand breaks in mammalian cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110, 7720-7725 (2013
17. Zhang, Y. & Jasin, M. An essejntial role for CtIP in chromosomal translocation formation through an alternative end-joining pathway. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 18, 80-84 (2011
18. Dinkelmann, M. et al. Multiple functions of MRN in end-joining pathways during isotype class switching. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 16, 808-813 (2009
19. Lee, K. & Lee, S.E. Saccharomyces cerevisiae Sae2-And Tel1-dependent single-strand DNA formation at DNA break promotes microhomology-mediated end joining. Genetics 176, 2003-2014 (2007
20. Xie, A., Kwok, A. & Scully, R. Role of mammalian Mre11 in classical and alternative nonhomologous end joining. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 16, 814-818 (2009
21. Rass, E. et al. Role of Mre11 in chromosomal nonhomologous end joining in mammalian cells. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 16, 819-824 (2009
22. Mortensen, U.H., Bendixen, C., Sunjevaric, I. & Rothstein, R. DNA strand annealing is promoted by the yeast Rad52 protein. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93, 10729-10734 (1996
23. Sugawara, N. & Haber, J.E. Characterization of double-strand break-induced recombination: Homology requirements and single-stranded DNA formation. Mol. Cell. Biol. 12, 563-575 (1992
24. Villarreal, D.D. et al. Microhomology directs diverse DNA break repair pathways and chromosomal translocations. PLoS Genet. 8, e1003026 (2012
25. Daley, J.M. & Wilson, T.E. Rejoining of DNA double-strand breaks as a function of overhang length. Mol. Cell. Biol. 25, 896-906 (2005
26. Wold, M.S. Replication protein A: A heterotrimeric, single-stranded DNA-binding protein required for eukaryotic DNA metabolism. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 66, 61-92 (1997
27. Sugiyama, T., New, J.H. & Kowalczykowski, S.C. DNA annealing by RAD52 protein is stimulated by specific interaction with the complex of replication protein A and single-stranded DNA. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95, 6049-6054 (1998
28. Smith, J. & Rothstein, R. A mutation in the gene encoding the Saccharomyces cerevisiae single-stranded DNA-binding protein Rfa1 stimulates a RAD52-independent pathway for direct-repeat recombination. Mol. Cell. Biol. 15, 1632-1641 (1995
29. Smith, J. & Rothstein, R. An allele of RFA1 suppresses RAD52-dependent double-strand break repair in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 151, 447-458 (1999
30. Soustelle, C., Vedel, M., Kolodner, R. & Nicolas, A. Replication protein A is required for meiotic recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 161, 535-547 (2002
31. Umezu, K., Sugawara, N., Chen, C., Haber, J.E. & Kolodner, R.D. Genetic analysis of yeast RPA1 reveals its multiple functions in DNA metabolism. Genetics 148, 989-1005 (1998
32. Chen, H., Lisby, M. & Symington, L. RPA coordinates DNA end resection and prevents formation of DNA hairpins. Mol. Cell 50, 589-600 (2013
33. Milne, G.T., Jin, S., Shannon, K.B. & Weaver, D.T. Mutations in two Ku homologs define a DNA end-joining repair pathway in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 16, 4189-4198 (1996
34. Moore, J.K. & Haber, J.E. Cell cycle and genetic requirements of two pathways of nonhomologous end-joining repair of double-strand breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 16, 2164-2173 (1996
35. Kantake, N., Sugiyama, T., Kolodner, R.D. & Kowalczykowski, S.C. The recombination-deficient mutant RPA (rfa1-T11) is displaced slowly from single-stranded DNA by Rad51 protein. J. Biol. Chem. 278, 23410-23417 (2003
36. Lee, S.E. et al. Saccharomyces Ku70, mre11/rad50 and RPA proteins regulate adaptation to G2/M arrest after DNA damage. Cell 94, 399-409 (1998
37. Lobachev, K.S., Gordenin, D.A. & Resnick, M.A. The Mre11 complex is required for repair of hairpin-capped double-strand breaks and prevention of chromosome rearrangements. Cell 108, 183-193 (2002
38. Rattray, A.J., Shafer, B.K., Neelam, B. & Strathern, J.N. A mechanism of palindromic gene amplification in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genes Dev. 19, 1390-1399 (2005
39. Gibb, B., Silverstein, T.D., Finkelstein, I.J. & Greene, E.C. Single-stranded DNA curtains for real-Time single-molecule visualization of protein-nucleic acid interactions. Anal. Chem. 84, 7607-7612 (2012
40. Gibb, B. et al. Concentration-dependent exchange of replication protein a on single-stranded DNA revealed by single-molecule imaging. PLoS ONE 9, e87922 (2014
41. Graham, J.S., Johnson, R.C. & Marko, J.F. Concentration-dependent exchange accelerates turnover of proteins bound to double-stranded DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 39, 2249-2259 (2011
42. Liu, P., Carvalho, C.M., Hastings, P.J. & Lupski, J.R. Mechanisms for recurrent and complex human genomic rearrangements. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 22, 211-220 (2012
43. Stephens, P.J. et al. Complex landscapes of somatic rearrangement in human breast cancer genomes. Nature 462, 1005-1010 (2009
44. Stephens, P.J. et al. Massive genomic rearrangement acquired in a single catastrophic event during cancer development. Cell 144, 27-40 (2011
45. Pâques, F. & Haber, J.E. Multiple pathways of recombination induced by double-strand breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 63, 349-404 (1999
46. Audebert, M., Salles, B. & Calsou, P. Involvement of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 and XRCC1/DNA ligase III in an alternative route for DNA double-strand breaks rejoining. J. Biol. Chem. 279, 55117-55126 (2004
47. Mansour, W.Y., Rhein, T. & Dahm-Daphi, J. The alternative end-joining pathway for repair of DNA double-strand breaks requires PARP1 but is not dependent upon microhomologies. Nucleic Acids Res. 38, 6065-6077 (2010
48. Wang, M. et al. PARP-1 and Ku compete for repair of DNA double strand breaks by distinct NHEJ pathways. Nucleic Acids Res. 34, 6170-6182 (2006
49. Liang, L. et al. Human DNA ligases I and III, but not ligase IV, are required for microhomology-mediated end joining of DNA double-strand breaks. Nucleic Acids Res. 36, 3297-3310 (2008
50. Simsek, D. et al. DNA ligase III promotes alternative nonhomologous end-joining during chromosomal translocation formation. PLoS Genet. 7, e1002080 (2011
51. Wang, H. et al. DNA ligase III as a candidate component of backup pathways of nonhomologous end joining. Cancer Res. 65, 4020-4030 (2005
52. Matsuzaki, K., Terasawa, M., Iwasaki, D., Higashide, M. & Shinohara, M. Cyclin-dependent kinase-dependent phosphorylation of Lif1 and Sae2 controls imprecise nonhomologous end joining accompanied by double-strand break resection. Genes Cells 17, 473-493 (2012
53. Shibata, A. et al. Factors determining DNA double-strand break repair pathway choice in G2 phase. EMBO J. 30, 1079-1092 (2011
54. Mimitou, E.P. & Symington, L.S. Ku prevents Exo1 and Sgs1-dependent resection of DNA ends in the absence of a functional MRX complex or Sae2. EMBO J. 29, 3358-3369 (2010
55. Gravel, S., Chapman, J.R., Magill, C. & Jackson, S.P. DNA helicases Sgs1 and BLM promote DNA double-strand break resection. Genes Dev. 22, 2767-2772 (2008
56. Chung, W.H., Zhu, Z., Papusha, A., Malkova, A. & Ira, G. Defective resection at DNA double-strand breaks leads to De novo telomere formation and enhances gene targeting. PLoS Genet. 6, e1000948 (2010
57. Chen, C. & Kolodner, R.D. Gross chromosomal rearrangements in Saccharomyces cerevisiae replication and recombination defective mutants. Nat. Genet. 23, 81-85 (1999
58. Chen, C., Umezu, K. & Kolodner, R.D. Chromosomal rearrangements occur in S. cerevisiae rfa1 mutator mutants due to mutagenic lesions processed by double-strand-break repair. Mol. Cell 2, 9-22 (1998
59. Wang, Y. et al. Mutation in Rpa1 results in defective DNA double-strand break repair, chromosomal instability and cancer in mice. Nat. Genet. 37, 750-755 (2005
60. Foster, S.S., Balestrini, A. & Petrini, J.H. Functional interplay of the Mre11 nuclease and Ku in the response to replication-Associated DNA damage. Mol. Cell. Biol. 31, 4379-4389 (2011
61. Langston, L.D. & Symington, L.S. Gene targeting in yeast is initiated by two independent strand invasions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101, 15392-15397 (2004
62. Decottignies, A. Microhomology-mediated end joining in fission yeast is repressed by pku70 and relies on genes involved in homologous recombination. Genetics 176, 1403-1415 (2007
63. Davis, A.P. & Symington, L.S. The yeast recombinational repair protein Rad59 interacts with Rad52 and stimulates single-strand annealing. Genetics 159, 515-525 (2001
64. Greene, E.C., Wind, S., Fazio, T., Gorman, J. & Visnapuu, M.L. DNA curtains for high-Throughput single-molecule optical imaging. Methods Enzymol. 472, 293-315 (2010.