Essential bioinformatics

Essential Bioinformatics

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 1-339

  Xiong, Jin ^a  

^a TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84924149446     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511806087     Document Type: Book

References (181)

1. Attwood, T. K., and Miller, C. J. 2002. Progress in bioinformatics and the importance of being earnest. Biotechnol. Annu. Rev. 8:1–54.
2. Golding, G. B. 2003. DNA and the revolution of molecular evolution, computational biology, and bioinformatics. Genome 46: 930–5.
3. Goodman, N. 2002. Biological data becomes computer literature: New advances in bioinformatics. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 13: 68–71.
4. Hagen, J. B. 2000. The origin of bioinformatics. Nat. Rev. Genetics 1: 231–6.
5. Kanehisa, M., and Bork, P. 2003. Bioinformatics in the post-sequence era. Nat. Genet. 33 Suppl: 305–10.
6. Kim, J. H. 2002. Bioinformatics and genomic medicine. Genet. Med. 4 Suppl: 62S–5S.
7. Luscombe, N. M., Greenbaum, D., and Gerstein, M. 2001. What is bioinformatics? A proposed definition and overview of the field. Methods Inf. Med. 40: 346–58.
8. Ouzounis, C. A., and Valencia, A. 2003. Early bioinformatics: The birth of a discipline –Apersonal view. Bioinformatics 19: 2176–90.
9. Apweiler, R. 2000. Protein sequence databases. Adv. Protein Chem. 54: 31–71.
10. Blaschke, C., Hirschman, L., and Valencia, A. 2002. Information extraction in molecular biology. Brief. Bioinform. 3: 154–65.
11. Geer, R. C., and Sayers, E.W. 2003. Entrez: Making use of its power. Brief. Bioinform. 4: 179–84.
12. Hughes, A. E. 2001. Sequence databases and the Internet. Methods Mol. Biol. 167: 215–23.
13. Patnaik, S. K., and Blumenfeld, O. O. 2001. Use of on-line tools and databases for routine sequence analyses. Anal. Biochem. 289: 1–9.
14. Stein, L. D. 2003. Integrating biological databases. Nat. Rev. Genet. 4: 337–45.
15. Batzoglou, S. 2005. The many faces of sequence alignment. Brief. Bioinformatics 6: 6–22.
16. Brenner, S. E., Chothia, C., and Hubbard, T. J. 1998. Assessing sequence comparison methods with reliable structurally identified distant evolutionary relationships. Proc.Natl. Acad. Sci.USA 95: 6073–8.
17. Chao, K.-M., Pearson, W. R., and Miller, W. 1992. Aligning two sequences within a specified diagonal band. Comput. Appl. Biosci. 8: 481–7.
18. Henikoff, S., and Henikoff, J. G. 1992. Amino acid substitution matrices from protein blocks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A 89: 10915–19.
19. Huang, X. 1994. On global sequence alignment. Comput. Appl. Biosci. 10: 227–35.
20. Pagni, M., and Jongeneel, V. 2001. Making sense of score statistics for sequence alignments. Brief. Bioinformatics 2: 51–67.
21. Pearson, W. R. 1996. Effective protein sequence comparison. Methods Enzymol. 266: 227–58.
22. Rost, B. 1999. Twilight zone of protein sequence alignments. Protein Eng. 12: 85–94.
23. States, D. J., Gish, W., and Altschul, S. F. 1991. Improved sensitivity of nucleic acid database searches using application-specific scoring matrices. Methods 3: 66–70.
24. Valdar, W. S. 2002. Scoring residue conservation. Proteins. 48: 227–41.
25. Vingron, M., and Waterman, M. S. 1994. Sequence alignment and penalty scores. J. Mol. Biol. 235: 1–12.
26. Altschul, S. F., Boguski, M. S., Gish, W., and Wootton, J. C. 1994. Issues in searching molecular sequences databases. Nat. Genet. 6: 119–29.
27. Altschul, S. F., Madden, T. L., Schaffer, A. A., Zhang, J., Zhang, Z., Miller, W., and Lipman, D. J. 1997.Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: A new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 25: 3389–402.
28. Chen, Z. 2003. Assessing sequence comparison methods with the average precision criterion. Bioinformatics 19: 2456–60.
29. Karlin, S., and Altschul, S. F. 1993. Applications and statistics for multiple high-scoring segments in molecular sequences. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90: 5873–7.
30. Mullan, L. J., andWilliams, G.W. 2002. BLAST and go? Brief. Bioinform. 3: 200–2.
31. Sansom, C. 2000. Database searching with DNA and protein sequences: An introduction. Brief. Bioinform. 1: 22–32.
32. Spang, R., and Vingron, M. 1998. Statistics of large-scale sequence searching. Bioinformatics 14: 279–84.
33. Apostolico, A., and Giancarlo, R. 1998. Sequence alignment in molecular biology. J. Comput. Biol. 5: 173–96.
34. Gaskell, G. J. 2000.Multiple sequence alignment tools on theWeb. Biotechniques 29: 60–2.
35. Gotoh, O. 1999. Multiple sequence alignment: Algorithms and applications. Adv. Biophys. 36: 159–206.
36. Lecompte, O., Thompson, J. D., Plewniak, F., Thierry, J., and Poch, O. 2001. Multiple alignment of complete sequences (MACS) in the post-genomic era. Gene 270: 17–30.
37. Morgenstern, B. 1999. DIALIGN 2: improvement of the segment-to-segment approach to multiple sequence alignment. Bioinformatics 15: 211–8.
38. Morgenstern, B., Dress, A., andWerner T. 1996.Multiple DNA and protein sequence alignment based on segment-to-segment comparison. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93: 12098–103.
39. Mullan, L. J. 2002. Multiple sequence alignment – The gateway to further analysis. Brief. Bioinform. 3: 303–5.
40. Nicholas, H.B., Ropelewski, A. J., and Deerfield, D.W. 2002. Strategies for multiple sequence alignment. Biotechniques 32: 572–91.
41. Notredame, C. 2002. Recent progress in multiple sequence alignment: A survey. Pharmacogenomics 3: 131–44.
42. Notredame, C., Higgins, D. G., and Heringa, J. 2000. T-Coffee: A novel method for fast and accurate multiple sequence alignment. J.Mol. Biol. 302: 205–17.
43. Thompson, J.D., Higgins, D. G., and Gibson, T. J. 1994. CLUSTAL W: Improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res. 22: 4673–80.
44. Thompson, J. D., Plewniak, F., and Poch, O. 1999. A comprehensive comparison of multiple sequence alignment programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 27: 2682–90.
45. Altschul, S. F., and Koonin, E. V. 1998. Iterated profile searches with PSI-BLAST – A tool for discovery in protein databases. Trends Biochem. Sci. 23: 444–7.
46. Baldi, P., Chauvin, Y., Hunkapiller, T., and McClure M. A. 1994. Hidden Markov models of biological primary sequence information. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91: 1059–63.
47. Eddy, S. R. 1996. HiddenMarkov models. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 6: 361–5.
48. Eddy, S. R. 1998. Profile hiddenMarkov models. Bioinformatics 14: 755–63.
49. Jones, D. T., and Swindells, M. B. 2002. Getting the most from PSI-BLAST. Trends Biochem. Sci. 27: 161–4.
50. Panchenko, A. R., and Bryant, S. H. 2002.Acomparison of position-specific score matrices based on sequence and structure alignments. Protein Sci. 11: 361–70.
51. Attwood, T. K. 2000. The quest to deduce protein function from sequence: The role of pattern databases. Int. J. Biochem. Cell. Biol. 32: 139–55.
52. Attwood, T. K. 2002. The PRINTS database: A resource for identification of protein families. Brief. Bioinform. 3: 252–63.
53. Biswas, M., O’Rourke, J. F., Camon, E., Fraser, G., Kanapin, A., Karavidopoulou, Y., Kersey, P., et al. Applications of InterPro in protein annotation and genome analysis. Brief. Bioinform. 3: 285–95.
54. Copley, R. R., Ponting, C. P., Schultz, J., and Bork, P. 2002. Sequence analysis of multidomain proteins: Past perspectives and future directions. Adv. Protein Chem. 61: 75–98.
55. Kanehisa, M., and Bork, P. 2003. Bioinformatics in the post-sequence era. Nat.Genet. 33 (Suppl): 305–10.
56. Kong, L., and Ranganathan, S. 2004. Delineation of modular proteins: Domain boundary prediction from sequence information. Brief. Bioinform. 5: 179–92.
57. Kriventseva, E. V., Biswas, M., and Apweiler R. 2001. Clustering and analysis of protein families. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 11: 334–9.
58. Liu, J., and Rost, B. 2003. Domains, motifs and clusters in the protein universe. Curr.Opin. Chem. Biol. 7: 5–11.
59. Peri, S., Ibarrola, N., Blagoev, B., Mann, M., and Pandey, A. 2001. Common pitfalls in bioinformatics-based analyses: Look before you leap. Trends Genet. 17: 541–5.
60. Servant, F., Bru, C., Carrere, S., Courcelle, E., Gouzy, J., Peyruc, D., and Kahn, D. 2002. ProDom: Automated clustering of homologous domains. Brief. Bioinform. 3: 246–51.
61. Sigrist, C. J., Cerutti, L., Hulo, N., Gattiker, A., Falquet, L., Pagni, M., Bairoch, A., and Bucher, P. 2002. PROSITE: A documented database using patterns and profiles as motif descriptors. Brief. Bioinform. 3: 265–74.
62. Wu, C. H., Huang, H., Yeh, L. S., and Barker, W.C. 2003.Protein family classificationandfunctional annotation. Comput. Biol. Chem. 27: 37–47.
63. Aggarwal, G., and Ramaswamy, R. 2002. Ab initio gene identification: Prokaryote genome annotation with GeneScan and GLIMMER. J. Biosci. 27: 7–14.
64. Ashurst, J. L., and Collins, J. E. 2003. Gene annotation: Prediction and testing. Annu. Rev. Genomics Hum. Genet. 4: 69–88.
65. Azad, R. K., and Borodovsky, M. 2004. Probabilistic methods of identifying genes in prokaryotic genomes: Connections to the HMM theory. Brief. Bioinform. 5: 118–30.
66. Cruveiller, S., Jabbari, K., Clay, O., and Bemardi, G. 2003. Compositional features of eukaryotic genomes for checking predicted genes. Brief. Bioinform. 4: 43–52.
67. Davuluri, R.V., and Zhang, M.Q. 2003. “Computer software tofindgenes in plant genomicDNA.” In Plant Functional Genomics, edited by E. Grotewold, 87–108. Totowa, NJ: Human Press.
68. Guigo, R., andWiehe, T. 2003. “Gene prediction accuracy in large DNA sequences.” In Frontiers in Computational Genomics, edited by M. Y. Galperin and E. V. Koonin, 1–33. Norfolk, UK: Caister Academic Press.
69. Guigo, R., Dermitzakis, E. T., Agarwal, P., Ponting, C. P., Parra, G., Reymond, A., Abril, J. F., et al. 2003. Comparison of mouse and human genomes followed by experimental verification yields an estimated 1,019 additional genes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100: 1140–5.
70. Li, W., and Godzik, A. 2002. Discovering new genes with advanced homology detection. Trends Biotechnol. 20: 315–16.
71. Makarov, V. 2002. Computer programs for eukaryotic gene prediction. Brief. Bioinform. 3: 195–9.
72. Mathe, C., Sagot, M. F., Schiex, T., and Rouze, P. 2002. Current methods of gene prediction, their strengths and weaknesses. Nucleic Acids Res. 30: 4103–17.
73. Parra, G., Agarwal, P., Abril, J. F., Wiehe, T., Fickett, J. W., and Guigo, R. 2003. Comparative gene prediction in human and mouse. Genome Res. 13: 108–17.
74. Wang, J., Li, S., Zhang, Y., Zheng, H., Xu, Z., Ye, J., Yu, J., and Wong, G. K. 2003. Vertebrate gene predictions and the problem of large genes. Nat. Rev. Genet. 4: 741–9.
75. Wang, Z., Chen, Y., and Li, Y. 2004. A brief review of computational gene prediction methods. Geno. Prot. Bioinfo. 4: 216–21.
76. Zhang, M. Q. 2002. Computational prediction of eukaryotic protein coding genes. Nat. Rev. Genetics. 3: 698–709.
77. Dubchak, I., and Pachter, L. 2002. The computational challenges of applying comparative-based computational methods to whole genomes. Brief. Bioinform. 3: 18–22.
78. Hannenhalli, S., and Levy, S. 2001. Promoter prediction in the human genome. Bioinformatics 17(Suppl): S90–6.
79. Hehl, R., and Wingender, E. 2001.Database-assisted promoteranalysis. TrendsPlant Sci. 6: 251–5.
80. Ohler, U., and Niemann, H. 2001. Identification and analysis of eukaryotic promoters: Recent computational approaches. Trends Genet. 17: 56–60.
81. Ovcharenko, I., and Loots, G.G. 2003. Finding the needle in the haystack: Computational strategies for discovering regulatory sequences in genomes. Curr. Genomics 4: 557–68.
82. Qiu, P. 2003. Recent advances in computational promoter analysis in understanding the transcriptional regulatory network. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 309: 495–501.
83. Rombauts S., Florquin K., Lescot M., Marchal K., Rouze P., and van de Peer Y. 2003. Computational approaches to identify promoters and cis-regulatory elements in plant genomes. Plant Physiol. 132: 1162–76.
84. Salgado, H., Moreno-Hagelsieb, G., Smith, T. F., and Collado-Vides, J. 2000. Operons in Escherichia coli: Genomic analyses and predictions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97: 6652–7.
85. Wang, L., Trawick, J. D., Yamamoto, R., and Zamudio, C. 2004. Genome-wide operon prediction in Staphylococcus aureus. Nucleic Acids Res. 32: 3689–702.
86. Werner, T. 2003. The state of the art of mammalian promoter recognition. Brief. Bioinform. 4: 22–30.
87. Graur, D., and Li, W.-H. 2000. Fundamentals of Molecular Evolution. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.
88. Higgins, D.G. 2000. Amino acid-based phylogeny and alignment. Adv. Protein Chem. 54: 99–135.
89. Nei, M., and Kumar, S. 2000. Molecular Evolution and Phylogenetics. New York: Oxford University Press.
90. Salemi, M., and Vandamme, A.-M. 2003. The Phylogenetics Handbook – A Practical Approach to DNA and Protein Phylogeny. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
91. Thornton, J. W., and DeSalle, R. 2000. Gene family evolution and homology: Genomics meets phylogenetics. Annu. Rev. Genomics Hum. Genet. 1: 41–73.
92. Whelan, S., Lio, P., and Goldman, N. 2001.Molecular phylogenetics: State of the art methods for looking into the past. Trends Genet. 17: 262–72.
93. Graur, D., and Li, W.-H. 2000. Fundamentals of Molecular Evolution. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.
94. Hall, B. G. 2001. Phylogenetic Trees Made Easy. A How-to Manual for Molecular Biologists. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.
95. Huelsenbeck J. P., Ronquist, F., Nielsen R., and Bollback, J. P. 2001. Bayesian inference of phylogeny and its impact on evolutionary biology. Science. 294: 2310–14.
96. Nei, M., and Kumar, S. 2000. Molecular Evolution and Phylogenetics. NewYork: OxfordUniversity Press.
97. Salemi, M., and Vandamme, A.-M. 2003. The Phylogenetics Handbook – A Practical Approach to DNA and Protein Phylogeny. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
98. Swofford, D. L., Olsen, G. J., Waddel, P. J., and Hillis, D. M. 1996. ”Phylogenetic inference.” In Molecular Systematics. 2nd ed., edited by D. M. Hillis, C.Moritz, and B. K.Mable Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.
99. Branden, C., and Tooze, J. 1999. Introduction to Protein Structure, 2nd ed. New York: Garland Publishing.
100. Scheeff, E. D., and Fink, J. L. 2003. “Fundamentals of protein structure.” In Structural Bioinformatics, edited by P. E. Bourne and H.Weissig, 15–39. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Liss.
101. Westbrook, J. D., and Fitzgerald, P. M. D. 2003. “The PDB format, mmCIF and other data formats.” In Structural Bioinformatics, edited by P. E. Bourne and H. Weissig, 161–79. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Liss.
102. Bourne, P. E., and Shindyalov, I. N. 2003. “Structure comparison and alignment.” In Structural Bioinformatics, edited by P. E. Bourne and H.Weissig, 321–37. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Liss.
103. Carugo, O., and Pongor, S. 2002. Recent progress in protein 3D structure comparison. Curr. Protein Pept. Sci. 3: 441–9.
104. Hadley, C., and Jones, D. T. 1999. A systematic comparison of protein structure classifications: SCOP, CATH, and FSSP. Structure 7: 1099–112.
105. Jawad, Z., and Paoli, M. 2002. Novel sequences propel familiar folds. Structure 10: 447–54.
106. Kinch, L. N., and Grishin, N. V. 2002. Evolution of protein structures and functions. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 12: 400–8.
107. Koehl, P. 2001. Protein structure similarities. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 11: 348–53.
108. Orengo, C. A., Pearl, F. M. G., and Thornton, J. M. 2003. “The CATH domain structure database.” In Structural Bioinformatics, edited by P. E. Bourne and H. Weissig, 249–71. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Liss.
109. Ouzounis, C. A., Coulson, R. M., Enright, A. J., Kunin, V., and Pereira-Leal, J. B. 2003. Classification schemes for protein structure and function. Nat. Rev. Genet. 4: 508–19.
110. Reddy, B. J. 2003. “Protein structure evolution and the scop database.” In Structural Bioinformatics, edited by P. E. Bourne and H.Weissig, 239–48. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Liss.
111. Russell, R. B. 2002. Classification of protein folds. Mol. Biotechnol. 20: 17–28.
112. Tate, J. 2003. “Molecular visualization.” In Structural Bioinformatics, edited by P. E. Bourne and H.Weissig, 135–58. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Liss.
113. Edwards, Y. J., and Cottage, A. 2003. Bioinformatics methods to predict protein structure and function. A practical approach. Mol. Biotechnol. 23: 139-66.
114. Heringa J. 2002. Computational methods for protein secondary structure prediction using multiple sequence alignments. Curr. Protein Pept. Sci. 1: 273-301.
115. Lehnert, U., Xia, Y., Royce, T. E., Goh, C. S., Liu, Y., Senes, A., Yu, H., Zhang, Z. L., Engelman, D. M, and Gerstein M. 2004. Computational analysis of membrane proteins: Genomic occurrence, structure prediction and helix interactions. Q. Rev. Biophys. 37: 121-46.
116. Möller, S., Croning, M. D. R., and Apweiler, R. 2001. Evaluation of methods for the prediction of membrane spanning regions. Bioinformatics 17: 646-53.
117. Przybylski, D., and Rost, B. 2002. Alignments grow, secondary structure prediction improves. Proteins 46: 197–205.
118. Rost B. 2001. Review: Protein secondary structure prediction continues to rise. J. Struct. Biol. 134: 204–18.
119. Rost B. 2003. Prediction in 1D: Secondary structure, membrane helices, and accessibility. In Structural Bioinformatics, edited by P. E. Bourne and H. Weissig, 559–87. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley–Liss.
120. Al-Lazikani, B., Jung, J., Xiang, Z., and Honig, B. 2001. Protein structure prediction. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 5: 51–6.
121. Baker, D., and Sali, A. 2001. Protein structure prediction and structural genomics. Science. 294: 93–6.
122. Bonneau, R., and Baker, D. 2001. Ab initio protein structure prediction: Progress and prospects. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 30: 173–89.
123. Bourne, P. E. 2003. “CSAP and CAFASP experiments and their findings.” In Structural Bioinformatics, edited by P. E. Bourne and H.Weissig, 501–7. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Liss.
124. Chivian, D., Robertson, T., Bonneau, R., and Baker, D. 2003. “Ab initio methods.” In Structural Bioinformatics, edited by P. E. Bourne and H.Weissig, 547–56. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Liss.
125. Edwards, Y. J., and Cottage, A. 2003. Bioinformatics methods to predict protein structure and function. A practical approach. Mol Biotechnol. 23: 139–66.
126. Fetrow, J. S., Giammona, A., Kolinski, A., and Skolnick, J. 2002. The protein folding problem: A biophysical enigma. Curr. Pharm. Biotechnol. 3: 329–47.
127. Forster, M. J. 2000. Molecular modelling in structural biology. Micron 33: 365–84.
128. Ginalski, K., Grishin, N. V., Godzik, A., and Rychlewski, L. 2005. Practical lessons from protein structure prediction. Nucleic Acids Res. 33: 1874–91.
129. Godzik, A. 2003. “Fold recognition methods.” In Structural Bioinformatics, edited by P. E. Bourne and H.Weissig, 525–46. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Liss.
130. Hardin, C., Pogorelov, T. V., and Luthey-Schulten, Z. 2002. Abinitio protein structure prediction. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 12: 176–81.
131. Krieger, E., Nabuurs, S. B., and Vriend, G. 2003. “Homology modeling.” In Structural Bioinformatics, edited by P. E. Bourne and H.Weissig, 509–23. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Liss.
132. Marti-Renom, M. A., Stuart, A. C., Fiser, A., Sanchez, R., Melo, F., and Sali, A. 2000. Comparative protein structure modeling of genes and genomes. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 29: 291–325.
133. Xu, D., Xu, Y., and Uberbacher, E. C. 2000. Computational tools for protein modeling. Curr. Protein Pept. Sci. 1: 1–21.
134. Doshi, K. J., Cannone, J. J., Cobaugh, C. W., and Gutell, R. R. 2004. Evaluation of the suitability of free-energy minimization using nearest-neighbor energy parameters for RNA secondary structure prediction. BMC Bioinformatics 5: 105.
135. Doudna, J. A. 2000. Structural genomics of RNA. Nat. Struct. Biol. Suppl: 954–6.
136. Gardner, P. P., and Giegerich, R. 2004. A comprehensive comparison of comparative RNA structure prediction approaches. BMC Bioinformatics 5: 140.
137. Gorodkin, J., Stricklin, S. L., and Stormo, G. D. 2001. Discovering common stem-loop motifs in unaligned RNA sequences. Nucleic Acids. Res. 10: 2135–44.
138. Leontis, N. B., Stombaugh, J., andWesthof, E. 2002.Motif prediction in ribosomal RNAs lessons and prospects for automated motif prediction in homologous RNA molecules. Biochimie 84: 961–73.
139. Major, F., and Griffey, R. 2001. Computational methods for RNA structure determination. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 11: 282–6.
140. Westhof, E., Auffinger, P., and Gaspin, C. 1997. “DNA and RNA structure prediction.: In: DNA and Protein Sequence Analysis, edited by M. J. Bishop and C. J. Rawlings, 255–78. Oxford, UK: IRL Press.
141. Bennetzen, J. 2002. Opening the door to comparative plant biology. Science 296: 60–3.
142. Chain, P., Kurtz, S., Ohlebusch, E., and Slezak, T. 2003. An applications-focused review of comparative genomics tools: Capabilities, limitations and future challenges. Brief. Bioinform. 4: 105–23.
143. Dandekar, T, Snel, B., Huynen, M., and Bork, P. 1998. Conservation of gene order: A fingerprint of proteins that physically interact. Trends Biochem. Sci. 23: 324–8.
144. Frazer, K. A., Elnitski, L., Church, D. M., Dubchak, I., and Hardison, R. C. 2003. Cross-species sequence comparisons: A review of methods and available resources. Genome Res. 13: 1–12.
145. Gibson, G., and Muse, S. V. 2002. A Primer of Genome Science. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.
146. Karlin, S., Mrazek, J., and Gentles, A. J. 2003. Genome comparisons and analysis. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 13: 344–52.
147. Lewis, R., and Palevitz, B. A. 2001. Genome economy. The Scientist 15: 21.
148. Lio, P. 2003. Statistical bioinformatic methods in microbial genome analysis. BioEssays 25: 266–73.
149. Michalovich, D., Overington, J., and Fagan, R. 2002. Protein sequence analysis in silico: Application of structure-based bioinformatics to genomic initiatives. Curr. Opin. Pharmacol. 2: 574–80.
150. Pennacchio, L. A., and Rubin, E. M. 2003. Comparative genomic tools and databases: Providing insights into the human genome. J. Clin. Invest. 111: 1099–106.
151. Primrose, S. B., and Twyman, R. M. 2003. Principles of Genome Analysis and Genomics, 3rd ed. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
152. Stein, L. 2001. Genome annotation: From sequence to biology. Nat. Rev. Genetics 2: 493–503.
153. Sterky, F., and Lundeberg, J. 2000. Sequence analysis of gene and genomes. J.Biotechnol. 76: 1–31.
154. Ureta-Vidal, A., Ettwiller, L., and Birney, E. 2003. Comparative genomics: Genome-wide analysis of metazoan eukaryotes. Nature Rev. Genetics 4: 251–62.
155. Waterston, R. H., Lindblad-Toh, K., Birney, E., Rogers, J., Abril, J. F., Agarwal, P., Agarwala, R., et al. 2002. Initial sequencing and comparative analysis of the mouse genome. Nature 420: 520–62.
156. Wei, L., Liu, Y., Dubchak, I., Shon, J., and Park, J. 2002. Comparative genomics approaches to study organism similarities and differences. J. Biomed. Inform. 35: 142–50.
157. Xiong, J., Fischer, W. M., Inoue, K., Nakahara, M., and Bauer, C. E. 2000.Molecular evidence for the early evolution of photosynthesis. Science 289: 1724–30.
158. Causton, H.C., Quackenbush, J., and Brazma, A. 2003. MicroarrayGeneExpressionDataAnalysis: A Beginner’s Guide. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
159. Forster, T., Roy, D., and Ghazal, P. 2003. Experiments using microarray technology: Limitations and standard operating procedure. J. Endocrinol. 178: 195–204.
160. Gill, R.W., and Sanseau, P. 2000. Rapid in silico cloning of genes using expressed sequence tags (ESTs). Biotechnol. Annu. Rev. 5: 25–44.
161. Quackenbush, J. 2002.Microarray data normalizationandtransformation. Nat Genet. 32(Suppl): 496–501.
162. Scott, H. S., and Chrast, R. 2001.Global transcript expression profiling by Serial Analysis of Gene Expression (SAGE). Genet. Eng. 23: 201–19.
163. Slonim, D. K. 2002. From patterns to pathways: Gene expression data analysis comes of age. Nat. Genet. 32(Suppl): 502–8.
164. Stanton, L.W. 2001.Methods to profile gene expression. Trends Cardiovasc. Med. 11: 49–54.
165. Stekel, D. 2003. Microarray Bioinformatics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
166. Ye, S. Q., Usher, D. C., and Zhang, L. Q. 2002. Gene expression profiling of human diseases by serial analysis of gene expression. J. Biomed. Sci. 9: 384–94.
167. Aebersold, R., andMann, M. 2003.Mass spectrometry-based proteomics. Nature 422: 198–207.
168. Cutler, P. 2003. Protein arrays: The current state-of-the-art. Proteomics 3: 3–18.
169. Donnes, P., andHoglund, A. 2004. Predicting protein subcellular localization: past, present, and future. Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics 2: 209–15.
170. Droit, A., Poirier, G. G., and Hunter, J.M. 2005. Experimental and bioinformatic approaches for interrogating protein-protein interactions to determine protein function. J.Mol. Endocrinol. 34: 263–80.
171. Eisenhaber, F., Eisenhaber, B., and Maurer-Stroh, S. 2003. “Prediction of post-translational modifications from amino acid sequence: Problems, pitfalls, and methodological hints.” In Bioinformatics and Genomes: Current Perspectives, edited by M. A. Andrade, 81–105.Wymondham, UK: Horizon Scientific Press.
172. Emanuelsson, O. 2002. Predicting protein subcellular localisation from amino acid sequence information. Brief. Bioinform. 3: 361–76.
173. Huynen, M. A., Snel, B., Mering, C., and Bork, P. 2003. Function prediction and protein networks. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 15: 191–8.
174. Mann, M., and Jensen, O. N. 2003. Proteomic analysis of post-translational modifications. Nature Biotechnol. 21: 255–61.
175. Nakai, K. 2000. Protein sorting signals and prediction of subcellular localization. Adv. Protein Chem. 54: 277–344.
176. Nakai, K. 2001. Review: Prediction of in vivo fates of proteins in the era of genomics and proteomics. J. Struct. Biol. 134: 103–16.
177. Phizicky, E., Bastiaens, P. I. H., Zhu, H., Snyder, M., and Fields, S. 2003. Protein analysis on a proteomic scale. Nature 422: 208–15.
178. Sadygov, R. G., Cociorva, D., and Yates, J. R. III. 2004. Large-scale database searching using tandem mass spectra: Looking up the answer in the back of the book. Nat. Methods 1: 195–202.
179. Tyers, M., andMann, M. 2003. From genomics to proteomics. Nature 422: 193–7.
180. Valencia, A., and Pazos, F. 2002. Computational methods for the prediction of protein interactions. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 12: 368–73.
181. Valencia, A., and Pazos, F. 2003. Prediction of protein-protein interactions from evolutionary information. Methods Biochem. Anal. 44: 411–26.