Protein family classification and functional annotation

Computational Biology and Chemistry

Volumn 27, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 37-47

  Wu, Cathy H ^a   Huang, Hongzhan ^a   Yeh, Lai Su L ^a   Barker, Winona C ^a  

^a National Biomedical Research Foundation   (United States)

Author keywords

Data integration; Knowledge base; Protein annotation; Protein classification; Protein database; Protein family

Indexed keywords

CHEMICAL BONDS; CLASSIFICATION (OF INFORMATION); COMPLEXATION; COMPUTATIONAL METHODS; DATABASE SYSTEMS; GENES; GRAPHICAL USER INTERFACES; KNOWLEDGE BASED SYSTEMS; MARKOV PROCESSES;

DATA INTEGRATION; KNOWLEDGE BASE; PROTEIN ANNOTATION; PROTEIN CLASSIFICATION; PROTEIN DATABASE;

PROTEINS;

PROTEIN;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; BIOLOGY; CLASSIFICATION; METHODOLOGY; MOLECULAR GENETICS; NOMENCLATURE; PHYSIOLOGY; PROTEIN DATABASE; PROTEIN MOTIF; PROTEIN TERTIARY STRUCTURE; REVIEW; STANDARD;

AMINO ACID MOTIFS; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; DATABASES, PROTEIN; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, TERTIARY; PROTEINS; TERMINOLOGY;

EID: 0041922344     PISSN: 14769271     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1476-9271(02)00098-1     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Altschul S.F., et al. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 25:1997;3389-3402.
2. Apweiler R., et al. The InterPro database, an integrated documentation resource for protein families, domains and functional sites. Nucleic Acids Res. 29:2001;37-40.
3. Attwood T.K., et al. PRINTS and PRINTS-S shed light on protein ancestry. Nucleic Acids Res. 30:2002;239-241.
4. Bairoch A., Apweiler R. The SWISS-PROT protein sequence database and its supplement TrEMBL in 2000. Nucleic Acids Res. 28:2000;45-48.
5. Barker W.C., Pfeiffer F., George D.G. Superfamily classification in PIR-International Protein Sequence Database. Methods Enzymol. 266:1996;59-71.
6. Bateman A., et al. The Pfam protein families database. Nucleic Acids Res. 30:2002;276-280.
7. Benson D.A., , et al. GenBank. Nucleic Acids Res. 30:2002;17-20.
8. Bork P., Koonin E.V. Predicting functions from protein sequences - where are the bottlenecks? Nat. Genet. 18:1998;313-318.
9. Brenner S.E. Errors in genome annotation. Trends Genet. 15:1999;132-133.
10. Corpet F., Servant F., Gouzy J., Kahn D. ProDom and ProDom-CG: tools for protein domain analysis and whole genome comparisons. Nucleic Acids Res. 28:2000;267-269.
11. Dayhoff, M.O., 1965-1978. Atlas of Protein Sequence and Structure. vol. 1-5, supplements 1-3. National Biomedical Research Foundation, Washington, DC.
12. Dayhoff M.O. The origin and evolution of protein superfamilies. Fed. Proc. 35:1976;2132-2138.
13. Devos D., Valencia A. Intrinsic errors in genome annotation. Trends Genet. 17:2001;429-431.
14. Eddy S.R., Mitchison G., Durbin R. Maximum discrimination hidden Markov models of sequence consensus. J. Comp. Biol. 2:1995;9-23.
15. Falquet L., , et al. The PROSITE database, its status in 2002. Nucleic Acids Res. 30:2002;235-238.
16. Felsenstein J. PHYLIP - Phylogeny Inference Package (version 3.2). Cladistics. 5:1989;164-166.
17. Haft D.H., , et al. TIGRFAMs: a protein family resource for the functional identification of proteins. Nucleic Acids Res. 29:2001;41-43.
18. Hirschman, L., Park, J.C., Tsujii, J., Wong, L., Wu, C.H., 2002. Accomplishments and challenges in literature data mining for Biology. Bioinformatics 18 (in press).
19. Huang, H., Barker, W.C., Chen, Y., Wu, C.H., 2003. iProClass: an integrated database of protein family, function, and structure information. Nucleic Acids Res. 31 (in press).
20. Iyer, L.M. et al., 2001. Quod erat demonstrandum? The mystery of experimental validation of apparently erroneous computational analyses of protein sequences. Genome Biol. 2 (12), research0051.1-0051.11.
21. Kanehisa M., Goto S., Kawashima S., Nakaya A. The KEGG databases at GenomeNet. Nucleic Acids Res. 30:2002;42-46.
22. Lo Conte L., Brenner S.E., Hubbard T.J.P., Chothia C., Murzin A.G. SCOP database in 2002: refinements accommodate structural genomics. Nucleic Acids Res. 30:2002;264-267.
23. Marcotte E.M., Pellegrini M., Thompson M.J., Yeates T.O., Eisenberg D. A combined algorithm for genome-wide prediction of protein function. Nature. 402:1999;83-86.
24. Pearl F.M.G., , et al. A rapid classification protocol for the CATH domain database to support structural genomics. Nucleic Acids Res. 29:2001;223-227.
25. Pearson W.R., Lipman D.J. Improved tools for biological sequence comparison. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 85:1988;2444-2448.
26. Pruitt K.D., Maglott D.R. RefSeq and LocusLink: NCBI gene-centered resources. Nucleic Acids Res. 29:2001;137-140.
27. Shan X., Dunbrack R.L. Jr., Christopher S.A., Kruger W.D. Mutations in the regulatory domain of cystathionine beta synthase can functionally suppress patient-derived mutations in cis. Hum. Mol. Genet. 10:2001;635-643.
28. Thompson J.D., Higgins D.G., Gibson T.J. CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res. 22:1994;4673-4680.
29. Westbrook J., , et al. The Protein Data Bank: unifying the archive. Nucleic Acids Res. 30:2002;245-248.
30. Wheeler D.L., , et al. Database resources of the National Center for Biotechnology Information: 2002 update. Nucleic Acids Res. 30:2002;13-16.
31. Wu, C.H. et al., 2003. The Protein Information Resource. Nucleic Acids Res. 31 (in press).
32. Yona G., Linial N., Linial M. ProtoMap: automatic classification of protein sequences and hierarchy of protein families. Nucleic Acids Res. 28:2000;49-55.
33. Zhang R., , et al. Characteristics and crystal structure of bacterial inosine-5′-monophosphate dehydrogenase. Biochemistry. 38:1999;4691-4700.
34. Zhou X., Cahoon M., Rosa P., Hedstrom L. Expression, purification, and characterization of inosine 5′-monophosphate dehydrogenase from Borrelia burgdorferi. J. Biol. Chem. 272:1997;21977-21981.