The doping mindset – Part II: Potentials and pitfalls in capturing athletes’ doping attitudes with response-time methodology

Performance Enhancement and Health

Volumn 2, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 164-181

  Petróczi, Andrea ^a,b  

^a KINGSTON UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Implicit Association Test; Mental representation; Self report; Social cognition; Sport; Stimulus response compatibility

Indexed keywords

EID: 84923874350     PISSN: 22112669     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.peh.2014.08.003     Document Type: Article

References (149)

1. Agosta, S., Ghirardi, V., Zogmaister, C., Castiello, U., Sartori, G., Detecting fakers of the autobiographical IAT. Applied Cognitive Psychology 25:2 (2011), 299–306.
2. Agosta, S., Sartori, G., The autobiographical IAT: A review. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 2013, 519.
3. Asendorpf, J.B., Conner, M., De Fruyt, F., De Houwer, J., Denissen, J.J., Fiedler, K., et al. Recommendations for increasing replicability in psychology. European Journal of Personality 27:2 (2013), 108–119.
4. Asp, E.W., Tranel, D., False tagging theory: Toward a unitary account of prefrontal cortex function. Stuss, D.T., Knights, R.T., (eds.) Principles of frontal lobe function, 2012, Oxford University Press, New York, NY, 383–416.
5. Bargh, J.A., Chartrand, T.L., The mind in the middle: A practical guide to priming and automaticity research. Reis, H.T., Judd, C.M., (eds.) Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology, 2000, Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, 253–285.
6. Barnes-Holmes, D., Barnes-Holmes, Y., Power, P., Hayden, E., Milne, R., Stewart, I., Do you really know what you believe? Developing the Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure (IRAP) as a direct measure of implicit beliefs. The Irish Psychologist 32:7 (2006), 169–177.
7. Bizer, G.Y., Petty, R.E., McCaslin, M., How we conceptualize our attitudes matters: The effects of valence framing on the resistance of political attitudes. Political Psychology 26 (2005), 553–568.
8. Blanton, H., Jaccard, J., Christie, C., Gonzales, P.M., Plausible assumptions, questionable assumptions and post hoc rationalisations: Will the real IAT, please stand up?. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 43 (2007), 399–409.
9. Blanton, H., Jaccard, J., Gonzales, P.M., Christie, C., Decoding the implicit association test: Implications for criterion prediction. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 42 (2006), 192–212.
10. Blanton, H., Jaccard, J., Klick, J., Mellers, B., Mitchell, G., Tetlock, P.E., Strong claims and weak evidence: Reassessing the predictive validity of the IAT. Journal of Applied Psychology 94:3 (2009), 567–582.
11. Bohner, G., Dickel, N., Attitudes and attitude change. Annual Review of Psychology 62 (2011), 391–417.
12. Brand, R., Heck, P., Ziegler, M., Illegal performance enhancing drugs and doping in sport: a picture-based brief implicit association test for measuring athletes’ attitudes. Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy, 9, 2014, 7.
13. Brand, R., Wolff, W., Thieme, D., Using response-time latencies to measure athletes’ doping attitudes: the brief implicit attitude test identifies substance abuse in bodybuilders. Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy, 9, 2014, 36.
14. Brand, R., Melzer, M., Hagemann, N., Towards an implicit association test (IAT) for measuring doping attitudes in sports. Data-based recommendations developed from two recently published tests. Psychology of Sport and Exercise 12 (2011), 250–256.
15. Brewster, B. H. (2005). History of the concept of the attitude in social psychology. Retrieved from: http://www.academia.edu/1747510/History_of_the_Concept_of_the_Attitude_in_Social_Psychology. Accessed 23.11.13.
16. Carlston, D.E., Smith, E.R., Principles of mental representation. Higgins, E.T., Kruglanski, A.W., (eds.) Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles, 1996, Guilford Press, New York, NY, US, 184–210.
17. Chen, H. H., & Zhang, L. W. (2007). Can social approval regulate the relations between implicit cognition and explicit cognition. Journal of Tianjin University Sport, 2007-1. http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-TJTY200701011.htm. Accessed 10.11.13.
18. Cohen, J.B., Reed, A., A multiple pathway anchoring and adjustment (MPAA) model of attitude generation and reinforcement. Journal of Consumer Research 33 (2006), 1–15.
19. Conrey, F.R., Smith, E.R., Attitude representation: Attitudes as patterns in a distributed connectionist representational system. Social Cognition 25 (2007), 718–735.
20. Cunningham, W.A., Zelazo, P.D., Attitudes and evaluations: A social cognitive neuroscience perspective. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 11 (2007), 97–104.
21. Cunningham, W.A., Zelazo, P.D., Packer, D.J., Van Bavel, J.J., The Iterative Reprocessing Model: A multilevel framework for attitudes and evaluation. Social Cognition 25 (2007), 736–760.
22. Cvencek, D., Greenwald, A.G., Brown, A.S., Gray, N.S., Snowden, R.J., Faking of the Implicit Association Test is statistically detectable and partly correctable. Basic and Applied Social Psychology 32 (2010), 302–314.
23. Czywenska, M., Ginsburg, H.J., Explicit and implicit effects of anti-marijuana and anti-tobacco TV advertisements. Addictive Behaviors 32 (2007), 114–127.
24. De Houwer, J., The Implicit Association Test as a tool for studying dysfunctional associations in psychopathology: Strengths and limitations. Journal of Behaviour Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry 33 (2002), 115–133.
25. De Houwer, J., A structural analysis of indirect measures of attitudes. Musch, J., Klauer, K.C., (eds.) The psychology of evaluation: Affective processes in cognition and emotion, 2003, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, Mahwah, NJ, US, 219–244.
26. De Houwer, J., Using the Implicit Association Test does not rule out an impact of conscious propositional knowledge on evaluative conditioning. Learning and Motivation 37:2 (2006), 176–187.
27. De Houwer, J., What are implicit measures and why are we using them. Wiers, R.W., Stacy, A.W., (eds.) The handbook of implicit cognition and addiction, 2006, Sage, Thousand Oaks, 11–28.
28. De Houwer, J., Moors, A., How to define and examine the implicitness of implicit measures. Wittenbrink, B., Schwarz, N., (eds.) Implicit measures of attitudes, 2007, Guilford Press, London, 179–195.
29. De Houwer, J., Teige-Mocigemba, S., Spruyt, A., Moors, A., Implicit measures: A normative analysis and review. Psychological Bulletin 135:3 (2009), 347–368.
30. Deutsch, R., Gawronski, B., Strack, F., At the boundaries of automaticity: Negation as reflective operation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 91 (2006), 385–405.
31. Dimofte, C.V., Implicit measures of consumer cognition: A review. Psychology & Marketing 27:10 (2010), 921–937.
32. Dunham, Y., Baron, A.S., Banaji, M.R., The development of implicit intergroup cognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 12:7 (2008), 248–253.
33. Eder, A.B., Rothermund, K., De Houwer, J., Affective compatibility between stimuli and response goals: A primer for a new implicit measure of attitudes. PLOS ONE, 8(11), 2013, e79210.
34. Fazio, R.H., Multiple processes by which attitudes guide behavior: The MODE model as an integrative framework. Zanna, M.P., (eds.) Advances in experimental social psychology, Vol. 23, 1990, Academic Press, New York, 75–109.
35. Fazio, R.H., The MODE model as an integrative framework. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 23 (1990), 75–109.
36. Fazio, R.H., Attitudes as object-evaluation associations: Determinants, consequences, and correlates of attitude accessibility. Petty, R.E., Krosnick, K.A., (eds.) Attitude strength, 1995, Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, 247–282.
37. Fazio, R.H., Olson, M.A., Implicit measures in social cognition research: their meaning and use. Annual Review of Psychology 54 (2003), 297–327.
38. Fazio, R.H., Sanbonmatsu, D.M., Powell, M.C., Kardes, F.R., On the automatic activation of attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 50 (1986), 229–238.
39. Fazio, R.H., Towles-Schwen, T., The MODE model of attitude-behavior processes. Chaiken, S., Trope, Y., (eds.) Dual process theories in social psychology, 1999, Guilford Press, New York, 97–116.
40. Fiedler, K., Bluemke, M., Faking the IAT: Aided and unaided response control on the Implicit Association Tests. Basic and Applied Social Psychology 27 (2005), 307–316.
41. Fiedler, K., Bluemke, M., Unkelbach, C., Exerting control over allegedly automatic associative processes. The psychology of self-regulation: cognitive, affective, and motivational processes. The Sydney symposium of social psychology, 2009, Psychol. Press, New York, 249–269.
42. Fiedler, K., Messner, C., Bluemke, M., Unresolved problems with the “I” the “A” and the “T”: A logical and psychometric critique of the Implicit Association Test (IAT). European Review of Social Psychology 17 (2006), 74–147.
43. Fitts, P.M., Seeger, C.M., SR compatibility: Spatial characteristics of stimulus and response codes. Journal of Experimental Psychology 46 (1953), 199–210.
44. Friese, M., Hofmann, W., Schmitt, M., When and why do implicit measures predict behavior? Empirical evidence for the moderating role of opportunity, motivation, and process reliance. European Review of Social Psychology 1 (2008), 285–338.
45. Friese, M., Hofmann, W., Wänke, M., When impulses take over: Moderated predictive validity of explicit and implicit attitude measures in predicting food choice and consumption behaviour. The British Journal of Social Psychology 47 (2008), 397–419.
46. Gawronski, B., Editorial: Attitudes can be measured! But what is an attitude?. Social Cognition 25 (2007), 573–581.
47. Gawronski, B., Ten frequently asked questions about implicit measures and their frequently supposed, but not entirely correct answers. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne 50 (2009), 141–150.
48. Gawronski, B., Bodenhausen, G.V., Accessibility effects on implicit social cognition: The role of knowledge activation and retrieval experiences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 89 (2005), 672–685.
49. Gawronski, B., Bodenhausen, G.V., Associative and prepositional processes in evaluation: An integrative review of implicit and explicit attitude change. Psychological Bulletin 132 (2006), 692–731.
50. Gawronski, B., Bodenhausen, G.V., Unraveling the processes underlying evaluation: Attitudes from the perspective of the APE model. Social Cognition 25 (2007), 687–717.
51. Gawronski, B., Bodenhausen, G.V., Becker, A.P., I like it, because I like myself: Associative self-anchoring and post-decisional change of implicit evaluations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 43 (2007), 221–232.
52. Gawronski, B., LeBel, E.P., Understanding patterns of attitude change: When implicit measures show change but explicit measures do not. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 44 (2008), 1355–1361.
53. Gawronski, B., LeBel, E.P., Peters, K.R., What do implicit measures tell us? Scrutinizing the validity of three common assumptions. Perspectives on Psychological Science 2:2 (2007), 181–193.
54. Gawronski, B., Peters, K.R., LeBel, E.P., What makes mental associations personal or extra-personal? Conceptual issues in the methodological debate about implicit attitude measures. Social and Personality Psychology Compass 2 (2008), 1002–1023.
55. Gawronski, B., Strack, F., On the propositional nature of cognitive consistency: Dissonance changes explicit, but not implicit attitudes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 40 (2004), 535–542.
56. Gilbert, D.T., How mental systems believe. American Psychologist 46 (1991), 107–119.
57. Golijani-Moghaddam, N., Hart, A., Dawson, D.L., The implicit relational assessment procedure: Emerging reliability and validity data. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 2013, 10.1016/j.jcbs.2013.05.002.
58. Govan, C.L., Williams, K.D., Changing the affective valence of the stimulus items influences the IAT by re-defining the category labels. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 40 (2004), 357–365.
59. Greenwald, A.G., Banaji, M., Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. Psychological Review 102 (1995), 4–27.
60. Greenwald, A.G., Banaji, M.R., Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem and stereotypes. Psychological Review 102 (1995), 4–27.
61. Greenwald, A.G., Banaji, M.R., Rudman, L.A., Farnham, S.D., Nosek, B.A., Mellott, D.S., A unified theory of implicit attitudes, stereotypes, self-esteem, and self-concept. Psychological Review 109 (2002), 3–25.
62. Greenwald, A.G., McGhee, D.E., Schwartz, J.L.K., Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The Implicit Association Test. Journal of Personality 74 (1998), 1464–1480.
63. Greenwald, A.G., Nosek, B.A., Attitudinal dissociation: What does it mean?. Petty, R.E., Fazio, R.H., Briñol, P., (eds.) Attitudes: Insights from the new implicit measures, 2008, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, 65–82.
64. Greenwald, A.G., Nosek, B.A., Sriram, N., Consequential validity of the implicit association test: Comment on Blanton and Jaccard (2006). American Psychologist 61 (2006), 56–61.
65. Greenwald, A.G., Poehlman, T.A., Uhlmann, E.L., Banaji, M.R., Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: III. Meta-analysis of predictive validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 97 (2009), 17–41.
66. Gregg, A.P., When vying reveals lying: The timed antagonistic response althiometer. Applied Cognitive Psychology 21 (2007), 631–647.
67. Gregg, A.P., Klymowsky, J., The Implicit Association Test in market research: Potentials and pitfalls. Psychology & Marketing 30 (2013), 588–601.
68. Gregg, A.P., Seibt, B., Banaji, M.R., Easier done than undone: Asymmetry in the malleability of implicit preferences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 90 (2006), 1–20.
69. Han, H.A., Czellar, S., Olson, M.A., Fazio, R.H., Malleability of attitudes or malleability of the IAT?. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 46 (2010), 286–298.
70. Hardie, M., Shilbury, D., Ware, I., & Bozzi, C. (2010). I wish I was twenty one now – beyond doping in the Australian peloton, Draft Version 1.0. http://www.newcyclingpathway.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/21-NOW-FINAL-.pdf.
71. Heider, F., The psychology of interpersonal relations. 1958, Wiley, New York.
72. Hofmann, W., Friese, M., Strack, F., Impulse and self-control from a dual-systems perspective. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2009, 162–176.
73. Hu, X., Chen, H., Fu, G., A repeated lie becomes a truth? The effect of intentional control and training on deception. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 2012, 488.
74. Hughes, S., Barnes-Holmes, D., De Houwer, J., The dominance of associative theorizing in implicit attitude research: Propositional and behavioural alternatives. The Psychological Record 61 (2011), 465–496.
75. James, R., Naughton, D.P., Petroczi, A., Promoting functional foods as acceptable alternatives to doping: Potential for information-based social marketing approach. Journal of International Society for Sports Nutrition, 7, 2010, 37.
76. Kahneman, D., A perspective on judgment and choice: Mapping bounded rationality. American Psychologist 58 (2003), 697–720.
77. Kahneman, D., Thinking, fast and slow. 2011, Farrar, Straus, and Giroux, New York, NY.
78. Kahneman, D., Frederick, S., Representativeness revisited: Attribute aubstitution in intuitive judgment. Gilovich, T., Griffin, T.D., Kahneman, D., (eds.) Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment, 2002, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 49–81.
79. Kaprinski, A., Steinman, R.B., The single category Implicit Association Test as a measure of implicit social cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 9 (2006), 16–32.
80. Kim, D.Y., Voluntary controllability of the Implicit Association Test (IAT). Social Psychology Quarterly 66 (2003), 83–96.
81. Kirby, K., Moran, A., Guerin, S., A qualitative analysis of the experiences of elite athletes who have admitted to doping for performance enhancement. International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics 3 (2011), 205–224.
82. Lane, K.A., Banaji, M.R., Nosek, B.A., Greenwald, A.G., Understanding and us-ing the Implicit Association Test: IV. What we know (so far). Wittenbrink, B., Schwarz, N.S., (eds.) Implicit measures of attitudes: Procedures and controversies, 2007, Guilford Press, New York, 59–102.
83. Lensvelt-Mulders, G.J.L.M., Boeije, H.R., Evaluating compliance with a computer assisted randomized response technique: A qualitative study into the origins of lying and cheating. Computers in Human Behaviour 23 (2007), 591–608.
84. Lotz, S., Hagemann, N., Using the Implicit Association Test to measure athlete's attitude toward doping. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 29, 2007, S183.
85. Lynott, D., Kansal, H., Connell, L., & O'Brien, K. (n.d.). Modelling the IAT: Implicit Association Test reflects shallow linguistic environment and not deep personal attitudes. (pp. 1948–1953). Retrieved from http://mindmodeling.org/cogsci2012/papers/0341/paper0341.pdf. Accessed 28.10.13.
86. McBride, D.M., Coane, J.H., Raulerson, B.A. III, An investigation of false memory in perceptual implicit tasks. Acta Psychologica 123:3 (2006), 240–260.
87. McClelland, D.C., Koestner, R., Weinberger, J., How do self-attributed and implicit motives differ?. Psychological Review 96 (1989), 690–702.
88. McConnell, A.R., Leibold, J.M., Weak criticisms and selective evidence: Reply to Blanton et al. (2009). Journal of Applied Psychology 94 (2009), 583–589.
89. Morente-Sánchez, J., Zabala, M., Doping in sport: A review of elite athletes’ attitudes, beliefs, and knowledge. Sports Medicine 43 (2013), 395–411.
90. Nelson, T.O., Kruglanski, A.W., Jost, J.T., Knowing thyself and others: Progress in metacognitive social psychology. Yzerbyt, V.Y., Lories, G., Benoit, D., (eds.) Metacognition: Cognitive and social dimensions, 1998, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, 69–89.
91. Nosek, B.A., Implicit-explicit relations. Current Directions in Psychological Science 16:2 (2007), 65–69.
92. Nosek, B.A., Banaji, M.R., The go/no-go association task. Social Cognition 19 (2001), 161–176.
93. Nosek, B.A., Hawkins, C.B., Frazier, R.S., Implicit social cognition: From measures to mechanisms. Trends in Cognitive Science 15:4 (2011), 152–159.
94. Nosek, B.A., Riskind, R.G., Policy implications of implicit social cognition. Social Issues and Policy Review 6 (2012), 112–145.
95. Nosek, B.A., Sriram, N., Faulty assumptions: A comment on Blanton et al., 2006. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 43 (2007), 393–398.
96. Olson, M.A., Fazio, R.H., Implicit and explicit measures of attitudes: The perspective of the MODE model. Petty, R.E., Fazio, R.H., Briñol, P., (eds.) Attitudes: Insights from the new implicit measures, 2009, Psychology Press, New York, 19–63.
97. Olson, M.A., Fazio, R.H., Han, H.A., Conceptualizing personal and extrapersonal associations. Social and Personality Psychology Compass 3:2 (2009), 152–170.
98. Outram, S.M., Discourses of performance enhancement: Can we separate performance enhancement from performance enhancing drug use?. Performance Enhancement & Health, 2013, 10.1016/j.peh.2013.08.015.
99. Pappa, E., Kennedy, E., It was my thought… he made it a reality’: Normalization and responsibility in athletes’ accounts of performance enhancing drug use. International Review of Sociology of Sport, 2012, 10.1177/1012690212442116.
100. Payne, B.K., Cameron, C.D., Implicit social cognition and mental representation. Carlston, D., (eds.) Oxford handbook of social cognition, 2013, Oxford University Press, New York, NY, 220–238.
101. Payne, B.K., Gawronski, G.B., A history of implicit social cognition: Where is it coming from? Where is it going?. Gawronski, B., Payne, K., (eds.) Handbook of implicit social cognition: Measurement, theory, and applications, 2010, Guilford Press, New York, NY, 1–8.
102. Perugini, M., Predictive models of implicit and explicit attitudes. British Journal of Social Psychology 44 (2005), 29–45.
103. Perugini, M., Richetin, J., Zogmaister, C., Prediction of behaviour. Gawronski, B., Payne, K., (eds.) Handbook of implicit social cognition: Measurement, theory, and applications, 2010, Guilford Press, New York, NY, 255–294.
104. Peter, J., Valkenburg, P.M., The impact of “forgiving” introductions on the reporting of sensitive behavior in surveys. The role of social desirability response style and developmental status. Public Opinion Quarterly 75 (2011), 779–787.
105. Petroczi, A., Attitudes and doping: A structural equation analysis of the relationship between athletes’ attitudes, sport orientation and doping behaviour. Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy, 2, 2007, 34.
106. Petróczi, A., The doping mindset – Part I: Implications of the functional use theory on mental representations of doping. Performance Enhancement and Health 2 (2013), 153–163.
107. Petróczi, A., Aidman, E., Measuring explicit attitude toward doping: Review of the psychometric properties of the Performance Enhancement Attitude Scale. Psychology of Sport and Exercise 10 (2009), 390–396.
108. Petroczi, A., Aidman, E.V., Psychological drivers in doping: The life-cycle model of performance enhancement. Substance Abuse, Treatment, Prevention and Policy, 3, 2008, 7.
109. Petróczi, A., Aidman, E.V., Hussain, I., Deshmukh, N., Nepusz, T., Uvacsek, M., et al. Virtue or pretense? Looking behind self-declared innocence in doping. PLOS ONE, 5(5), 2010, e10457.
110. Petroczi, A., Aidman, E., Nepusz, T., Capturing doping attitudes by self report declarations and implicit assessment: A methodology study. Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention and Policy, 3, 2008, 9.
111. Petroczi, A., Mazanov, J., Naughton, D., Inside athletes’ minds: Preliminary results from a pilot study on mental representation of doping and potential implications for anti-doping. Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy, 6, 2011, 10.
112. Petroczi, A., Naughton, D.P., Impact of multidisciplinary research on advancing anti-doping efforts. International Journal of Sport Policy 3 (2011), 231–254.
113. Petróczi, A., Uvacsek, M., Deshmukh, N., Shah, I., Nepusz, T., Aidman, E.V., et al. Incongruence in doping related attitudes, beliefs and opinions in the context of discordant behavioural data: In which measure do we trust?. PLOS ONE, 6(4), 2011, e18804.
114. Petty, R.E., A metacognitive model of attitudes. Journal of Consumer Research 33 (2006), 22–24.
115. Petty, R.E., Briñol, P., Implicit ambivalence. A meta-cognitive approach. Petty, R.E., Fazio, R.H., Briñol, P., (eds.) Attitudes: Insight from new implicit measures, 2009, Psychology Press, New York, 119–161.
116. Petty, R.E., Briñol, P., DeMarree, K.G., The meta-cognitive model (MCM) of attitudes: Implications for attitude measurement, change, and strength. Social Cognition 25 (2007), 657–686.
117. Petty, R.E., Briñol, P., Johnson, I., Implicit ambivalence. Gawronski, B., Strack, F., (eds.) Cognitive consistency, 2012, Guilford Press, New York, 178–201.
118. Petty, R.E., Tormala, Z.L., Rucker, D.D., Resisting persuasion by counterarguing: An attitude strength perspective. Jost, J.T., Banaji, M.R., Prentice, D.A., (eds.) Perspectivism in social psychology: The yin and yang of scientific progress, 2004, American Psychological Association, Washington, DC, 37–51.
119. Prestwich, A., Perugini, M., Hurling, R., Richetin, J., Using the self to change implicit attitudes. European Journal of Social Psychology 40 (2010), 61–71.
120. Roediger, H.L. III, McDermott, K.B., Creating false memories: Remembering words not present in lists. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 21 (1995), 803–814.
121. Röhner, J., Schröder-Abé M., Schütz, A., What do fakers actually do to fake the IAT? An investigation of faking strategies under different faking conditions. Journal of Research in Personality, 2013, 10.1016/j.jrp.2013.02.009.
122. Rothermund, K., Wentura, D., Figure-ground asymmetries in the Implicit Association Test (IAT). Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie 48 (2001), 94–106.
123. Rothermund, K., Wentura, D., Underlying processes in the implicit association test: Dissociating salience from associations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 133 (2004), 139–165.
124. Rudman, L.A., Sources of implicit attitudes. Current Directions in Psychological Science 13 (2004), 79–82.
125. Rydell, R.J., McConnell, A.R., Understanding implicit and explicit attitude change: A systems of reasoning analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 91 (2006), 995–1008.
126. Sartori, G., Agosta, S., Zogmaister, C., Castiello, U., How to accurately detect autobiographical events. Psychological Science 19:8 (2008), 772–780.
127. Schirlin, O., Rey, G., Jouvent, R., Dubal, S., Komano, O., Perez-Diaz, F., et al. Attentional bias for doping words and its relation with physical self-esteem in young adolescents. Psychology of Sport and Exercise 10 (2009), 615–620.
128. Schwarz, N., Feelings as information: Informational and motivational functions of affective states. Higgins, E.T., Sorrentino, R.M., (eds.) Handbook of motivation and cognition: Foundations of social behavior, Vol. 2, 1990, Guilford Press, New York, NY, US, 527–561.
129. Schwarz, N., Attitude construction: Evaluation in context. Social Cognition 25 (2007), 638–656.
130. Schwarz, N., Bohner, G., The construction of attitudes. Tesser, A., Schwarz, N., (eds.) Blackwell handbook of social psychology: Intraindividual processes, 2001, Blackwell Publishers, Balden, MA, 436–457.
131. Sheeran, P., Gollwitzer, P.M., Bargh, J.A., Nonconscious processes and health. Health Psychology 32 (2012), 460–473.
132. Shepherd, H., The cultural context of cognition: What the Implicit Association test tells us about how culture works. Sociological Forum 26 (2011), 121–143.
133. Sherman, J.W., Gawronski, B., Gonsalkorale, K., Hugenberg, K., Allen, T.J., Groom, C.J., The self-regulation of automatic associations and behavioral impulses. Psychological Review 115 (2008), 314–335.
134. Slovic, P., Finucane, M.L., Peters, E., MacGregor, D.G., The affect heuristic. European Journal of Operational Research 177 (2007), 1333–1352.
135. Smith, E.R., Conrey, F.R., Mental representations are states, not things, Implications for implicit and explicit measurements. Wittenbrink, B., Schwarz, N., (eds.) Implicit measures of attitudes, 2007, Guilford Press, New York, 247–264.
136. Sriram, N., Greenwald, A.G., The Brief Implicit Association Test. Experimental Psychology 56 (2009), 283–294.
137. Steffens, M.C., Is the implicit association test immune to faking?. Experimental Psychology (formerly Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie) 51:3 (2004), 165–179.
138. Strack, F., Deutsch, R., Reflective and impulsive determinants of social behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review 8 (2004), 220–247.
139. Takarangi, M.K.T., Strange, D., Shortland, A.E., James, H.E., Source confusion influences the effectiveness of the autobiographical IAT. Psychological Bulletin Review, 2013, 10.3758/s13423-013-0430-3.
140. Tourangeau, R., Yan, T., Sensitive questions in surveys. Psychological Bulletin 133:5 (2007), 859–883.
141. Uhlmann, E.L., Poehlman, T.A., Nosek, B.A., Attitudes or cultural knowledge?. Hanson, J., (eds.) Ideology, Psychology, and Law, 2012, Oxford University Press, New York, 228–260.
142. Uvacsek, M., Ránky, M., Nepusz, T., Naughton, D.P., Mazanov, J., Petroczi, A., Self-admitted behaviour and perceived use of performance enhancing versus psychoactive drugs among competitive athletes. Scandinavian Journal of Science & Medicine in Sport 21 (2011), 224–234.
143. Verschuere, B., Prati, V., De Houwer, J., Cheating the lie detector faking in the autobiographical Implicit Association Test. Psychological Science 20 (2009), 410–413.
144. Wallaert, M., Ward, A., Mann, T., Explicit control of implicit responses: Simple directives can alter IAT performance. Social Psychology 41:3 (2010), 152–157.
145. Webb, T.L., Sheeran, P., Pepper, J., Gaining control over responses to implicit attitude tests: Implementation intentions engender fast responses on attitude-incongruent trials. British Journal of Social Psychology 51 (2012), 13–32.
146. Wiers, R.W., de Jong, P.J., Havermans, R., Jelicic, M., How to change implicit drug use-related cognitions in prevention: A transdisciplinary integration of findings from experimental psychopathology, social cognition, memory and experimental learning psychology. Substance Use & Misuse 3 (2004), 1625–1684.
147. Wilson, T.D., Lindsey, S., Schooler, T.Y., A model of dual attitudes. Psychological Review 107 (2000), 101–126.
148. Yoshida, E., Peach, J.M., Zanna, M.P., Spencer, S.J., Not all automatic associations are created equal: How implicit normative evaluations are distinct from implicit attitudes and uniquely predict meaningful behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 48 (2012), 694–706.
149. Ziegert, J.C., Hanges, P.J., Strong rebuttal for weak criticisms: Reply to Blanton et al. (2009). Journal of Applied Psychology 94 (2009), 590–597.