Cheating the lie detector: Faking in the autobiographical implicit association test: Research Report

Psychological Science

Volumn 20, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 410-413

  Verschuere, Bruno ^a   Prati, Valentina ^b   Houwer, Jan De ^a  

^a GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PADOVA   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; FEMALE; FORENSIC MEDICINE; HUMAN; LITERATURE; MALE; MALINGERING; PERSONALITY TEST; REACTION TIME; RECUMBENCY;

ALGORITHMS; AUTOBIOGRAPHY; DECEPTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; LIE DETECTION; MALE; MALINGERING; REACTION TIME; WORD ASSOCIATION TESTS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 64249162115     PISSN: 09567976     EISSN: 14679280     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02308.x     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. Committee to Review the Scientific Evidence on the Polygraph, National Research Council 2003). The polygraph and lie detection. Washington, DC : National Academies Press.
2. Degner, J. (in press). On the (un-)controllability of affective priming: Strategic manipulation is feasible but can possibly be prevented. Cognition & Emotion.
3. Fiedler, K. Bluemke, M. (2005). Faking the IAT: Aided and unaided response control on the Implicit Association Tests. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 27, 307 316.
4. Greenwald, A.G., McGhee, D.E. Schwartz, J.L.K. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1464 1480.
5. Greenwald, A.G., Nosek, B.A. Banaji, M.R. (2003). Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: I. An improved scoring algorithm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 197 216.
6. Gregg, A.P. (2007). When vying reveals lying: The timed antagonistic response alethiometer. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 21, 621 647.
7. Sartori, G., Agosta, S., Zogmaister, C., Ferrara, S.D. Castiello, U. (2008). How to accurately assess autobiographical events. Psychological Science, 19, 772 780.