The development of implicit intergroup cognition

Trends in Cognitive Sciences

Volumn 12, Issue 7, 2008, Pages 248-253

  Dunham, Yarrow ^a   Baron, Andrew S ^b   Banaji, Mahzarin R ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ELSEVIER (CO); SOCIAL COGNITION; SOCIAL LEARNING;

ADULT; AFRICAN AMERICAN; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE; CAUCASIAN; CHILD DEVELOPMENT; CHILD IMPLICIT ASSOCIATION TEST; COGNITION; FACE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INFANT; INTERNALIZATION; LEARNING; MODEL; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; PRESCHOOL CHILD; RACISM; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY;

ASSOCIATION LEARNING; CHILD; CHILD DEVELOPMENT; COGNITION; GROUP PROCESSES; HIERARCHY, SOCIAL; HUMANS; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SOCIAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 45849136324     PISSN: 13646613     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2008.04.006     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Devine P.G. Stereotypes and prejudice: their automatic and controlled components. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 56 (1989) 5-18
2. Bargh J.A., et al. The generality of the automatic attitude activation effect. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 62 (1991) 893-912
3. Greenwald A.G., and Banaji M.R. Implicit social cognition: attitudes, self esteem, and stereotypes. Psychol. Rev. 102 (1995) 4-27
4. Fazio R.H., et al. Variability in automatic activation as an unobtrusive measure of racial attitudes: a bona fide pipeline?. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 69 (1995) 1013-1027
5. Dovidio J.F., et al. Implicit and explicit prejudice and interracial interaction. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 82 (2002) 62-68
6. Phelps E.A., et al. Performance on indirect measures of race evaluation predicts amygdala activation. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 12 (2000) 729-738
7. Cunningham W.A., et al. Separable neural components in the processing of black and white faces. Psychol. Sci. 15 (2004) 806-813
8. Bigler R.S., and Liben L.S. A developmental intergroup theory of social stereotypes and prejudice. In: Kail R.V. (Ed). Advances in Child Development and Behavior Vol. 34 (2006), Blackwell Publishers 39-89
9. Hirschfeld L.A. Race in the Making: Cognition, Culture, and the Child's Construction of Human Kinds (1998), MIT Press
10. Smith E.R., and DeCoster J. Dual process models in social and cognitive psychology: conceptual integration and links to underlying memory systems. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Rev. 4 (2000) 108-131
11. Fazio R.H., et al. On the automatic activation of attitudes. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 50 (1986) 229-238
12. Sloman S. The empirical case for two systems of reasoning. Psychol. Bull. 119 (1996) 3-22
13. Chaiken S. Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 39 (1980) 752-766
14. Rudman L.A. Sources of implicit attitudes. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 13 (2004) 79-82
15. Rudman L.A., et al. Developmental sources of implicit attitudes. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 33 (2007) 1700-1713
16. Pascalis O., and Slater A. The Development of Face Processing in Infancy and Early Childhood: Current Perspectives (2003), Nova Science Publishers
17. Pascalis O., et al. Mother's face recognition in neonates: a replication and an extension. Infant Behav. Dev. 17 (1995) 79-85
18. Kinzler K.D., et al. The native language of social cognition. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 104 (2007) 12577-12580
19. Quinn P.C., et al. Representation of the gender of human faces by infants: a preference for female. Perception 31 (2002) 1109-1121
20. Kelly D.J., et al. Three-month-olds, but not newborns, prefer own-race faces. Dev. Sci. 8 (2005) F31-F36
21. Bar-Haim Y., et al. Nature and nurture in own-race face processing. Psychol. Sci. 17 (2006) 159-163
22. Walker-Andrews A.S., et al. Infants' bimodal perception of gender. Ecol. Psychol. 3 (1991) 55-75
23. Hoss R.A., et al. Infants prefer attractive faces. The Development of Face Processing in Infancy and Early Childhood: Current Perspectives (2003), Nova Science Publishers 27-38
24. Greenwald A.G., et al. Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: the implicit association test. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 76 (1998) 1464-1480
25. Baron A.S., and Banaji M.R. The development of implicit attitudes. Psychol. Sci. 17 (2006) 53-58
26. Rutland A., et al. Social norms and self-presentation: children's implicit and explicit intergroup attitudes. Child Dev. 76 (2005) 451-466
27. Dunham Y., et al. From American city to Japanese village: a cross-cultural investigation of implicit race attitudes. Child Dev. 77 (2006) 1268-1281
28. Hugenberg K., and Bodenhausen G.V. Ambiguity in social categorization: the role of prejudice and facial affect in racial categorization. Psychol. Sci. 15 (2004) 342-345
29. Gregg A.P., et al. Easier done than undone: asymmetry in the malleability of implicit preferences. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 90 (2006) 1-20
30. Ashburn-Nardo L., et al. Implicit associations as the seeds of intergroup bias: how easily do they take root?. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 81 (2001) 789-799
31. Otten S., and Wentura D. About the impact of automaticity in the Minimal Group Paradigm: evidence from affective priming tasks. Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 29 (1999) 1049-1071
32. Duckworth K.L., et al. The automatic evaluation of novel stimuli. Psychol. Sci. 13 (2002) 513-519
33. Sidanius J., and Pratto F. Social dominance: An Intergroup Theory of Social Hierarchy and Oppression (1999), Cambridge University Press
34. Nosek B.A., et al. Harvesting implicit group attitudes and beliefs from a demonstration website. Group Dyn-Theor. Res. 6 (2002) 101-105
35. Nosek B.A. Implicit-explicit relations. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 16 (2007) 65-69
36. Jost J., et al. A decade of System Justification Theory: accumulated evidence of conscious and unconscious bolstering of the status quo. Polit. Psychol. 25 (2004) 881-919
37. Dunham Y., et al. Children and social groups: a developmental analysis of implicit consistency in Hispanics Americans. Self Identity 6 (2007) 238-255
38. Baron, A.S. and Banaji, M.R. The development of implicit race attitudes: what we can learn from Black-American children. Soc. Pers. Psychol. Compass. (in press)
39. Zajonc R.B. On the primacy of affect. Am. Psychol. 29 (1984) 117-123
40. Zajonc R.B. Mere exposure: a gateway to the subliminal. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 10 (2004) 224-228
41. Olsson A., et al. The role of social groups in the persistence of learned fear. Science 309 (2005) 785-787
42. Henry P.J., and Hardin C.D. The contact hypothesis revisited: status bias in the reduction of implicit prejudice in the United States and Lebanon. Psychol. Sci. 17 (2006) 862-868
43. Lemm K.M. Positive associations among interpersonal contact, motivation, and implicit and explicit attitudes toward gay men. J. Homosex. 51 (2006) 79-99
44. Tam T., et al. Intergroup contact and grandparent-grandchild communication: the effects of self-disclosure on implicit and explicit biases against older people. Group Process. Interg. 9 (2006) 413-429
45. Kurzban R., et al. Can race be erased? coalitional computation and social categorization. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 98 (2001) 15387-15392
46. Cosmides L., et al. Perceptions of race. Trends Cogn. Sci. 7 (2007) 173-179
47. Aboud F.A. Children and Prejudice (1988), Blackwell Publishers
48. Greenwald A.G., et al. Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: I. An improved scoring algorithm. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 85 (2003) 197-216