Capturing doping attitudes by self-report declarations and implicit assessment: A methodology study

Substance Abuse: Treatment, Prevention, and Policy

Volumn 3, Issue , 2008, Pages

  Petróczi, Andrea ^a,b   Aidman, Eugene V ^c   Nepusz, Tamás ^d  

^a KINGSTON UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ADELAIDE   (Australia)

^d INSTITUTE OF EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE   (Hungary)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PSYCHOTROPIC AGENT;

ADDICTION; ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE; DOPING; DRUG CONTROL; DRUG EFFECT; FEMALE; HUMAN; LEGAL ASPECT; MALE; PILOT STUDY; REACTION TIME;

ADULT; ATTITUDE; DOPING IN SPORTS; DRUG AND NARCOTIC CONTROL; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PILOT PROJECTS; PSYCHOTROPIC DRUGS; REACTION TIME; SUBSTANCE-RELATED DISORDERS;

EID: 44249090638     PISSN: None     EISSN: 1747597X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1747-597X-3-9     Document Type: Article

References (81)

1. Anshel MH Substance use: Chemical roulette in sport The sport psychology handbook Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics Murphy S 2005:255-77.
2. Brissonneau C Depiesse F Doping and doping control in French sport Doping and Doping Control in Europe Stuttgart: Meyer & Meyer Spitzer G 2006:45-67.
3. Koch JJ Performance-enhancing substances and their use among adolescent athletes Pediat Rev 2002, 23:310-17. 10.1542/pir.23-9-310
4. Laure P Lecerf T Friser A Binsinger C Drugs, recreational drug use and attitudes toward doping of high school athletes Int J Sports Med 2004, 25:133-8. 10.1055/s-2004-819946 14986197
5. Yesalis MPH Bahrke MS Doping among adolescent athletes Ballieres Clin Endocrinol Metab 2000, 14:25-35.
6. Laure P Binsinger C Doping prevalence among preadolescents athletes: A 4-year follow-up Br J Sports Med 2007. 10.1136/bjsm.2007.035733 17473000
7. Terry P 'I'm sorry mum': Insights into motives for taking performance-enhancing drugs and the impact of getting caught Paper presented at the Joint APS and NZPsS Conference, Auckland, New Zealand 2006.
8. Anshel MH Russell KG Examining athletes' attitudes toward using anabolic steroids and their knowledge of the possible effects J Drug Educ 1997, 27:121-45. 9270210
9. Evans M Weinberg R Jackson A Psychological factors related to drug use in college athletes Sport Psychol 1992, 6:24-41.
10. Buti A Fridman S Drugs, Sport and the Law Mudgeeraba, Qld: Scribblers Publishing 2001.
11. Tricker R Connolly D Drugs and college athlete: An analysis of the attitudes of student athletes at risk J Drug Educ 1997, 27:105-19. 9270209
12. Kavassanu M Roberts GC Moral functioning in sport: An achievement goal perspective J Sport Exerc Psychol 2001, 23:37-54.
13. Roberts GC Ommundsen Y Lemyre PN Miller B Cheating in sport Encyclopaedia of applied psychology London: Elsevier Spielberger C 2004:313-22.
14. Hoff D Overview of ethics and social science research in anti-doping Paper presented at the WADA Conference 'Ethics and Social Science Research in Anti-doping' 2006.
15. Ajzen I Fishbein M Attitude-behaviour relations: A theoretical analysis and review of empirical research Psychol Bull 1977, 84:888-918. 10.1037/ 0033-2909.84.5.888
16. Ajzen I Fishbein M Understanding attitudes and predicting social behaviour Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall 1980.
17. Ajzen I Madden TJ Prediction of goal directed behaviour: Attitudes, intentions and perceived behavioural control J Exp Soc Psychol 1986, 22:453-74. 10.1016/0022-1031(86)90045-4
18. Alaranta A Alaranta H Holmila J Palmu P Pietila K Helenius S Self-reported attitudes of elite athletes towards doping: Differences between type of sport Int J Sports Med 2006, 27:842-6. 10.1055/ s-2005-872969 16586338
19. Wanjek B Rosendahl J Strauss B Gabriel HH Doping, drugs and drug abuse among adolescents in the State of Thuringia (Germany): Prevalence, knowledge and attitudes Int J Sports Med 2007, 28:346-53. 10.1055/ s-2006-924353 17024651
20. Backhouse SH Atkin A McKenna J Robinson S International literature review: Attitudes, behaviours, knowledge and education - drugs in sport: past, present and future Report to the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) 2007. http://www.wada-ama.org/en/dynamic.ch2?pageCategory.id=513
21. Greenwald A McGhee D Schwartz J Measuring the individual differences in implicit cognition: The Implicit Association Test J Pers Soc Psychol 1998, 74:1464-80. 10.1037/0022-3514.74.6.1464 9654756
22. Aidman EV Schofield G Personality and individual differences in sport Sport Psychology: Theory, Applications and Issues Milton: Wiley Morris T, Summers J 2 2004:22-47.
23. Gawronski B LeBel EP Peters KR What do implicit measures tell us? Scrutinising the validity of three common assumptions Perspect Psychol Sci 2007, 2:181-193. 10.1111/j.1745-6916.2007.00036.x
24. O'Brien KS Hunter JA Banks M Implicit anti-fat bias in physical educators: Physical attributes, ideology and socialization Int J Obes 2007, 31(2):308-14. 10.1038/sj.ijo.0803398 16733526
25. Schwartz MB Vartanian LR Nosek BA Brownell KD The influence of one's own body weight on implicit and explicit anti-fat bias Obesity 2006, 14:440-447. 10.1038/oby.2006.58 16648615
26. Teachman BA Brownell KD Implicit anti-fat bias among health professionals: Is anyone immune? Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 2001, 25(10);1525-31. 10.1038/sj.ijo.0801745 11673776
27. Teachman BA Gapinski KD Brownell KD Jeyaram S Rawlins M Demonstrations of implicit anti-fat bias: The impact of providing causal information and evoking empathy Health Psychol 2003, 22:68-78. 10.1037/ 0278-6133.22.1.68 12558204
28. Puhl RM Wharton CM Weight bias: A primer for the fitness Industry ACSM'S Health & Fitness J 2007, 11:7-11. 10.1249/01.FIT.0000269060.03465.ab
29. Craeynesta M Crombez G De Houwer J Deforche B Tanghe A De Bourdeaudhuij I Explicit and implicit attitudes towards food and physical activity in childhood obesity Behav Res Ther 2005, 43:1111-20. 10.1016/ j.brat.2004.07.007 16005700
30. Perugini M Predictive models of implicit and explicit attitudes Brit J Soc Psychol 2005, 44(Pt 1):29-45. 10.1348/014466604X23491 15901390
31. Thush C Wiers RW Explicit and implicit alcohol-related cognitions and the prediction of future drinking in adolescents Addict Behav 2007, 32:1367-83. 10.1016/j.addbeh.2006.09.011 17125932
32. Ostafin BD Palfai TP Compelled to consume: The implicit association test and automatic alcohol motivation Psychol Addict Behav 2006, 20:322-7. 10.1037/0893-164X.20.3.322 16938070
33. Wiers RW Stacy AW Implicit cognition and addiction Curr Dir Psychol Sci 2006, 15:292-6. 10.1111/j.1467-8721.2006.00455.x
34. de Jong PJ Wiers RW Braak van de M Huijding J Using the Extrinsic Affective Simon Test as a measure of implicit attitudes towards alcohol: relationship with drinking behavior and alcohol problems J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry 2007, 38:133-43. 10.1016/j.jbtep.2006.10.004 17109815
35. De Houwer J Crombez G Koster EHW De Beul N Implicit alcohol-related cognitions in a clinical sample of heavy drinkers J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry 2004, 35:275-86. 10.1016/j.jbtep.2004.05.001 15530843
36. Wiers RW Van Woerden N Smulders FTY de Jong PJ Implicit and explicit alcohol-related cognitions in heavy and light drinkers J Abnorm Psychol 2002, 111:648-58. 10.1037/0021-843X.111.4.648 12428778
37. Houben K Wiers RW Are drinkers implicitly positive about drinking alcohol? Personalizing the alcohol-IAT to reduce negative extrapersonal contamination Alcohol Alcohol 2007, 42(4):301-7. 10.1093/alcalc/agm015 17517819
38. Hofmann W Gawronski B Gschwendner T Le H Schmitt M A meta-analysis on the correlation between the Implicit Association Test and explicit self report measures Pers Soc Psychol Bull 2005, 31:1369-85. 10.1177/ 0146167205275613 16143669
39. Rudman LA Sources of Implicit Attitudes Curr Dir Psychol Sci 2004, 13:79-82. 10.1111/j.0963-7214.2004.00279.x
40. Hofmann W Gschwender T Nosek BA Schmitt M What moderated implicit-explicit consistency? Eur Rev Soc Psychol 2005, 16:335-90. 10.1080/10463280500443228
41. Wilson TD Lindsey S Schooler TY A model of dual attitudes Psychol Rev 2000, 107:101-26. 10.1037/0033-295X.107.1.101 10687404
42. Phelps EA O'Connor KJ Cunningham WA Funayama ES Gatenby JC Gore JC Banaji MR Amygdala activation predicts performance on indirect measures of racial bias J Cogn Neurosci 2000, 12:729-38. 10.1162/089892900562552 11054916
43. Cunningham WA Zelazo PD Attitudes and evaluations: A social cognitive neuroscience perspective Trends Cogn Sci 2006, 11(3):97-104. 10.1016/ j.tics.2006.12.005 17276131
44. Fazio RH Olson MA Implicit measures in social cognition research: Their meaning and use Ann Rev Psychol 2003, 54:297-327. 10.1146/ annurev.psych.54.101601.145225 12172003
45. Fazio RH Towles-Schwen T The MODE model of attitude-behaviour process Dual Process Theories in Social Psychology New York: Wiley Chaiken S, Trope Y 1999:97-116.
46. Fazio RH Multiple processes by which attitudes guide behavior: The MODE model as an integrative framework Advances in Experimental Social Psychology New York: Academic Press Zanna MP 1990, 23:75-109.
47. Johnson BT Boynton MH Cumulating evidence about the social animal: meta-analysis in social-personality psychology Soc Person Psychol Compass 2008. doi:10.1111/j.1751-9004.2007.00048.x
48. Jaccard J Blanton H A theory of implicit reasoned action: The role of implicit and explicit attitudes in the prediction of behaviour Prediction and change of health behaviour Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Ajzen I, Albarracin D, Hornik R 2007:69-94.
49. Bargh JA Ferguson MJ Beyond behaviorism: On the automaticity of higher mental processes Psychol Bull 2000, 126:925-45. 10.1037/ 0033-2909.126.6.925 11107883
50. Spence A Townsend E Predicting behaviour towards genetically modified food using implicit and explicit attitudes Br J Soc Psychol 2007, 46:437-57. 10.1348/014466606X152261 17565791
51. Hofmann W Rauch W Gawronski B And deplete us not into temptation: automatic attitudes, dietary restraint, and self-regulatory resources as determinants of eating behaviour J Exp Soc Psychol 2007, 43:497-504. 10.1016/j.jesp.2006.05.004
52. Spruyt A Hermans D De Houwer J Vandekerckhove J Eelen P On the predictive validity of indirect attitude measures: Prediction of consumer choice behavior on the basis of affective priming in the picture-picture naming task J Exp Soc Psychol 2007, 43:599-610. 10.1016/ j.jesp.2006.06.009
53. Gabriel U Banse R Hug F Predicting private and public helping behaviour by implicit attitudes and the motivation to control prejudiced reactions Br J Soc Psychol 2007, 46:365-82. 10.1348/014466606X120400 17565787
54. Ronay R Do-Yeong K Gender differences in explicit and implicit risk attitudes: A socially facilitated phenomenon Br J Soc Psychol 2006, 45:397-419. 10.1348/014466605X66420 16762107
55. von Hippel W Brener B von Hippel C Implicit prejudice toward injecting drug users predicts intentions to change jobs among drug and alcohol nurses Psychol Sci 2008, 19:7-11. 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02037.x 18181783
56. Fiedler K Bluemke M Faking the IAT: Aided and unaided response control on the Implicit Association Tests Basic Appl Soc Psych 2005, 27:307-16. 10.1207/s15324834basp2704_3
57. Kim DY Voluntary controllability of the Implicit Association Test (IAT) Soc Psychol Q 2003, 66:83-96. 10.2307/3090143
58. Steffens MC Is the Implicit Association test immune to faking? Exp Psychol 2004, 51:165-79. 15267125
59. Olson MA Fazio RH Reducing the influence of extrapersonal associations on the Implicit Association Test: Personalizing the IAT J Pers Soc Psychol 2004, 86(5):653-67. 10.1037/0022-3514.86.5.653 15161392
60. Greenwald AG Nosek BA Banaji MR Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: I. An improved scoring algorithm J Pers Soc Psychol 2003, 85:197-216. 10.1037/0022-3514.85.2.197 12916565
61. Petróczi A Nepusz T The effect of self-impression management in social science doping research Paper presented at the WADA International Conference 'Ethics and Social Science Research in Anti-doping', Larnaca, Cyprus 2006.
62. Gawronski B Bodenhausen GV Associative and propositional processes in evaluation: An integrative review of implicit and explicit attitude change Psychol Bull 2006, 132:692-731. 10.1037/0033-2909.132.5.692 16910748
63. De Houwer J Moors A How to define and examine the implicitness of implicit measures Implicit measures of attitudes London: Guilford Press Wittenbrink B, Schwarz N 2007:179-95.
64. Farnham SD Greenwald AG Banaji MR Implicit self-esteem Social cognition and social identity London: Blackwell Abrams D, Hogg MA 1999:203-248.
65. Dasgupta N McGhee DE Greenwald AG Banaji MR Automatic preference for white Americans: Eliminating the familiarity explanation J Exp Soc Psychol 2000, 36:316-28. 10.1006/jesp.1999.1418
66. Greenwald A Farnham S Using the Implicit Association Test to measure self-esteem and self-concept J Pers Soc Psychol 2000, 79:1022-38. 10.1037/0022-3514.79.6.1022 11138752
67. Rudman LA Ashmore RD Gary M 'Unlearning' automatic biases: The malleability of implicit prejudice and stereotypes J Pers Soc Psychol 2001, 81:856-68. 10.1037/0022-3514.81.5.856 11708562
68. Dasgupta N Greenwald AG Banaji MR The first ontological challenge to the IAT: Attitude or mere familiarity? Psychological Inquiry 2003, 14:238-43. 10.1207/S15327965PLI1403&4_10
69. De Houwer J A structural and process analysis of the implicit association test J Exp Psychol 2001, 37:443-534. 10.1006/jesp.2000.1464
70. Bluemke M Friese M Do features of stimuli influence IAT effects? Exp Soc Psychol 2006, 42:163-76. 10.1016/j.jesp.2005.03.004
71. WADA The 2008 Prohibited List http://www.wada-ama.org/rtecontent/ document/2008_List_En.pdf
72. Petróczi A Exploring the doping dilemma: Can athletes' attitudes be responsible for doping? Published PhD thesis University of Northern Colorado, Sport and Exercise Science 2002.
73. Tangen JO Breivik G Doping games and drug abuse Sportwissenschaft 2001, 31:188-98.
74. Lane KA Banaji MR Nosek BA Greenwald AG Understanding and using the implicit association test: IV. In: Implicit measures of attitudes Guilford: The Guilford Press Wittenbrink B, Schwarz N 2007:59-102.
75. Greenwald AG Banaji MR Rudman LA Farnham SD Nosek BA Mellott DS A unified theory of implicit attitudes, stereotypes, self-esteem and self-concept Psychol Rev 2002, 109(1):3-25. 10.1037/0033-295X.109.1.3 11863040
76. Karpinski A Steinman RB Hilton JL Attitude importance as a moderator of the relationship between implicit attitude measures Pers Soc Psychol Bull 2005, 31:949-62. 10.1177/0146167204273007 15951366
77. Han AH Olson MA Fazio RH The influence of experimentally created extrapersonal associations of the Implicit Association test J Exp Soc Psychol 2006, 42:259-72. 10.1016/j.jesp.2005.04.006
78. Richetin J Perugini M Adjali I Hurling R The moderator role of intuitive versus deliberative decision making for the predictive validity of implicit and explicit measures Eur J Pers 2007, 21:529-46. 10.1002/ per.625
79. WADA Adverse analytical findings 2005 report 2005 http://www.wada-ama.org
80. Gawronski B Hofman W Wilbur CJ Are "implicit" attitudes unconscious? Consc Cognit 2006, 15:485-499. 10.1016/j.concog.2005.11.007
81. Cogswell A Explicit rejection of an implicit dichotomy: Integrating two approaches to assessing dependency J Pers Assess 2008, 90:26-35. 18444092