Detecting fakers of the autobiographical IAT

Applied Cognitive Psychology

Volumn 25, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 299-306

  Agosta, Sara ^a   Ghirardi, Valentina ^a   Zogmaister, Cristina ^b   Castiello, Umberto ^a   Sartori, Giuseppe ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PADOVA   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MILANO BICOCCA   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUTOBIOGRAPHICAL MEMORY; BRAIN FUNCTION; COGNITION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MEMORY; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TRAINING;

EID: 79953052045     PISSN: 08884080     EISSN: 10990720     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/acp.1691     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Agosta, S. (2005). A new lie-detector based on the IAT. Master Degree Thesis.
2. Ben-Shakhar, G., & Elaad, E. (2003). The validity of psychophysiological detection of information with the guilty knowledge test: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 131-151. DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.88.1.131
3. Benussi, V. (1914). Die Atmungssymptome der Lüge. Archiv für die gesamte Psychologie, 31, 244-273. English translation printed in 1975. Poligraph, 4(1), 52-76.
4. Cvencek, D., Greenwald, A. G., Brown, A., Gray, N. S., & Snowden, R. J. (under review). Faking of the implicit association test is statistically detectable and partly correctable.
5. Elaad, E. (2009). Effects of context and state of guilt on the detection of concealed crime. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 71, 225-234. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2008.10.001
6. Fiedler, K., & Bluemke, M. (2005). Faking the IAT: Aided and unaided response control on the implicit association test. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 27, 307-316. DOI: 10.1207/s15324834basp2704-3
7. Ganis, G., Kosslyn, S. M., Stose, S., Thompson, W. L., & Yurgelun-Todd, D. A. (2003). Neural correlates of different types of deception: An fMRI investigation. Cerebral Cortex, 13, 830-836.
8. Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E., & Schwarz, J. L. K. (1998). Measuring individual difference in implicit cognition: The implicit association test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1464-1480. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.74.6.1464
9. Greenwald, A. G., Nosek, B. A., & Banaji, M. R. (2003). Understanding and using the implicit association test: I. An improved scoring algorithm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 197-216. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.85.3.481
10. Honts, C. R., Devitt, M. K., Winbush, M., & Kircher, J. C. (1996). Mental and physical countermeasures reduce the accuracy of the concealed knowledge test. Psychophysiology, 7, 10-14. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8986. 1996.tb02111
11. Honts, C. R., Raskin, D. C., & Kircher, J. C. (1994). Mental and physical countermeasures reduce the accuracy of the polygraph test. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 252-259. DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.79.2.252
12. Kim, D. Y. (2003). Voluntary controllability of the implicit association test. Social Psychology Quarterly, 66, 83-96.
13. Langleben, D. D., Loughead, J. W., Bilker, W. B., Ruparel, K., Childress, A. R., Busch, S. I., et al. (2005). Telling truth from lie in individual subjects with fast event-related fMRI. Human Brain Mapping, 26, 262-272. DOI: 10.1002/hbm.20191.
14. Lykken, D. T. (1959). The GSR in the detection of guilt. Journal of Applied Psychology, 43, 385-388.
15. Lykken, D. T. (1960). The validity of the guilty knowledge technique: The effects of faking. Journal of Applied Psychology, 44, 258-262.
16. Office of Technology Assessment. (1983). Scientific validity of polygraph testing: A research review and evaluation. A technical memorandum, Report No. OTA-TM-H-15, Washington, DC: Office of Technology Assessment.
17. Priori, A., Mameli, F., Cogiamanian, F., Marceglia, S., Tiriticco, M., Mrakic-Sposta, S., et al. (2008). Lie-specific involvement of dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in deception. Cerebral Cortex, 18, 451-455. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhm088
18. Reid, J. E. (1947). A revised questioning technique in lie detection tests. The Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology, and Police Science, 37, 542-547.
19. Reid, J. E., & Inbau, F. E. (1977). Truth and deception: The polygraph ('lie-detector') technique (2nd edition), Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins.
20. Sartori, G., Agosta, S., & Gnoato, F. (2007). High accuracy detection of malingered whiplash syndrome. Paper presented at the International Whiplash Trauma Congress, Miami, FL.
21. Sartori, G., Agosta, S., Zogmaister, C., Ferrara, S. D., & Castiello, U. (2008). How to accurately detect autobiographical events. Psychological Science, 19, 772-780. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02156
22. Verschuere, B., Prati, V., & De Houwer, J. (2009). Cheating the lie-detector: Faking the autobiographical IAT. Psychological Science, 20, 410-413. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02308