High courts and economic governance in Argentina and Brazil

High Courts and Economic Governance in Argentina and Brazil

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 1-289

  Kapiszewski, Diana ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84923590912     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139017664     Document Type: Book

References (374)

1. Acuña, Carlos. 1994. “Politics and Economics in the Argentina of the Nineties (Or Why the Future No Longer Is What It Used to Be).” In William C. Smith. Carlos Acuña. and Eduardo A. Gamarra, eds.Latin American Political Economy in the Age of Neoliberal Reform: Theoretical and Comparative Perspectives. Coral Gables: North-South Center.
2. Acuña, Carlos 1995. “Introduction.” In Carlos Acuña, ed., La nueva matriz política argentina. Buenos Aires: Ediciones Nueva Visión.
3. Alarie, Benjamin R. D., and Andrew Green. 2oo7. “The Reasonable Justice: An Empirical Analysis of Frank Iacobucci’s Career on the Supreme Court of Canada.”University of Toronto Law Journal57: 195-226.
4. Amann, Edmund, and Werner Baer. 2oo2. “Neoliberalism and Its Consequences in Brazil.”Journal of Latin American Studies34: 945-59.
5. Amann, Edmund, and Werner Baer 2oo5. “From the Developmental to the Regulatory State: The Transformation of the Government’s Impact on the Brazilian Economy.”The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance45: 421-31.
6. Amorim Neto, Octavio, Gary W. Cox, and Matthew D. McCubbins. 2003. “Agenda Power in Brazil’s Cámara dos Deputados 1989-98.”World Politics55(4): 550-78.
7. Arantes, Rogério Bastos. 1997. Judiciário e Política No Brasil.Sao Paulo: IDESP.
8. Arantes, Rogério Bastos 2005. “Constitutionalism, the Expansion of Justice and the Judicialization of Politics in Brazil.” In Rachel Sieder, Line Schj olden, and Alan Angell, eds., The Judicialization of Politics in Latin America. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
9. Arantes, Rogerio Bastos, and Fábio Kerche. 2003. “Poder Judicial y Democracia en Brasil.” In Vicente Palermo, ed., Política Brasileña Contemporánea. Buenos Aires. Siglo XXI/Instituto di Tella.
10. Arenas de Mesa, Alberto, and Fábio M. Bertranou 1997. “Learning from Social Security Reforms: Two Different Cases, Chile and Argentina.”World Development 25(3): 329-48.
11. Ballard, Megan J. 1999. “The Clash Between Local Courts and Global Economics: The Politics of Judicial Reform in Brazil.”Berkeley Journal of International Law17: 230-76.
12. Barbalho Leite, Fábio. 2004. “O Supremo Tribunal Federal e a Contribuido de Servidores Inativos e Pensionistas (EC no. 41/03): Lineamentos para o Reconhecimento de sua Constitucionalidade.”Revista Brasileira de Direito Público (RBDP)2(5): 43-72.
13. Barnes, Jeb. 2007. “Bringing the Courts Back in: Interbranch Perspectives on the Role of Courts in American Politics and Policy Making.”Annual Review of Political Science 10: 25-43.
14. Barros, Sérgio Resende de. 2000. “Controle De Constitucionalidade: Proposta De Simplificado.”Revista Da Procuradoria Geral Do Estado De Sao Paulo54: 21-43.
15. Barros, Robert. 2003. “Dictatorship and the Rule of Law: Rules and Military Power in Pinochet’s Chile.” In José María Maravall and Adam Przeworski, eds., Democracy and the Rule of Law.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
16. Baum, Lawrence. 1976. “Implementation of Judicial Decisions.”American Politics Quarterly4: 86-114.
17. Baum, Lawrence 1993. “Making Judicial Policies in the Political Arena.” In Carl Van Horn, ed., The State of the States,2nd ed. Washington DC: CQ Press.
18. Baum, Lawrence 2006. Judges and Their Audiences: A Perspective on Judicial Behavior.Princeton: Princeton University Press.
19. Bergman, Marcelo. 2009. Tax Evasion and the Rule of Law in Latin America: The Political Culture of Cheating and Compliance in Argentina and Chile. State College: Penn State University Press.
20. Bianchi, Alberto. 2002a. Control de constitucionalidad, Tomo I y II.Buenos Aires: Abaco.
21. Bianchi, Alberto 2002b. “De Guida a Tobar (La sinuosa ruta de los salarios de los agentes públicos).”Jurisprudencia Argentina 2002-III, suplemento del fascículo no. 11.
22. Bianchi, Alberto ND. ¿Ha llegado la Corte Suprema al final de su lucha por una jurisdicción discrecional? Perspectivas actuales y futuras del Recurso Ordinario.” El Derecho.
23. Bidart Campos, German J. 1986. “La Corte Suprema no achica ni agranda su función (un caso más de jubilaciones).”El Derecho120: 562-3.
24. Boas, Taylor. 2007. “Conceptualizing Continuity and Change: The Composite-Standard Model of Path Dependence.”Journal of Theoretical Politics19(1): 33-54.
25. Bohmer, Martin. 2000. “La Corte de los’80 y la Corte de los’90, Un diálogo sobre el Rule of Law Argentino.” Trabajo preparado para el SELA 2000.
26. Borner, Silvio, Aymo Brunetti, and Beatrice Weder. 1995. Political Credibility and Economic Development.London: St. Martin’s Press.
27. Bratton, Michael. 2007. “Formal versus Informal Institutions in Africa."Journal of Democracy18(3): 96-110.
28. Brinks, Daniel M. 2003. “Informal Institutions and the Rule of Law: The Judicial Response to State Killings in Buenos Aires and Sao Paulo in the 1990s.”Comparative Politics36(1): 1-19.
29. Brinks, Daniel M. 2005. “Judicial Reform and Independence in Brazil and Argentina: The Beginning of a New Millennium?”Texas International Law Journal40(30): 595.
30. Brinks, Daniel M. 2007. The Judicial Response to Police Killings in Latin America: Inequality and the Rule of Law. New York and Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
31. Brinks, Daniel M. and Sandra Botero. 2010. “Inequality and the Rule of Law: Ineffective Rights in Latin American Democracies.” Paper presented at the American Political Science Association Annual Meeting, Washington, DC, September 2-5, 2010.
32. Burley, Anne-Marie, and Walter Mattli. 1993. “Europe before the Court: A Political Theory of Legal Integration.”International Organization47(1): 41-76.
33. Caldeira, Gregory A., and James L. Gibson. 1995. “The Legitimacy of the Court of Justice in the European Union: Models of Institutional Support.” American Political Science Review89: 356-76.
34. Carothers. Thomas. 1998. “The Rule of Law Revival.” Foreign Affairs 77(1): 95-106.
35. Carrió. Alejandro. 1996. La Corte Suprema y su independencia. Buenos Aires: Abeledo Perrot.
36. Carrubba, Clifford J. 2003. “The European Court of Justice, Democracy, and Enlargement.” European Union Politics 4(1): 75-100.
37. Castagnola. Andrea, and Aníbal Pérez-Liñán. 2011. “Bolivia: The Rise (and Fall) of Judicial Review.” In Gretchen Helmke and Julio Rios-Figueroa, eds., Courts in Latin America. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
38. Castelar Pinheiro. Armando. ed. 2000. Judiciário e Economia No Brasil. Sao Paulo. Editora Sumare.
39. Cavallo. Claudio. 2002. “Esto… ¿Será Justicia? Una visión sobre la decisión de la Corte acerca del recorte de haberes del sector público y jubilados.”La Ley, Nota a fallo, 2002-F.
40. Chavez. Rebecca B. 2001. “The Construction of the Rule of Law in Nascent Democracies: Judicial Autonomy in Latin America.” Doctoral Dissertation, Political Science, Stanford University.
41. Chavez, Rebecca B., 2004a. Rule of Law in Nascent Democracies: Judicial Politics in Argentina. Stanford. Stanford University Press.
42. Chavez. Rebecca B. 2004b. “The Evolution of Judicial Autonomy in Argentina: Establishing the Rule of Law in an Ultrapresidential System.”Journal of Latin American Studies36: 45I-78.
43. Clayton. Cornell, and Howard Gillman, eds. 1999. Supreme Court Decision-Making: New Institutionalist Approaches. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
44. Collier, David, and James Mahoney. 1996. “Insights and Pitfalls: Selection Bias in Qualitative Research.” World Politics 49(1): 56-91.
45. Collier, Ruth Berins. 1999. Paths toward Democracy: The Working Class and Elites in Western Europe and South America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
46. Collier, Ruth Berins, and David Collier. 1979. “Inducements vs. Constraints: Disaggregating Corporatism.” American Political Science Review 73(4): 967-86.
47. Collier, Ruth Berins, and David Collier 1991. Shaping the Political Arena: Critical Junctures, the Labor Movement, and Regime Dynamics in Latin America. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
48. Cooter. Robert, and Tom Ginsburg. 1996. “Comparative Judicial Discretion: An Empirical Test of Economic Models.” International Review of Law and Economics i6: ¿95-313.
49. Costin. Claudia. 2006. “State Reform in Brazil (1995-2005).” Unpublished manuscript.
50. Couso. Javier. Alexandra Huneeus, and Rachel Sieder, eds. 2010. Cultures of Legality: Judicialization and Political Activism in Contemporary Latin America. New York: Cambridge University Press.
51. Dahl. Robert A. 1957a. “The Concept of Power.”Behavioural Science2: 202-10.
52. Dahl. Robert A. 1957b. “Decision Making in a Democracy: The Supreme Court as a National Policy Maker.”Journal of Public Law6: 279-95.
53. Davis, Michael C. 1998. “The Price of Rights: Constitutionalism and East Asian Economic Development.”Human Rights Quarterly20: 303-37.
54. Davis. Richard. 2005. Electing Justice: Fixing the Supreme Court Nomination Process. Oxford University Press.
55. Desposato, Scott W. 2004. “The Impact of Party Switching on Legislative Behavior in Brazil.” Unpublished manuscript.
56. Desposato, Scott W. 2006. “Parties for Rent? Ambition, Ideology, and Party Switching in Brazil’s Chamber of Deputies.” American Journal of Political Science 50(1): 62-80.
57. Dezalay. Yves, and Bryant G. Garth. 2002. The Internationalization of Palace Wars: Lawyers, Economists, and the Contest to Transform Latin American States. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
58. Dezalay. Yves, and Bryant G. Garth 2010. Asian Legal Revivals: Lawyers in the Shadow of Empire.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
59. Díaz. Rodolfo. 2002. ¿Prosperidad o Ilusión? Las reformas de los 90 en la Argentina. Buenos Aires: Abaco.
60. Di Maggio. P. J. 1998. “The New Institutionalisms: Avenues of Collaboration.”Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics154(4): 696-705.
61. Dixon, Rosalind. 2007. “Creating Dialogue about Socioeconomic Rights: Strong-Form versus Weak-Form Judicial Review Revisited.” International Journal of Constitutional Law 5(3): 391-418.
62. Dodson, Michael, and Donald W. Jackson. 2003. “Horizontal Accountability and the Rule of Law in Latin America.” In Scott Mainwaring and Christopher Welna, eds., Democratic Accountability in Latin America. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
63. Dolbeare, Kenneth M., and Phillip E. Hammond. 1971. The School Prayer Decisions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
64. Dolinger, Jacob. 1990. “The Influence of American Constitutional Law on the Brazilian Legal System.” The American Journal of Comparative Law 38(4): 803-37.
65. Domingo, Pilar. 2004. “Judicialization of Politics or Politicization of the Judiciary: Recent Trends in Latin America.” Democratization 11(1): 104-26.
66. Domingo, Pilar 2005. “Judicialization of Politics: The Changing Political Role of the Judiciary in Mexico.” In Rachel Sieder, Line Schjolden, and Alan Angell, eds., The Judicialization of Politics in Latin America. New York: Palgrave.
67. Druker, Jeremy, 2008. “Czech Republic.” In Jeannette Goehring, ed., Nations in Transit 2008: Democratization from Central Europe to Eurasia. New York: Freedom House.
68. Eisenstadt, Todd. 2003, “Thinking Outside the (Ballot) Box: Informal Electoral Institutions and Mexico’s Political Opening.”Latin American Politics and Society45(I): 25-54.
69. Epp, Charles C. 1998, The Rights Revolution: Lawyers, Activists, and Supreme Courts in Comparative Perspective.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
70. Epstein, Lee, and Jack Knight. 2000. “Toward a Strategic Revolution in Judicial Politics: A Look Back, A Look Ahead.” Political Research Quarterly 53(3): 625-61
71. Epstein, Lee, Jack Knight, and Olga Shvetsova. 2001. “The Role of Constitutional Courts in the Establishment and Maintenance of Democratic Systems of Government.” Law and Society Review 35(1): 117-64.
72. Epstein, Lee, Jack Knight, and Olga Shvetsova 2002. “Selecting Selection Systems.” In Stephen Burbank and Barry Friedman, eds., Judicial Independence at the Crossroads: An Interdisciplinary Approach.
73. Epstein, Lee, and Jeffrey A. Segal. 2005. Advice and Consent: The Politics of Judicial Appointments. New York: Oxford University Press.
74. Epstein, Lee, and Jeffrey A. Segal Fallos de la Corte Suprema de Justicia de la Nación. Buenos Ares. Various years.
75. Farber, Daniel A. 2002. “Rights as Signals.”Journal of Legal StudiesXXXI: 83-98.
76. Faro de Castro, Marcus. 1997a. “The Courts, Law, and Democracy in Brazil.” International Social Science Journal 49(152): 241-52.
77. Faro de Castro, Marcus 1997b. “O Supremo Tribunal Federal e a Judicializa^ao Da Política.” Revista Brasileira De Ciencias Sociais 12(34): 147-56.
78. Farrell, H., and A. Heritier. 2003. “Formal and Informal Institutions under Co-Decision: Continuous Constitution-Building in Europe.” Governance 16(4): 577-600.
79. Faundez, Julio. 2005. “The Rule of Law Enterprise: Promoting a Dialogue Between Practitioners and Academics.” Democratization 12(4): 567-86.
80. Favetti, Rafael Thomaz. 2003. Controle de Constitucionalidade e Política Fiscal. Porto Alegre: Sergio Antonio Fabris Editor.
81. Fayt, Carlos. 2004. La Corte Suprema y la Evolución de su Jurisprudencia Leading Cases y Holdings Casos Trascendentes. Buenos Aires: La Ley.
82. Ferejohn, John. 2002. “Judicializing Politics, Politicizing Law.” Law and Contemporary Problems 65: 41-69.
83. Ferejohn, John, Frances Rosenbluth, and Charles Shipan. 2007. “Comparative Judicial Politics.” In Carles Boix and Susan Stokes, eds., The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Politics.New York: Oxford.
84. Ferreyra, Raul Gustavo. 2004. “Corte Suprema de Justicia Argentina y Control de Constitucionalidad: Vicsitudes y retos del papel institucional del tribunal.” Presentado como ponencia en el Congreso Internacional de Culturas y Sistemas Jurídicos Comparados, UNAM, Instituto de Investigaciones Jurídicas, México, febrero de 2004.
85. Figueiredo, Argelina, and Fernando Limongi. 2000. “Presidential Power, Legislative Organization and Party Behavior in the Legislature.” Comparative Politics 32: z5I-7°.
86. Finkel, Jodi. 2001. “Judicial Reform in Latin America: Market Economies, SelfInterested Politicians, and Judicial Independence.” Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Political Science, University of California, Los Angeles.
87. Finkel, Jodi 2003. “Supreme Court Decisions on Electoral Rules After Mexico’s 1994 Judicial Reform: An Empowered Court.”Journal of Latin American Studies35: 777-99.
88. Finkel, Jodi 2004. “Judicial Reform in Argentina in the 1990s: How Electoral Incentives Shape Institutional Change.” Latin American Research Review 39(3): 56-80.
89. Finkel, Jodi 2005. “Judicial Reform As an ‘Insurance Policy’ in Mexico in the 1990s: A Supreme Court Willing and Able to Enter the Political Fray.” Latin American Politics and Society47(1): 87-113.
90. Finkel, Jodi 2008. Judicial Reform as Political Insurance: Argentina, Peru and Mexico in the 1990s. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
91. Fisher. Louis. 2007. Constitutional Dialogues: Interpretation as Political Process. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
92. Fishlow. Albert. 2000. “Brazil and Economic Realities.” Daedalus 129(2): 339-57.
93. Fonseca de Araujo Faria. Lilian. 1998. “The Role of the Judicial Branch in Managing the Brazilian Government’s Economic Policy.” Instituto Cultural Minerva, Institute of Brazilian Issues, The George Washington University.
94. Freedom House. 2006. “Freedom in the World - Argentina (2006).” Available at www. freedomhouse.org, accessed 27 May 2007.
95. French. John D. 2004. Drowning in Laws: Labor Law and Brazilian Political Culture. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
96. Friedman. Barry. 2006. “Taking Law Seriously.” Perspectives on Politics 4(2): 261-76.
97. Friedman. Barry 2009. The Will of the People: How Public Opinion Has Influenced the Supreme Court and Shaped the Meaning of the Constitution.New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
98. Frühling. Hugo. 1984. “Law in Society: Social Transformation and the Crisis of Law in Chile, 1830-1970.” Doctoral Dissertation, Harvard University School of Law.
99. Furtado. Adolfo. ND. “Correado das contas do FGTS: um dilema distributivo.” Cadernos Aslegis 13.
100. Gandhi. Jennifer. 2008. Political Institutions Under Dictatorship. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
101. Gargarella. Roberto. 1998. “Después del diluvio. El perfeccionismo conservador en la nueva jurisprudencia de la Corte Suprema (1990-1997).”Desarrollo Económico Revista de Ciencias Sociales. 38(149): 439-56.
102. Gargarella. Roberto 2003. “Inconsistencia y parcialidad. Un examen histórico de la jurisprudencia de la Corte Suprema Argentina.”Lexis Nexis Jurisprudencia Argentina (Numero especial, “140 anos de la Corte Suprema de Justicia de la Nación”), JA 2003-IV, fascículo n. 9: 19-35.
103. Gargarella. Roberto 2004. “In Search of Democratic Justice - What Courts Should Not Do: Argentina, 1983-2002.” In Siri Gloppen, Robert Gargarella, and Elin Skaar, eds., Democratization and the Judiciary: The Accountability Function of Courts in New Democracies. London: Frank Cass
104. Gargarella. Roberto 2011. “Dialogic Justice in the Enforcement of Social Rights.” In Siri Gloppen and Alicia Yamin, eds., Litigating Health Rights: Can Courts Bring More Justice to Health?Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
105. Gauri, Varun and Daniel M. Brinks, 2008. “Introduction: The Elements of Legalization and the Triangular Shape of Social and Economic Rights.” In Varun Gauri and Daniel M. Brinks, eds., Courting Social Justice: Judicial Enforcement of Social and Economic Rights in the Developing World. New York: Cambridge University Press.
106. Gauri, Varun, and Daniel M. Brinks, eds. 2008. Courting Social Justice: Judicial Enforcement of Social and Economic Rights in the Developing World. New York: Cambridge University Press.
107. Gelli, María Angélica. 2003a. Constitución de la Nación Comentada y Concordada. Buenos Aires: La Ley.
108. Gelli, María Angélica 2003b. “El mundo jurídico y los dilemas del poder de la Corte Suprema.” Especial para La Ley. T.2003-E, Sec. Doctrina, 986-89.
109. Gelli, María Angélica 2003c. “El caso ‘Provincia de San Luis v. Estado Nacional’, entre el debido proceso adjetivo y el control de razonabilidad.” Jurisprudencia Argentina, 2003-II-1294.
110. Gerchunoff, Pablo and Lucas Llach. 2003. El ciclo de la ilusión y el desencanto: un siglo de políticas económicas argentinas. Buenos Aires: Ariel.
111. Gerhardt, Michael. 2000. The Federal Appointments Process: A Constitutional and Historical Analysis. Durham: Duke University Press.
112. Geyh, Charles Gardner. 2010. “Judicial Politics, the Rule of Law, and the Future of an Ermine Myth.” Indiana University Maurer School of Law, Research Paper Number 165.
113. Gibson, James L., Gregory A. Caldeira, and Vanessa A. Baird. 1998. “On the Legitimacy of National High Courts.”American Political Science Review92: 343-58.
114. Gil Domínguez. Andrés. 2002. “La Corte Suprema: Poder Cuestionado.”Todo es Historia4i8(Mayo): 6-17.
115. Gillman. Howard. 2001. “What’s Law Got to Do with It? Judicial Behavioralists Test the ‘Legal Model’ of Judicial Decision-Making.”Law and Social Inquiry26(2): 465-504.
116. Gillman, Howard, and Cornell Clayton, eds. i999. The Supreme Court in American Politics: New Institutionalist Interpretations. Lawrence: University of Kansas Press.
117. Ginsburg, Tom. 2000. “Review: Does Law Matter for Economic Development? Evidence from East Asia.”Law and Society Review34(3): 829-56.
118. Ginsburg, Tom 2002. “Economic Analysis and the Design of Constitutional Courts.” Theoretical Inquires in Law 3(1): 49-85.
119. Ginsburg, Tom 2003. Judicial Review in New Democracies: Constitutional Courts in Asian Cases. New York: Cambridge University Press.
120. Gloppen. Siri. 2006. “Courts and Social Transformation: An Analytical Framework.” In Roberto Gargarella. Pilar Domingo, and Theunis Roux, eds., Courts and Social Transformation in New Democracies: An Institutional Voice for the Poor?Aldershot: Ashgate.
121. Gloppen. Siri. Roberto Gargarella, and Elin Skaar, eds. 2004. Democratization and the Judiciary: The Accountability Function of Courts in New Democracies. London: Frank Cass.
122. Gomes de Mattos, Mauro Roberto. 2003. “O Controle dos Poderes Executivo e Legislativo Pelo Supremo Tribunal Federal.”Selegoes Jurídicas.Outubro.
123. Greenburg, Jan Crawford. 2007. Supreme Conflict: The Inside Story of the Struggle for Control of the United States.New York: The Penguin Press.
124. Grondona, Mariano. 1994. “La justicia y los políticos.” In Francisco Diez, ed., La justicia en crisis. Buenos Aires: Poder Ciudadano.
125. Guest, I an. 1990. Behind the Disappearances: Argentina’s Dirty War Against Human Rights and the United Nations.Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
126. Haggard, Stephen, and Robert R. Kaufman, eds. 1992. The Politics of Economic Adjustment.Princeton: Princeton University Press.
127. Haggard, Stephen, and Robert R. Kaufman. 1995. The Political Economy of Democratic Transitions. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
128. Hagopian, Frances. 1996. Traditional Politics and Regime Change in Brazil.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
129. Hall, Peter A., and Rosemary C. R. Taylor. 1996. “Political Science and the Three New Institutionalisms.” Political Studies 44(5): 936-57.
130. Hansen, J. M. 1986. “Detecting and Explaining the Structure of Informal Institutions -Agricultural Policy Networks in the United States Congress.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 11(1): 131
131. Hart, L. A. 1961. The Concept of Law. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
132. Hartlyn, Jonathan. 1998. “Political Continuities, Missed Opportunities, and Institutional Rigidities: Another Look at Democratic Transitions in Latin America.” In Scott Mainwaring and Arturo Valenzuela, eds., Politics, Society, and Democracy: Latin America. Boulder: Westview Press.
133. Helmke, Gretchen. 2000. “Ruling Against the Rulers: Court-Executive Relations in Argentina Under Dictatorship and Democracy.” Doctoral Dissertation, Department of Political Science, University of Chicago.
134. Helmke, Gretchen 2002. “The Logic of Strategic Defection: Court-Executive Relations in Argentina Under Dictatorship and Democracy.” American Political Science Review 96(2): 291-303
135. Helmke, Gretchen 2005. Courts Under Constraints: Judges, Generals, and Presidents in Argentina. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
136. Helmke, Gretchen, and Steven Levitsky. 2004. “Informal Institutions and Comparative Politics: A Research Agenda.” Perspectives on Politics 2(4): 725-40.
137. Helmke, Gretchen, and Steven Levitsky 2006. Informal Institutions and Democracy: Lessons from Latin America.Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
138. Hertogh, Marc and Simon Halliday, eds. 2004. Judicial Review and Bureaucratic Impact: International and Interdisciplinary Perspectives.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
139. Hilbink, Elisabeth. 2007. The Politics of Judicial Apoliticism: Chile in Comparative Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
140. Hilbink, Lisa and Elizabeth Woods, eds. 2009. “MiniSymposium: Comparative Sources of Judicial Empowerment: Ideas and Interests.” Political Research Quarterly 62(4): 745-839.
141. Hirschl, Ran. 2004. Towards Juristocracy: The Origins and Consequences of the New Constitutionalism.Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
142. Hirschl, Ran 2008. “Constitutionalism vs. Theocracy: Constitutional Courts and the Containment of Sacred Law.” Presented at the Plenary Session of the U.C. Berkeley Sawyer Seminar on Comparative Judicial Power, Berkeley, CA, November 8, 2008.
143. Hoekstra, Valerie. 2003. Public Reaction to Supreme Court Decisions. New York: Cambridge University Press.
144. Hoffmann, Florian F. and Fernando R. N. M. Bentes. 2008. “Accountability for Social and Economic Rights in Brazil.” In Varun Gauri and Daniel M. Brinks, eds., Courting Social Justice: Judicial Enforcement of Social and Economic Rights in the Developing World.New York: Cambridge University Press.
145. Huneeus. Alexandra. 2006. “The Dynamics of Judicial Transition: Judges, Pinochet-Era Claims, and the Question of Judicial Legitimacy in Chile (1998-2005).” PhD Dissertation, Jurisprudence and Social Policy Program, University of California, Berkeley.
146. Huneeus. Alexandra 2010. “Judging with a Guilty Conscience: The Chilean Judiciary’s Human Rights Turn.” Law and Social Inquiry. 35(1): 99-135.
147. Hunter. Wendy. 1997. Eroding Military Influence in Brazil: Politicians Against Soldiers. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
148. Hunter. Wendy and Timothy J. Power. 2005. “Lula’s Brazil at Midterm.”Journal of Democracy16(3): 127-39.
149. Huntington. Samuel. 1991. The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late 20th Century. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.
150. Iaryczower, Matías. Pablo T. Spiller, and Mariano Tommasi. 2000. “Un Enfoque Estratégico para Entender el Comportamiento de la Corte Suprema de Justicia de la Nación.” Paper presented at the “Conference to Honor Guillermo Molinelli,” Centro de Estudio para el Desarrollo Institucional, Buenos Aires, Argentina, November 27.
151. Iaryczower, Matías 2002. “Judicial Independence in Unstable Environments, Argentina 1935-1998.”American Journal of Political Science46(4): 699-716.
152. Immergut. Ellen. 1998. “The Theoretical Core of the New Institutionalism.” Politics and Society 25(4): 5-34.
153. Ingram, Matthew C. 2009. “Not All Courts Are Created Equal(ly): A Causal Logics Approach to Clarifying Causation in Judicial Politics.” Paper presented at the American Political Science Association Annual Meeting, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, September 3-6.
154. Kagan. Robert. Bliss Cartwright. Lawrence M. Friedman, and Stanton Wheeler. 1978. “The Evolution of State Supreme Courts.” Michigan Law Review76: 961-1005.
155. Kapiszewski. Diana. 2011a. “Power Broker, Policymaker, or Rights Adjudicator? The Brazilian Supremo Tribunal Federal in Transition.” In Gretchen Helmke and Julio Ríos-Figueroa, eds., Courts in Latin America. New York: Cambridge University Press.
156. Kapiszewski. Diana 2011b. “Tactical Balancing: High Court Decision-Making on Politically Crucial Cases.” Law and Society Review 45(2): 471-506.
157. Kapiszewski. Diana and Matthew M. Taylor. 2008. “Doing Courts Justice? Studying Judicial Politics in Latin America.”Perspectives on Politics6(4): 741-67.
158. Kapiszewski. Diana and Matthew M. Taylor Forthcoming. “Compliance: Conceptualizing, Measuring, and Explaining Adherence to Judicial Rulings.” Law and Social Inquiry.
159. Kapiszewski, Diana, Gordon Silverstein, and Robert A. Kagan, eds. Forthcoming. Consequential Courts: Judicial Roles in Global Perspective. New york: Cambridge University Press.
160. Karl. Terry Lynn. 1990. “Dilemmas of Democratization in Latin America.”Comparative Politics23: 1-23.
161. Karst, Kenneth L. and Keith S. Rosenn. 1975. Law and Development in Latin America. Berkeley: University of California Press.
162. Kerche, Fábio. 1999. “O Ministério Público e a Constituinte de 1987/88.” In Maria Teresa Sadek, ed.O Sistema de Justiga, Sao Paulo: IDESP.
163. Khair, Amir Antonio. 2004. Diagnóstico do Poder Judiciário Brasileiro: Relatório de Pesquisa. Unpublished manuscript.
164. Kingstone, Peter R. 2000. “Muddling Through Gridlock: Economic Policy Performance, Business Responses, and Democratic Sustainability.” In Peter R. Kingstone and Timothy J. Power, eds.Democratic Brazil: Actors, Institutions, and Processes. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
165. Kingstone, Peter R. 2006. “After the Washington Consensus: The Limits to Democratization and Development in Latin America.” Latin American Research Review 41(1): 153-64.
166. Kitschelt, Herbert, Zdenka Mansfeldova, Radoslaw Markowski, and Gabor Toka. 1999, Post-communist Party Systems: Competition, Representation, and InterParty Cooperation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
167. Klein, David, and Gregory Mitchell, eds. 2010, The Psychology of Judicial Decision Making, New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press
168. Klug, Heinz, 2000, Constituting Democracy: Law, Globalism, and South Africa’s Political Reconstruction.New York: Cambridge University Press
169. Knight, Jack, and Lee Epstein, 1996, “The Norm of Stare Decisis,” American Journal of Political Science 40(4): 1018-35
170. Koerner, Andrei, 2006. “Decisao judicial, institutes e estrutura socioeconómica por uma análise política do pensamento jurídico brasileiro.” In Andrei Koerner, ed., História da Justiga Penal no Brasil: Pesquisas e Análises.Sao Paulo: IBCCRIM
171. Kommers, Donald P., John E. Finn, and Gary J. Jacobsohn, 2004, American Constitutional Law: Essays, Cases, and Comparative Notes, Second edition.Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers
172. Konder Comparato, Fabio, 1990, “The Economic Order in the Brazilian Constitution of 1988”The American Journal of Comparative Law38(4): 753-71.
173. Kritzer, Herbert M. and Mark J. Richards, 2010, “Taking and Testing Jurisprudential Regimes Seriously: A Response to Lax and Rader.”Journal of Politics72 (April): 285-8.
174. Kuzio, Taras, 2001, “Transition in Post-Communist States: Triple or Quadruple?”Politics21(3): 168-77.
175. La Porta, Rafael 1997, “Legal Determinants of External Finance” Journal of Finance52: 1131-50.
176. Lamounier, Bolivar, 1999. “Brazil: Inequality Against Democracy.” In Larry Diamond, Jonathan Hartlyn, Juan Linz, and Seymour Martin Lipset, eds., Democracy in Developing Countries: Latin America. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.
177. Landes, William M. and Richard A. Posner, 1975, “The Independent Judiciary in an Interest-Group Perspective” Journal of Law and Economics18(3): 875-901.
178. Larkins, Christopher, 1996, “Judicial Independence and Democratization: A Theoretical and Conceptual Analysis.”The American Journal of Comparative Law44 (4): 605-26.
179. Larkins, Christopher 1998. “The Legacies of Hyper-Presidentialism: Executive-Judicial Relations, Constitutional Cultures, and The Future of Democratic Governance in Argentina and Peru.” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Southern California.
180. Lasser, Mitchel de S. O. l’E. 2004, Judicial Deliberations: A Comparative Analysis of Judicial Transparency and Legitimacy.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
181. Lasser, Mitchel de S. O. l’E 2009, Judicial Transformations: The Rights Revolution in the Courts of Europe, Oxford: Oxford University Press
182. Lauth, Han-Joachim. 2005. “The Impact of Informal Institutions on Democratic Performance: Theoretical Reflections and Empirical Findings" Paper presented at the American Political Science Association Annual Meeting, Washington, DC, September 1-4.
183. Lax, Jeffrey R. and Kelly T. Rader. 2010a. “Legal Constraints on Supreme Court Decision Making: Do Jurisprudential Regimes Exist?” Journal of Politics 72 (April): 273-84.
184. Lax, Jeffrey R. and Kelly T. Rader 2010b. “The Three Prongs of a Jurisprudential Regimes Test: A Response to Kritzer and Richards.” Journal of Politics 72 (April): 289-91.
185. Legarre, Santiago. 2004. “Una puesta al día en materia de ‘certiorari’.” La Ley 2004-A: 1267-74.
186. Levitsky. Steven. 2001. “Organization and Labor-Based Party Adaptation: The Transformation of Argentine Peronism in Comparative Perspective.”World Politics54(1): 27-56.
187. Levitsky. Steven 2003. Transforming Labor-Based Parties in Latin America: Argentine Peronism in Comparative Perspective.New York: Cambridge University Press.
188. Lieberson. Stanley. 1991. “Small N’s and Big Conclusions: An Examination of the Reasoning in Comparative Studies Based on a Small Number of Cases.” Social Forces 70(2): 307-20.
189. Linares. Sebastián. 2010. “Evaluando el gobierno judicial en América Latina: el caso de El Salvador.”Revista Latinoamericana de Política Comparada3: 69-98.
190. Llamazares. Iván. 2005. “Patterns in Contingencies: The Interlocking of Formal and Informal Political Institutions in Contemporary Argentina.”Social Forces83(4): 1671-96.
191. Llanos. Mariana, and Constanza Figueroa-Schibber. 2007. “Prestando acuerdo: El Senado frente a los nombramientos del Poder Judicial en la Argentina democrática (1983-2006). German Institute of Global and Area Studies Working Paper No. 54.
192. López-Ayllón. Sergio and Hector F. Fix-Fierro. 2003. ““Faraway, So Close!” The Rule of Law and Legal Change in Mexico 1970-2000.” In Lawrence Friedman and Rogelio Pérez-Perdomo, eds., Legal Culture in the Age of Globalization: Latin America and Latin Europe. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
193. Luhmann. Niklas. 1988. “The Unity of the Legal System.” In Gunther Tuebner, ed., Autopoietic Law: A New Approach to Law and Society. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
194. Magalhaes, Pedro C. 1999. “The Politics of Judicial Reform in Eastern Europe.” Comparative Politics 31(4): 43-62.
195. Magaloni. Beatriz. 2008. “Enforcing the Autocratic Political Order and the Role of Courts: The Case of Mexico.” In Tom Ginsburg and Tamir Moustafa, eds., Rule by Law: The Politics of Courts in Authoritarian Regimes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
196. Mahoney. James. 2000. “Path Dependence in Historical Sociology.” Theory and Society 29(4): 507-48.
197. Mainwaring. Scott. 1999. Rethinking Party Systems in the Third Wave of Democratization. Stanford: Stanford University Press
198. Malleson, Kate. 2007. “Introduction.” In Kate Malleson and Peter H. Russell, eds., Appointing Judges in an Age of Judicial Power: Critical Perspectives from around the World. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
199. Malleson, Kate, and Peter H. Russell, eds. 2007. Appointing Judges in an Age of Judicial Power: Critical Perspectives from around the World.Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
200. Manzetti, Luigio. 2003. “Political Manipulations and Market Reforms Failures.”World Politics55: 315-60.
201. March, James G. and Johan P. Olsen. 1984. “The New Institutionalism: Organizational Factors in Political Life.” The American Political Science Review 78(3): 734-49.
202. Marques de Lima, Francisco Gerson. 2001. O Supremo Tribunal Federal - Na Crise Institucional Brasileira: Estudo de Casos. Fortaleza: ABC Editora.
203. Marshall, T. H. 1950. Citizenship and Social Class, and Other Essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
204. Martinez-Lara, Javier. 1996. Building Democracy in Brazil: The Politics of Constitutional Change 1985-1995. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
205. Mate, Manoj. 2009. “The Variable Power of Courts: Rights, Governance, and the Indian Supreme Court.” Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Political Science, University of California, Berkeley.
206. Mattes, Robert, and Michael Bratton. 2001. “Africa’s Triple Transition: Popular Perspectives” African Security Review 10(1): 48-59.
207. Mattli, Walter and Anne-Marie Slaughter. 1995. “Law and Politics in the European Union: A Reply to Garrett”International Organization49(1): 183-90.
208. Mattli, Walter and Anne-Marie Slaughter 1998. “Revisiting the European Court of Justice”International Organization52(1): 177-209.
209. McAllister, Lesley. 2008. Making Law Matter: Environmental Protection and Legal Institutions in Brazil. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
210. McCubbins, Mathew D., Roger G. Noll, and Barry R. Weingast. 1987. “Administrative Procedures as Instruments of Political Control” Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization 3(2): 243-77.
211. Miller, Jonathan. 2000. “Evaluating the Argentine Supreme Court under Presidents Alfonsin and Menem (1983-1999).”Southwestern Journal of Law and Trade in the Americas7: 369-433.
212. Miller, Mark C., and Jeb Barnes. 2004. Making Policy, Making Law: An Interbranch Perspective.Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
213. Molinelli, N. Guillermo, M. Valeria Palanza, and Gisela Sin. 1999. Congreso, Presidencia y Justicia en Argentina. Buenos Aires: Temas Grupo Editorial SRL.
214. Monahan, Patrick. 1987. Politics and the Constitution: The Charter, Federalism, and the Supreme Court of Canada.Toronto: Carswell Legal Publications.
215. Montero, Alfred P. 2000. “Devolving Democracy? Political Decentralization and the New Brazilian Federalism.” In Peter R. Kingstone and Timothy J. Power, eds., Democratic Brazil: Actors, Institutions, and Processes. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
216. Montero, Alfred P. 2005. Brazilian Politics. Cambridge: Polity Press.
217. Moreira Maues, Antonio G., and Anelice F. Belem Leitao. 2003. “Dimensoes da judi-cializa^ao da politica no Brasil: as ADIns dos partidos pol iticos.” In Fernando Facury Scarr, organizador. Constitucionalizando Direitos: 15 anos da Constituigao Brasileira de 1988. Rio de Janeiro: Renovar.
218. Moustafa, Tamir. 2003. “Law versus the State: The Judicialization of Politics in Egypt.”Law and Social Inquiry28(4): 883-930.
219. Moustafa, Tamir 2007. The Struggle for Constitutional Power: Law, Politics, and Economic Development in Egypt. New York: Cambridge University Press.
220. Negretto, Gabriel L. 2004. “Government Capacities and Policy Making by Decree in Latin America.” Comparative Political Studies 37(5): 531-62.
221. Néri da Silveira, José. 1996. “O Supremo Tribunal Federal como Guardiâo dos Direitos Fundamentais.” (STF Folheto).
222. Nino, Carlos Santiago. 1993. “On the Exercise of Judicial Review in Argentina.” In Irwin P. Stotzky, ed., Transition to Democracy in Latin America: The Role of the Judiciary. Boulder: Westview Press.
223. Nino, Carlos Santiago 1996. Radical Evil on Trial.New Haven: Yale University Press.
224. Nino, Carlos SantiagoNo Hay Derecho, Año 2, No. 5 (1991); Año 2, No. 6 (1992); Año 3, No. 7 (1992); Año 3, No. 8 (1992); Año 6, No. 10 (1993).
225. North, Douglass C. 1990. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. New York: Cambridge University Press.
226. North, Douglass C., and Barry Weingast. 1989. “Constitutions and Commitment: The Evolution of Institutions Governing Public Choice in Seventeenth-Century England.” Journal of Economic History49: 803-32.
227. Nunes, Rodrigo. 2010. “Politics Without Insurance: Democratic Competition and Judicial Reform in Brazil.” Comparative Politics 42(3): 313-31.
228. O’Brien, David M. 2007. “The Politics of Judicial Selection and Appointments in Japan and Ten South and Southeast Asian Countries.” In Kate Malleson and Peter H. Russell, eds., Appointing Judges in an Age of Judicial Power: Critical Perspectives from around the World. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
229. O’Donnell, Guillermo. 1994. “Delegative Democracy.” Journal of Democracy 5(1): 55-68.
230. O’Donnell, Guillermo 2001. “Democracy, Law, and Comparative Politics.” Studies in Comparative International Development 36(1): 7-36.
231. O’Donnell, Guillermo 2006. “On Informal Institutions, Once Again.” In Gretchen Helmke and Steven Levitsky, eds., Informal Institutions and Democracy: Lessons from Latin America. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
232. O’Donnell, Guillermo and Philippe C. Schmitter. 1986. Transitions from Authoritarian Rule: Tentative Conclusions about Uncertain Democracies, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
233. O’Donnell, Guillermo, Philippe C. Schmitter, and Laurence Whitehead. 1986, Transitions from Authoritarian Rule, Volume 2: Latin America, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
234. Olson, Mancur. 1993, “Dictatorship, Democracy, and Development,”American Political Science Review87: 567-76.
235. Ostberg, C. L. and Matthew E. Wetstein, 1998, “Dimensions of Attitudes Underlying Search and Seizure Decisions of the Supreme Court of Canada,”Canadian Journal of Political Science31: 767-87.
236. Ostberg, C. L. and Matthew E. Wetstein 2002, “Attitudinal Dimensions of Supreme Court Decision Making in Canada: The Lamer Court, 1991-1995”Political Research Quarterly55: 237-58.
237. Ostberg, C. L. and Matthew E. Wetstein 2007, Attitudinal Decision Making in the Supreme Court of Canada.Vancouver: UCB Press
238. Ostberg, C. L., Matthew E. Wetstein, Donald R. Songer, and Susan W. Johnson. 2009. “Ideological Consistency and Attitudinal Confi ict: A Comparative Analysis of the U.S. and Canadian Supreme Courts.”Comparative Political Studies42 (6): 763-92.
239. Oteiza, Eduardo. 1994, La Corte Suprema: Entre la Justicia sin Política y la Política sin Justicia, Buenos Aires: Editora Platense/La Plata
240. Oxhorn, Philip D. and Graciela Ducatenzeiler, eds. 1998. What Kind of Democracy? What Kind of Market? Latin America in the Age of Neoliberalism. State College. Pennsylvania State University Press.
241. Panizza, Francisco. 2003. “Política y Econom ía de Brasil Contemporáneo.” In Vicente Palermo, ed., Política Brasileña Contemporánea: de Collor a Lula en Años de Transformación. Buenos Aires: Institute Di Tella/Siglo Veintiuno.
242. Parsons, Craig. 2007. How to Map Arguments in Political Science. New York: Oxford University Press.
243. Passos, Edilenice. 2002. Doing Legal Research in Brazil. Available on www.LLRX. com.
244. Peerenboom, Randall. 2002. China’s Long March toward Rule of Law. New York. Cambridge University Press.
245. Pellet Lastra, Arturo. 2001. Historia Política de la Corte 1930-1990. Buenos Aires. Editorial Ad-Hoc S. R. L. Villela Editora.
246. Pellet Lastra, Arturo 2003b. “140 años en los laberintos de la historia de la Cote. Una historia complicada por la falta de conocimiento del rol pol ítico del alto tribunal y la tendencia de nombrar jueces ‘adictos’.” Lexis Nexis Jurisprudencia Argentina,26 de noviembre (Número especial, “140 años de la Corte Suprema de Justicia de la Nación”), JA 2003-IV, fascículo n. 9: 43-8.
247. Pereira, Anthony W. 2000. “An Ugly Democracy: State Violence and the Rule of Law in Postauthoritarian Brazil.” In Peter Kingstone and Timothy J. Power, eds., Democratic Brazil: Actors, Institutions and Processes.Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
248. Pereira, Anthony W. 2005, Political (In) Justice, Authoritarianism and the Rule of Law in Brazil, Chile, and Argentina. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
249. Pérez-Liñán, Aníbal. 2011, “The Conditions for Effective Constitutional Adjudication: Lessons from Latin America,”Duquesne Law Review49(Spring): 133-44.
250. Pérez-Liñán, Aníbal, and Andrea Castagnola. 2009, “Presidential Control of High Courts in Latin America: A Long-term View (1904-2006),”Journal of Politics in Latin America2: 87-114.
251. Pérez Perdomo, Rogelio. 2005. “Judicialization and Regime Transformation: The Venezuelan Supreme Court.” In Rachel Sieder, Line Schjolden, and Alan Angell, eds., The Judicialization of Politics in Latin America, New York: Palgrave MacMillan
252. Perry, Amanda. 2000. “Effective Legal Systems and Foreign Direct Investment: In Search of the Evidence,”International and Comparative Law Quarterly49(4): 779-99.
253. Pierson, Paul. 2000, “Increasing Returns, Path Dependence, and the Study of Politics,”American Political Science Review, 94(2): 251-67.
254. Pollack, Mark A. 1997, “Delegation, Agency, and Agenda Setting in the European Community,”International Organization51(1): 99-134.
255. Popova, Maria, 2012, Politicized Justice in Emerging Democracies: A Study of the Courts in Russia and Ukraine, New York: Cambridge University Press
256. Posner, Richard A. 1998, “Creating a Legal Framework for Economic Development.”World Bank Research Observer13: 1-11.
257. Porto Macedo Junior, Ronaldo. 1995. “A evolu^ao institucional do Ministério Público.” In Maria Teresa Sadek, ed., Uma introdugao ao Estudo da Justiga, Sao Paulo: Editora Sumaré.
258. Power, Timothy J. 2000. “Political Institutions in Democratic Brazil: Politics as a Permanent Constitutional Convention.” In Peter R. Kingstone and Timothy J. Power, Timothy J., eds., Democratic Brazil: Actors, Institutions, and Processes. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
259. Prillaman. William C. 2000. The Judiciary and Democratic Decay in Latin America: Declining Confidence in the Rule of Law. Westport: Praeger.
260. Pritchett, C. Herman. 1948. The Roosevelt Court.New York: Macmillan.
261. Putnam, Robert. 1993. Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
262. Ramseyer. Mark. 1994. “The Puzzling (In)Dependence of Courts: A Comparative Approach.”Journal of Legal Studies 23: 721-47.
263. Rebolledo. Juan and Frances McCall Rosenbluth. 2010. “Political Competition and Judicial Integrity: The Case of Mexico.” Paper presented at the American Political Science Association Annual Meeting, Washington, DC, September 2-5.
264. Reich, Gary M. 1998. “The 1988 Constitution a Decade Later: Ugly Compromises Reconsidered” Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs 40(4): 5-24.
265. Reinhart, Carmen M., and Miguel Savastano. 2003. “The Realities of Modern Hyperinflation” Finance and Development40(2): 20-23.
266. Ribeiro de Oliveira. Marcelo. 2003. “A fiscalizaçao abstrata da constitucionalidade de normas e o processo objetivo no STF: Uma análise da evoluçao do controle de constitucionalidade no Brasil e de sua atual estrutura processual.” Dissertaçao de Mestrado na Área de Direito e Estado, Universidade de Brasilia.
267. Richards, Mark J. and Herbert M. Kritzer. 2002. “Jurisprudential Regimes in Supreme Court Decision Making.” American Political Science Review 96 (June): 305-20.
268. Rios-Figueroa. Julio. 2003. “A Minimum Condition for the Judiciary to Become an Effective Power: The Mexican Supreme Court, 1994-2002.” Paper presented at the Congress of the Latin American Studies Association, Dallas, TX, March 27-29.
269. Rios-Figueroa. Julio 2006. “Institutional Models of Judicial Independence and Corruption in Latin America.” Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Political Science, New York University.
270. Rios-Figueroa, Julio and Matthew M. Taylor. 2006. “Institutional determinants of the judicialization of policy in Brazil and Mexico.”Journal of Latin American Studies38(4): 739-66.
271. Rocha. Jean Paul Veiga da. 2004. “A Capacidade Normativa de Conjuntura no Direito Económico: O Déficit Democrático da Regulaçao Financeira.” Tese da Faculdade de Direito da Universidade de Sao Paulo.
272. Rocha. Zélio Maia da and Vicente Paulo. 2003. O Controle de Constitucionalidade nos Concursos Públicos. Brasilia: Vestcon.
273. Rodríguez-Garavito. César. 2011. “Beyond the Courtroom: The Impact of Judicial Activism on Social and Economic Rights in Latin America.” Texas Law Review 89(7): 1669-98.
274. Rohde, David W. and Harold J. Spaeth. 1976. Supreme Court Decision Making.San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.
275. Rosenn, Keith S. 1984. “Brazil’s Legal Culture: The Jeito Revisited.” Florida International Law Journal I(i): 1-43.
276. Rosenn, Keith S. 1990a. “Brazil’s New Constitution: An Exercise in Transient Constitutionalism for a Transitional Society.” The American Journal of Comparative Law 38(4): 773-802.
277. Rosenn, Keith S. 1990b. “The Success of Constitutionalism in the United States and its Failure in Latin America: An Explanation.” University of Miami Inter-American Law Review 22(1): 1-39.
278. Rosenn, Keith S. 2000. “Judicial Review in Brazil: Developments under the 1988 Constitution " Southwestern Journal of Law and Trade in the Americas 7(2): 291-319.
279. Russell, Peter H. 2007. “Conclusion.” In Kate Malleson and Peter H. Russell, eds., Appointing Judges in an Age of Judicial Power: Critical Perspectives from around the World. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
280. Sadek. Maria Teresa. 1995. “A Crise do Judiciário Vista pelos Ju ízes: Resultados da Pesquisa Quantitativa,” in Maria Teresa Sadek, ed., Uma introdugao ao Estudo da Justiga. Sao Paulo: Editora Sumaré.
281. Sadek. Maria Teresa 1999. “O Poder Judiciário na Reforma do Estado.” In Luiz Carlos Bresser Pereira. Jorge Wilheim, and Lourdes Sola, eds., Sociedade e Estado em Transformagao. Sao Paulo: Editora UNESP.
282. Sadurski, Wojciech, ed. 2002. Constitutional Justice, East and West: Democratic Legitimacy and Constitutional Courts in Post-Communist Europe in a Comparative Perspective. The Hague: Kluwer Law International.
283. Sadurski, Wojciech. 2010. “Constitutional Courts and Constitutional Culture in Central and Eastern European Countries.” In Alberto Febbrajo and Wojciech Sadurski, eds., Central and Eastern Europe After Transition: Towards a New Socio-Legal Semantics.Aldershot: Ashgate.
284. Samuels, David. 2003. “Fiscal Straitjacket: The Politics of Macroeconomic Reform in Brazil, 1995-2002.”Journal of Latin American Studies 35: 545-69.
285. Santiago, Alfonso. 1994. “La Corte de los nueve (Principales fallos institucionales 1990-93).”Anuario de Derecho de la Universidad Austral.
286. Santiago, Alfonso 1998, La Corte Suprema y el control político.Buenos Aires: Abaco
287. Santiso, Carlos. 2001. “Democratic Governance and Insulated Economic Policy: The Challenges of Divided Governance in Argentina and Brazil.” Paper presented at the VIth International Congress of CLAD on State and Local Administration Reform, Buenos Aires, November 5-9.
288. Santiso, Carlos 2004. “Economic Reform and Judicial Governance in Brazil: Balancing Independence with Accountability.” In Siri Gloppen, Robert Gargarella, and Elin Skaar, eds., Democratization and the Judiciary, London: Frank Cass.
289. Savolainen, Jukka. 1994, “The Rationality of Drawing Big Conclusions Based on Small Samples: In Defense of Mill’s Methods,”Social Forces72(4): 1217-24.
290. Scheppele, Kim Lane, 2003, “Constitutional Negotiations: Political Contexts of Judicial Activism in Post-Soviet Europe,”International Sociology18(1): 219-38.
291. Schiemann, John. 2001, “Explaining Hungary’s Powerful Constitutional Court: A Bargaining Approach,”European Journal of Sociology42(2): 357-90.
292. Schubert, Glendon, 1965, The Judicial Mind, Evanston: Northwestern University Press
293. Schwartz, Herman, 2002. “Path Dependence and Collective Action; or, the Long Road to Find Mechanisms.” Paper presented at the UC Berkeley Center for German and European Studies, April 15.
294. Schwartz, Herman 2000, The Struggle for Constitutional Justice in Post-Communist Europe, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
295. Scribner, Druscilla L. 2004. “Limiting Presidential Power: Supreme Court - Executive Relations in Argentina and Chile.” Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Political Science, University of California, San Diego.
296. Seawright, Jason. Forthcoming. Party-System Collapse: The Roots of Crisis in Peru and Venezuela, Palo Alto: Stanford University Press
297. Segal, Jeffrey A., and Harold J. Spaeth. 1993. The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model.New York: Cambridge University Press.
298. Segal, Jeffrey A., and Harold J. Spaeth 1999. Majority Rule or Minority Will: Adherence to Precedent on the U.S. Supreme Court. New York: Cambridge University Press.
299. Sepulveda Pertence, José Paulo. 2001. “O Contrôle de Constitucionalidade das Emendas Constitucionais pelo Supremo Tribunal Federal: Crônica de Jurisprudência.” Sao Paulo: Max Limonad.
300. Shapiro, Martin M. 1981. Courts: A Comparative and Political Analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
301. Shapiro, Martin M., and Alec Stone Sweet. 1994. “The New Constitutional Politics of Europe.” Comparative Political Studies 26(4): 397-421.
302. Shapiro, Martin M., and Alec Stone Sweet 2002. On Law, Politics, and Judicialization.Oxford: Oxford University Press.
303. Sieder, Rachel, Line Schjolden, and Alan Angell, eds. 2005. The Judicialization of Politics in Latin America. New York: Palgrave.
304. Sikkink, Kathryn. 2005. “The Transnational Dimension of the Judicialization of Politics in Latin America.” In Rachel Sieder, Line Schjolden, and Alan Angell, eds. 2005. The Judicialization of Politics in Latin America. New York: Palgrave.
305. Silverstein, Gordon. 2003. “Globalization and the Rule of Law: ‘A Machine That Runs of Itself’?”International Journal of Constitutional Law1(3): 427-45.
306. Simmons, Beth. 2009. Mobilizing for Human Rights: International Law in Domestic Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
307. Skidmore, Thomas E. 1988. The Politics of Military Rule in Brazil, 1964-85.New York: Oxford University Press.
308. Skidmore, Thomas E. 2000. “Forward: A New Test for Brazilian Democracy.” In Peter R. Kingstone and Timothy J. Power, eds. 2000. Democratic Brazil: Actors, Institutions, and Processes. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
309. Slaughter, Anne-Marie, Alec Stone Sweet, and Joseph Weiler. 1998. The European Courts and National Courts: Doctrine and Jurisprudence. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
310. Smith, Peter H. 1991. “Crisis and Democracy in Latin America.”World Politics43 (July): 608-34.
311. Smithey, Shannon I. and John I shiyama. 2000. “Judicious Choices: Designing Courts in Post-Communist Politics.”Communist and Post-Communist Studies33(2): 163-82.
312. Smulovitz, Catalina. 1997. “The Discovery of Law: Political Consequences in the Argentine Case.” Paper presented at the Conference, “New Challenges for the Rule of Law: Lawyers, Internationalization, and the Social Construction of Legal Rules,” organized by the American Bar Foundation, Santa Barbara, CA, November 7^ 1997.
313. Smulovitz, Catalina 2005. “Petitioning and Creating Rights: Judicialization in Argentina.” In Rachel Sieder, Line Schjolden, and Alan Angell, eds., The Judicialization of Politics in Latin America. New York: Palgrave.
314. Smulovitz, Catalina and Enrique Peruzzotti. 2003. “Societal and Horizontal Controls: Two Cases of a Fruitful Relationship.” In Scott Mainwaring and Christopher Welna, eds., Democratic Accountability in Latin America. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
315. Smyth, Regina, Anna Lowry, and Brandon Wilkening. 2007. “Engineering Victory: Institutional Reform, Informal Institutions, and the Formation of a Hegemonic Party in the Russian Federation.” Post-Soviet Affairs 23(2): 118-37.
316. Souza, Celina. 1997. Constitutional Engineering in Brazil: The Politics of Federalism and Decentralization.New York: St. Martin’s Press.
317. Souza Cruz, Álvaro Ricardo de, ed. 2003. O Supremo Tribunal Federal Revisitado. Belo Horizonte: Mandamentos Editora.
318. Souza Cruz, Álvaro Ricardo de. 2004. “Breve Histórico do Supremo Tribunal Federal e do Controle de Constitucionalidade Brasileiro.” In José Adércio Leite Sampaio, ed., Crises e Desafios da Constituiçâo: Perspectivas Críticas da Teoria e das Prácticas Constitucionais Brasileiras.Belo Horizonte: Del Rey.
319. Souza Júnior, Antonio Umberto de. 2004. O Supremo Tribunal Federal e as Questoes Políticas. Sao Paulo: Sintese.
320. Spriggs II, James F. 1997. “Explaining Federal Bureaucratic Compliance with Supreme Court Opinions.”Political Research Quarterly50: 567-93.
321. Stark, David. 1994. “Path Dependence and Privatization Strategies in East Central Europe.” In János Mátyás Kovács, ed., Transition to Capitalism?: The Communist Legacy in Eastern Europe. Edison, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
322. Stark, David, and Laszlo Bruszt. 1998. Postsocialist Pathways: Transforming Politics and Property in East Central Europe. New York: Cambridge University Press.
323. Staton, Jeffrey. 2002. “Judicial Activism and Public Authority Compliance: The Role of Public Support in the Mexican Separation-of-Powers System.” Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Political Science, Washington University.
324. Staton, Jeffrey 2004. “Judicial Policy Implementation in Mexico City and Mérida.” Comparative Politics 37(1): 41-60.
325. Staton, Jeffrey 2006. “Constitutional Review and the Selective Promotion of Case Results.” American Journal of Political Science 50(1): 98-112.
326. Staton, Jeffrey 2010. Judicial Power and Strategic Communication in Mexico. New York: Cambridge University Press.
327. Staton, Jeffrey and Georg Vanberg. 2008. “The Value of Vagueness: Delegation, Defiance, and Judicial Opinions.”American Journal of Political Science52(3): 504-19.
328. Stepan, Alfred. 1989. Democratizing Brazil: Problems of Transition and Consolidation. New York: Oxford University Press.
329. Stokes, Susan C. 2001. Mandates and Democracy: Neoliberalism by Surprise in Latin America. New York: Cambridge University Press.
330. Stone, Geoffrey R. 2010. “Understanding Supreme Court Confirmations.” In Dennis J. Hutchinson, David A. Strauss, and Geoffrey R. Stone, eds., The Supreme Court Review.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
331. Stone Sweet, Alec. 1999. “Judicialization and the Construction of Governance.” Comparative Political Studies 32(2): 147-184.
332. Stone Sweet, Alec 2000. Governing with Judges: Constitutional Politics in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
333. Stone Sweet, Alec 2002. “Constitutional Courts and Parliamentary Democracy.” Western European Politics 25(1): 77-100.
334. Stras, David R. 2008. “Understanding the New Politics of Judicial Appointments.”Texas Law Review86: 1033-78.
335. Sunstein, Cass. 1993. “Against Positive Rights.”East European Constitutional Review 35-8.
336. Tamanaha, Brian. 1996. “The Internal/External Distinction and the Notion of a ‘Practice’ in Legal Theory and Sociolegal Studies.” Law and Society Review 30(1): 163-204.
337. Tate, C. Neal, and Torbjorn Vallinder, eds. 1995. The Global Expansion of Judicial Power.New York: New York University Press.
338. Taylor, Matthew. 2004a. “Activating Judges: Courts, Institutional Structure, and the Judicialization of Policy Reform in Brazil, 1988-2002.” Doctoral Dissertation, Department of Government, Georgetown University.
339. Taylor, Matthew 2004b. Veto and Voice in the Brazilian Judiciary: Strong Courts, Institutional Frameworks, and Policy Change. Paper presented at the Southern Political Science Association Annual Meeting, New Orleans, LA, January 8-10.
340. Taylor, Matthew 2006. “Courts, Policy Contestation and the Legitimation of Economic Reform under Cardoso.” In Lourdes Sola and Laurence Whitehead, eds., Statecraft and Monetary Authority: Democracy and Financial Order in Brazil.Oxford: Centre for Brazilian Studies.
341. Taylor, Matthew 2008. Judging Policy: Courts and Policy Reform in Democratic Brazil.Stanford: Stanford University Press.
342. Teixeira. Ariosto Alberto Paz. 1997. “A Judicializa^ao da Política no Brasil (19901996).” Tese do Mestrado em Ciencia Política, Universidade de Brasilia.
343. Thelen. Kathleen. 1999. “Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Politics.”American Review of Political Science2: 369-404.
344. Trochev. Alexei. 2004. “Less Democracy, More Courts: A Puzzle of Judicial Review in Russia.” Law and Society Review 38(3): 513-38.
345. Trochev. Alexei 2008. Judging Russia: Constitutional Court in Russian Politics1990-2006.New York: Cambridge University Press.
346. Trubeck. David, and Alvaro Santos, eds. 2006. The New Law and Economic Development.New York and Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
347. Ungar, Mark. 2002. Elusive Reform: Democracy and the Rule of Law in Latin America. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
348. Uprimny, Rodrigo. 2004. “The Constitutional Court and Control of Presidential Extraordinary Powers in Colombia.” In Siri Gloppen, Roberto Gargarella, and Elin Skaar, eds., Democratization and the Judiciary: The Accountability Function of Courts in New Democracies.London: Frank Cass Publishers.
349. Vanberg. Georg. 1998. “Abstract Judicial Review: Legislative Bargaining and Policy Compromise.”Journal of Theoretical Politics10: 299-346.
350. Vanberg. Georg 2001. “Legislative-Judicial Relations: A Game Theoretic Approach to Constitutional Review.”American Journal of Political Science45: 346-61.
351. Vanberg. Georg 2005. The Politics of Constitutional Review in Germany.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
352. Verbitsky. Horacio. 1993. Hacer la Corte.Buenos Aires: Planeta.
353. Vidal Luna. Francisco, and Herbert S. Klein. 2006. Brazil Since 1980. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
354. Vilhena Vieira. Oscar. 1999. A Constituigao e Sua Reserva de Justiga. Sao Paulo: Malheiros Editores.
355. Vilhena Vieira. Oscar 2002. Supremo Tribunal Federal: Jurisprudencia Política.Sao Paulo: Malheiros Editores.
356. Viotti da Costa, Emilia. 2001. O Supremo Tribunal Federal e a Construgao da Cidadania. Sao Paulo: IEJE (Instituto de Estudos Jurídicos e Económicos).
357. Voeten. Eric. 2007. “The Politics of International Judicial Appointments: Evidence from the European Court of Human Rights.”International Organization61: 669-701.
358. VonDoepp. Peter, and Rachel Ellett. 2011. “Reworking Strategic Models of Executive-Judicial Relations: Insights from New African Democracies.”Comparative Politics 43(2): 147-65.
359. Wasby, Stephen L. 1970. The Impact of the United States Supreme Court: Some Perspectives.Homewood: The Dorsey Press.
360. Weber, Max (Guenther Roth and Claus Wittich, eds). 1978. Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology. Berkeley: University of California Press.
361. Wechsler, Herbert. 1959. “Toward Neutral Principles of Constitutional Law.” Harvard Law Review 73(1): 1-35.
362. Weingast, Barry. 1993. “Constitutions as Governance Structures: The Political Foundations of Secure Markets.”Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics149: 286-311.
363. Werneck Vianna, Luiz, 1999. A Judicializagao Da Politica e Das Relagoes Sociais No Brasil.Rio de Janeiro: Editora Revan.
364. Weyland, Kurt. 1996. Democracy Without Equity: Failures of Reform in Brazil. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
365. Weyland, Kurt 2000. “The Brazilian State in the New Democracy.” In Peter R. Kingstone and Timothy J. Power, eds., Democratic Brazil: Actors, Institutions, and Processes. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
366. Weyland, Kurt 2002. The Politics of Market Reform in Fragile Democracies: Argentina, Brazil, Peru, and Venezuela. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
367. Whittington, Keith. 2000. “Once More Unto the Breach: Post-Behavioral Approaches to Judicial Politics.”Law and Social Inquiry25: 601-32.
368. Williamson. Oliver E. 1994. The Institutions and Governance of Economic Development and Reform. Working Paper, University of California at Berkeley.
369. Wilson. Bruce M. 2005. “Changing Dynamics: The Political Impact of Costa Rica’s Constitutional Court.” In Rachel Sieder. Line Schjolden, and Alan Angell, eds., The Judicialization of Politics in Latin America. New York: Palgrave.
370. Wilson. Bruce M., and Juan C. Rodriguez Cordero. 2006. “Legal Opportunity Structures and Social Movements: The Effects of Institutional Change on Costa Rican Politics.” Comparative Political Studies39(3): 325-51.
371. Wittes. Benjamin. 2006. Confirmation Wars: Preserving Independent Courts in Angry Times. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
372. Zakaria. Fareed. 1997. “The Rise of Illiberal Democracy.” Foreign Affairs 76(6): 22-43.
373. Zakaria. Fareed 2003. The Future of Freedom: Illiberal Democracy at Home and Abroad.New York: W. W. Norton.
374. Zaverucha. Jorge. 1998. “1988 Brazilian Constitution and Its Authoritarian Legacy: Formalizing Democracy While Gutting its Essence.”The Journal of Third World Studies15(1): 105-24.