Judicial review in new democracies: Constitutional courts in asian cases

Judicial Review in New Democracies: Constitutional Courts in Asian Cases

Volumn , Issue , 2003, Pages 1-295

  GinsburgC, Tom ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84922946466     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511511189     Document Type: Book

References (318)

1. Aba-Namay, Rashed. “The Recent Constitutional Reforms in Saudi Arabia.” International and Comparative Law Quarterly 42, no. 3 (1993): 295–331.
2. Abe, Masaki. “Internal Control of a Bureaucratic Judiciary: The Case of Japan.” International Journal of the Sociology of Law 23 (1995): 303–20.
3. Abel, Richard, and Philip Lewis. Lawyers in Society. 3 vols. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1988.
4. Ackerman, Bruce. We the People: Foundations. Cambridge, MA: Belknap, 1993.
5. Ackerman, Bruce. “The Rise of World Constitutionalism.” Virginia Law Review 83, no. 4 (1997): 771–97.
6. Ackerman, Bruce. We the People: Tranformations. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1998.
7. Ahdieh, Robert. Russia’s Constitutional Revolution. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1997.
8. Ahn, Kyong-whan. “The Growth of the Bar and the Changes in the Lawyer’s Role: Korea’s Dilemma.” In Law and Technology in the Pacific Community, edited by Philip S. C. Lewis, 119–34. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1994.
9. Ahn, Kyong-whan. “The Influence of American Constitutionalism on South Korea.” Southern Illinois Law Journal 27 (1998): 71.
10. Ainsworth, Janet E. “Categories and Culture: On the ‘Rectification of Names’ in Comparative Law.” Cornell Law Review 82 (1996): 19–42.
11. Akande, Dapo. “The International Court of Justice and the Security Council: Is There Room for Judicial Control of Decisions of the Political Organs of the United Nations?” International and ComparativeLawQuarterly 46, no. 2 (1997): 309–43.
12. Alexander, Larry, and Frederick Schauer. “On Extrajudicial Constitutional Interpretation.” Harvard Law Review 110, no. 7 (1997): 1359–87.
13. Alvarez, Jose. “Judging the Security Council.” American Journal of International Law 90 (1996): 1.
14. Aman, Alfred. Administrative Law in a Global Era. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1992.
15. Amsden, Alice. Asia’s Next Giant. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989.
16. Anand, Adarsh Sein. “Protection of Human Rights through Judicial Review in India.” In Judicial Review in International Perspective: Liber Amicorum Lord Slynn, edited by Mats Andenas, 381–93. The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2000.
17. Arnold, Bruce, and Fiona May. “Social Capital, Violations of Trust and the Vulnerability of Isolates: The Social Organization of Law Practice and Professional Self-Regulation.” Paper presented at the Meetings of the Law and Society Association, Toronto, Canada, 1995.
18. Bailey, William Somers. “Reducing Malapportionment in Japan’s Electoral Districts: The Supreme Court Must Act.” Pacific Rim Law and Policy Journal 6, no. 1 (1997): 169.
19. Bainbridge, Stephen M. “Why a Board? Group Decisionmaking in Corporate Governance.” Vanderbilt Law Review 55 (2002): 1–34.
20. Batbayar, Ts. “Mongolia in 1993.” Asian Survey 34 (1994): 41–45.
21. Batbayar, Ts. Collected Essays. Ulaanbaatar: Mongolian Academy of Sciences, 1997.
22. Batchelor, Stephen. TheAwakening of theWest. Berkeley, CA: Parallax Press, 1994.
23. Bauer, Joanne R., and Daniel Bell, eds. The East Asian Challenge for Human Rights. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1999.
24. Baum Julian. “Under My Thumb.” Far Eastern Economic Review (Feb. 26, 1998): 26–27.
25. Baum, Lawrence. The Puzzle of Judicial Behavior. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1997.
26. Bawden, Charles R. A Modern History of Mongolia, 2d ed. London: Kegan Paul, 1989.
27. Bayar, S. “Mongolia’s National Security Challenges.” San Francisco: Center for Asian Pacific Affairs, Report No. 16, Sept. 1994.
28. Beatty, David. Constitutional Law in Theory and in Practice. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1995.
29. Bedeski, Robert E. The Transformation of South Korea: Reform and Reconstitution in the Sixth Republic under Roh Tae Woo, 1987–1992. New York: Routledge, 1994.
30. Bell, Daniel. East MeetsWest: Human Rights and Democracy in East Asia. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2000.
31. Bell, Daniel, David Brown, Kanishika Jayasuriya, and David Martin Jones. Towards Illiberal Democracy in Pacific Asia. New York: St. Martins Press, 1995.
32. Berman, Harold. Justice in the USSR. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1963.
33. Berman, Harold. Law and Revolution. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1985.
34. Bickel, Alexander. The Least Dangerous Branch: The Supreme Court at the Bar of American Politics, 2d ed. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1986.
35. Black, Charles L. A New Birth of Freedom: Human Rights, Named and Unnamed. New York: Grosset/Putnam, 1998.
36. Bodde, Derk, and Clarence Morris. Law in Imperial China. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1967.
37. Brzezinski, Mark. The Struggle for Constitutionalism in Poland. New York: St. Martins Press, 1998.
38. Buchanan, James, The Limits of Liberty. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1975.
39. Burley, Anne Marie, and Walter Mattli. “Europe Before the Court.” International Organization 47 (1993): 41–76.
40. Butler, W. E. The Mongolian Legal System. Boston, MA: Kluwer, 1982.
41. Cappelletti, Mauro. Judicial Review in the ContemporaryWorld. New York: Bobbs- Merrill, 1971.
42. Cappelletti, Mauro. The Judicial Process in Comparative Perspective. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1989.
43. Carothers, Thomas. “The Rule of Law Revival.” Foreign Affairs 35 (1997): 23.
44. Carrasco, Enrique. “Rhetoric, Race and the Asian Crisis.” Los Angeles Times, Jan. 1, 1998.
45. Carrasco, Enrique. “Tough Sanctions: The Asian Crisis and the New Colonialism.” Chicago Tribune, Jan. 3, 1998.
46. Central News Agency. “Party Screening Committee Puts off DPP Independence Case.” Feb. 20, 1992.
47. Chang, Wen-chen. Transition to Democracy, Constitutionalism and Judicial Activism: Taiwan in Comparative Constitutional Perspective. Unpublished J.S.D. dissertation, Yale Law School, June 2001.
48. Chang, Yook-Seok. “Prosecutor’s Discretionary Power in the Republic of Korea.” UNAFEI Resource Material Series 49 (1997): 69–78.
49. Chao, Linda, and Ramon Myers. The First Chinese Democracy: Political Life in the Republic of China on Taiwan. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1998.
50. Chen, Paul Heng-cha. Chinese Legal Tradition under the Mongols. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1979.
51. Cheng, Tun-jen. “Democratizing the Quasi-Leninist Regime in Taiwan.” World Politics 41 (1987): 471–99.
52. Cheng, Tun-jen, and Stephen Haggard, eds. Political Change in Taiwan. Boulder, CD: Lynne Reiner, 1992.
53. Cheng, Tun-jen, and Yi-shing Lao. “Taiwan in 1997: An Embattled Government in Search of New Opportunities.” Asian Survey 38, no. 1 (1998): 53–63.
54. Chiu, Hungdah. “Constitutional Development and Reform in the Republic of China on Taiwan.” Issues and Studies 29 (1993): 1–38.
55. Chiu, Hungdah, and Jyh-Pin Fa. “Taiwan’s Legal System and Legal Profession.” In Taiwan Trade and Investment Law, edited by Mitchell Silk, 21–42. New York: Oxford University Press, 1994.
56. Cho, Kuk. “Tension Between the National Security Law and Constitutionalism in South Korea: Security for What?” Boston University International Law Journal 15 (1997): 125.
57. Choi, Dae-kwon. “InformalWays vs. the Formal Law in Korea.” Paper presented at the Research Committee on the Sociology of Law Meeting, Tokyo, Japan, July 1995.
58. Choi, Sang-yong, ed. Democracy in Korea: Its Ideals and Realities. Seoul: Korean Political Science Association, 1997.
59. Chu, Lawrence. “Legislators Pass Amendments to Hooligan Control Act.” Central News Agency, Dec. 30, 1996.
60. Chu, Yun-han. “Taiwan’s Unique Challenges.” Journal of Democracy 7, no. 3 (1997): 69–82.
61. Clark, Cal, and K.C. Roy. Comparing Development Patterns in Asia. Boulder, CO: Lynne Reiner, 1997.
62. Clark, Donald, ed. The Kwangju Uprising: Shadows over the Regime in South Korea. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1988.
63. Clinton, Robert Lowry. Marbury v. Madison and Judicial Review. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 1989.
64. Clinton, Robert Lowry. “Game Theory, Legal History and the Origins of Judicial Review: A Revisionist Analysis of Marbury v. Madison.” American Journal of Political Science 38, no. 2 (1994): 285–302.
65. Constitutional Court of Korea. Constitutional Justice in Korea. Seoul, 1993.
66. Constitutional Court of Korea. The Constitutional Court. Seoul, 1997.
67. Constitutional Court of Korea. The First Ten Years of the Korean Constitutional Court. Seoul, 2001.
68. Cooney, Sean. “The New Taiwan and Its Old Labour Law: Authoritarian Legislation in a Democratised Society.” Comparative Labor Law Journal 18, no. 1 (1996): 1–61.
69. Cooney, Sean. “Taiwan’s Emerging Liberal Democracy and the New Constitutional Review.” In Asian Laws Through Australian Eyes, edited by Veronica Taylor, Sydney, 141–60. LBC Information Systems, 1997.
70. Cooney, Sean. “Why Taiwan Is Not Hong Kong: A Review of the PRC’s ‘One Country Two Systems’ Model for Reunification with Taiwan.” Pacific Rim Law and Policy Journal 6 (1997): 497.
71. Cooney, Sean. “A Community Changes: Taiwan’s Council of Grand Justices and Liberal Democratic Reform.” In Law, Capitalism and Power in East Asia, edited by Kanishka Jayasuriya, 253–81. New York: Routledge, 1999.
72. Cooter, Robert. The Strategic Constitution. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2000.
73. Cooter, Robert, and Tom Ginsburg. “Comparative Judicial Discretion – An Empirical Test of Economic Models.” International Review of Law and Economics 16 (1996): 295–313.
74. Dadomo, Christian, and Susan Farran. French Substantive Law. London: Sweet and Maxwell, 1997.
75. Dahl, Robert. “Decision-making in a Democracy: The Supreme Court as a National Policy-maker.” Journal of Public Law 6 (1957): 279.
76. Dahl, Robert. Democracy and Its Critics. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1989.
77. Dahl, Robert. “Thinking About Democratic Constitutions: Conclusions from Democratic Experience.” In Nomos XXXVIII: Political Order, edited by Ian Shapiro and Russell Hardin, 175–206. New York: New York University Press, 1996.
78. Dashpurev, D., and S. Soni. Reign of Terror in Mongolia. Absecon Highlands, NJ: South Asian Publishers, 1992.
79. Davis, Michael, ed. Human Rights and Chinese Values. New York: Oxford University Press, 1995.
80. Davis, Michael. “Constitutionalism and Political Culture: The Debate over Human Rights and Asian Values.” Harvard Human Rights Journal 11 (1998): 109.
81. Davis, Michael. “The Price of Rights: Constitutionalism and East Asian Economic Development.” Human Rights Quarterly 20 (1998): 303.
82. De Bary, William Theodore. The Liberal Tradition in China. New York: Columbia University Press (1983).
83. De Bary, William Theodore. “The ‘Constitutional Tradition’ in China.” Journal of Asian Law 9, no. 1 (1995): 7–34.
84. De Bary, William Theodore. AsianValues and Human Rights. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1998.
85. Devins, Neal. Shaping Constitutional Values: Elected Government, the Supreme Court, andthe Abortion Debate. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1996.
86. Devins, Neal, and Louis Fisher. “Judicial Exclusivity and Political Instability.” Virginia Law Review 84 (1998): 83.
87. Diamond, Larry. “Is the Third Wave Over?” Journal of Democracy 7 (1996): 20.
88. Dicey, Albert V. Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution, 8th ed. London: Macmillan, 1915.
89. Drexl, Josef. “Was Sir Francis Drake a Dutchman? – British Supremacy of Parliament after Factortame.” AmericanJournal ofComparativeLaw 41 (1993): 551–71.
90. Dreyer, June Teufel. Testimony Before Asian Affairs Subcommittee, U.S. House of Representatives, Hearings on Taiwan, Sept. 24, 1991.
91. Elman, Benjamin A. “Confucianism and Modernization: A Reevaluation.” In Confucianism and Modernization: A Symposium, edited by Joseph P. L. Jiang, 1–19. Taipei: Freedom Council, 1987.
92. Elster, Jon. “Forces and Mechanisms in the Constitution-Making Process.” Duke Law Journal 45 (1995): 364–96.
93. Elster, Jon. “Limiting Majority Rule: Alternatives to Judicial Review in the Revolutionary Epoch.” In Constitutional Justice under Old Constitutions, edited by Eivind Smith, 3–22. The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 1995.
94. Elster, Jon. “Introduction.” In The Roundtable Talks and the Breakdown of Communism, edited by Jon Elster, 1–20. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1996.
95. Elster, Jon, ed. Ulysses Unbound. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2000.
96. Elster, Jon, Claus Offe, and Ulrich K. Preuss. Institutional Design inPost-Communist Societies. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1998.
97. Ely, John Hart. Democracy and Distrust. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1980.
98. Emery, C. T., and B. Smythe. Judicial Review. London: Sweet and Maxwell, 1986.
99. Epp, Charles R. The Rights Revolution: Lawyers, Activists and Supreme Courts in Comparative Perspective. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1998.
100. Epstein, Lee, and Jack Knight. The Choices Justices Make. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press, 1998.
101. Eskridge, William. “The Judicial Review Game.” Northwestern University Law Review 88 (1993): 382.
102. Eskridge, William. Dynamic Statutory Interpretation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1994.
103. Eskridge, William, and John Ferejohn. “Politics, Interpretation, and the Rule of Law.” In Nomos XXXVI: The Rule of Law, edited by Ian Shapiro, 265–94. New York: New York University Press, 1994.
104. Evans, Peter. Embedded Autonomy: States and Industrial Transformation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1995.
105. Fa, Jyh-pin. A Comparative Study of Judicial Review under Nationalist Chinese and American Constitutional Law. Asian Studies Occasional Reprints Series No. 3. Baltimore: University of Maryland School of Law, 1980.
106. Fa, Jyh-pin. “Constitutional Developments in Taiwan: The Role of the Council of Grand Justices.” International and Comparative Law Quarterly 40 (1991): 198–209.
107. Faundez, Julio, ed. Good Government and Law: Legal and Institutional Reform in Developing Countries. New York: St. Martins Press, 1997.
108. Feldman, David. “Parliamentary Scrutiny of Legislation and Human Rights.” Public Law (summer 2002): 323–48.
109. Feldman, Harvey J., ed. Constitutional Reform and the Future of the Republic of China. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe, 1991.
110. Finkel, Jodi S. “The Implementation of Judicial Reform in Peru in the 1990s.” Paper presented at the American Political Science Association Meetings, San Francisco, CA, Aug. 2001.
111. Fish, M. Steven. Democracy from Scratch: Opposition and Regime in theNewRussian Revolution. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1995.
112. Fish, M. Steven. “The Perils of Russian Superpresidentialism.” Current History 96, no. 612 (1997): 326–30.
113. Fisher, Louis. Constitutional Dialogues. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1988.
114. Fiss, Owen. “The Right Degree of Independence.” In Transitions to Democracy in Latin America: The Role of the Judiciary, edited by Irwin P. Stotzky, 55–72. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1993.
115. Folsom, Ralph, John Minan, and Lee Ann Otto. Law and Politics in the People’s Republic of China. St. Paul, MN: West Publishing, 1992.
116. Fox, Gregory H., and Georg Nolte. “Intolerant Democracies.” Harvard International Law Journal 36, no. 1 (1995): 1–70.
117. Fox, Russell A. “Confucian and Communitarian Responses to Liberal Democracy.” Review of Politics 59 (1997): 561–92.
118. Freedom House. Freedom in theWorld. Washington, DC: 1986–99.
119. Friedman, Barry. “Dialogue and Judicial Review.” Michigan Law Review 91 (1993): 577.
120. Friedman, Barry. “A History of the Countermajoritarian Difficulty, Part One: The Road to Judicial Supremacy.” N.Y.U. Law Review 73 (1998): 333.
121. Fuller, Lon. The Morality of Law. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1964.
122. Gadbois, George H., Jr. “The Institutionalization of the Supreme Court of India.” In Comparative Judicial Systems: Challenging Frontiers in Conceptual and Empirical Analysis, edited by John Schmidhauser, 111–42. Boston, MA: Butterworths, 1987.
123. Ganzorig, Gombosurengin. “The Relationship between the Constitutional and Supreme Court of Mongolia,” Journal of East European Law 7, nos. 3–4 (2000): 667–94.
124. Garrett, Geoffrey. “From the Luxembourg Compromise to Codecision: Decision Making in the European Union.” Electoral Studies 14 (1995): 289–308.
125. Garrett, Geoffrey. “The Politics of Legal Integration in the European Union.” International Organization 49 (1995): 175–81.
126. Garrett, Geoffrey, and George Tsebelis. “An Institutional Critique of Intergovernmentalism.” International Organization 50 (1996): 269–99.
127. Geertz, Clifford. The Interpretation of Cultures. New York: Basic Books, 1973.
128. Gely, Rafael, and Pablo Spiller. “The Political Economy of Supreme Court Constitutional Decisions: The Case of Roosevelt’s Court-Packing Plan.” International Review of Law and Economics 12 (1992): 45–67.
129. Ginsburg, Tom. “The Transformation of Legal Institutions in Mongolia, 1990– 1993.” Issues and Studies 12 (1994): 77–113.
130. Ginsburg, Tom. “Between Russia and China: Political Reform in Mongolia.” Asian Survey 35 (1995): 459–71.
131. Ginsburg, Tom. “Deepening Democracy: Mongolia in 1997.” Asian Survey 38 (1998): 64–68.
132. Ginsburg, Tom. “Confucian Constitutionalism? The Emergence of Judicial Review in Korea and Taiwan.” Law and Social Inquiry 27 (2002): 763–99.
133. Ginsburg, Tom. “Economic Analysis and the Design of Constitutional Courts.” Theoretical Inquiries in Law 3 (2002): 49–85.
134. Ginsburg, Tom, and G. Ganzorig. “Constitutionalism and Human Rights in Mongolia.” In Mongolia in Transition, edited by Ole Bruun and Ole Odgaard, 147–64. London: Curzon Press/Nordic Institute of Asian Studies, 1996.
135. Ginsburgs, George. “The Constitutional Courts of Eastern Europe.” Review of Central and Eastern European Law 18 (1992): 6.
136. Glendon, Mary Ann. Abortion and Divorce in Western Law. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press, 1987.
137. Glenn, H. Patrick. Legal Traditions of the World. New York: Oxford Univeristy Press, 2000.
138. Gold, Thomas. State and Society in the Taiwan Miracle. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe, 1986.
139. Gold, Thomas. “Factors in Taiwan’s Democratic Transition.” Paper presented at the conference Consolidating the Third Wave Democracies, Institute of National Policy Research, Taipei, Taiwan, Aug. 27–30, 1995.
140. Goldsworthy, Jeffrey. The Sovereignty of Parliament: History and Philosophy. New York: Oxford University Press, 1999.
141. Goodman, John B. Monetary Sovereignty: The Politics of Central Banking inWestern Europe. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1992.
142. Griffin, Stephen. American Constitutionalism: From Theory to Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1996.
143. Gutmann, Amy, and Dennis Thompson. DemocracyandDisagreement. Cambridge, MA: Belknap, 1996.
144. Habermas, Jurgen. Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1996.
145. Haggard, Stephen, and Robert Kaufmann. The Political Economy of Democratic Transitions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1995.
146. Hahm, Pyong-choon. The Korean Political Tradition and Law. Seoul: Royal Asiatic Society, 1987.
147. Hahm, Sung-deuk, and L. Christopher Plein. After Development: The Transformation of the Korean Presidency and Bureaucracy. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 1997.
148. Halmai, Gabor, and Kim Lane Scheppele. “Living Well Is the Best Revenge: The Hungarian Approach to Judging the Past.” In Transitional Justice and the Rule of Law in New Democracies, edited by James McAdams, 155–84. Notre Dame, IN: Notre Dame University Press, 1997.
149. Hamilton, Gary, and Cheng-shu Kao. “Max Weber and the Analysis of the Asian Industrialization.” University of California at Davis, Research Program in East Asian Culture and Development, Working Paper No. 2, 1986.
150. Han, Sung-joo. “South Korea: Politics in Transition.” In Democracy in Korea: Its Ideals and Realities, edited by Sang-yong Choi, 21–47. Seoul: Korean Political Science Association, 1997.
151. Heaton, William. “Mongolia in 1990.” Asian Survey 31 (1991): 1.
152. Henderson, Gregory. Korea: Politics of the Vortex. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1968.
153. Henkin, Louis. The Age of Rights. New York: Columbia University Press, 1996.
154. Hirschman, Albert O. Exit, Voice and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations and States. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1972.
155. Hofnung, Menachem. “The Unintended Consequences of Unplanned Constitutional Reform: Constitutional Politics in Israel.” American Journal of Comparative Law 44, no. 4 (1996): 585–604.
156. Holland, Peter. “Towards Constitutionalism: The First Term of the Constitutional Court of South Korea.” In Asian Laws Through Australian Eyes, edited by Veronica Taylor. Sydney: LBC Information Systems, 1997.
157. Holmes, Stephen. “Precommitment and the Paradox of Democracy.” In Constitutionalism and Democracy, edited by Jon Elster and Rune Slagstad, 175–240. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988.
158. Hood, Steven J. The Kuomintang and the Democratization of Taiwan. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1997.
159. Hulan, H. “Mongolia’s New Constitutional Regime: Institutional Tensions and Political Consequences.” Mongolian Journal of International Affairs 3 (1996): 42.
160. Huntington, Samuel. The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking ofWorld Order. New York: Simon & Schuster, 1996.
161. Huntington, Samuel. “After Twenty Years: The Future of the ThirdWave.” Journal of Democracy 8, no. 4 (1997): 3–12.
162. Ishiyama, John, and Matthew Velten. “Presidential Power and Democratic Development in Post-Communist Politics.” Communist and Post-Communist Studies 31 (1998): 217–34.
163. Jennings, Jeremy. “From ‘Imperial State to l’Etat de Droit’: Benjamin Constant, Blandine Kriegel and the Reform of the French Constitution.” In Constitutionalism in Transformation: European and Theoretical Perspectives, edited by Richard Bellamy and Dario Castiglione, 76–92. London: Blackwell, 1996.
164. Judicial Yuan of the Republic of China. The Grand Justices and Constitutional Court of the Republic of China. Taipei: 1995.
165. Kahn, Paul W. The Reign of Law: Marbury v. Madison and the Construction of America. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1997.
166. Kelsen, Hans. “La garantie jurisdictionnel de la constitution.” Revue de droit public 44 (1928): 197–257.
167. Kenney, Sally J., William M. Reisinger, and John C. Reitz, eds. Constitutional Dialogues in Comparative Perspective. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1999.
168. King, Ambrose Y. C. “State Confucianism and Its Transformation in Taiwan.” In Confucian Traditions in East Asian Modernity: Moral Education and Economic Culture in Japan and the Four Mini-Dragons, edited by Wei-ming Tu, 228–43. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1996.
169. Klarman, Michael J. “How Great Were the ‘Great’ Marshall Court Decisions?” Virginia Law Review 87 (2001): 1111–84.
170. Klingsberg, Ethan. “Judicial Review and Hungary’s Transition from Communism to Democracy: The Constitutional Court, the Continuity of Law and the Redefinition of Property Rights.” B.Y.U. Law Review (1992): 41–144.
171. Klug, Heinz. Constituting Democracy: Law, Globalism and South Africa’s Political Reconstruction. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2000.
172. Kodderitsch, Lorenz. “Japan’s New Administrative Procedures Law: Reasons for Its Enactment and Likely Implications.” Law in Japan 24 (1994): 105.
173. Kommers, Donald. The Constitutional Jurisprudence of the Federal Republic of Germany, 2d ed. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1997.
174. Kommers, Donald. “Building Democracy: Judicial Review and the German Rechtstaat.” In The Postwar Transformation of Germany: Democracy, Prosperity andNationhood, edited by John Brady, Beverly Crawford, and Sarah E.Wiliarty, 94–121. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1999.
175. Koo, Hagen, ed. State and Society in Contemporary Korea. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1993.
176. Koopmans, T. “Comparative Law and the Courts.” American Journal of Comparative Law 45 (1996): 545–56.
177. Kritz, Neil, ed. Transitional Justice:HowEmerging Democracies Reckon with Former Regimes, 3 vols. Washington, DC: U.S. Institute for Peace, 1995.
178. Krug, Peter. “Departure from the Centralized Model: The Russian Supreme Court and Constitutional Control of Legislation.” Virginia Journal of InternationalLaw 37 (1997): 725–87.
179. Kuo, Deborah. “Grand Justices Say Conscription Regulation Unconstitutional.” China News Agency, Dec. 26, 1997.
180. Kyvig, David. “The Road Not Taken.” Political Science Quarterly 104 (1989): 473.
181. Laakso, Markku, and Rein Taagepera. “Effective Number of Parties: A Measure with Application to Western Europe.” Comparative Political Studies 12 (1979): 3–27.
182. Landes, William, and Richard Posner. “The Independent Judiciary in an Interest- Group Perspective.” Journal of Law and Economics 18 (1975): 875.
183. Larkin, Christopher. “Judicial Independence and Democratization: A Theoretical and Conceptual Analysis.” American Journal of Comparative Law 44, no. 4 (1996): 605–26.
184. Lattimore, Owen. Nationalism and Revolution in Mongolia. New York: Oxford University Press, 1955.
185. Lattimore, Owen. Studies in Frontier History. New York: Oxford University Press, 1962.
186. Lawyers Committee for Human Rights. Halfway to Reform: The World Bank and the Venezuelan Justice System. New York: Lawyers Committee for Human Rights/Provena, 1996.
187. Lee, Teng-hui. “Chinese Culture and Political Renewal.” Journal of Democracy 6, no. 4 (1995): 3–8.
188. Leigh, Ian. “Taking Rights Proportionately: Judicial Review, the Human Rights Act and Strasbourg.” Public Law (2002): 265–87.
189. Lessig, Lawrence. “Introduction: Roundtable on Redesigning the Russian Court” East European Constitutional Review 3, no. 3–4 (1994): 72–74.
190. Li, Nigel T., and Joyce C. Fan. “An Uncommon Case of Bigamy: An Uncommon Constitutional Interpretation.” Journal of Chinese Law 4, no. 3 (1990): 69–81.
191. Li, Nigel T. “The Less-Restrictive-Means Principle – A More or Less Restrictive Methodology?” Paper presented at Conference on the Evolving U.S. Constitution, 1787–1987, Institute of American Culture, Academica Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan, June 2–4, 1988.
192. Lijphart, Arend. Democracies: Patterns of Majoritarian and Consensus Government in Twenty-One Countries. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1984.
193. Lim, C. W. “Student Clash with Riot Police over Kwangju Massacre.” Agence France Presse, Nov. 27, 1995.
194. Lim, Jibong, “The Pursuit of Happiness Clause in the Korean Constitution.” Journal of Korean Law 1 (2001): 71–103.
195. Linebarger, Paul. The Political Doctrines of Sun Yat-sen. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1937.
196. Linz, Juan, and Alfred Stepan. Problems ofDemocraticTransitionandConsolidation. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1996.
197. Liu, Lawrence Shao-liang. “Judicial Review and the Constitution: A Tale of Two Institutions.” Paper presented at Conference on the Evolving U.S. Constitution, 1787–1987, Institute of American Culture, Academica Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan, June 2–4, 1988.
198. Liu, Lawrence Shao-liang. “Judicial Review and Emerging Constitutionalism: The Uneasy Case of the Republic of China on Taiwan.” American Journal of Comparative Law 39 (1991): 509.
199. Lubman, Stanley, ed. China’s Legal Reforms. New York: Oxford University Press, 1996.
200. Ludwikowski, Rett R. “Constitution Making in the Countries of Former Soviet Dominance: Current Developments.” Georgia Journal of International and Comparative Law 23 (1993): 155.
201. Ludwikowski, Rett R. Constitution Making in the Countries of Former Soviet Dominance. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1996.
202. Lutz, Donald. “Toward a Theory of Constitutional Amendment.” American Political Science Review 88, no. 2 (1994): 355–70.
203. Ma, Herbert Han-pao, “The Rule of Law in a Contemporary Confucian Society: A Reinterpretation.” Presentation to Harvard Law School, East Asian Legal Studies Program, spring 1998.
204. Mahbubani, Kishore. Can Asians Think? Singapore: Time Editions, 1998.
205. Marino-Blanco, Elena. The Spanish Legal System. London: Sweet and Maxwell, 1996.
206. McAdams, A. James, ed. Transitional Justice and the Rule of Law in New Democracies. Notre Dame, IN: Notre Dame University Press, 1997.
207. McAdams, Richard. “A Focal Point Theory of Expressive Law.” Virginia Law Review 86 (2000): 1649–1729.
208. McCann, Michael. Rights at Work: Pay Equity Reform and the Politics of Legal Mobilization. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1994.
209. McCloskey, Robert, and Sanford Levinson. TheAmerican Supreme Court. Chicago: IL: University of Chicago Press, 1994.
210. Mendel, F. Fraser. “Judicial Power and Illusion: The Republic of China’s Council of Grand Justices and Constitutional Interpretation.” Pacific Rim Law and Policy Journal 2, no. 1 (1993): 157–89.
211. Meyer, John W., John Boli, George M. Thomas, and Francisco O. Ramirez.“World Society and the Nation State.” American Journal of Sociology 103 (1997): 144– 81.
212. Montesquieu, Charles de Secondat. The Spirit of the Laws. Translated and edited by Anne M. Cohler, Basia Miller, and Harold Stone. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1989.
213. Mueller, Dennis. Constitutional Democracy. New York: Oxford University Press, 1996.
214. Mueller, Dennis, “Fundamental Issues in Constitutional Reform:With Special Reference to Latin America and the United States.” Constitutional Political Economy 10, no. 2 (1999): 119–48.
215. Mukhopadhaya, Kaushik. “Jury Size and the Free Rider Problem.” Forthcoming, Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 19 (2003).
216. Murphy, Walter. “Constitutions, Constitutionalism and Democracy.” In Constitutionalism and Democracy: Transitions in the Contemporary World, edited by Douglas Greenberg, Stanley N. Katz, Melanie Beth Oliviero, and Steven C. Wheatley, 3–25. New York: Oxford University Press, 1993.
217. Nathan, Andrew. Chinese Democracy. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1985.
218. Nino, Carlos Santos. The Constitution of Deliberative Democracy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1995.
219. O’Donnell, Guillermo. “Horizontal Accountability in New Democracies.” Journal of Democracy 9 (1998): 112–26.
220. Oh, John Kie-chang. Korean Politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1999.
221. Park, Chan-wook. “Partisan Conflict and Immobilisme in the Korean National Assembly: Conditions, Processes, and Outcomes.” In Democracy in Korea: Its Ideals and Realities, edited by Sang-yong Choi, 295–327. Seoul: Korean Political Science Association, 1997.
222. Pashin, Sergy. “A Second Edition of the Constitutional Court.” East European Constitutional Review 3, nos. 3–4 (1994): 82.
223. Peerenboom, Randall. “Answering the Bell: Round Two of the Asian Values Debate.” Korea Journal 42, no. 2 (2002): 194–240.
224. Posner, Richard. Overcoming Law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1995.
225. Posner, Richard. “Is the Ninth Circuit Too Large? A Statistical Study of Judicial Quality.” Journal of Legal Studies 29 (2000): 711–18.
226. Post, Robert. “Theories of Constitutional Interpretation.” In Lawand the Order of Culture, edited by Robert Post, 13–42. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1991.
227. Power, Timothy J., and Mark J. Gasiorowski. “Institutional Design and Democratic Consolidation in the Third World.” Comparative Political Studies 30, no. 2 (1997): 123–55.
228. Prosser, Tony. “Understanding the British Constitution.” In Constitutionalism in Transformation:EuropeanandTheoreticalPerspectives, edited by Richard Bellamy and Dario Castiglione, 61–75. London: Blackwell, 1996.
229. Pye, Lucien. Asian Power and Politics: The Cultural Dimensions of Authority. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1985.
230. Rakove, Jack. “The Origins of Judicial Review: A Plea for New Contexts.” Stanford Law Review 49 (1997): 1031–64.
231. Ramseyer, J. Mark. “The Puzzling (In)Dependence of Courts: A Comparative Approach.” Journal of Legal Studies 23 (1994): 721.
232. Ramseyer, J. Mark, and Eric B. Rasmusen. “Judicial Independence in a Civil Law Regime: The Evidence from Japan.” Journal ofLaw, Economics and Organization 13, no. 2 (1997): 259–86.
233. Ramseyer, J. Mark, and Eric B. Rasmusen. Measuring Judicial Independence:ThePolitical Economy of Judging in Japan. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2003.
234. Rawls, John. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1972.
235. Riasonovsky, V. A. Customary Law of the Mongol Tribes. Harbin, China: 1929.
236. Riasonovsky, V. A. Fundamental Principles of Mongol Law. Tientsin, China: 1937.
237. Root, Hilton. Small Countries, Big Lessons: Governance and the Rise of East Asia. New York: Oxford University Press/Asian Development Bank, 1996.
238. Rosenberg, Gerald N. The Hollow Hope. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1991.
239. Rubenfeld, Jed. Freedom and Time: A Theory of Constitutional Self-Government. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2001.
240. Rupen, Robert. Mongols of theTwentiethCentury. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1964.
241. Sandag, Shagdariin, and Harry Kendall. The Stalin-Choibalsan Massacres in Mongolia 1921–1941: Forging the Second Communist State. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 2000.
242. Sanders, Alan J. K. “Mongolia’s New Constitution.” Asian Survey 32, no. 6 (1992) 506–21.
243. Sartori, Giovanni. Comparative Constitutional Engineering: An Inquiry into Structures, Incentives and Outcomes, 2d ed. New York: New York University Press, 1996.
244. Schedler, Andreas, Larry Diamond, and Marc F. Plattner, eds. The Self-Restraining State: Power and Accountability in New Democracies. Boulder, CO: Lynne Reiner, 1999.
245. Schelling, Thomas C. The Strategy of Conflict. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1960.
246. Schmidhauser, John R., ed. Comparative Judicial Systems: Challenging Frontiers in Conceptual and Empirical Analysis. Boston, MA: Butterworths, 1987.
247. Schram, Stuart, ed. Foundations and Limits of State Power in China. Hong Kong: Chinese University Press, 1987.
248. Schwartz, Herman. “The New Courts: An Overview.” East European Constitutional Review 2, no. 2 (1993): 28–32.
249. Schwartz, Warren, and C. Frederick Beckner III. “Toward a Theory of the ‘Meritorious Case’: Legal Uncertainty as a Social Choice Problem.” George Mason Law Review 6 (1998): 801–20.
250. Searl, Alan. “Legislature Debates Need for Soldiers on College Campuses.” China Times, Apr. 4, 1998.
251. Segal, Jeffrey A., and Harold J. Spaeth. The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1993.
252. Seong, C. Gweon. “Hope I Die Before I Get Old.” Korea Herald, Sept. 24, 1997.
253. Shapiro, Martin. Law and Politics in the Supreme Court. New York: Free Press, 1964.
254. Shapiro, Martin. Courts: A Comparative and Political Analysis. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1981.
255. Shapiro, Martin. “Lawyers, Corporations and Knowledge.” American Journal of Comparative Law 38 (1990): 683.
256. Shapiro, Martin. “Coments on the Draft Constitution of Mongolia.” Unpublished ms., San Francisco: Asia Foundation, 1991.
257. Shapiro, Martin. “Federalism, the Race to the Bottom, and the Regulation-Averse Entrepreneur.” In North American Federalism in Comparative Perspective, edited by Harry Scheiber, 47–56. Berkeley, CA: Institute of Governmental Studies, 1992.
258. Shetreet, Shimon, and Jules Deschênes. Judicial Independence: The Contemporary Debate. Boston, MA: Martinus Nijhoff, 1985.
259. Shih, Chih-yu. “The Style of Chinese Constitutional Development: China and Taiwan.” International Journal of the Sociology of Law 23 (1995): 371–93.
260. Shim Jae-hon and Charles S. Lee. “Test of Wills.” Far Eastern Economic Review, Jan. 23, 1997: 14–15.
261. Shin Yong-bae. “Opposition Party Files Lawsuit Against Speaker.” Korea Herald, Mar. 27, 1998.
262. Slaughter, Anne-Marie. “The Real New World Order.” Foreign Affairs 76, no. 5 (1997): 183–97.
263. Slaughter, Anne-Marie, Joseph Weiler, and Alec Stone Sweet, eds. The European Court and National Courts, Doctrine and Jurisprudence: Legal Change in Its Social Context. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 1998.
264. Smith, Eivind, ed. Constitutional Justice under Old Constitutions. The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 1995.
265. Snell, James G., and Frederick Vaughan. The Supreme Court of Canada: History of the Institution. Toronto: Osgoode Society, 1985.
266. Sólyom, László, and Georg Brunner. Constitutional Judiciary in a New Democracy: The Hungarian Constitutional Court. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2000.
267. Spitz, Richard, with Matthew Chaskalon. The Politics of Transition: A Hidden History of South Africa’s Negotiated Settlement. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2000.
268. Steamer, Robert J. The Supreme Court in Crisis. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press, 1971.
269. Stearns, Maxwell. Constitutional Process:ASocial Choice Analysis of Supreme Court Decision Making. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2000.
270. Steinberg, David I. The Republic of Korea: Economic Transformation and Social Change. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1989.
271. Steinberg, David I. “The Republic of Korea: Pluralizing Politics.” In Politics in Developing Countries: Comparing Experiences with Democracy, edited by Larry Diamond, Juan J. Linz, and Seymour Martin Lipset, 369–416. Boulder, CO: Lynne Reiner, 1995.
272. Steinberg, David I. “Korea: Triumph Amid Turmoil.” Journal of Democracy 9, no. 2 (1998): 76–90.
273. Sterett, Susan. Creating Constitutionalism? The Politics of Legal Expertise and Administrative Law in England and Wales. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1997.
274. Stone, Alec. The Birth of Judicial Politics in France. New York: Oxford University Press, 1992.
275. Stone, Alec, and James Caporaso. “From Free Trade to Supranational Polity: The European Court and Integration.” Berkeley: Center for German and European Studies Working Paper, University of California, 1996.
276. Stotzky, Irwin P., ed. Transitions to Democracy in Latin America: The Role of the Judiciary. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1993.
277. Su, Yong-chin. “Summary of Interpretations by the Council of Grand Justices.” In Zhonghua Minguo Xing HsienWu Shi Nien (Fifty Years of the ROC Constitution). Taipei: National Assembly, 1997.
278. Sun, Yat-sen. The Teachings of Sun Yat-sen: Selections from His Writings. London: Sylvan Press, 1945.
279. Sunstein, Cass. Designing Democracy: What Constitutions Do. New York: Oxford University Press, 2001.
280. Sutil, Jorge Correa. “The Judiciary and the Political System in Chile: The Dilemmas of Judicial Independence during the Transition to Democracy.” In Transitions to Democracy in Latin America: The Role of the Judiciary, edited by Irwin P. Stotzky, 89–105. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1993.
281. Taagepera, Rein, and Matthew Soberg Shugart. Seats and Votes: The Effects and Determinants of Electoral Systems. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1989.
282. Tate, C. Neal. “Book Review of Paula Newberg, Judging the State: Courts and Constitutional Politics in Pakistan.” Law and Politics Book Review 6, no. 7 (1996): 109–12.
283. Tate, Neal, and Thorsten Vallinder, eds. The Global Expansion of Judicial Power. New York: New York University Press, 1995.
284. Teik, Khoo Boo. “Between Law and Politics: The Malaysian Judiciary Since Independence.” In Law, Capitalism and Power in East Asia, edited by Kanishka Jayasuriya, 205–32. New York: Routledge, 1999.
285. Thurow, Lester. “Asia: The Collapse and the Cure.” New York Review of Books, Feb. 5, 1998: 22–28.
286. Tien, Hung-mao. The Great Transition: Political and Social Change in the Republic of China. Stanford, CA: Hoover Institution Press, 1989.
287. Tien, Hung-mao, ed. Taiwan’s Electoral Politics and Democratic Transition: Riding the ThirdWave. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe, 1995.
288. Tollefson, Edwin. “Compliance of the Mongolian Criminal Code and Criminal Procedure Code with International Norms of Human Rights.” Ulaanbaatar: United Nations Center for Human Rights, 1996.
289. Tseng, Osman. “Legislature Grants No Honeymoon to President.” Business Taiwan, June 24, 1996.
290. Tu, Wei-ming, ed. Confucian Traditions in East Asian Modernity: Moral Education and Economic Culture in Japan and the Four Mini-Dragons. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1996.
291. U.S. Department of State. “Korea Report on Human Rights Practices.” Washington, DC: 1991–2001.
292. U.S. Department of State. “Mongolia Report on Human Rights Practices.” Washington, DC: 1993–2001.
293. U.S. Department of State. “Taiwan Report on Human Rights Practices.” Washington, DC: 1993–2001.
294. Unger, Roberto Mangaeira. Law in Modern Society: Toward a Criticism of Social Theory. New York: Free Press, 1976.
295. van Maarseven, Henc, and Ger van der Tang. Written Constitutions. Dobbs Ferry, NY: Oceana Publications, 1978.
296. Voigt, Stefan. “Positive Constitutional Economics: A Survey.” Public Choice 90 (1997): 11–53.
297. Voigt, Stefan. “Making Constitutions Work – Conditions for Maintaining the Rule of Law.” Cato Journal 18, no. 2 (1998): 275–86.
298. Volcansek, Mary, and Jacqueline Lucienne Lafon. Judicial Selection. New York: Greenwood Press, 1987.
299. Volcansek, Mary. “Political Power and Judicial Review in Italy.” Comparative Political Studies 26, no. 4 (1994): 492–509.
300. Waltman, Jerold L. “Judicial Activism in England.” In Judicial Activism in Comparative Perspective, edited by Kenneth Holland, 33–52. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1991.
301. West, James, and Dae-kyu Yoon. “The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Korea: Transforming the Jursiprudence of the Vortex.” American Journal of Comparative Law 40 (1992): 73–119.
302. West, James M. “Martial Lawlessness: The Legal Aftermath of Kwangju.” Pacific Rim Law and Policy Journal 6, no. 1 (1997): 85–168.
303. West, James M., and Edward J. Baker “The 1987 Constitutional Reforms in South Korea: Electoral Processes and Judicial Independence.” Harvard Human Rights Yearbook 1 (1988): 135–76.
304. White, G. Edward. “The ‘Constitutional Revolution’ as a Crisis in Adaptivity.” Hastings Law Journal 48 (1997): 867.
305. White, Gordon. “Civil Society, Democratization, and Development.” Democratization 1, no. 2 (1994): 379–94.
306. Whittington, Keith E. “Legislative Sanctions and the Strategic Environment of Judicial Review.” I-CON International Journal of Constitutional Law 1 (2003).
307. Winn, Jane Kaufmann, and Tang-chi Yeh. “Advocating Democracy: The Role of Lawyers in Taiwan’s Political Transformation.” Lawand Social Inquiry 20, no. 2 (1995): 561.
308. Worden, Robert, and Andrea Marles. Mongolia: A Country Study, 2d ed. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service, 1991.
309. Yamamoto, Tadashi. Emerging Civil Society in the Asia-Pacific Region. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, 1995.
310. Yang, Kun. “Judicial Review and Social Change in the Korean Democratizing Process.” American Journal of Comparative Law 41 (1993): 1–8.
311. Yeh, Jiunn-rong. “Changing Forces of Constitutional and Regulatory Reform in Taiwan.” Journal of Chinese Law 4 (1990): 83–100.
312. Yeh, Jiunn-rong. “An Analysis of Council of Grand Justices Interpretations Imposing Compliance Deadlines.” Proceedings of the National Science Council 6, no. 1 (1996): 1.
313. Yoon, Dae-kyu. Law and Political Authority in SouthKorea. Boulder, CO:Westview Press, 1990.
314. Yoon, Dae-kyu. “New Developments in Korean Constitutionalism: Changes and Prospects.” Pacific Rim Law and Policy Journal 4, no. 2 (1995): 395– 417.
315. Youm, Kyu-ho. “Press Freedom and Judicial Review in South Korea.” Stanford Journal of International Law 30 (1994): 1.
316. Young, Michael K. “Judicial Review of Administrative Guidance: Governmentally Encouraged Consensual Dispute Resolution in Japan.” Columbia Law Review 84 (1984): 935.
317. Zakaria, Fareed. “The Rise of Illiberal Democracy.” Foreign Affairs (Nov./Dec. 1997): 22–43.
318. Zhao, Suisheng. Power by Design: Constitution-Making in Nationalist China. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press, 1996.