Judicial power and strategic communication in Mexico

Judicial Power and Strategic Communication in Mexico

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 1-221

  Staton, Jeffrey K ^a  

^a EMORY UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84925148360     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511750632     Document Type: Book

References (222)

1. Aguinaco Alemán, José Vicente. 1998. El Nuevo Poder Judicial de la Federación. México: Suprema Corte de la Nación.
2. Aguinaco Alemán, 1997a. La Toga y la Palabra. México: Dirección General de Comunicación Social. Suprema Corte de Jusiticia.
3. Aguinaco Alemán, 1997b. El Poder Judicial de la Federación Fortalece su Independencia. México: Dirección General de Comunicación Social, Suprema Corte de Jusiticia.
4. Aguinaco Alemán, 1997c. 75 Decisiones Relevantes de la Suprema Corte de Justicia de la Nacion (Novena Epoca). México: Dirección General de Comunicación Social, Suprema Corte de Jusiticia.
5. Alter, Karen. 1998. “Who are the ‘Masters of the Treaty’: European Governments and the European Court of Justice.” International Organization 52: 121-47.
6. Altheide, D. L., and Robert P. Snow. 1979. Media Logic. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
7. Alvarez, Mike, Jose Antonio Cheibub, Fernando Limongi, and Adam Przeworski. “Classifying Political Regimes.” Studies in Comparative International Development 31:236.
8. Apodaca, Clair. 2004. “The Rule of Law and Human Rights.” Judicature 87: 292-9.
9. Andrews, Josephine T., and Gabriella R. Montinola. 2004. “Veto Players and the Rule of Law in Emerging Democracies.” Comparative Political Studies 37:55-87.
10. Arnold, Linda. 1996. Política y Justicia: La Suprema Corte Mexicana (18241855). Trans. José Luis Soberatnes Fernández and Julián Bunster. México: Universidad Autónoma de México.
11. Arnold, Linda. 1998. Bureaucracy and Bureaucrats in Mexico City, 1742-1835. Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona Press.
12. Badinter, Robert, and Stephen Breyer. 2004. Judges in Contemporary Democracy. New York: New York University Press.
13. Baird, Vanessa A. 2004. “The Effect of Politically Salient Decisions on the US Supreme Court's Agenda.” Journal of Politics 66:755-72.
14. Baird, Vanessa A., and Amy Gangl. 2006. “Shattering the Myth of Legality: The Impact of the Media's Framing of Supreme Court Procedures on Perceptions of Fairness.” Political Psychology 27:597-614.
15. Baker, Richard D. 1971. Judicial Review in Mexico. A Study of the Amparo Suit. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
16. Barber, Sotirios A. 1993. The Constitution of Judicial Power. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
17. Barro, Robert J. 1997. Determinants of Economic Growth: A Cross-Country Empirical Study. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
18. Barros, Robert. 2002. Constitutionalism and Dictatorship: Pinochet, the Junta, and the 1980 Constitution. New York: Cambridge University Press.
19. Baum, Lawrence. 2006. Judges and Their Audiences: A Perspective on Judicial Behavior. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
20. Beard, Charles A. 1962. “The Supreme Court-Usurper or Grantee.” In The Courts: A Reader in the Judicial Process, ed. Robert G. Scigliano. Boston, MA: Little Brown.
21. Billikopf, David Marshall. 1973. The Exercise of Judicial Power: 1789-1864. New York: Vantage Press.
22. Boudin, Louis B. 1962. “Government by Judiciary.” In The Courts: A Reader in the Judicial Process, ed. Robert G. Scigliano. Boston, MA: Little Brown.
23. Brambor, Thomas, William Roberts Clark, and Matt Golder. 2006. “Understanding Interaction Models: Improving Empirical Analyses.” Political Analysis 4:63-82.
24. Brinks, Daniel. 2005. “Judicial Reform and Independence in Brazil and Argentina: The Beginning of a New Millennium?” Texas International Law Journal 40:595-622.
25. Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce, Alastair Smith, Randolph M. Siverson, and James D. Morrow. 2003. The Logic of Political Survival. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
26. Burgoa, O. Ignaico. 1998. El Juicio de Amparo. México: Editorial Porrúa.
27. Burgoa, O. Ignaico. 1984. El Juicio de Amparo, 21st ed. México: Porrúa.
28. Burley, Anne-Marie, and Walter Mattli. 1993. “Europe Before the Court: A Political Theory of Legal Integration.” International Organization 47: 41-76.
29. Cabrera Acevedo, Lucio. 1988. La Suprema Corte de Justicia. La República y el Imperio. México: Poder Judicial Federal.
30. Caldeira, Gregory. 1986. “Neither the Purse Nor the Sword: Dynamics of Public Confidence in the Supreme Court.” The American Political Science Review 80:1209-26.
31. Caldeira, Gregory A., and James L. Gibson. 1995. “The Legitimacy of the Court of Justice in the European Union: Models of Institutional Support.” The American Political Science Review 89:356-76.
32. Caldeira, Gregory A., and James L. Gibson. 1992. “The Etiology of Public Support for the Supreme Court.” American Journal of Political Science 36:635-64.
33. Cameron, Charles M. 2002. “Judicial Independence: How Can You Tell It When You See It?” In Judicial Independence at the Crossroads: An Interdisciplinary Approach, eds. Stephen B. Burbank and Barry Friedman. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
34. Canon, Bradley C., and Charles A. Johnson. 1999. Judicial Politics: Implementation and Impact. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
35. Carothers, Thomas. 2007. “How Democracies Emerge: The “Sequencing” Fallacy.” Journal of Democracy 18:12-27.
36. Carpizo, Jorge. 1995. “Reformas Constitucionales al Poder Judicial Federal y a la Jurisdicción Constitucional del 31 de diciembre de 1994.” Boletín Mexicano de Derecho Comparado 28.
37. Carranco Zúñiga, Joel. 2000. Poder Judicial. México: Editorial Porrúa.
38. Carrubba, Clifford J. 2009. “A Model of the Endogenous Development of Judicial Institutions in Federal and International Systems.” Journal of Politics 71: 1-15.
39. Carrubba, Clifford J. 2005. “Courts and Compliance in International Regulatory Regimes.” Journal of Politics 67:669-89.
40. Carrubba, Clifford J. 2003. “The European Court of Justice, Democracy and Enlargement.” European Union Politics 4:75-100.
41. Casey, Gregory. 1974. “The Supreme Court and Myth: An Empirical Investigation.” Law and Society Review 8:385-419.
42. Chávez Padrón, Martha. 1990. Evolución del Juicio de Amparo y del Poder Judicial Federal Mexicano. México: Porrúa.
43. Cingranelli, David L., and David L. Richards. 2008. “The Cingranelli- Richards (CIRI) Human Rights Data Project Coding Manual.” Available at: http://ciri.binghamton.edu/documentation/ciri_coding_guide.pdf
44. Clague, Christopher, Philip Keefer, Stephen Knack, and Mancur Olson. 1999. “Contract-Intensive Money: Contract Enforcement, Property Rights, and Economic Performance.” Journal of Economic Growth 4:185-211.
45. Clark, Thomas. Forthcoming, 2010. “The Limits of Judicial Independence.” New York: Cambridge University Press.
46. Clinton, Robert Lowry. 1994. “Game Theory, Legal History, and the Origins of Judicial Review: A Revisionist Analysis of Marbury v. Madison.” American Journal of Political Science 38: 285-302.
47. Cohn, Ellen S., Susan O. White, and Joseph Sanders. 2000. “Distributive and Procedural Justice in Seven Nations.” Law and Human Behavior 24:553-80.
48. Cook, Timothy E. 1996. “The Negotiation of Newsworthiness.” In The Psychology of Political Communication, ed. Ann N. Crigler. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
49. Couso, Javier A. 2004. “The Politics of Judicial Review in Chile in the Era of Democratic Transition.” In Democratization and the Judiciary: The Accountability Function of Courts in New Democracies, eds. Siri Gloppen, Roberto Gargarella, and Elin Skaar. London: Frank Cass Publishers.
50. Cornelius, Wayne A., Judity Gentleman, and Peter H. Smith, eds. 1989. Mexico's Alternative Political Futures. La Jolla, CA: Center for U.S.-Mexican Studies, University of California-San Diego.
51. Costeloe, Michael P. 1975. La Primera República Federal de México, 1825-1835: Un Estudio de los Partidos Políticos en el México Independiente. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
52. Creyke, Robin, and John McMillan. 2004. “The Operation of Judicial Review in Australia.” In Judicial Review and Bureaucratic Impact: International and Interdisciplinary Perspectives, eds. Marc Hertogh and Simon Halliday. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
53. Dahl, Robert A. 1957. “Decision-Making in a Democracy: The Supreme Court as a National Policy-Maker.” Journal of Public Law 6:279-95.
54. Dahl, Robert A. 1963. Politics, Economics, and Welfare Planning. New York: Harper Collins.
55. Davis, Richard. 1994. Decisions and Images: The Supreme Court and the Press. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
56. Díaz Barriga, Miguel, and Karen Kleiber. 1996. “The Press and Urban Conflict in Mexico City: A Case Study of Newspaper Reporting on Ecology and Urban Expansion in the Ajusco Region, 1982-1990.” Mexican Studies 12: 273-300.
57. Domingo, Pilar. 2000. “Judicial Independence: The Politics of the Supreme Court in Mexico.” Journal of Latin American Studies 32:705-35.
58. Domingo, Pilar. 1999a. “Judicial Independence and Judicial Reform in Latin America.” In The Self-Restraining State: Power and Accountability in New Democracies, eds. Andreas Schedler, Larry Diamond, and Marc F. Plattner. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
59. Domingo, Pilar. 1999b. “Rule of Law, Citizenship and Access to Justice in Mexico.” Mexican Studies 15:151-91.
60. Downs, Anthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper.
61. Dubek, Leslie B. 2007. “Understanding ‘Judicial Lockjaw’: The Debate over Extrajudicial Activity.” New York University Law Review 82:569-601.
62. Easterbrook, Frank H. 1987. “Allocating Antitrust Decision-making Tasks.” Georgetown Law Journal 76:305-20.
63. Eisenstadt, Todd A. 2004. Courting Democracy in Mexico: Party Strategies and Electoral Institutions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
64. Epp, Charles R. 1998. The Rights Revolution: Lawyers, Activists and Supreme Courts in Comparative Perspective. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
65. Epstein, Lee, and Jack Knight. 1998. The Choices Justices Make. Washington DC: CQ Press.
66. Epstein, Lee, and Jack Knight. 1996. “On the Struggle for Judicial Supremacy.” Law and Society Review 30:87-120.
67. Falaschetti, Dino, and Gary Miller. 2000. “Constraining Leviathan: Moral Hazard and Credible Commitment in Constitutional Design.” Paper presented at the 2000 Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, IL.
68. Ferejohn, John. 1999. “Independent judges, dependent judiciary: Explaining judicial independence.” Southern California Law Review 72:353-84.
69. Ferejohn, John, and Barry R. Weingast. 1992. “A positive theory of statutory interpretation.” International Review of Law and Economics 12:263-79.
70. Ferejohn, John, and Charles Shipan. 1990. “Congressional Influence on Bureaucracy.” Journal of Law, Economics and Organization 6:1-21.
71. Ferrer Mac-Gregor, Eduardo. 2000. Acción Constitucional de Amparo en México y España. México: Editorial Porrúa.
72. Finkel, Jodi S. 2008. Judicial Reform as Political Insurance: Argentina, Peru, and Mexico in the 1990s. South Bend, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
73. Finkel, Jodi S. 2005. “Judicial Reform as Insurance Policy: Mexico in the 1990s.” Latin American Politics and Society 47: 87-113.
74. Fiss, Owen. 1994. “The Right Degree of Independence.” In Transition to Democracy in Latin America: The Role of the Judiciary, ed. Irwin P. Stotzky. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
75. Fix-Fierro, Héctor. 1999. “Jueces y corruption.” Bien Común y Gobierno 55: 11-16.
76. Fix-Fierro, Héctor. 1998a. “Judicial Reform and The Supreme Court of Mexico: The Trajectory of Three Years.” U.S.-Mexico Law Journal 6:1-21.
77. Fix-Fierro, Héctor. 1998b. “Poder Judicial.” In Transiciones y Diseños Institucionales, ed. María Refugio González and Sergio López Ayllón. Distrito Federal: México.
78. Fix-Zamudio, Héctor. 1987. “La Suprema Corte de Justicia Como Tribunal Constitutional,” In Las Nuevas Bases Constitucionales y Legales del Sistema Judicial Mexicano: La Reforma Judicial 1986-1987, ed. Jorge Madrazo. México: Porrúa.
79. Fix-Zamudio, Héctor, and José Ramon Cossío Díaz. 1995. El Poder Judicial en el Ordenamiento Mexicano. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
80. Flowers, Julianne, Audrey A. Haynes, and Michael H. Crespin. 2003. “The Media, the Campaign and the Message.” American Journal of Political Science 47:259-73.
81. Franklin, Charles H., and Liane C. Kosaki. 1989. “Republican School Master: The U.S. Supreme Court, Public Opinion, and Abortion.” The American Political Science Review 83:751-71.
82. Freedom House. Various years. Freedom in the World. New York: Freedom House.
83. Friedman, Barry. 2000. “The History of the Countermajoritarion Difficulty, Part Four: Law's Politics.” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 148: 974-1065.
84. Friedrich, Robert J. 1982. “In Defense of Multiplicative Terms in Multiple Regression Equations.” American Journal of Political Science 26:797-833.
85. Gibson, James L. 2008. “Challenges to the Impartiality of State Supreme Courts: Legitimacy Theory and ‘New-Style’ Judicial Campaigns.” American Political Science Review. Forthcoming.
86. Gibson, James L. 1989. “Understandings of Justice: Institutional Legitimacy, Procedural Justice, and Political Tolerance.” Law and Society Review 3:469-96.
87. Gibson, James L., and Gregory A. Caldeira. 2009. Citizens, Courts, and Confirmations: Positivity Theory and the Judgments of the American People. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
88. Gibson, James L., and Gregory A. Caldeira. 1998. “Changes in the Legitimacy of the European Court of Justice: A Post- Maastrict Analysis.” British Journal of Political Science 28:63-91.
89. Gibson, James L., Gregory A. Caldeira, and Vanessa A. Baird. 1998. “On the Legitimacy of National High Courts.” American Political Science Review 92:343-58.
90. Ginsburg, Tom. 2003. Judicial Review in New Democracies: Constitutional Courts in Asian Cases. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
91. Gongora Pimentel. 2000. “El Estado de Derecho como Promotor del Desarrollo Economico Nacional.” Remarks before the XI Convención del Mercado de Valores, October 17, 2000.
92. Gongora Pimentel. 2000a. “Acerquemos la Justicia a la Sociedad.” In Once Voces, ed. Alberto Aragón Bolado. México: Suprema Corte de Justicia de la Nación.
93. González Casanova, Pablo. 1967. La democracia en México. México: Era.
94. González Cosío, Arturo. 1985. El Juicio de Amparo, 2nd ed. Distrito Federal: México.
95. Gonzalez Oropeza, Manuel. 1995. “El Desafío de la Justicia, La Administración de Justicia y el Estado de Derecho en México.” Lex, Torreón, Coahuila: México.
96. Graber, Doris A. 2005. Mass Media and American Politics, 7th ed. Washington DC: CQ Press.
97. Greene, William H. 1998. “Gender Economics Courses in Liberal Arts Colleges: Further Results.” Journal of Economic Education 29:291-300.
98. Gunther, Gerald. 1991. Constitutional Law, 12th ed. New York: Foundation Press, Inc.
99. Hale, Charles A. 1968. Mexican Liberalism in the Age of Mora, 1821-1853. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
100. Hall, Melina Gann. 1992. “Electoral Politics and Strategic Voting in State Supreme Courts.” The Journal of Politics 54:427-46.
101. Harvey, Anna, and Barry Friedman. 2006. “Pulling Punches: Congressional Constraints on the Supreme Court's Constitutional Rulings, 1987-2000.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 31:533.
102. Hathaway, Oona. 2007. “Why Do Countries Commit to Human Rights Treaties?” Journal of Conflict Resolution 8:588-621.
103. Hausmaninger, Herbert. 1995. “Toward a ‘New’ Russian Constitutional Court.” Cornell International Law Journal 28:305.
104. Helmke, Gretchen. 2005. Courts Under Constraints: Judges, Generals, and Presidents in Argentina. New York: Cambridge University Press.
105. Helmke, Gretchen. 2002. “The Logic of Strategic Defection: Court-Executive Relations in Argentina Under Dictatorship and Democracy.” American Political Science Review 96:291-304.
106. Helmke, Gretchen, and Frances Rosenbluth. 2008. “Regimes and the Rule of Law: Judicial Independence in Comparative Perspective.” Typescript. University of Rochester.
107. Helmke, Gretchen and Frances Rosenbluth. 2009. “Regimes and the Rule of Law: Judicial Independence in Comparative Perspective.” Annual Review of Political Science 12:345-66.
108. Herron, Erik S., and Kirk A. Randazzo. 2003. “The Relationship Between Independence and Judicial Review in Post-Communist Courts.” Journal of Politics 65:422-38.
109. Hibbing, John R., and Elizabeth Theiss-Morse. 1995. Congress as Public Enemy: Public Attitudes Toward American Political Institutions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
110. Hilbink, Lisa. 2007. “Judges Beyond Politics.” In Democracy and Dictatorship: Lessons from Chile. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
111. Hillygus, D. Sunshine, and Simon Jackman. 2003. “Voter Decision Making in Election 2000: Campaign Effects, Partisan Activation, and the Clinton Legacy.” American Journal of Political Science 47:583-96.
112. Hirshl, Ran. 2001. “The Political Origins of Judicial Empowerment Through Constitutionalization: Lessons from Israel's Constitutional Revolution.” Comparative Politics 33:3.
113. Howard, Richard M. and Henry F. Carey. 2004. “Is an Independent Judiciary Necessary for Democracy?” Judicature 87:284-90.
114. Iaryczower, Matías, Pablo T. Spiller, and Mariano Tommasi. 2002. “Judicial Decision-Making in Unstable Environments, Argentina 1935-1998.” American Journal of Political Science 46:699-716.
115. International Country Risk Guide. 2004. Political Risk Services, East Syracuse, NY.
116. Jackson, Vicki C., and Mark Tushnet. 2006. Comparative Constitutional Law, 2nd ed. New York: Foundation Press.
117. Johnson, Herbert Alan. 1996. The Chief Justiceship of John Marshall, 18011835. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.
118. Johnson, Richard M. 1967. The Dynamics of Compliance: Supreme Court Decision-Making from a New Perspective. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
119. Johnson, Timothy R., and Andrew D. Martin. 1998. “The Public's Conditional Response to Supreme Court Decisions.” American Political Science Review 92:299-310.
120. Kapiszewski, Diana and Matthew M. Talyor. 2008. “Doing Courts Justice? Studying Judicial Politics in Latin America.” Perspectives in Politics 6:741-67.
121. Kaufmann, Daniel, Aart Kraay, and Massimo Mastruzzi. 2007. “Governance Matters VI: Governance Indicators for 1996-2006.” World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 4280.
122. Kernell, Samuel. 1993. Going Public: New Strategies of Presidential Leadership, 2nd ed. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
123. Klesner, Joseph L., and Chappell Lawson. 2001. “Adiós to the PRI? Voter Turnout in Mexico's Political Transition.” Mexican Studies 17: 17-39.
124. Kommers, Donald. 1997. The Constitutional Jurisprudence of the Federal Republic of Germany, 2nd ed. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
125. Landes, William M., and Richard A. Posner. 1975. “Independent Judiciary in an Interest-Group Perspective.” Journal of Law and Economics 18: 875-901.
126. Lasser, William. 1988. The Limits of Judicial Power: The Supreme Court in American Politics. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.
127. Laver, Michael, and Norman Schofield. 1990. Multiparty Government: the Politics of Coalition in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press; repr. 1998, University of Michigan Press.
128. Lawson, Chappell. 2002. Building the Fourth Estate: Democratization and the Rise of a Free Press in Mexico. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
129. Linz, Juan, and Alfred Stepan. 1996. Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation: Southern Europe, South America, and Post-Communist Europe. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
130. Locke, John. [1698] 1952. The Second Treatise of Government, ed. Thomas Peardon. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill.
131. Mackey, Michael W. 1998. “Informe de Michael W. Mackey en la evaluación integral de las operaciones y funciones del Fondo Bancario de Proteccion al Ahorro, FOBAPROA y la calidad de supervisión de los programas del FOBAPROA de 1995 a 1998 (Julio de 1999).” Gaceta Parlamentaria, Cámara de Diputados.
132. Macune, Charles W. 1978. El Estado de México y la Federación Mexicana, 18231835. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
133. Madison, James, Alexander Hamilton, and John Jay. [1787] 1961. The Federalist Papers. Introduction by Clinton Rossiter. New York: Mentor-New American Library.
134. Magaloni, Beatriz, and Arianna Sánchez. 2003. “Empowering Courts as Constitutional Veto Players: Presidential Delegation and the New Mexican Supreme Court.” Paper presented at the 2001 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, August 30-September 2, 2001, San Francisco.
135. Maltzman, Forrest, James F. Spriggs, and Paul J. Walbeck. 2000. Crafting Law on the Supreme Court: The Collegial Game. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
136. Marshall, Monty G., and Keith Jaggers. 2007. Polity IV Dataset Version 2006.
137. Martin, Andrew D., and Kevin M. Quinn. 2007. “Assessing Preference Change on the U.S. Supreme Court.” Journal of Law, Economics and Organization 23:365-85.
138. Mason, Alpheus Thomas. 1953. “Extra-Judicial Work for Judges: the Views of Chief Justice Stone.” Harvard Law Review 67:193-216.
139. Masood, Salman. 2007a. “Musharraf Re-election Plan Disputed in Supreme Court.” New York Times.:://www.nytimes.com/2007/09/18/world/asia/18pakistan.html?partner=permalink&exprod=permalink.
140. Masood, Salman. 2007b. “Suspension of Jurist Unleashes Furor against Musharraf.” New York Times.:://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/15/world/asia/15pakistan.html.
141. Masood, Salman. 2007c. “World Briefing: Asia: Pakistan: 6 Judges Resign to Protest Chief Justice's Removal.” New York Times.:://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9D03E7DB1730F933A15750C0A9619C8B63.
142. Masood, Salman. 2007d. “World Briefing: Asia: Pakistan: Judges Involuntarily Retir” New York Times.:://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9503EFDD163DF935A35751C1A9619C8B63.
143. Mayhew, David R. 1974. Congress: The Electoral Connection. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
144. McGraw, Kathleen M. 1991. “Managing Blame: An Experimental Test of the Effects of Political Accounts.” American Political Science Review 85: 1133-58.
145. McGuire, Kevin T. 1995. “Repeat Players in the Supreme Court: The Role of Experienced Lawyers in Litigation Success.” The Journal of Politics 57: 187-96.
146. Meyer, Michael C., and William L. Sherman. 1991. The Course of Mexican History, 4th ed. New York: Oxford University Press.
147. Middlebrook, Kevin. 1995. The Paradox of Revolution: Labor, the State and Authoritarianism in Mexico. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
148. Milner, Neil A. 1971. The Court and Local Law Enforcement: The Impact of Miranda. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
149. Mondak, Jeffrey A. 1993. “Institutional Legitimacy and Procedural Justice: Reexamining the Question of Causality.” Law and Society Review 27: 599-608.
150. Mondak, Jeffrey A. 1991. “Substantive and Procedural Aspects of Supreme Court Decisions As Determinants of Institutional Approval.” American Politics Quarterly 19: 174-88.
151. Montesquieu, Baron de. [1748] 1900. The Spirit of Laws. New York: Collier.
152. Moustafa, Tamir. 2007. The Struggle for Constitutional Power: Law, Politics, and Economic Development in Egypt. New York: Cambridge University Press.
153. Murphy, Walter F. 1964. Elements of Judicial Strategy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
154. Murphy, Walter F., and Joseph Tanenhaus. 1968. “Public Opinion and the United States Supreme Court.” Law and Society Review 2:357-82.
155. Nagel, Jack H. 1975. The Descriptive Analysis of Power. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
156. Nagel, Jack H. 1968. “Some Questions About the Concept of Power.” Behavioral Science 13:129-37.
157. Niemeyer, E. V, Jr. 1974. Revolution at Queretaro: The Mexican Constitutional Convention of 1916-17. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
158. North, Douglass. 1990. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
159. North, Douglass C., and Barry R. Weingast. 1989. “Constitutions and Commitment: The Evolution of Institutions Governing Public Choice in Seventeenth- Century England.” The Journal of Economic History 49: 803-32.
160. North, Douglass C., William Summerhill, and Barry R. Weingast. 2000. “Order, Disorder and Economic Change: Latin America versus North America.” In Governing for Prosperity, ed. Bruce Bueno de Mesquita and Hilton Root. New Haven: Yale University Press.
161. O’Donnell, Guillermo. 1999. “Horizontal Accountability in New Democracies.” In The Self-Restraining State: Power and Accountability in New Democracies, eds. Andreas Schedler, Larry Diamond, and Marc F. Plattner. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
162. Osborne, Martin, and Ariel Rubenstein. 1994. A Course in Game Theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
163. Powell, G. Bingham. 2000. Elections as Instruments of Democracy: Majoritarian and Proportional Visions. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
164. Powell, Emilia Justyna, and Jeffrey K. Staton. 2009. “Domestic Judicial Institutions and Human Rights Treaty Violation.” International Studies Quarterly 53:149-74.
165. Rabasa, Oscar. 1982. El Derecho Angloamericano (Estudio Expositivo y Comparado del “Common Law”), 2nd ed. México: Porrúa.
166. Ramseyer, J. Mark, and Eric Rasmusen. 2003. Measuring Judicial Independence. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
167. Ramseyer, J. Mark, and Eric Rasmusen. 2001. “Why are Japanese Judges so Conservative in Politically Charged Cases.” American Political Science Review 2:331-44.
168. Ríos-Figueroa, Julio. 2007. “The Emergence of an Effective Judiciary in Mexico, 1994-2002.” Latin American Politics and Society 49:31-57.
169. Ríos-Figueroa, Julio. 2006. Judicial Independence: Definition, Measurement, and Its Effects on Corruption: An Analysis of Latin America. PhD diss., Department of Politics, New York University.
170. Ríos-Figueroa, Julio, and Jeffrey K. Staton. 2008. “Unpacking the Rule of Law: A Review of Judicial Independence Measures.” Committee on Concepts and Measures Working Paper Series, International Political Science Association. Available at: http://www.concepts-methods.org.
171. Rogers, James R. 2001. “Information and Judicial Review: A Signaling Game of Legislative-Judicial Interaction.” American Journal of Political Science 45: 84-99.
172. Rosenberg, Gerald. 1991. The Hollow Hope: Can Courts Bring About Social Change. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
173. Rubio, Luis, Beatriz Magaloni, and Edna Jaime. 1994. A la puerta de la ley: El Estado de derecho en Mexico. Mexico DF: Cal y Arena.
174. Salgado, Eréndia. 2001. Poderes en Conflicto. México: Suprema Corte de Justicia de la Nación.
175. Sánchez Cordero de García Villegas, Olga. 2000. “La Independencia Judicial en México: Apuntes Sobre una Realidad Conquistada por los Jueces Mexicanos.” Available at: http://www.scjn.gob.mx/Ministros/oscgv/Conf/Conf-011.htm.
176. Sánchez Cordero de García Villegas, Olga. 1997. “Hacia un Auténtico Sistema de Impartición de Justicia en México.” In La Toga y la palabra. México: Dirección General de Comunicación Social. Suprema Corte de Jusiticia.
177. Scheb, II, John M., and William Lyons. 2000. “The Myth of Legality and Public Evaluation of the Supreme Court.” Social Science Quarterly 81:929-40.
178. Schwarz, Carl. 1973. “Judges Under the Shadow: Judicial Independence in the United States and Mexico.” California Western International Law Journal 3:261-321.
179. Segal, Jeffrey A. 1997. “Separations-of-Powers Games in the Positive Theory of Congress and Courts.” American Political Science Review 91:28-44.
180. Segal, Jeffrey A., and Harold J. Spaeth. 2002. The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model Revisited. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
181. Segal, Jeffrey A., and Harold J. Spaeth. 1993. The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
182. Shapiro, Martin. 2004. “Judicial Review in Developed Democracies.” In Democratization and the Judiciary: The Accountability Function of Courts in New Democracies, eds. Siri Gloppen, Roberto Gargarella, and Elin Skaar. London: Frank Cass Publishers.
183. Sharlet, Robert. 1993. “Chief Justice as Judicial Politician.” East European Constitutional Review 2:32-37.
184. Sheehan, Reginald S., William Mishler, and Donald R. Songer. 1992. “Ideology, Status, and the Differential Success of Direct Parties Before the Supreme Court.” The American Political Science Review 86:464-71.
185. Shirk, David A. 2004. Mexico's New Politics: The PAN and Democratic Change. Boulder, CO: Lynne Reinner Publishers.
186. Silva Meza, Juan N. 2000a. “La Corte y la Defensa de la Constitución.” In Once Voces, ed. Alberto Aragón Bolado. México: Suprema Corte de Justicia de la Nación.
187. Silva Meza, Juan N. 2000b. “La Confianza Se Gana Día a Día.” Palabras pronuciadas por Ministro Juan N. Silva Meza, el 13 de enero de 2000, con motivo de la toma de protesta de jueces de Distrito y magistrados de Circuito. Colección Discursos, Número 11.
188. Smithey, Shannon Ishiyama, and John Ishiyama. 2002. “Judicial Activism in Post-Communist Politics.” Law and Society Review 36:719-42.
189. Soberantes Fernández, José Luis. 1992. “Notas Sobre el Origen del Amparo- Casación en México.” Boletín Mexicano de Derecho Comparado. 63: 529-47.
190. Sobocinski, Raymund A. 2006. “Adumbrations On Judicial Campaign Speech.” Idaho Law Review 43:193. Available at: SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=892686.
191. Spaeth, Harold J. 2004. “United States Supreme Court Judicial Database, 19532003 Terms.” Available at: http://www.as.uky.edu/polisci/ulmerproject/.
192. Spaeth, Harold J., David B. Meltz, Gregory J. Rathjen, and Michael V. Hasel-swerdt. 1972. “Is Justice Blind: An Empirical Investigation of a Normative Ideal.” Law and Society Review 7:119-38.
193. Spriggs, James F. 1996. “The Supreme Court and Federal Administrative Agencies: A Resource-Based Theory and Analysis of Judicial Impact.” American Journal of Political Science 40:1122-51.
194. Staton, Jeffrey K. 2007. “Lobbying for Judicial Reform: The Role of the Mexican Supreme Court in Institutional Selection.” In Reforming the Administration of Justice in Mexico, in eds. Wayne A. Cornelius and David A. Shirk. Norte Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
195. Staton, Jeffrey K. 2006. “Constitutional Review and the Selective Promotion of Case Results.” American Journal of Political Science 50:98-112.
196. Staton, Jeffrey K. 2004. “Judicial Policy Implementation in Mexico City and Mérida.” Comparative Politics 37:41-60.
197. Staton, Jeffrey K. 2002. Judicial Activism and Public Authority Compliance. Unpublished PhD diss., Washington University in St. Louis.
198. Staton, Jeffrey K., and Georg Vanberg. 2008. “The Value of Vagueness: Delegation, Defiance, and Judicial Opinions.” American Journal of Political Science 58:504-19.
199. Stephenson, Matthew C. 2004. “Court of Public Opinion: Government Accountability and Judicial Independence.” The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 20:379-99.
200. Stokes, Susan C. 2001. Mandates and Democracy: Neoliberalism by Surprise in Latin America. New York: Cambridge University Press.
201. Stone, Alec. 1992. The Birth of Judicial Politics in France: The Constitutional Council in Comparative Perspective. New York: Oxford University Press.
202. Stone Sweet, Alec. 2000. Governing with Judges: Constitutional Politics in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
203. Tate, C. Neal, and Linda Camp Keith. 2007. “Conceptualizing and Operationalizing Judicial Independence Globally.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, August 30-September 1, 2007, Chicago.
204. Tate, C. Neal, Stacia L. Haynie, Reginald Sheehan, and Donald R. Songer. 2006. “Collaborative Research: Extending a Multi-Country Database and Program of Research.” National Science Foundation, Law and Social Science Program, Basic Research Grant.
205. Tate, C. Neal, and Torbjorn Vallinder. 1995. “The Global Expansion of Judicial Power: The Judicialization of Politics.” In The Global Expansion of Judicial Power, eds. C. Neal Tate and Torbjorn Vallinder. New York: New York University Press.
206. Tena Ramírez, Felipe. 1957. Leyes Fundamentales de México, 1808-1957. México: Editorial Porrúa.
207. Transparency International. 2007. “Global Corruption Report 2007: Corruption in Judicial Systems.” Transparency International, Berlin.
208. Trochev, Alexei. 2002. “Implementing Russian Constitutional Court Decisions.” East European Constitutional Review 11:95-103.
209. Tsebelis, George. 2002. Veto Players. How Political Institutions Work. New York: Russell Sage Foundation and Princeton University Press.
210. Tyler, Tom R. 1990. Why People Follow the Law: Procedural Justice, Legitimacy, and Compliance. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
211. Tyler, Tom R. 2009. “Law and Psychology.” In Oxford Handbook of Law and Politics, eds. Keith E. Whittington, R. Daniel Kelemen, and Gregory A. Caldeira. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
212. Vanberg, Georg. 2005. The Politics of Constitutional Review in Germany. New York: Cambridge University Press.
213. Vanberg, Georg. 2001. “Establishing Judicial Independence in West Germany: The Impact of Opinion Leadership and the Separation of Powers.” Comparative Politics 33:333-53.
214. Volcansek, Mary L. 2000. Constitutional Politics in Italy: The Constitutional Court. New York: St. Martin's Press.
215. Volcansek, Mary L. 1991. “Judicial Activism in Italy.” In Judicial Activism in Comparative Perspective, ed. Kenneth Holland. New York: St. Martin's Press.
216. Workshop on Reporting of Court Proceedings by Media and Administration of Justice. Supreme Court of India. March 29-30, 2008, Vigyan Bhawan, New Delhi.
217. Weingast, Barry. 1997. “The Political Foundations of Democracy and the Rule of Law.” American Political Science Review 91:245-63.
218. Whittington, Keith E. 2005. “‘Interpose Your Friendly Hand’: Political Supports for the Exercise of Judicial Review by the United States Supreme Court.” American Political Science Review 99:583-96.
219. Wilson, Bruce M., and Juan Carlos Rodríguez Cordero. 2006. “Legal Opportunity Structures and Social Movements: The Effects of Institutional Change on Costa Rican Politics.” Comparative Political Studies 39:325-51.
220. Workshop on Reporting of Court Proceedings by Media and Administration of Justice. Supreme Court of India. March 29-30, 2008, Vigyan Bhawan, New Delhi.
221. Wuhs, Steven T. 2008. Savage Democracy: Institutional Change and Party Development in Mexico. University Park, PA: Penn State University Press.
222. Zakaria, Fareed. 1997. “The Rise of Illiberal Democracy.” Foreign Affairs 76: 22-43.