Comparing Analysis Frames for Visual Data Sets: Using Pupil Views Templates to Explore Perspectives of Learning

Journal of Mixed Methods Research

Volumn 7, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 22-42

  Wall, Kate ^a   Higgins, Steve ^a   Remedios, Richard ^a   Rafferty, Victoria ^b   Tiplady, Lucy ^b  

^a DURHAM UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b NEWCASTLE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Learning to Learn; mixed methods analysis; Pupil Views Templates; visual methods

Indexed keywords

EID: 84871368052     PISSN: 15586898     EISSN: 15586901     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1558689812450211     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Alise M. A.,Teddlie C.A continuation of the paradigm wars? Prevalence rates of methodological approaches across the social/behavioural sciences.Journal of Mixed Methods Research. 2010;4 (2): 103-126.
2. Bartsch K.,Horvarth K.,Estes D.Young children's talk about learning events.Cognitive Development. 2003;18:177-193.
3. Baumfield V.,Hall E.,Wall K.Action research in the classroom. London, England: Sage; 2008:.
4. Bryman A.Social research methods. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press; 2003:.
5. Creswell J. W.Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches. 2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2009:.
6. Creswell J. W.,Plano Clark V. L.,Gutmann M. L.,Hanson W. D.Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research. Tashakkori A.Teddlie C., ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2003:209-241.
7. Elliott J.Making evidence-based practice educational.British Educational Research Journal. 2001;27:555-574.
8. Feilzer M. F.Doing mixed methods research pragmatically: Implications for the rediscovery of pragmatism as a research paradigm.Journal of Mixed Methods Research. 2009;4 (1): 6-16.
9. Glaser B. G.Doing grounded theory-Issues and discussions. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press; 1998:.
10. Glaser B. G.,Strauss A. L.The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago, IL: Aldine; 1967:.
11. Green S. B.,Salkind N. J.Using SPSS for Windows: Analyzing and understanding data. 2003). Using SPSS for Windows: Analyzing and understanding data (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall; 2003:.
12. Greene J. C.Mixed methods in social enquiry. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 2007:.
13. Greene J. C.Is mixed methods social enquiry a distinctive methodology?.Journal of Mixed Methods Research. 2008;2 (1): 7-22.
14. Hammersley M.Can and should educational research be educative?.Oxford Review of Education. 2003;29:3-25.
15. Harry B.,Sturges K. M.,Klingner J. K.Mapping the process: An exemplar of process and challenge in grounded theory analysis.Educational Researcher. 2005;34:3-13.
16. Higgins S.,Remedios R.,Wall K.Exploring the development of pupils' declarative knowledge of metacognition. 2012;:.
17. Johnson R. B.,Onwuegbuzie A. J.Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come.Educational Researcher. 2004;33 (7): 14-26.
18. Kuhn D.Child psychology: A handbook of contemporary issues. Balter L.Tamis-LeMonda C. S., ed. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press; 1999:209-241.
19. Kuhn D.,Dean D.Metacognition: A bridge between cognitive psychology and educational practice.Theory Into Practice. 2004;43:268-273.
20. Lather P.Issues of validity in openly ideological research: Between a rock and a soft place.Interchange. 1986;17 (4): 63-84.
21. Leech N.,Barrett K. C.,Morgan G.SPSS for intermediate statistics: Use and interpretation. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 2005:.
22. Major C. H.,Savin-Baden M.Integration of qualitative evidence: Towards construction of academic knowledge in social science and professional fields.Qualitative Research. 2011;11:645-663.
23. Mathison S.What counts as credible evidence in research and evaluation. Donaldson S.Christie C.Mark M., ed. London, England: Sage; 2008:181-196.
24. Mehan H.Qualitative voices in educational research. Schratz M., ed. London, England: Falmer Press; 1993:93-105.
25. Miller W. L.,Crabtree B. F.Doing qualitative research. 1999). Clinical research: A multi-method typology and qualitative roadmap. In CrabtreeB. F.MillerW. L. (Eds.), Doing qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 3-31). London, England: Sage.Crabtree B. F.Miller W. L., ed. London, England: Sage; 1999:3-31.
26. Moseley D.,Baumfield V.,Elliott J.,Higgins S.,Miller J.,Newton D. P.Frameworks for thinking: A handbook for teaching and learning. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press; 2005:.
27. Moseley D.,Elliott J.,Gregson M.,Higgins S.Thinking skills frameworks for use in education and training.British Educational Research Journal. 2005;31:81-101.
28. Nastasi B. K.,Hitchcock J. H.,Brown L. M.Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research. 2010). An inclusive framework for conceptualizing mixed methods design typologies: Moving toward fully integrated synergistic research models. In TashakkoriA.TeddlieC. (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research (2nd ed., pp. 305-338). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Tashakkori A.Teddlie C., ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2010:305-338.
29. Newman I.,Benz C. R.Qualitative-quantitative research methodology: Exploring the interactive continuum. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois State Press; 1998:.
30. Newman I.,Ridenour C. S.,Newman C.,DeMarco G. M. P.Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research. Tashakkori A.Teddlie C., ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2003:167-188.
31. Onwuegbuzie A. J.,Slate J. R.,Leech N. L.,Collins K. M. T.Conducting mixed analyses: A general typology.International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches. 2007;1:4-18.
32. Onwuegbuzie A. J.,Teddlie C.Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research. Tashakkori A.Teddlie C., ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2003:351-383.
33. Peirce C. S.Indianapolis: Indiana University Press; 1986:.
34. Image-based research. Prosser J., ed. London, England: RoutledgeFalmer; 1998:.
35. Prosser J.Visual methods and the visual culture of schools.Visual Studies. 2007;22:13-30.
36. Prosser J. Loxley A. (2008, October). Introducing visual methods (Review paper NCRM/010). Southampton, England: ESRC National Centre for Research Methods. Retrieved from http://eprints.ncrm.ac.uk/420/.
37. ShankG.CunninghamD. J. (1996). Modeling the six modes of Peircian abduction for educational purposes. In GasserM. (Ed.), On-line Proceedings of the 1996 Midwest Artifical Intelligence and Cognitive Science Conference (Indiana). Retrieved from http://www.cs.indiana.edu/event/maics96/Proceedings/shank.html.
38. Stephenson W.The study of behavior: Q technique and its methodology. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 1953:.
39. Tabachnick B. G.,Fidell L. S.Using multivariate statistics. New York, NY: Harper Collins; 1996:.
40. Doing visual research with children and young people. Thompson P., ed. London, England: Routledge; 2008:.
41. Veenman M. V. J.,Kok R.,Blöte A. W.The relation between intellectual and metacognitive skills in early adolescence.Instructional Science. 2005;33:193-211.
42. Veenman M. V. J.,Spaans M. A.Relation between intellectual and metacognitive skills: Age and task difference.Learning and Individual Differences. 2005;15:159-176.
43. Vygotsky L. S.Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1978:.
44. Wall K.Understanding metacognition through the use of pupil views templates: Pupil views of Learning to Learn.Thinking Skills and Creativity. 2008;3:23-33.
45. Wall K. Hall E. Baumfield V. Higgins S. Rafferty V. Remedios R. Woolner P. (2010). Learning to Learn in Schools Phase 4 and Learning to Learn in further education projects: Annual report. London, England: Campaign for Learning. Retrieved from www.campaign-for-learning.org.uk.
46. Wall K. Hall E. Higgins S. Leat D. Thomas U. Tiplady L. Woolner P. (2009). Learning to Learn in Schools Phase 4: Year One Report. London, England: Campaign for Learning. Retrieved from www.campaign-for-learning.org.uk.
47. Wall K.,Higgins S.Facilitating and supporting talk with pupils about metacognition: A research and learning tool.International Journal of Research & Method in Education. 2006;29:39-53.
48. Wall K.,Higgins S.,Packard E.Talking about learning: Using templates to find out pupils' views. Devon, England: Southgate; 2007:.
49. Willig C.Qualitative research Psychology: A practical guide to theory and method. Buckingham, England: Oxford University Press; 2001:.
50. Woolner P.,Clark J.,Hall E.,Tiplady L.,Thomas U.,Wall K.Pictures are necessary but not sufficient: Using a range of visual methods to engage users about school design.Learning Environments Research. 2010;13:1-22.