Validation of Assessment for Learning Questionnaires for teachers and students

British Journal of Educational Psychology

Volumn 83, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 98-113

  Pat El, Ron Jonathan ^a   Tillema, Harm ^a   Segers, Mien ^a,b   Vedder, Paul ^a  

^a LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CHILD; FACTORIAL ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HUMAN; LEARNING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NETHERLANDS; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; QUESTIONNAIRE; REPRODUCIBILITY; STANDARD; STATISTICS; STUDENT; UNIVERSITY; VALIDATION STUDY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; CHILD; FACTOR ANALYSIS, STATISTICAL; FACULTY; FEMALE; HUMANS; LEARNING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NETHERLANDS; QUESTIONNAIRES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; STUDENTS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84873122783     PISSN: 00070998     EISSN: 20448279     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.2044-8279.2011.02057.x     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Assessment Reform Group. (2002). Assessment for learning: 10 principles Retrieved from http://arg.educ.cam.ac.uk/CIE3.pdf
2. Bartholomew, L. K., Parcel, G. S., Kok, G., & Gottlieb, N. H. (2001). Intervention mapping: Designing theory and evidence-based health promotion programs Mountain View, CA : Mayfield.
3. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998a). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education, 21, 49-97. doi:10.1080/0969595980050102
4. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998b). Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 80, 139-148.
5. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21, 5-31. doi:10.1007/s11092-008-9068-5
6. Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables New York : John Wiley & Sons.
7. Boud, D. (2000). Sustainable assessment: Rethinking assessment for the learning society. Studies in Continuing Education, 22, 151-167. doi:10.1080/713695728
8. Brown, G. T. L. (2008). Conceptions of assessment: Understanding what assessment means to teachers and students New York : Nova Science Publishers.
9. Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1992). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sociological Methods and Research, 21, 230-258. doi:10.1177/0049124192021002005
10. Byrne, B. M. (2006). Structural equation modeling with EQS Mahwah, NJ : Erlbaum.
11. Central Bureau of Statistics. (2007). Jaarboek onderwijs in cijfers [ Yearbook education in numbers ]. Voorburg, the Netherlands : Central Bureau of Statistics.
12. Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 233-255. doi:10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5
13. Crooks, T. (2001). The validity of formative assessments Leeds, UK : British Educational Research Association.
14. Darling-Hammond, L. (2010). Performance counts: Assessment systems that support high-quality learning. Council of Chief State School Officers (CCSSO). Retrieved from http://www.ccsso.org/publications/details.cfm?PublicationID=381
15. Entwistle, N. J. (1991). Approaches to learning and perceptions of the learning environment: Introduction to the special issue. Higher Education, 22, 201-204. doi:10.1007/BF00132287
16. Fan, X., & Sivo, S. A. (2007). Sensitivity of fit indices to model misspecification and model types. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42, 509-529. doi:10.1080/00273170701382864
17. Gibbs, G., & Simpson, C. (2003). Measuring the response of students to assessment: The Assessment Experience Questionnaire Paper presented at the proceedings of the 11th International Improving Student Learning Symposium, Hinckley, UK
18. Gipps, C. (1994). Beyond testing: Towards a theory of educational assessment London, UK : Falmer Press.
19. Gregorich, S. E. (2006). Do self-report instruments allow meaningful comparisons across diverse population groups? Testing measurement invariance using the confirmatory analysis framework. Medical Care, 44, S78-S94. doi:10.1097/01.mlr.0000245454.12228.8f
20. Hirschfeld, G. H. F., & Brown, G. T. L. (2009). Students' conceptions of assessment: Factorial and structural invariance of the SCoA across sex, age, and ethnicity. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 25, 30-38. doi:10.1027/1015-5759.25.1.30
21. Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118
22. James, M., & Pedder, D. (2006). Beyond method: Assessment and learning practices and values. Curriculum Journal, 17, 109-138. doi:10.1080/09585170600792712
23. Kluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A. (1996). The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 254-284. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.119.2.254
24. Könings, K. D. (2007). Student perspectives on education: Implications for instructional redesign Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Open University of the Netherlands, Heerlen, the Netherlands
25. Loughran, J. J. (2010). What expert teachers do: Enhancing professional knowledge for classroom practice Sydney, London : Allen & Unwin/Routledge.
26. MacLellan, E. (2001). Assessment for learning: The differing perceptions of tutors and students. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 26, 307-318. doi:10.1080/02602930120063466
27. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1995). Assessment standards for school mathematics Reston, VA : Author.
28. Norman, D. A. (1986). Cognitive engineering. In D. A. Norman & S. W. Draper (Eds.), New perspectives on human-computer interaction (pp. 31-62). Hillsdale, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
29. OECD. (2005). Formative assessment: Improving learning in secondary classrooms Paris, France : OECD/CERI.
30. Olkinuora, E., & Salonen, P. (1992). Adaptation, motivational orientation and cognition in a subnormally-performing child: A systematic perspective for training. In B. Wong (Ed.), Contemporary intervention research in learning disabilities (pp. 190-213). New York : Springer-Verlag.
31. Pat-El, R. J., Segers, M. S. R., Tillema, H. H., & Vedder, P. H. (2008). Constructing a new assessment for learning questionnaire. Paper presented at the meeting of the fourth biennial Earli/Northumbria Assessment Conference, Potsdam, Germany
32. Popham, J. (2008). Transformative assessment Alexandria, VA : Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
33. Prosser, M., & Trigwell, K. (1993). Development of an approaches to teaching questionnaire. Research and Development in Higher Education, 15, 468-473.
34. Schultz, R. A. (2001). Cultural differences in student and teacher perceptions concerning the role of grammar instructions and corrective feedback. Modern Language Journal, 85, 244-258. doi:10.1111/0026-7902.00107
35. Scouller, K. (1998). The influence of assessment method on students' learning approaches: Multiple choice examination versus assignment essay. Higher Education, 35, 453-472. doi:10.1023/A:1003196224280
36. Scriven, M. (2002). Evaluation ideologies. In D. L. Stufflebeam, G.F. Madaus, & T. Kellaghan (Eds.). Evaluation: Viewpoints on educational and human services evaluation models (2nd ed., pp. 249-278). Boston, MA : Kluwer Academic Publishers.
37. Segers, M. (2004). Assessment en leren als een twee-eenheid: Onderzoek naar de impact van assessment op leren [ Assessment and learning as a duality, Research into the impact of assessment on learning ] (Inaugural address). Leiden, the Netherlands : Leiden University.
38. Stiggins, R. J. (2005). From formative assessment to assessment for learning: A path to success in standards-based schools. Phi Delta Kappan, 87, 324-328.
39. Struyven, K., Dochy, F., & Janssens, S. (2005). Students' perceptions about evaluation and assessment in higher education: A review. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 30, 325-341. doi:10.1080/02602930500099102
40. Vedder, P. (1985). Cooperative learning: A study on processes and effect of cooperation between primary school children Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Rijksuniversiteit Groningen.
41. Wiggins, G. (1993). Assessing student performance: Exploring the purpose and limits of testing San Fransisco, CA : Jossey-Bass.
42. Wiliam, D. (2011). What is assessment for learning? Studies in Educational Evaluation, 37, 3-14. doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2011.03.001
43. Wu, A. D., Li, Z., & Zumbo, B. D. (2007). Decoding the meaning of factorial invariance and updating the practice of multi-group confirmatory factor analysis: A demonstration with TIMSS data. Practical Assessment Research and Evaluation, 12, 1-25. Retrieved from http://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=12&n=3