Fisher's geometric model with a moving optimum

Evolution

Volumn 68, Issue 9, 2014, Pages 2571-2588

  Matuszewski, Sebastian ^a   Hermisson, Joachim ^a,b   Kopp, Michael ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA   (Austria)

^b MAX F PERUTZ LABORATORIES   (Austria)

^c AIX MARSEILLE UNIVERSITÉ   (France)

Author keywords

Adaptation; Models simulations; Mutations; Pleiotropy; Population genetics; Selection natural

Indexed keywords

CORRELATION; ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE; GENOME; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PHENOTYPIC PLASTICITY; PLEIOTROPY; POPULATION GENETICS;

ADAPTATION; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; ENVIRONMENT; EVOLUTION; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETICS; MUTATION; PHENOTYPE; PLEIOTROPY; POPULATION GENETICS; TIME;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; ENVIRONMENT; GENETIC PLEIOTROPY; GENETICS, POPULATION; MODELS, GENETIC; MUTATION; PHENOTYPE; SELECTION, GENETIC; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 84908013044     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: 15585646     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/evo.12465     Document Type: Article

References (107)

1. Adamo, G., S. Brocca, S. Passolunghi, B. Salvato, and M. Lotti. 2012. Laboratory evolution of copper tolerant yeast strains. Microb. Cell Fact. 11:1.
2. Agrawal, A. F., and J. R. Stinchcombe. 2009. How much do genetic covariances alter the rate of adaptation? Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 276:1183-1191.
3. Albert, A. Y., S. Sawaya, T. H. Vines, A. K. Knecht, C. T. Miller, B. R. Summers, S. Balabhadra, D. M. Kingsley, and D. Schluter. 2008. The genetics of adaptive shape shift in stickleback: pleiotropy and effect size. Evolution 62:76-85.
4. Antonov, A., B. G. Stokke, J. R. Vikan, F. Fossøy, P. S. Ranke, E. Røskaft, A. Moksnes, A. P. Møller, and J. A. Shykoff. 2010. Egg phenotype differentiation in sympatric cuckoo cuculus canorus gentes. J. Evol. Biol. 23:1170-1182.
5. Barrett, R. D. H., and D. Schluter. 2008. Adaptation from standing genetic variation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 23:38-44.
6. Barrick, J. E., and R. E. Lenski. 2013. Genome dynamics during experimental evolution. Nat. Rev. Genet. 14:827-839.
7. Barrick, J. E., D. S. Yu, S. H. Yoon, H. Jeong, T. K. Oh, D. Schneider, R. E. Lenski, and J. F. Kim. 2009. Genome evolution and adaptation in a long-term experiment with Escherichia coli. Nature 461:1243-1247.
8. Bell, G. 2009. The oligogenic view of adaptation. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol. 74:139-144.
9. Bell, G., and A. Gonzalez. 2009. Evolutionary rescue can prevent extinction following environmental change. Ecol. Lett. 12:942-948.
10. Bürger, R. 1999. Evolution of genetic variability and the advantage of sex and recombination in a changing environment. Genetics 153:1055-1069.
11. Bürger, R.. 2000. The mathematical theory of selection, recombination, and mutation. Wiley, Chichester.
12. Bürger, R., and A. Gimelfarb. 2002. Fluctuating environments and the role of mutation in maintaining quantitative genetic variation. Genet. Res. 80:31-46.
13. Bürger, R., and M. Lynch. 1995. Evolution and extinction in a changing environment: a quantitative genetic analysis. Evolution 49:151-163.
14. Charlesworth, B. 1996. The good fairy godmother of evolutionary genetics. Curr. Biol. 6:220.
15. Chevin, L. M. 2013. Genetic constraints on adaptation to a changing environment. Evolution 67:708-721.
16. Chevin, L. M., G. Martin, and T. Lenormand. 2010. Fisher's model and the genomics of adaptation: restricted pleiotropy, heterogenous mutation, and parallel evolution. Evolution 64:3213-3231.
17. Collins, S. 2011a. Competition limits adaptation and productivity in a photosynthetic alga at elevated Co2. Proc. Biol. Sci. 278:247-255.
18. Collins, S. 2011b. Many possible worlds: expanding the ecological scenarios in experimental evolution. Evol. Biol. 38:3-14.
19. Collins, S., J. de Meaux, and C. Acquisti. 2007. Adaptive walks toward a moving optimum. Genetics 176:1089-1099.
20. Cooper, T. F., E. A. Ostrowski, and M. Travisano. 2007. A negative relationship between mutation pleiotropy and fitness effect in yeast. Evolution 61:1495-1499.
21. Dieckmann, U., and R. Law. 1996. The dynamical theory of coevolution: a derivation from stochastic ecological processes. J. Math. Biol. 34:579-612.
22. Domingues, V. S., Y.-P. Poh, B. K. Peterson, P. S. Pennings, J. D. Jensen, and H. E. Hoekstra. 2012. Evidence of adaptation from ancestral variation in young populations of beach mice. Evolution 66:3209-3223.
23. Elena, S. F., and R. E. Lenski. 2003. Evolution experiments with microorganisms: the dynamics and genetic bases of adaptation. Nat. Rev. Genet. 4:457-469.
24. Fisher, R. 1930. The genetical theory of natural selection. Clarendon Press, Oxford, U.K.
25. Gerrish, P. J., and R. E. Lenski. 1998. The fate of competing beneficial mutations in an asexual population. Genetica 102/103:127-144.
26. Gienapp, P., M. Lof, T. E. Reed, J. McNamara, S. Verhulst, and M. E. Visser. 2013. Predicting demographically sustainable rates of adaptation: can great tit breeding time keep pace with climate change? Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 368:20120289.
27. Gillespie, J. H. 1983. A simple stochastic gene substitution model. Theor. Popul. Biol. 23:202-215.
28. Gillespie, J. H. 1993. Substitution processes in molecular evolution. I. Uniform and clustered substitutions in a haploid model. Genetics 134:971-981.
29. Gomulkiewicz, R., and R. D. Holt. 1995. When does evolution by natural selection prevent extinction? Evolution 49:201-207.
30. Gomulkiewicz, R., and D. Houle. 2009. Demographic and genetic constraints on evolution. Am. Nat. 174:E218-E229.
31. Gonzalez, A., O. Ronce, R. Ferriere, and M. E. Hochberg. 2013. Evolutionary rescue: an emerging focus at the intersection between ecology and evolution. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 368: 20120404.
32. Gordo, I., and P. R. A. Campos. 2013. Evolution of clonal populations approaching a fitness peak. Biol. Lett. 9: 20120239.
33. Guerreiro, R., A. A. Besson, J. Bellenger, K. Ragot, G. Lizard, B. Faivre, and G. Sorci. 2012. Correlational selection on pro- and anti-inflammatory effectors. Evolution 66:3615-3623.
34. Hairston, N. G., S. P. Ellner, M. A. Geber, T. Yoshida, and J. A. Fox. 2005. Rapid evolution and the convergence of ecological and evolutionary time. Ecol. Lett. 8:1114-1127.
35. Haldane, J. B. S. 1927. A mathematical theory of natural and artificial selection. Part V: selection and mutation. Proc. Camb. Philos. Soc. 23:838-844.
36. Hancock, A. M., B. Brachi, N. Faure, M. W. Horton, L. B. Jarymowycz, F. G. Sperone, C. Toomajian, F. Roux, and J. Bergelson. 2011. Adaptation to climate across the Arabidopsis thaliana genome. Science 334:83-86.
37. Hansen, T. F., and D. Houle. 2008. Measuring and comparing evolvability and constraints in multivariate characters. J. Evol. Biol. 21:1201-1219.
38. Hermisson, J., and A. P. McGregor. 2008. Pleiotropic scaling and QTL data. Nature 456:E3.
39. Hermisson, J., and P. S. Pennings. 2005. Soft sweeps: molecular population genetics of adaptation from standing genetic variation. Genetics 169:2335-2352.
40. Hietpas, R. T., C. Bank, J. D. Jensen, and D. N. A. Bolon. 2013. Shifting fitness landscapes in response to altered environments. Evolution 67:3383-3689.
41. Hill, W. G. 1982. Rates of change in quantitative traits from fixation of new mutations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 79:142-145.
42. Hill, W. G. and J. Rasbash, 1986a. Models of long term artificial selection in finite populations. Genet. Res. 48:41-50.
43. Hill, W. G. and J. Rasbash. 1986b. Models of long term artificial selection in finite populations with recurrent mutation. Genet. Res. 48:125-131.
44. Hill, W. G., and A. Robertson. 1966. The effect of linkage on limits to artificial selection. Genet. Res. 8:269-294.
45. Hill, W. G., and X.-S. Zhang. 2012a. Assessing pleiotropy and its evolutionary consequences: pleiotropy is not necessarily limited, nor need it hinder the evolution of complexity. Nat. Rev. Genet. 13:296.
46. Hill, W. G., and X.-S. Zhang. 2012b. On the pleiotropic structure of the genotype-phenotype map and the evolvability of complex organisms. Genetics 190:1131-1137.
47. Hughes, B. S., A. J. Cullum, and A. F. Bennett. 2007. Evolutionary adaptation to environmental pH in experimental lineages of Escherichia coli. Evolution 61:1725-1734.
48. Jerome, J. P., J. A. Bell, A. E. Plovanich-Jones, J. E. Barrick, C. T. Brown, and L. S. Mansfield. 2011. Standing genetic variation in contingency loci drives the rapid adaptation of Campylobacter jejuni to a novel host. PLoS One 6:e16399.
49. Jones, A. G., S. J. Arnold, and R. Bürger. 2003. Stability of the G-matrix in a population experiencing pleiotropic mutation, stabilizing selection, and genetic drift. Evolution 57:1747-1760.
50. Jones, A. G., S. J. Arnold, and R. Bürger. 2004. Evolution and stability of the G-matrix on a landscape with a moving optimum. Evolution 58:1636-1654.
51. Jones, A. G., R. Bürger, S. J. Arnold, P. A. Hohenlohe, and J. C. Uyeda, 2012. The effects of stochastic and episodic movement of the optimum on the evolution of the G-matrix and the response of the trait mean to selection. J. Evol. Biol. 25:2210-2231.
52. Kacser, H., and J. A. Burns. 1981. Themolecular basis of dominance. Genetics 97:639-666.
53. Kauffman, S. A. A. 1993. Origins of order: self-organization and selection in evolution. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, U.K.
54. Kawecki, T. J., R. E. Lenski, D. Ebert, B. Hollis, I. Olivieri, and M. C. Whitlock. 2012. Experimental evolution. Trends Ecol. Evol. 27:547-560.
55. Kimura, M. 1983. The neutral theory of molecular evolution. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, U.K.
56. Kopp, M., and J. Hermisson. 2007. Adaptation of a quantitative trait to a moving optimum. Genetics 176:715-718.
57. Kopp, M., and J. Hermisson. 2009a. The genetic basis of phenotypic adaptation I: fixation of beneficial mutations in the moving optimum model. Genetics 182:233-249.
58. Kopp, M., and J. Hermisson. 2009b. The genetic basis of phenotypic adaptation II: the distribution of adaptive substitutions in the moving optimum model. Genetics 183:1453-1476.
59. Kopp, M., and S. Matuszewski. 2014. Rapid evolution of quantitative traits: theoretical perspectives. Evol. Appl. 7:169-191.
60. Lachapelle, J., and G. Bell. 2012. Evolutionary rescue of sexual and asexual populations in a deteriorating environment. Evolution 66:3508-3518.
61. Lande, R. 1979. Quantitative genetic analysis ofmultivariate evolution applied to brain:body size allometry. Evolution 33:402-416.
62. Lande, R. 1980. Sexual dimorphism, sexual selection, and adaptation in polygenic characters. Evolution 34:292-305.
63. Langlade, N. B., X. Feng, T. Dransfield, L. Copsey, A. I. Hanna, C. Thebaud, A. Bangham, A. Hudson, and E. Coen. 2005. Evolution through genetically controlled allometry space. Proc.Natl. Acad. Sci.USA 102:10221-10226.
64. Lindsey, H. A., J. Gallie, S. Taylor, and B. Kerr. 2013. Evolutionary rescue from extinction is contingent on a lower rate of environmental change. Nature 494:463-467.
65. Lourenço, J., N. Galtier, and S. Glémin. 2011. Complexity, pleiotropy, and the fitness effect of mutations. Evolution 65:1559-1571.
66. Lourenço, J., S. Glémin, and N. Galtier. 2013. The rate of molecular adaptation in a changing environment. Mol. Biol. Evol. 30:1292-1301.
67. Lynch, M., and R. Lande. 1993. Evolution and extinction in response to environmental change. Pp. 43-53 in P. Kareiva, J. G. Kingsolver, and R. B. Juey, eds. Biotic interactions and global change. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.
68. Martin, G., and T. Lenormand. 2006a. A general multivariate extension of Fisher's geometrical model and the distribution of mutation fitness effects across species. Evolution 60:893-907.
69. Martin, G., and T. Lenormand. 2006b. The fitness effect of mutations in stressful environments: a survey in the light of fitness landscape models. Evolution 60:2413-2427.
70. Maynard Smith, J. 1976. What determines the rate of evolution? Am. Nat. 110:331-338.
71. Messer, P.W., and D. A. Petrov. 2013. Population genomics of rapid adaptation by soft selective sweeps. Trends Ecol. Evol. 28:659-669.
72. Metzker, M. L. 2010. Sequencing technologies-the next generation. Nat. Rev. Genet. 11:31-46.
73. Møller, A., N. Saino, P. Adamík, R. Ambrosini, A. Antonov, D. Campobello, B. Stokke, F. Fossøy, E. Lehikoinen, M. Martin-Vivaldi, et al. 2011. Rapid change in host use of the common cuckoo cuculus canorus linked to climate change. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 278:733-738.
74. Møller, A. P., D. Rubolini, and E. Lehikoinen. 2008. Populations of migratory bird species that did not show a phenological response to climate change are declining. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105:16195-16200.
75. Nunney, L. 2003. The cost of natural selection revisited. Ann. Zool. Fennici 40:185-194.
76. Orr, H. A. 1998. The population genetics of adaptation: the distribution of factors fixed during adaptive evolution. Evolution 52:935-949.
77. Orr, H. A.. 2000. Adaptation and the cost of complexity. Evolution 54:13-20.
78. Orr, H. A.. 2002. The population genetics of adaptation: the adaptation of DNA sequences. Evolution 56:1317-1330.
79. Orr, H. A.. 2005a. The genetic theory of adaptation: a brief history. Nat. Rev. Genet. 6:119-127.
80. Orr, H. A.. 2005b. Theories of adaptation: what they do and don't say. Genetica 123:3-13.
81. Otto, S. P., and C. D. Jones. 2000. Detecting the undetected: estimating the total number of loci underlying a quantitative trait. Genetics 156:2093-2107.
82. Paaby, A. B., and M. V. Rockman. 2013. The many faces of pleiotropy. Trends Genet. 29:66-73.
83. Park, S.-C., and J. Krug. 2007. Clonal interference in large populations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104:18135-18140.
84. Parmesan, C. 2006. Ecological and evolutionary responses to recent climate change. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 37:637-669.
85. Perron, G. G., A. Gonzalez, and A. Buckling. 2008. The rate of environmental change drives adaptation to an antibiotic sink. J. Evol. Biol. 21:1724-1731.
86. Reusch, T. B. H., and P.W. Boyd. 2013. Experimental evolution meets marine phytoplankton. Evolution 67:1849-1859.
87. Rockman, M. V. 2012. The QTN program and the alleles that matter for evolution: all that's gold does not glitter. Evolution 66:1-17.
88. Roff, D. A., and D. J. Fairbairn. 2012. Atest of the hypothesis that correlational selection generates genetic correlations. Evolution 66:2953-2960.
89. Rogers, S. M., P. Tamkee, B. Summers, S. Balabahadra, M. Marks, D. M. Kingsley, and D. Schluter. 2012. Genetic signature of adaptive peak shift in threespine stickleback. Evolution 66:2439-2450.
90. Schluter, D., K. B. Marchinko, R. D. H. Barrett, and S. M. Rogers. 2010. Natural selection and the genetics of adaptation in threespine stickleback. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 365:2479-2486.
91. Svensson, E., B. Sinervo, and T. Comendant. 2001. Density-dependent competition and selection on immune function in genetic lizard morphs. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98:12561-12565.
92. Teotónio, H., I. M. Chelo, M. Bradic, M. R. Rose, and A. D. Long. 2009. Experimental evolution reveals natural selection on standing genetic variation. Nat. Genet. 41:251-257.
93. Thompson, J. N. 2005. The geographic mosaic of coevolution. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
94. Turelli, M. 1985. Effects of pleiotropy on predictions concerning mutationselection balance for polygenic traits. Genetics 111:165-195.
95. Uecker, H., and J. Hermisson. 2011. On the fixation process of a beneficial mutation in a variable environment. Genetics 188:915-930.
96. Wagner, G. P. 1988. The influence of variation and of developmental constraints on the rate of multivariate phenotypic evolution. J. Evol. Biol. 1:45-66.
97. Wagner, G. P., and L. Altenberg. 1996. Perspective: complex adaptations and the evolution of evolvability. Evolution 50:967-976.
98. Wagner, G. P., and J. Zhang. 2011. The pleiotropic structure of the genotypephenotype map: the evolvability of complex organisms. Nat. Rev. Genet. 12:204-213.
99. Wagner, G. P., and J. Zhang. 2012. Universal pleiotropy is not a valid null hypothesis: reply to Hill and Zhang. Nat. Rev. Genet. 13:296.
100. Wagner, G. P., J. P. Kenney-Hunt, M. Pavlicev, J. R. Peck, D.Waxman, and J. M. Cheverud. 2008. Pleiotropic scaling of gene effects and the "cost of complexity". Nature 452:470-472.
101. Walsh, B., and M.W. Blows. 2009. Abundant genetic variation+strong selection = multivariate genetic constraints: a geometric view of adaptation. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 40:41-59.
102. Wang, Z., B. Y. Liao, and J. Zhang. 2010. Genomic patterns of pleiotropy and the evolution of complexity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 107:18034-18039.
103. Waxman, D., and J. R. Peck. 1999. Sex and adaptation in a changing environment. Genetics 153:1041-1053.
104. Weissman, D. B., and N. H. Barton. 2012. Limits to the rate of adaptive substitution in sexual populations. PLoS Genet. 8:e1002740.
105. Welch, J. J., and D. Waxman. 2003. Modularity and the costs of complexity. Evolution 57:1723-1734.
106. Wingreen, N. S., J. Miller, and E. C. Cox. 2003. Scaling of mutational effects in models for pleiotropy. Genetics 164:1221-1228.
107. Zhang, X. S. 2012. Fisher's geometrical model of fitness landscape and variance in fitnesswithin a changing environment. Evolution 66:2350-2368.