A negative relationship between mutation pleiotropy and fitness effect in yeast

Evolution

Volumn 61, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 1495-1499

  Cooper, Tim F ^a   Ostrowski, Elizabeth A ^b   Travisano, Michael ^c,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND   (New Zealand)

^b RICE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c University of Houston   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

Evolutionary genomics; Geometric model; Pleiotropy; Yeast

Indexed keywords

SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEIN;

FITNESS; GENE; GENOMICS; MORPHOLOGY; NUTATION; PHENOTYPE; PLEIOTROPY; PROTEIN; YEAST;

ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CYTOLOGY; GENE DELETION; GENETICS; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; PHENOTYPE; PHYSIOLOGY; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; GENE DELETION; MODELS, GENETIC; PHENOTYPE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS;

SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

EID: 34249794251     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: 15585646     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2007.00109.x     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Drummond, D. A., J. D. Bloom, C. Adami, C. Wilke, and F. H. Arnold. 2005. Why highly expressed proteins evolve slowly. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102 : 14338 14343.
2. Drummond, D. A., A. Raval, and C. Wilke. 2006. A single determinant dominates the rate of yeast protein evolution. Mol. Biol. Evol. 23 : 327 337.
3. Dudley, A. M., D. M. Janse, A. Tanay, R. Shamir, and G. M. Church. 2005. A global view of pleiotropy and phenotypically derived gene function in yeast. Mol. Syst. Biol. 11 : 2005 : 001.
4. Ericson, E., I. Pylvanainen, L. Fernandez-Ricaud, O. Nerman, J. Warringer, and A. Blomberg. 2006. Genetic pleiotropy in Saccharomyces cerevisiae quantified by high-resolution phenotypic profiling. Mol. Gen. Genomics 275 : 606 614.
5. Fisher, R. A. 1930. The genetical theory of natural selection. Clarendon Press, Oxford. U.K.
6. Fraser, H. B. 2005. Modularity and evolutionary constraint on proteins. Nat. Genet. 37 : 351 352.
7. Fraser, H. B., A. E. Hirsh, L. M. Steinmetz, C. Scharfe, and M. W. Feldman. 2002. Evolutionary rate in the protein interaction network. Science 296 : 750 752.
8. Ghaemmaghami, S., W. K. Huh, K. Bower, R. W. Howson, A. Belle, N. Dephoure, E. K. O'Shea, and J. S. Weissman. 2003. Global analysis of protein expression in yeast. Nature 425 : 737 741.
9. Giaever, G., A. M. Chu, L. Ni, C. Connelly, L. Riles, S. Véronneau, S. Dow, A. Lucau-Danila, K. Anderson, B. André, et al. 2002. Functional profiling of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome. Nature 418 : 387 391.
10. Han, J-D. J., N. Bertin, T. Hao, D. S. Goldberg, G. F. Berriz, L. V. Zhang, D. Depuy, A. J. M. Walhout, M. E. Cusick, F. Roth, et al. 2004. Evidence for dynamically organized modularity in the yeast protein-protein interaction network. Nature 430 : 88 93.
11. Hirsh, A. E., and H. B. Fraser. 2001. Protein dispensability and the rate of evolution. Nature 411 : 1046 1049.
12. Holstege, F. C. P., E. G. Jennings, J. J. Wyrick, T. I. Lee, C. J. Hengartner, M. R. Green, T. R. Golub, E. S. Lander, and R. A. Young. 1998. Dissecting the regulatory circuit of a eukaryotic genome. Cell 95 : 717 728.
13. Kellis, M., B. W. Birren, and E. S. Lander. 2004. Proof and evolutionary analysis of an ancient genome duplication in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature 428 : 617 624.
14. Ohya, Y., J. Sese, M. Yukawa et al. 2005. High-dimensional and large-scale phenotyping of yeast mutants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102 : 19015 19020.
15. Orr, H. A. 2000. Adaptation and the cost of complexity. Evolution 54 : 13 20.
16. Otto, S. P. 2004. Two steps forward, one step back: the pleiotropic effects of favoured alleles. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 271 : 705 714.
17. Steinmetz, L. M., C. Scharfe, A. M. Deutschbauer, D. Mokranjac, Z. S. Herman, T. Jones, A. M. Chu, G. Giaever, H. Prokisch, P. J. Oefner, and R. W. Davis. 2002. Systematic screen for human disease genes in yeast. Nat. Genet. 31 : 400 404.
18. Rocha, E. P., and A. Danchin. 2004. An analysis of determinants of amino acids substitution rates in bacterial proteins. Mol. Biol. Evol. 21 : 108 116.
19. Wall, D. P., A. E. Hirsh, H. B. Fraser, J. Kumm, G. Giaever, M. B. Eisen, and M. W. Feldman. 2005. Functional genomic analysis of the rates of protein evolution. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102 : 5483 5488.
20. Welch, J. J., and D. Waxman. 2003. Modularity and the cost of complexity. Evolution 57 : 1723 1734.
21. Winzeler, E. A., D. D. Shoemaker, A. Astromoff, H. Liang, K. Anderson, B. Andre, R. Bangham, R. Benito, J. D. Boeke, H. Bussey, et al. 1991. Functional characterization of the S. cerevisiae genome by gene deletion and parallel analysis. Science 285 : 901 906.