The population genetics of adaptation: The distribution of factors fixed during adaptive evolution

Evolution

Volumn 52, Issue 4, 1998, Pages 935-949

  Orr, H Allen ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Adaptation; Fisher's model; Natural selection; Phenotypic evolution; Quantitative trait locus

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; EVOLUTION; POPULATION GENETICS;

EID: 0031714655     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1998.tb01823.x     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. BRADSHAW, H. D., S. M. WILBERT, K. G. OTTO, AND D. W. SCHEMSKE. 1995. Genetic mapping of floral traits associated with reproductive isolation in monkeyflowers (Mimulus). Nature 376:762-765.
2. BRADSHAW, H. D., K. G. OTTO, B. E. FREWEN, J. K. McKAY, AND D. W. SCHEMSKE. 1998. Quantitative trait loci affecting differences in floral morphology between two species of monkeyflower (Mimulus). Genetics 149:367-382.
3. BULMER, M. G. 1980. The mathematical theory of quantitative genetics. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford.
4. CARROLL, S. B. 1995. Homeotic genes and the evolution of arthropods and chordates. Nature 376:479-485.
5. DAVID, H. A. 1970. Order statistics. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York.
6. DOBZHANSKY, T. 1937. Genetics and the origin of species. Columbia Univ. Press, New York.
7. DOEBLEY, J., AND A. STEG. 1991. Genetic analysis of the morphological differences between maize and teosinte. Genetics 129:285-295.
8. 2 populations. Genetics 134:559-570.
9. DORWEILER, J., A. STEC, J. KERMICLE, AND J. DOEBLEY. 1993. Teosinte glume architecture. 1. A genetic locus controlling a key step in maize evolution. Science 262:233-235.
10. DYKHUIZEN, D. E. 1990. Experimental studies of natural selection in bacteria. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 21:373-389.
11. EDWARDS, M. D., C. W. STUBER, AND J. F. WENDEL. 1987. Molecular-marker-facilitated investigations of quantitative-trait loci in maize. I. Numbers, genomic distribution and types of gene action. Genetics 116:113-125.
12. FISHER, R. A. 1930. The genetical theory of natural selection. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford.
13. _. 1934. Adaptation and mutations. School Science Review 15:294-301.
14. FRAZZETTA, T. H. 1975. Complex adaptations in evolving populations. Sinauer Associates, Inc., Sunderland, MA.
15. GOULD, S. J., AND R. C. LEWONTIN. 1979. The spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian paradigm: a critique of the adaptationist program. Proc. Roy. Soc. London B 205:581-598.
16. GREGORY, W. C. 1965. Mutation frequency, magnitude of change and the probability of improvement in adaptation. Radiation Botany 5 (Suppl.):429-441.
17. GUMBEL, E. J. 1958. Statistics of extremes. Columbia Univ. Press, New York.
18. HARTL, D., AND C. H. TAUBES. 1996. Compensatory nearly neutral mutations: selection without adaptation. J. Theor. Biol. 182:303-309.
19. HILL, W. G., AND A. CABALLERO. 1992. Artificial selection experiments. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 23:287-310.
20. HUNT, G., R. E. PAGE, M. K. FONDRK, AND C. J. DULLUM. 1995. Major quantitative trait loci affecting honey bee foraging behavior. Genetics 141:1537-1545.
21. HUXLEY, J. 1963. Evolution: the modern synthesis. 2d ed. Dickens, Northampton, U.K.
22. KAUFFMAN, S. A. 1993. The origins of order. Oxford Univ. Press, New York.
23. KEIGHTLEY, P. D. 1994. The distribution of mutational effects on viability in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 138:1315-1322.
24. KIMURA, M. 1983. The neutral theory of molecular evolution. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, U.K.
25. LAURIE, C. C., J. R. TRUE, J. LIU, AND J. M. MERCER. 1997. An introgression analysis of quantitative trait loci that contribute to a morphological difference between Drosophila simulans and D. mauritiana. Genetics 145:339-348.
26. LEIGH, E. G. 1987. Ronald Fisher and the development of evolutionary theory. II. Influences of new variation on evolutionary process. Pp. 213-263 in P. H. Harvey and L. Partridge, ed. Oxford surveys in evolutionary biology. Vol. 4. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford.
27. LENSKI, R. E., AND M. TRAVISANO. 1994. Dynamics of adaptation and diversification: a 10,000-generation experiment with bacterial populations. Proceedings National Academy of Sciences 91:6808-6814.
28. LIU, J., J. M. MERCER, L. F. STAM, G. C. GIBSON, Z.-B. ZENG, AND C. C. LAURIE. 1996. Genetic analysis of a morphological shape difference in the male genitalia of Drosophila simulans and D. mauritiana. Genetics 142:1129-1145.
29. LONG, A. D., S. L. MULLANEY, L. A. REID, J. D. FRY, C. H. LANGLEY, AND T. F. C. MACKAY. 1995. High resolution mapping of genetic factors affecting abdomial bristle number in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 139:1273-1291.
30. LONG, A. D., S. L. MULLANEY, T. F. C. MACKAY, AND C. H. LANGLEY. 1996. Genetic interactions between naturally occurring alleles at quantitative trait loci and mutant alleles at candidate loci affecting bristle number in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 144:1497-1510.
31. MACKAY, T. F. C. 1995. The genetic basis of quantitative variation: numbers of sensory bristles of Drosophila melanogaster as a model system. Trends in Genetics 11:464-470.
32. _. 1996. The nature of quantitative genetic variation revisited: lessons from Drosophila bristles. BioEssays 18:113-121.
33. MAYR, E. 1963. Animal species and evolution. The Belknap Press of Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, MA.
34. MITCHELL-OLDS, T. 1995. The molecular basis of quantitative variation in natural populations. Trends Ecol. and Evol. 10:324-328.
35. MUKAK T., S. I. CHIGUSA, L. E. METTLER, AND J. F. CROW. 1972. Mutation rate and dominance of genes affecting viability in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 72:333-355.
36. MULLER, H. J. 1940. Bearing of the Drosophila work on systematics. Pp. 185-268 in J. S. Huxley, ed. The new systematics. Clarendon Press, Oxford.
37. OHNISHI, O. 1977. Spontaneous and ethyl methanesulfonate-induced mutations controlling viability in Drosophila melanogaster. II. Homozygous effect of polygenic mutations. Genetics 87:529-545.
38. ORR, H. A., AND J. A. COYNE. 1992. The genetics of adaptation revisited. Amer. Natur. 140:725-742.
39. PATERSON, A. H.. S. DAMON, J. D. HEWITT, D. ZAMIR, H. D. RABINOWITCH, S. E. LINCOLN, E. S. LANDER, AND S. D. TANKSLEY. 1991. Mendelian factors underlying quantiative traits in the tomato: comparison across species, generations and environments. Genetics 127:181-197.
40. PECK, J. R., G. BARREAU, AND S. C. HEATH. 1997. Imperfect genes, fisherian mutation and the evolution of sex. Genetics 145:1171-1199.
41. PYKE, R. 1965. Spacings. J. Roy. Stat. Soc. 27:395-436.
42. RENSCH, B. 1959. Evolution above the species level. Columbia Univ. Press, New York.
43. RICE, S. 1990. A geometric model for the evolution of development. J. Theor. Biol. 143:319-342.
44. ROUSH, W. 1996. Corn: a lot of change from a little DNA. Science 272:1873.
45. SHRIMPTON, A. E., AND A. ROBERTSON. 1988. The isolation of polygenic factors controlling bristle score in Drosophila melanogaster. II. Distribution of third chromosome bristle effects within chromosome sections. Genetics 118:445-459.
46. TANKSLEY, S. D. 1993. Mapping polygenes. Ann. Rev. Genet. 27:205-233.
47. TURNER, J. R. G. 1985. Fisher's evolutionary faith and the challenge of mimicry. Oxford Surveys in Evolutionary Biology 2:159-196.
48. _. 1987. The evolutionary dynamics of Batesian and Mullerian mimicry: similarities and differences. Ecol. Entom. 12:81-95.
49. WRIGHT, S. 1948. Evolution, organic. Pp. 915-929 in Encyclopaedia Brittanica. 14th ed. Vol. 8.