The rate of molecular adaptation in a changing environment

Molecular Biology and Evolution

Volumn 30, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 1292-1301

  Lourenço, João M ^a   Glémin, Sylvain ^a   Galtier, Nicolas ^a  

^a UNIV MONTPELLIER   (France)

Author keywords

adaptive walk; amino acid substitution rate; extinction; Fisher's geometric model; population size

Indexed keywords

AMINO ACID;

ADAPTATION; AMINO ACID SUBSTITUTION; ARTICLE; DROSOPHILA; EFFECTIVE POPULATION SIZE; ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE; FISHER GEOMETRIC MODEL; GENE MUTATION; HUMAN; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; NONHUMAN; PHENOTYPE; PROTEIN SYNTHESIS;

ADAPTIVE WALK; AMINO ACID SUBSTITUTION RATE; EXTINCTION; FISHER'S GEOMETRIC MODEL; POPULATION SIZE;

ADAPTATION, BIOLOGICAL; AMINO ACID SUBSTITUTION; ANIMALS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DROSOPHILA; ENVIRONMENT; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; GENE-ENVIRONMENT INTERACTION; GENES; GENOME; HUMANS; MODELS, GENETIC; PROTEINS;

EID: 84877789322     PISSN: 07374038     EISSN: 15371719     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/molbev/mst026     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Bazin E, Glemin S, Galtier N. 2006. Population size does not influence mitochondrial genetic diversity in animals. Science 312:570-572.
2. Betancourt AJ, Blanco-Martin B, Charlesworth B. 2012. The relation between the neutrality index for mitochondrial genes and the distribution of mutational effects on fitness. Evolution 66:2427-2438.
3. Bierne N, Eyre-Walker A. 2004. The genomic rate of adaptive amino acid substitution in Drosophila. Mol Biol Evol. 21:1350-1360.
4. Boyko AR, Williamson SH, Indap AR, et al. (14 co-authors). 2008. Assessing the evolutionary impact of amino acid mutations in the human genome. PLoS Genet. 4:e1000083.
5. Carneiro M, Melo-Ferreira J, Galtier N, Gayral P, Blanco-Aguiar JA, Villafuerte R, Nachman MW, Ferrand N. 2012. Evidence for widespread positive and purifying selection across the European rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus). Mol Biol Evol. 29:1837-1849.
6. Charlesworth J, Eyre-Walker A. 2006. The rate of adaptive evolution in enteric bacteria. Mol Biol Evol. 23:1348-1356.
7. Eyre-Walker A, Keightley PD. 2009. Estimating the rate of adaptive molecular evolution in the presence of slightly deleterious mutations and population size change. Mol Biol Evol. 26: 2097-2108.
8. Fay JC, Wyckoff GJ, Wu C-I. 2001. Positive and negative selection on the human genome. Genetics 158:1227-1234.
9. Fay JC, Wyckoff GJ, Wu C-I. 2002. Testing the neutral theory ofmolecular evolution with genomic data from Drosophila. Nature 415: 1024-1026.
10. Foxe JP, Dar VU, Zheng H, Nordborg M, Gaut BS, Wright SI. 2008. Selection on amino acid substitutions in Arabidopsis. Mol Biol Evol. 25:1375-1383.
11. Gillespie JH. 1984. Pleiotropic overdominance and the maintenance of genetic variation in polygenic characters. Genetics 107:321-330.
12. Gillespie JH. 1999. The role of population size in molecular evolution. Theor Popul Biol. 55:145-156.
13. Gillespie JH. 2001. Is the population size of a species relevant to its evolution? Evolution 55:2161-2169.
14. Gillespie JH. 2004. Population genetics. London: Johns Hopkins University Press.
15. Gossmann TI, Keightley PD, Eyre-Walker A. 2012. The effect of variation in the effective population size on the rate of adaptive molecular evolution in eukaryotes. Gen Biol Evol. 4:658-667.
16. Gossmann TI, Song BH, Windsor AJ, Mitchell-Olds T, Dixon CJ, Kapralov MV, Filatov DA, Eyre-Walker A. 2010. Genome wide analyses reveal little evidence for adaptive evolution in many plant species. Mol Biol Evol. 27:1822-1832.
17. Haddrill PR, Loewe L, Charlesworth B. 2010. Estimating the parameters of selection on nonsynonymous mutations in Drosophila pseudoobscura and D. miranda. Genetics 185:1381-1396.
18. Halligan DL, Oliver F, Eyre-Walker A, Harr B, Keightley PD. 2010. Evidence for pervasive adaptive protein evolution in wild mice. PLoS Genet. 6:e1000825.
19. Hermisson J, Pennings PS. 2005. Soft sweeps. Genetics 169:2335-2352.
20. Jensen JD, Bachtrog D. 2011. Characterizing the influence of effective population size on the rate of adaptation: Gillespie's Darwin domain. Genome Biol Evol. 3:687-701.
21. Keightley PD, Eyre-Walker A. 2010. What can we learn about the distribution of fitness effects of new mutations from DNA sequence datá Philos Trans R Soc London B Biol Sci. 365: 1187-1193.
22. Lourenco J, Galtier N, Gle'min S. 2011. Complexity, pleiotropy, and the fitness effect of mutations. Evolution 65:1559-1571.
23. Martin G, Lenormand T. 2008. The distribution of beneficial and fixed mutation fitness effects close to an optimum. Genetics 179: 907-916.
24. Maynard-Smith J, Haigh J. 1974. The hitch-hiking effect of a favourable gene. Genet Res. 23:23-35.
25. McDonald JH, KreitmanM. 1991. Adaptive evolution at the Adh locus in Drosophila. Nature 351:652-654.
26. Nikolaev S, Montoya-Burgos JI, Margulies EH, Program NCS, Rougemont J, Nyffeler B, Antonarakis SE. 2007. Early history of mammals is elucidated with the ENCODE multiple species sequencing data. PLoS Genet. 3:e2.
27. Ohta T, Gillespie JH. 1996. Development of neutral and nearly neutral theories. Theor Popul Biol. 49:128-142.
28. Orr HA. 1998. The population genetics of adaptation: The distribution of factors fixed during adaptive evolution. Evolution 52:935-949.
29. Orr HA. 2000. Adaptation and the cost of complexity. Evolution 54: 13-20.
30. Orr HA. 2002. The population genetics of adaptation: The adaptation of DNA sequences. Evolution 56:1317-1330.
31. Phifer-Rixey M, Bonhomme F, Boursot P, Churchill GA, PiÁlek J, Tucker PK, Nachman MW. 2012. Adaptive evolution and effective population size in wild house mice. Mol Biol Evol. 29:2949-2955.
32. Popadin K, Polishchuk LV, Mamirova L, Knorre D, Gunbin K. 2007. Accumulation of slightly deleterious mutations in mitochondrial protein-coding genes of large versus small mammals. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 104:13390-13395.
33. Rand DM, Kahn LM. 1996. Excess amino acid polymorphism in mitochondrial DNA: Contrasts among genes from Drosophila, mice and humans. Mol Biol Evol. 13:735-748.
34. Slotte T, Foxe JP, Hazzouri KM, Wright SI. 2010. Genome-wide evidence for efficient positive and purifying selection in Capsella grandiflora, a plant species with a large effective population size. Mol Biol Evol. 27: 1813-1821.
35. Smith NGC, Eyre-Walker A. 2002. Adaptive protein evolution in Drosophila. Nature 415:1022-1023.
36. Strasburg JL, Kane NC, Raduski AR, Bonin A, Michelmore R, Rieseberg LH. 2011. Effective population size is positively correlated with levels of adaptive divergence among annual sunflowers. Mol Biol Evol. 28: 1569-1380.
37. Venton D. 2012. Highlight - tracking adaptation's role: Do larger populations evolve faster? Gen Biol Evol. 4:668-669.
38. Welch JJ, Eyre-Walker A, Waxman D. 2008. Divergence and polymorphism under the nearly neutral theory of molecular evolution. J Mol Evol. 67:418-426.
39. Wingreen NS, Miller J, Cox EC. 2003. Scaling of mutational effects in models for pleiotropy. Genetics 164:1221-1228.