A general multivariate extension of fisher's geometrical model and the distribution of mutation fitness effects across species

Evolution

Volumn 60, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 893-907

  Martin, Guillaume ^a,b   Lenormand, Thomas ^a  

^a CNRS   (France)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LAUSANNE   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Complexity; Fisher model; Mutation fitness effect distribution; Mutational and selective covariances; Random matrices; Survey

Indexed keywords

EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY; FITNESS; GENETIC VARIATION; GENOME; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; MUTATION;

ESCHERICHIA COLI; NEMATODA;

ANIMAL; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; ESCHERICHIA COLI; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETICS; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; MUTATION; NEMATODE; REVIEW;

ANIMALS; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; ESCHERICHIA COLI; MODELS, GENETIC; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; MUTATION; NEMATODA; SELECTION (GENETICS);

EID: 33747080569     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: 15585646     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1554/05-412.1     Document Type: Article

References (73)

1. Avila, V., and A. Garcia-Dorado. 2002. The effects of spontaneous mutation on competitive fitness in Drosophila melanogaster. J. Evol. Biol. 15:561-566.
2. Baer, C. F., F. Shaw, C. Steding, M. Baurngartner, A. Hawkins, A. Houppert, N. Mason, M. Reed, K. Sinnonelic, W. Woodard, and M. Lynch. 2005. Comparative evolutionary genetics of spontaneous mutations affecting fitness in rhabditid nematodes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102:5785-5790.
3. Barton, N., and L. Partridge. 2000. Limits to natural selection. BioEssays 22:1075-1084.
4. Barton, N. H., and P. D. Keightley. 2002. Understanding quantitative genetic variation. Nat. Rev. Genet. 3:11-21.
5. Bataillon, T. 2000. Estimation of spontaneous genome-wide mutation rate parameters: whither beneficial mutations? Heredity 84:497-501.
6. _. 2003. Shaking the "deleterious mutations" dogma? Trends Ecol. Evol. 18:315-317.
7. Bennetzen, J. L., C. Coleman, R. Y. Liu, J. X. Ma, and W. Ramakrishna. 2004. Consistent over-estimation of gene number in complex plant genomes. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 7:732-736.
8. Bonhoeffer, S., C. Chappey, N. T. Parkin, J. M. Whitcomb, and C. J. Petropoulos. 2004. Evidence for positive epistasis in HIV-1. Science 306:1547-1550.
9. Burch, C. L., and L. Chao. 1999. Evolution by small steps and rugged landscapes in the RNA virus phi6. Genetics 151:921-927.
10. Charlesworth, B., and D. Charlesworth. 1998. Some evolutionary consequences of deleterious mutations. Genetica 103:3-19.
11. Charlesworth, B., H. Borthwick, C. Bartolome, and P. Pignatelli. 2004. Estimates of the genomic mutation rate for detrimental alleles in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 167:815-826.
12. Chavarrias, D., C. Lopez-Fanjul, and A. Garcia-Dorado. 2001. The rate of mutation and the homozygous and heterozygous mutational effects for competitive viability: a long-term experiment with Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 158:681-693.
13. Clarke, B., and W. Arthur. 2000. What constitutes a "large" mutational change in phenotype? Evol. Dev. 2:238-240.
14. Drake, J. W., B. Charlesworth, D. Charlesworth, and J. F. Crow. 1998. Rates of spontaneous mutation. Genetics 148:1667-1686.
15. Elena, S. F., and R. E. Lenski. 2003. Evolution experiments with microorganisms: the dynamics and genetic bases of adaptation. Nat. Rev. Genet. 4:457-469.
16. Elena, S. F., and A. Moya. 1999. Rate of deleterious mutation and the distribution of its effects on fitness in vesicular stomatitis virus. J. Evol. Biol. 12:1078-1088.
17. Elena, S. F., L. Ekunwe, N. Hajela, S. A. Oden, and R. E. Lenski. 1998. Distribution of fitness effects caused by random insertion mutations in Escherichia coli. Genetica 103:349-358.
18. Estes, S., P. C. Phillips, D. R. Denver, W. K. Thomas, and M. Lynch. 2004. Mutation accumulation in populations of varying size: the distribution of mutational effects for fitness correlates in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 166:1269-1279.
19. Fisher, R. A. 1930. The genetical theory of natural selection. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, U.K.
20. Forrester, P. J., N. C. Snaith, and J. J. M. Verbaarschot. 2003. Developments in random matrix theory. J. Physics A 36:R1-R10.
21. Garcia-Dorado, A., C. Lopez-Fanjul, and A. Caballero. 1999. Properties of spontaneous mutations affecting quantitative traits. Genet. Res. 74:341-350.
22. Gerrish, P. J., and R. E. Lenski. 1998. The fate of competing beneficial mutations in an asexual population. Genetica 103:127-144.
23. Ihaka, I., and G. Robert. 1996. R: a language for data analysis and graphics. J. Comput. Graphic. Stat. 5:299-314.
24. Imhof, M., and C. Schlotterer. 2001. Fitness effects of advantageous mutations in evolving Escherichia coli populations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98:1113-1117.
25. Joseph, S. B., and D. W. Hall. 2004. Spontaneous mutations in diploid Saccharomyces cerevisiae: more beneficial than expected. Genetics 168:1817-1825.
26. Keightley, P. D. 1994. The distribution of mutation effects on viability in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 138:1315-1322.
27. _. 2004. Comparing analysis methods for mutation-accumulation data. Genetics 167:551-553.
28. Keightley, P. D., and A. Eyre-Walker. 2000. Deleterious mutations and the evolution of sex. Science 290:331-333.
29. Keightley, P. D., and M. Lynch. 2003. Toward a realistic model of mutations affecting fitness. Evolution 57:683-685.
30. Keightley, P. D., and O. Ohnishi. 1998. EMS-induced polygenic mutation rates for nine quantitative characters in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 148:753-766.
31. Keightley, P. D., E. K. Davies, A. D. Peters, and R. G. Shaw. 2000. Properties of ethylmethane sulfonate-induced mutations affecting life-history traits in Caenorhabditis elegans and inferences about bivariate distributions of mutation effects. Genetics 156:143-154.
32. Kibota, T. T., and M. Lynch. 1996. Estimate of the genomic mutation rate deleterious to overall fitness in E-coli. Nature 381:694-696.
33. Kingsolver, J. G., H. E. Hoekstra, J. M. Hoekstra, D. Berrigan, S. N. Vignieri, C. E. Hill, A. Hoang, P. Gibert, and P. Beerli. 2001. The strength of phenotypic selection in natural populations. Am. Nat. 157:245-261.
34. Korona, R. 2004. Experimental studies of deleterious mutation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Res. Microbiol. 155:301-310.
35. Lande, R. 1980. The genetic covariance between characters maintained by pleiotropic mutations. Genetics 94:203-215.
36. Loewe, L., V. Textor, and S. Scherer. 2003. High deleterious genomic mutation rate in stationary phase of Escherichia coli. Science 302:1558-1560.
37. Lyman, R. F., F. Lawrence, S. V. Nuzhdin, and T. F. C. Mackay. 1996. Effects of single P-element insertions on bristle number and viability in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 143:277-292.
38. Lynch, M., and J. S. Conery. 2003. The origins of genome complexity. Science 302:1401-1404.
39. Lynch, M., and B. Walsh. 1998. Correlations between characters. Pp. 629-655. Genetics and analysis of quantitative traits. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
40. Lynch, M., J. Blanchard, D. Houle, T. Kibota, S. Schultz, L. Vassilieva, and J. Willis. 1999. Perspective: Spontaneous deleterious mutation. Evolution 53:645-663.
41. Mackay, T. F. C., R. F. Lyman, and M. S. Jackson. 1992. Effects of P-Element insertions on quantitative traits in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 130:315-332.
42. Mathai, A. M., and S. B. Provost. 1992. Quadratic forms in random variables. Marcel Dekker, New York.
43. Mukai, T., S. I. Chigusa, L. E. Mettler, and J. F. Crow. 1972. Mutation rate and dominance of genes affecting viability in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 72:335-355.
44. Ohnishi, O. 1977. Spontaneous and ethyl methanesulfonate-induced mutations controlling viability in Drosophila melanogaster. II. Homozygous effects of polygenic mutations. Genetics 87:529-545.
45. Orr, H. A. 1998. The population genetics of adaptation: the distribution of factors fixed during adaptive evolution. Evolution 52:935-949.
46. _. 2000. Adaptation and the cost of complexity. Evolution 54:13-20.
47. _. 2001. The "sizes" of mutations fixed in phenotypic evolution: a response to Clarke and Arthur. Evol. Dev. 3:121-123.
48. _. 2002. The population genetics of adaptation: the adaptation of DNA sequences. Evolution 56:1317-1330.
49. _. 2003. The distribution of fitness effects among beneficial mutations. Genetics 163:1519-1526.
50. _. 2005a. Theories of adaptation: what they do and don't say. Genetica 123:3-13.
51. _. 2005b. The genetic theory of adaptation: a brief history. Nat. Rev. Genet. 6:119-127.
52. Otto, S. P. 2004. Two steps forward, one step back: the pleiotropic effects of favoured alleles. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 271:705-714.
53. Otto, S. P., and P. Yong. 2002. The evolution of gene duplicates. Pp. 451-483. Homology effects. Academic Press, San Diego, CA.
54. Poon, A., and S. P. Otto. 2000. Compensating for our load of mutations: freezing the meltdown of small populations. Evolution 54:1467-1479.
55. Remold, S. K., and R. E. Lenski. 2001. Contribution of individual random mutations to genotype-by-environment interactions in Escherichia coli. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 98:11388-11393.
56. Rice, S. H. 1998. The evolution of canalization and the breaking of von Baer's laws: modeling the evolution of development with epistasis. Evolution 52:647-656.
57. Rokyta, D. R., P. Joyce, S. B. Caudle, and H. A. Wichman. 2005. An empirical test of the mutational landscape model of adaptation using a single-stranded DNA virus. Nat. Genet. 37:441-444.
58. Rozen, D. E., J. de Visser, and P. J. Gerrish. 2002. Fitness effects of fixed beneficial mutations in microbial populations. Curr. Biol. 12:1040-1045.
59. Sanjuan, R., A. Moya, and S. F. Elena. 2004a. The distribution of fitness effects caused by single-nucleotide substitutions in an RNA virus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101:8396-8401.
60. _. 2004b. The contribution of epistasis to the architecture of fitness in an RNA virus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101:15376-15379.
61. Shaw, F. H., C. J. Geyer, and R. G. Shaw. 2002. A comprehensive model of mutations affecting fitness and inferences for Arabidopsis thaliana. Evolution 56:453-463.
62. Shaw, R. G., F. H. Shaw, and C. Geyer. 2003. What fraction of mutations reduces fitness? A reply to Keightley and Lynch. Evolution 57:686-689.
63. Stein, L. D., Z. R. Bao, D. Blasiar, T. Blumenthal, M. R. Brent, N. S. Chen, A. Chinwalla, L. Clarke, C. Clee, A. Coghlan, and many others. 2003. The genome sequence of Caenorhabditis briggsae: a platform for comparative genomics. Plos Biol. 1:166.
64. Thatcher, J. W., J. M. Shaw, and W. J. Dickinson. 1998. Marginal fitness contributions of nonessential genes in yeast. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95:253-257.
65. Vassilieva, L. L., A. M. Hook, and M. Lynch. 2000. The fitness effects of spontaneous mutations in Caenorhabditis elegans. Evolution 54:1234-1246.
66. Wagner, G. P., and L. Altenberg. 1996. Perspective: Complex adaptations and the evolution of evolvability. Evolution 50:967-976.
67. Ware, D., and L. Stein. 2003. Comparison of genes among cereals. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 6:121-127.
68. Waxman, D., and J. J. Welch. 2005. Fisher's microscope and Haldane's ellipse. Am. Nat. 166:447-457.
69. Welch, J. J., and D. Waxman. 2003. Modularity and the cost of complexity. Evolution 57:1723-1734.
70. Wloch, D. M., K. Szafraniec, R. H. Borts, and R. Korona. 2001. Direct estimate of the mutation rate and the distribution of fitness effects in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 159:441-452.
71. Xu, J. P. 2004. Genotype-environment interactions of spontaneous mutations for vegetative fitness in the human pathogenic fungus Cryptococcus neoformans. Genetics 168:1177-1188.
72. Zeyl, C., and J. DeVisser. 2001. Estimates of the rate and distribution of fitness effects of spontaneous mutation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 157:53-61.
73. Zhang, X. S., and W. G. Hill. 2003. Multivariate stabilizing selection and pleiotropy in the maintenance of quantitative genetic variation. Evolution 57:1761-1775.