Phylogenomics of the carrot genus (Daucus, Apiaceae)

American Journal of Botany

Volumn 101, Issue 10, 2014, Pages 1666-1685

  Arbizu, Carlos ^a   Ruess, Holly ^a   Senalik, Douglas ^a   Simon, Philipp W ^a   Spooner, David M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

Author keywords

Apiaceae; Carrot; Daucus; Germplasm; Next Generation sequencing; Phylogenomics

Indexed keywords

CULTIVAR; GENOMICS; GERMPLASM; PHYLOGENETICS; ROOT VEGETABLE; TAXONOMY; WILD POPULATION;

APIACEAE; DAUCUS; DAUCUS CAROTA;

PLANT DNA;

ALLELE; BAYES THEOREM; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CARROT; CLASSIFICATION; DNA SEQUENCE; EXON; GENETICS; INTRON; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PHYLOGENY; PLANT GENOME;

ALLELES; BASE SEQUENCE; BAYES THEOREM; CLASSIFICATION; DAUCUS CAROTA; DNA, PLANT; EXONS; GENOME, PLANT; INTRONS; MODELS, GENETIC; PHYLOGENY; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA;

EID: 84907964928     PISSN: 00029122     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3732/ajb.1400106     Document Type: Article

References (105)

1. ANÉ, C., B. LARGET, D. A. BAUM, S. D. SMITH, and A. ROKAS. 2007. Bayesian estimation of concordance among gene trees. Molecular Biology and Evolution 24: 412-426.
2. AYRES, D., A. DARLING, D. ZWICKL, P. BEERLI, M. T. HOLDER, P. O. LEWIS, J. HUELSENBECK, et al. 2012. BEAGLE: An application programming interface and high-performance computing library for statistical phylogenetics. Systematic Biology 61: 170-173.
3. BAUM, D. 2007. Concordance trees, concordance factors, and the exploration of reticulate genealogy. Taxon 56: 417-426.
4. BAUM, D. A., and S. D. SMITH. 2013. Tree thinking: An introduction to phylogenetic biology. Roberts and Co., Greenwood Village, Colorado, USA.
5. BLAIR, C., and R. W. MURPHY. 2011. Recent trends in molecular phylogenetic analysis: Where to next? Journal of Heredity 102: 130-138.
6. BLAIR, J. E., M. D. COFFEY, and F. N. MARTIN. 2012. Species tree estimation for the late blight pathogen, Phytophthora infestans, and close relatives. PLoS ONE 7: e37003.
7. BRANDENBURG, W. A. 1981. Possible relationships between wild and cultivated carrots (Daucus carota L.) in the Netherlands. Die Kulturpflanze 29: 369-375.
8. CAI, D., F. RODRÍGUEZ, Y. TENG, C. ANÉ, M. BONIERBALE, L. A. MUELLER, and D. M. SPOONER. 2012. Single copy nuclear gene analysis of polyploidy in wild potatoes (Solanum section Petota). BMC Evolutionary Biology 12: 70.
9. CAMACHO C., G. COULOURIS, V. AVAGYAN, N. MA, J. PAPADOPOULOS, K. BEALER, and T. L. MADDEN. 2009. BLAST+: Architecture and applications. BMC Bioinformatics 10: 421.
10. CHEN, F. C., and W. H. LI. 2001. Genomic divergences between humans and other hominoids and the effective population size of the common ancestor of humans and chimpanzees. American Journal of Human Genetics 68: 444-456.
11. CHEVREUX, B., T. WETTER, and S. SUHAI. 1999. Genome sequence assembly using trace signals and additional sequence information computer science and biology. Computer Science and Biology: Proceedings of the German Conference on Bioinformatics (GCB) 99: 45-56.
12. CHRISTELOVÁ, P., M. VALÁRIK, E. H IBOVÁ, E. DE LANGHE, and J. DOLEŽEL. 2011. A multi gene sequence-based phylogeny of the Musaceae (banana) family. BMC Evolutionary Biology 11: 103.
13. CRANSTON, K., B. HURWITZ, D. WARE, L. STEIN, and R. A. WING. 2009. Species trees from highly incongruent gene trees in rice. Systematic Biology 58: 489-500.
14. DARRIBA, D., G. L. TABOADA, R. DOALLO, and D. Posada. 2012. JModelTest 2: More models, new heuristics and parallel computing. Nature Methods 9: 772.
15. DELSUC, F., H. BRINKMANN, and H. PHILIPPE. 2005. Phylogenomics and the reconstruction of the tree of life. Nature Reviews. Genetics 6: 361-375.
16. DOOLITTLE, W. F. 1999. Lateral genomics. Trends in Cell Biology 9: M5-M8.
17. DOWNIE, S. R., D. S. Katz-Downie, and M. F. Watson. 2000. A phylogeny of the flowering plant family Apiaceae based on chloroplast DNA rpl16 and rpoc1 intron sequences: Towards a suprageneric classification of subfamily Apioideae. American Journal of Botany 87: 273-292.
18. DRESSMAN, D., H. YAN, G. TRAVERSO, K. W. KINZLER, and B. VOGELSTEIN. 2003. Transforming single DNA molecules into fluorescent magnetic particles for detection and enumeration of genetic variations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 100: 8817-8822.
19. DRUMMOND, A. J., G. K. NICHOLLS, A. G. RODRIGO, and W. SOLOMON. 2002. Estimating mutation parameters, population history and genealogy simultaneously from temporally spaced sequence data. Genetics 161: 1307-1320.
20. DRUMMOND, A. J., M. A. SUCHARD, D. XIE, and A. RAMBAUT. 2012. Bayesian phylogenetics with BEAUti and the BEAST 1.7. Molecular Biology and Evolution 29: 1969-1973.
21. DUNN, C. W., A. HEJNOL, D. Q. MATUS, K. PANG, W. E. BROWNE, S. A. SMITH, E. SEAVER, et al. 2008. Broad phylogenomics sampling improves resolution of the animal tree of life. Nature 452: 745-749.
22. EDGAR, R. C. 2004. MUSCLE: Multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Research 32: 1792-1797.
23. EDWARDS, V. 2009. Is a new and general theory of molecular systematic emerging? Evolution 63: 1-19.
24. EGAN, A., J. SCHLUETER, and D. M. SPOONER. 2012. Applications of nextgeneration sequencing in plant biology. American Journal of Botany 99: 175-185.
25. ELLIS, P. R., J. A. HARDMAN, T. C. CROWTHER, and P. L. SAW. 1993. Exploitation of the resistance to carrot fly in the wild carrot species Daucus capillifolius. Annals of Applied Biology 122: 79-91.
26. FARRIS, J. S. 1970. Methods for computing Wagner trees. Systematic Zoology 19: 83-92.
27. FELSENSTEIN, J. 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: An approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39: 783-791.
28. FITCH, W. 1971. Toward defining the course of evolution: Minimum change for a specific tree topology. Systematic Zoology 20: 406-416.
29. FAO [FOOD AND AGRICULTURAL ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS]. 2012. FAOSTAT, Rome, Italy. Website http://www.faostat.fao.org [accessed 4 March 2014].
30. FULTON, T. M., R. VAN DER HOEVEN, N. T. EANNETTA, and S. D. TANKSLEY. 2002. Identification, analysis, and utilization of conserved ortholog set markers for comparative genomics in higher plants. Plant Cell 14: 1457-1467.
31. GERNHARD, T. 2008. The conditioned reconstructed process. Journal of Theoretical Biology 253: 769-778.
32. GRZEBELUS, D., R. BARANSKI, K. SPALIK, C. ALLENDER, and P. W. SIMON. 2011. Daucus. In C. Kole [ed.], Wild crop relatives: Genomic and breeding resources, vol. 5, Vegetables, 129-216. Springer Verlag, Berlin, Germany.
33. HAUSER, T. P. 2002. Frost sensitivity of hybrids between wild and cultivated carrots. Conservation Genetics 3: 73-76.
34. HAUSER, T. P., and G. K. BJØRN. 2001. Hybrids between wild and cultivated carrots in Danish carrot fields. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 48: 499-506.
35. Iorizzo, M., D. Senalik, S. Ellison, P. Cavagnaro, S. Cheng, P. Zheng, Z. Zheng, et al. 2014. The building of the first Apiaceae genome. Plant and Animal Genome XXII, San Diego, California, USA [online abstract]. Website https://pag.confex.com/pag/xxii/webprogram/Paper11512.html.
36. IORIZZO, M., D. SENALIK, S. ELLISON, D. GRZEBELUS, P. CAVAGNARO, C. ALLENDER, J. BRUNET, et al. 2013. Genetic structure and domestication of carrot (Daucus carota subsp. sativus L.) (Apiaceae). American Journal of Botany 100: 930-938.
37. IORIZZO, M., D. A. SENALIK, D. GRZEBELUS, M. BOWMAN, P. F. CAVAGNARO, M. MATVIENKO, H. ASHRAFI, et al. 2011. De novo assembly and characterization of the carrot transcriptome reveals novel genes, new markers, and genetic diversity. BMC Genomics 12: 389.
38. IOVENE, M., E. GRZEBELUS, D. CARPUTO, J. JIANG, and P. W. SIMON. 2008. Major cytogenetic landmarks and karyotype analysis in Daucus carota and other Apiaceae. American Journal of Botany 95: 793-804.
39. JEFFREYS, H. 1946. An invariant form for the prior probability in estimation problems. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences 186: 453-461.
40. KOLACZKOWSKI, B., and J. W. THORNTON. 2004. Performance of maximum parsimony and maximum likelihood phylogenetics when evolution is heterogeneous. Nature 431: 980-984.
41. KOONIN, E. V. 2005. Orthologs, paralogs, and evolutionary genomics. Annual Review of Genetics 39: 309-338.
42. KOREN, S., M. C. SCHATZ, B. P. WALENZ, J. MARTIN, J. T. HOWARD, G. GANAPATHY, Z. WANG, et al. 2012. Hybrid error correction and de novo assembly of single-molecule sequencing reads. Nature Biotechnology 30: 693-700.
43. KRICKL, M. 1961. Karotten: zur Frage der Verkreuzung mit der wilden Karotte. Saatgut-Wirtschaft 13: 135-136.
44. KURTZ, S., A. PHILLIPPY, A. L. DELCHER, M. SMOOT, M. SHUMWAY, C. ANTONESCU, and S. L. SALZBERG. 2004. Versatile and open software for comparing large genomes. Genome Biology 5: R12.
45. LANG, J. M., A. E. DARLING, and J. A. EISEN. 2013. Phylogeny of bacterial and archaeal genomes using conserved genes: Supertrees and supermatrices. PLoS ONE 8: e62510.
46. LARGET, B., S. K. KOTHA, C. N. DEWEY, and C. ANÉ. 2010. BUCKy: Gene tree/species tree reconciliation with the Bayesian concordance analysis. Bioinformatics 26: 2910-2911.
47. LEACHÉ, A. D. 2009. Species tree discordance traces to phylogeographic clade boundaries in North American fence lizards (Sceloporus). Systematic Biology 58: 547-559.
48. LEE, B. Y., and S. R. DOWNIE. 2000. Phylogenetic analysis of cpDNA restriction sites and rpsl6 intron sequences reveals relationships among Apiaceae tribes Caucalideae, Scandiceae and related taxa. Plant Systematics and Evolution 221: 35-60.
49. LEE, B. Y., G. A. LEVIN, and S. R. DOWNIE. 2001. Relationships within the spiny-fruited umbellifers (Scandiceae subtribes Daucinae and Torilidinae) as assessed by phylogenetic analysis of morphological characters. Systematic Botany 26: 622-642.
50. LEVIN, R. A., A. WHELAN, and J. S. MILLER. 2009. The utility of nuclear conserved ortholog set II (COSII) genomic regions for specieslevel phylogenetic inference in Lycium (Solanaceae). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 53: 881-890.
51. LEWIS, P. O., M. T. HOLDER, and K. E. HOLSINGER. 2005. Polytomies and Bayesian phylogenetic inference. Systematic Biology 54: 241-253.
52. LI, M., J. WUNDER, G. BISSOLI, E. SCARPONI, S. GAZZANI, E. BARBARO, H. SAEDLER, and C. VAROTTO. 2008. Development of COS genes as universally amplifiable markers for phylogenetic reconstructions of closely related plant species. Cladistics 24: 727-745.
53. MADDISON, D. R., and W. P. MADDISON. 2005. MacClade 4.08a: Analysis of phylogeny and character evolution. Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA.
54. MADDISON, W. P., and L. L. KNOWLES. 2006. Inferring phylogeny despite incomplete lineage sorting. Systematic Biology 55: 21-30.
55. MARGULIES, M., M. EGHOLM, W. ALTMAN, S. ATTIYA, J. BADER, L. BEMBEN, J. BERKA, et al. 2005. Genome sequencing in microfabricated highdensity picolitre reactors. Nature 437: 376-380.
56. MCCOLLUM, G. D. 1975. Interspecific hybrid Daucus carota × D. capillifolius. Botanical Gazette (Chicago, Ill.) 136: 201-206.
57. MCCOLLUM, G. D. 1977. Hybrids of Daucus gingidium with cultivated carrots (D. carota subsp. sativus) and D. capillifolius. Botanical Gazette 138: 56-63.
58. MCCORMACK, J. E., S. HIRD, A. ZELLMER, B. CARSTENS, and R. BRUMFIELD. 2013. Applications of next-generation sequencing to phylogeography and phylogenetics. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 66: 526-538.
59. MILLER, M. A., W. PFEIFFER, and T. SCHWARTZ. 2010. Creating the CIPRES Science Gateway for inference of large phylogenetic trees. Proceedings of the Gateway Computing Environments Workshop (GCE) in New Orleans, 2010, 1-8, USA.
60. MOSSEL, E., and E. VIGODA. 2005. Phylogenetic MCMC algorithms are misleading on mixtures of trees. Science 309: 2207-2209.
61. NOTHNAGEL, T., P. STRAKA, and B. LINKE. 2000. Male sterility in populations of Daucus and the development of alloplasmic male-sterile lines of carrot. Plant Breeding 119: 145-152.
62. OWCZARZY, R., A. V. TATAUROV, Y. WU, J. A. MANTHEY, K. A. MCQUISTEN, H. G. ALMABRAZI, K. F. PEDERSEN, et al. 2008. IDT SciTools: A suite for analysis and design of nucleic acid oligomers. Nucleic Acids Research 36: W163-W169.
63. PACIFIC BIOSCIENCES. 2013. Pacific Biosciences introduces new chemistry with longer read lengths to detect novel features in DNA sequence and advance genome studies of large organisms. Website http://investor.pacificbiosciences.com/releasedetail.cfm?ReleaseID=794692 [accessed 9 March 2014].
64. PAGE, R. D. M., and M. A. CHARLESTON. 1997. From gene to organismal phylogeny: Reconciled trees and the gene tree species tree problem. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 7: 231-240.
65. PAMILO, P., and M. NEI. 1988. Relationships between gene trees and species trees. Molecular Biology and Evolution 5: 568-583.
66. PHILIPPE, H., H. BRINKMANN, D. V. LAVROV, D. T. J. LITTLEWOOD, M. MANUEL, G. WORHEIDE, and D. BAURAIN. 2011. Resolving difficult phylogenetic questions: Why more sequences are not enough. PLoS Biology 9: e1000602.
67. PHILIPPE, H., E. A. SNELL, E. BAPTESTE, P. LOPEZ, P. W. H. HOLLAND, and D. CASANE. 2004. Phylogenomics of eukaryotes: Impact of missing data on large alignments. Molecular Biology and Evolution 21: 1740-1752.
68. PIMENOV, M. G., and M. V. Leonov. 1993. The genera of Umbelliferae: A nomenclator. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, UK.
69. PLUNKETT, G. M., D. E. SOLTIS, and P. S. SOLTIS. 1996. Evolutionary patterns in Apiaceae: Inferences based on matK sequence data. Systematic Botany 21: 477-495.
70. RIESEBERG, L. H., S. J. BAIRD, and K. A. GARDNER. 2000. Hybridization, introgression, and linkage evolution. Plant Molecular Biology 42: 205-224.
71. ROCHE. 2009. Em-PCR method manual-Lib-A SV. Website http://www.high-throughput-sequencing.com/manuals_roche/emPCR_liba_sv_Oct2009.pdf [accessed 18 July 2014].
72. ROCHE. 2010. Rapid library preparation method manual. Website http://dna.uga.edu/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/GS-FLX-Titanium-RapidLibrary-RL-Preparation-Method-Manual-Roche.pdf [accessed 18 July 2014].
73. RODRÍGUEZ, F., F. WU, C. ANÉ, S. TANKSLEY, and D. M. SPOONER. 2009. Do potatoes and tomatoes have a single evolutionary history, and what proportion of the genome supports this history? BMC Evolutionary Biology 9: 191.
74. ROKAS, A., and S. B. CARROLL. 2005. More genes or more taxa? The relative contribution of gene number and taxon number to phylogenetic accuracy. Molecular Biology and Evolution 22: 1337-1344.
75. ROKAS, A., and S. B. CARROLL. 2006. Bushes in the tree of life. PLoS Biology 4: e352.
76. ROKAS, A., D. KRUGER, and S. CARROLL. 2005. Animal evolution and the molecular signature of radiations compressed in time. Science 310: 1933-1938.
77. ROKAS, A., B. L. WILLIAMS, N. KING, and S. B. CARROLL. 2003. Genomescale approaches to resolving incongruence in molecular phylogenies. Nature 425: 798-804.
78. RONQUIST, F., M. TESLENKO, P. VAN DER MARK, D. L. AYRES, A. DARLING, S. HÖHNA, B. LARGET, et al. 2012. MrBayes 3.2: Efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Systematic Biology 61: 539-542.
79. ROTHBERG, J. M., and J. H. LEAMON. 2008. The development and impact of 454 sequencing. Nature Biotechnology 26: 1117-1124.
80. RUBATZKY, V. E., C. F. QUIROS, and P. W. SIMON. 1999. Carrots and related vegetable Umbelliferae. CABI, New York, New York, USA.
81. Saenz De Rivas, C., and V. H. HEYWOOD. 1974. Preliminary study on the Daucus species of peninsular Spain). Anales del Jardin Botánico A. J. Canavilles 31: 97-118.
82. SÁENZ LAÍN, C. 1981. Research on Daucus L. (Umbelliferae). Anales del Jardin Botánico de Madrid 37: 481-534.
83. SALICHOS, L., and A. ROKAS. 2013. Inferring ancient divergences requires genes with strong phylogenetic signals. Nature 497: 327-333.
84. SANGER, F., S. NICKLEN, and A. R. COULSON. 1977. DNA sequencing with chain-terminating inhibitors. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 74: 5463-5467.
85. SCHIERWATER, B., M. EITEL, W. JAKOB, H. J. OSIGUS, H. HADRYS, S. L. DELLAPORTA, S. O. KOLOKOTRONIS, and R. DESALLE. 2009. Concatenated analysis sheds light on early metazoan evolution and fuels a modern ‘‘urmetazoon’’ hypothesis. PLoS Biology 7: e1000020.
86. SHENDURE, J., and H. JI. 2008. Next-generation DNA sequencing. Nature Biotechnology 26: 1135-1145.
87. SIMON, P., L. POLLAK, B. CLEVIDENCE, J. HOLDEN, and D. HAYTOWITZ. 2009. Plant breeding for human nutrition. Plant Breeding Reviews 31: 325-392.
88. SOLTIS, D. E., M. A. GITZENDANNER, G. STULL, M. CHESTER, A. CHANDERBALI, S. CHAMALA, I. Jordon-Thaden, et al. 2013. The potential of genomics in plant systematics. Taxon 62: 886-898.
89. SPALIK, K., and S. R. DOWNIE. 2007. Intercontinental disjunctions in Cryptotaenia (Apiaceae, Oenantheae): An appraisal using molecular data. Journal of Biogeography 34: 2039-2054.
90. SPALIK, K., M. Piwczyński, C. A. Danderson, R. Kurzyna-Młynik, T. S. Bone, and S. R. Downie. 2010. Amphitropic amphiantarctic disjunctions in Apiaceae subfamily Apioideae. Journal of Biogeography 37: 1977-1994.
91. SPOONER, D. M., P. ROJAS, M. BONIERBALE, L. A. MUELLER, M. SRIVASTAV, D. SENALIK, and P. SIMON. 2013. Molecular phylogeny of Daucus. Systematic Botany 38: 850-857.
92. SPOONER, D. M., M. P. WIDRLECHNER, K. R. REITSMA, D. E. PALMQUIST, S. ROUZ, Z. Ghrabi-Gammar, M. Neffati, et al. 2014. Reassessment of practical subspecies identifications of the USDA Daucus carota germplasm collection: Morphological data. Crop Science 54: 706-718.
93. ST. Pierre, M. D., R. J. Bayer, and I. M. Weiss. 1990. An isozyme-based assessment of the genetic variability within the Daucus carota complex (Apiaceae: Caucalideae). Canadian Journal of Botany 68: 2449-2457.
94. STAMATAKIS, A. 2014. RAxML version 8: A tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics 30: 1312-1313.
95. STEINBORN, R., B. LINKE, T. NOTHNAGEL, and T. BÖRNER. 1995. Inheritance of chloroplast and mitochondrial DNA in alloplasmic forms of the genus Daucus. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 91: 632-638.
96. SWOFFORD, D. 2002. PAUP*: Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods), version 4.0a131. Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
97. TAKAHATA, N. 1989. Gene genealogy in three related populations: Consistency probability between gene and population trees. Genetics 122: 957-966.
98. UMIEL, N., R. JACOBSON, and D. GLOBERSON. 1975. Pollination of the cultivated carrot (Daucus carota L.) by the wild carrot (D. carota var. maximus), and its implications on commercial seed production. Hassadeh 56: 478-480 [In Hebrew, English summary].
99. USDA [U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE], NATIONAL AGRICULTURAL STATISTICS SERVICE. 2012. Data and statistics. Website http://www.nass.usda.gov/Data_and_Statistics/index.asp [accessed 4 March 2014].
100. VIVEK, B. S., and P. SIMON. 1999. Phylogeny and relationships in Daucus based on restriction fragment length polymorphisms (RFLPs) of the chloroplast and mitochondrial genomes. Euphytica 105: 183-189.
101. WENDEL, J. F., and J. J. DOYLE. 1998. Phylogenetic incongruence: Window into genome history and molecular evolution. In D. E. Soltis, P. S. Soltis, and J. J. Doyle [eds.], Molecular systematics of plants II: DNA sequencing, 265-296. Kluwer, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
102. WIJNHEIJMER, E. H. M., W. A. BRANDENBURG, and S. J. TER BORG. 1989. Interactions between wild and cultivated carrots (Daucus carota L.). Euphytica 40: 147-154.
103. WILLIAMS, J. S., J. H. NIEDZWIECKI, and D. W. WEISROCK. 2013. Species tree reconstruction of a poorly resolved clade of salamanders (Ambystomatidae) using multiple nuclear loci. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 68: 671-682.
104. WU, F., L. A. MUELLER, D. CROUZILLAT, V. PÉTIARD, and S. D. TANKSLEY. 2006. Combining bioinformatics and phylogenetics to identify large sets of single-copy orthologous genes (COSII) for comparative, evolutionary and systematic studies: A test case in the euasterid plant clade. Genetics 174: 1407-1420.
105. ZWICKL, D. J. 2006. Genetic algorithm approaches for the phylogenetic analysis of large biological sequence datasets under the maximum likelihood criterion. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, USA.