Species trees from highly incongruent gene trees in rice

Systematic Biology

Volumn 58, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 489-500

  Cranston, Karen A ^a,b   Hurwitz, Bonnie ^a,c   Ware, Doreen ^c,d   Stein, Lincoln ^c,e   Wing, Rod A ^f  

^a University of Arizona   (United States)

^b FIELD MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY   (United States)

^c Howard Hughes Medical Institute Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Cold Spring Harbor   (United States)

^d ROBERT W HOLLEY CENTER FOR AGRICULTURE AND HEALTH   (United States)

^e ONTARIO INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RESEARCH   (Canada)

^f UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

Author keywords

Bayesian MCMC; Gene tree incongruence; Multilocus analysis; Phylogenetic inference; Rice

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BAYES THEOREM; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BIOLOGY; CLASSIFICATION; COMPUTER PROGRAM; DNA SEQUENCE; GENE; GENETICS; METHODOLOGY; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PHYLOGENY; RICE; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; PROCEDURES;

BASE SEQUENCE; BAYES THEOREM; CLASSIFICATION; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; GENES; MODELS, GENETIC; ORYZA SATIVA; PHYLOGENY; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA; SOFTWARE;

ORYZA;

EID: 70450231658     PISSN: 10635157     EISSN: 1076836X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/sysbio/syp054     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Altschul S.F., Gish W., Miller W., Myers E.W., Lipman D.J. 1990. Basic local alignment search tool. J. Mol. Biol. 215:403-410.
2. Ané C., Larget B., Baum D.A., Smith S.D., Rokas A. 2007. Bayesian estimation of concordance among gene trees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 24: 412-426.
3. Arvestad L., Berglund A.-C., Lagergren J., Sennblad B. 2003. Bayesian gene/species tree reconciliation and orthology analysis using MCMC. Bioinformatics. 19:i7-i15.
4. Belfiore N.M., Liu L., Moritz C. 2008. Multilocus phylogenetics of a rapid radiation in the genus Thomomys (Rodentia: Geomyidae). Syst. Biol. 57:294-310.
5. Brumfield R.T., Liu L., Lum D.E., Edwards S.V. 2008. Comparison of species tree methods for reconstructing the phylogeny of bearded manakins (Aves: Pipridae, Manacus) from multilocus sequence data. Syst. Biol. 57:719-731.
6. Bull J.J., Huelsenbeck J.P., Cunningham C.W., Swofford D.L., Waddell P.J. 1993. Partitioning and combining data in phylogenetic analysis. Syst. Biol. 42:384-397.
7. Caicedo A.L., Williamson S.H., Hernandez R.D., Boyko A., Fledel-Alon A., York T.L., Polato N.R., Olsen K.M., Nielsen R., McCouch S.R., Bustamante C.D., Purugganan M.D. 2007. Genome-wide patterns of nucleotide polymorphism in domesticated rice. PLoS Genet. 3:1745-1756.
8. Castresana J. 2000. Selection of conserved blocks from multiple alignments for their use in phylogenetic analysis. Mol. Biol. Evol. 17: 540-552.
9. Cummings M.P., Neel M.C., Shaw K.L., Otto S. 2008. A genealogical approach to quantifying lineage divergence. Evolution. 62: 2411-2422.
10. de Queiroz A., Donoghue M.J., Kim J. 1995. Separate versus combined analysis of phylogenetic evidence. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 26: 657-681.
11. de Queiroz A., Gatesy J. 2007. The supermatrix approach to systemat-ics. Trends Ecol. Evol. 22:34-41.
12. Degnan J.H., Rosenberg N.A. 2006. Discordance of species trees with their most likely gene trees. PLoS Genet. 2:e68.
13. Doolittle W.F. 1999. Lateral genomics. Trends Cell. Biol. 9:M5-M8.
14. Douzery E.J., Snell E.A., Bapteste E., Delsuc F., Philippe H. 2004. The timing of eukaryotic evolution: does a relaxed molecular clock reconcile proteins and fossils? Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 101:15386-15391.
15. Doyle J.J. 1992. Gene trees and species trees molecular systematics as one-character taxonomy. Syst. Bot. 17:144-163
16. Drosophila 12 Genomes Consortium. 2007. Evolution of genes and genomes on the Drosophila phylogeny. Nature 450:203-218.
17. Duan S., Lu B., Li Z., Tong J., Kong J., Yao W., Li S., Zhu Y. 2007. Phy-logenetic analysis of AA-genome Oryza species (Poaceae) based on chloroplast, mitochondrial, and nuclear DNA sequences. Biochem. Genet. 45:113-129.
18. Ebersberger I., Galgoczy P., Taudien S., Taenzer S., Platzer M., von Haeseler A. 2007. Mapping human genetic ancestry. Mol. Biol. Evol. 24:2266-2276.
19. Eckert A.J., Carstens B.C. 2008. Does gene flow destroy phylogenetic signal? The performance of three methods for estimating species phylogenies in the presence of gene flow. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 49:832-842.
20. Edwards S.V., Liu L., Pearl D.K. 2007. High-resolution species trees without concatenation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 104:5936-5941.
21. Goodman M., Czelusniak J., Moore G.W., Romeroherrera A.E., Matsuda G. 1979. Fitting the gene lineage into its species lineage, a parsimony strategy illustrated by cladograms constructed from globin sequences. Syst. Zool. 28:132-163.
22. Hartmann S., Vision T.J. 2008. Using ESTs for phylogenomics: can one accurately infer a phylogenetic tree from a gappy alignment? BMC Evol. Biol. 8:95.
23. Huelsenbeck J.P., Rannala B. 2004. Frequentist properties of Bayesian posterior probabilities of phylogenetic trees under simple and complex substitution models. Syst. Biol. 53:904-913.
24. Huelsenbeck J.P., Ronquist F. 2001. MrBayes: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics. 17:754-755.
25. Jeffroy O., Brinkmann H., Delsuc F., Philippe H. 2006. Phylogenomics: the beginning of incongruence? Trends Genet. 22:225-231.
26. Kim H., Hurwitz B., Yu Y., Collura K., Gill N., SanMiguel P., Mullikin J.C., Maher C., Nelson W., Wissotski M., Braidotti M., Kudrna D., Goicoechea J.L., Stein L., Ware D., Jackson S.A., Soderlund C., Wing R.A. 2008. Construction, alignment and analysis of twelve framework physical maps that represent the ten genome types of the genus Oryza. Genome Biol. 9: R45.
27. Kubatko L.S., Degnan J.H. 2007. Inconsistency of phylogenetic estimates from concatenated data under coalescence. Syst. Biol. 56: 17-24.
28. Kullberg M., Hallstrom B.M., Arnason U., Janke A. 2008. Phylogenetic analysis of 1.5 Mbp and platypus EST data refute the Marsupi-onta hypothesis and unequivocally support Monotremata as sister group to Marsupialia/Placentalia. Zool. Scr. 37:115-127.
29. Lakner C., van der Mark P., Huelsenbeck J.P., Larget B., Ronquist F. 2008. Efficiency of Markov chain Monte Carlo tree proposals in Bayesian phylogenetics. Syst. Biol. 57:86-103.
30. Larget B. 2006. Bayesian untangling of Concordance Knots (BUCKy), version 1.1. Available from: http://www.stat.wisc.edu/ larget/ bucky.html.
31. Linnen C.R., Farrell B.D. 2008. Comparison of methods for species-tree inference in the sawfly genus Neodiprion (Hymenoptera: Diprion-idae). Syst. Biol. 57:876-890.
32. Liu L. 2008. BEST: Bayesian estimation of species trees under the coa-lescent model. Bioinformatics. 24:2542-2543.
33. Liu L., Pearl D.K. 2007. Species trees from gene trees: reconstructing Bayesian posterior distributions of a species phylogeny using estimated gene tree distributions. Syst. Biol. 56:504-514.
34. Lu B.R., Naredo M., Juliano A., Jackson M.T. 2000. Preliminary studies on taxonomy and biosystematics of the AA-genome Oryza species (Poaceae). In: Jacobs S., Everett J., editors. Grasses: systematics and evolution. Melbourne (Australia): CSIRO. p. 51-58.
35. Maddison W.P., Knowles L.L. 2006. Inferring phylogeny despite incomplete lineage sorting. Syst. Biol. 55:21-30.
36. Mossel E., Vigoda E. 2005. Phylogenetic MCMC algorithms are misleading on mixtures of trees. Science. 309:2207-2209.
37. Notredame C., Higgins D.G., Heringa J. 2000. T-coffee: a novel method for fast and accurate multiple sequence alignment. J. Mol. Biol. 302:205-217.
38. Nylander J.A.A., Ronquist F., Huelsenbeck J.P., Nieves-Aldrey J.L. 2004. Bayesian phylogenetic analysis of combined data. Syst. Biol. 53:47-67.
39. Page R.D.M. 1994. Maps between trees and cladistic-analysis of historical associations among genes, organisms, and areas. Syst. Biol. 43:58-77.
40. Page R.D.M. 1998. Genetree: comparing gene and species phylogenies using reconciled trees. Bioinformatics. 14:819-820.
41. Page R.D.M., Charleston M.A. 1997. From gene to organismal phy-logeny: reconciled trees and the gene tree species tree problem. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 7:231-240.
42. Pamilo P., Nei M. 1988. Relationships between gene trees and species trees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 5:568-583.
43. Philippe H., Snell E.A., Bapteste E., Lopez P., Holland P.W.H., Casane D. 2004. Phylogenomics of eukaryotes: impact of missing data on large alignments. Mol. Biol. Evol. 21:1740-1752.
44. Phillips M.J., Delsuc F., Penny D. 2004. Genome-scale phylogeny and the detection of systematic biases. Mol. Biol. Evol. 21:1455-1458.
45. Pollard D.A., Iyer V.N., Moses A.M., Eisen M.B. 2006. Widespread discordance of gene trees with species tree in Drosophila: evidence for incomplete lineage sorting. PLoS Genet. 2:1634-1647.
46. Posada D., Crandall K.A. 1998. MODELTEST: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics. 14:817-818.
47. R Development Core Team. 2009. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna (Austria): R Foundation for Statistical Computing. ISBN 3-900051-07-0.
48. Rambaut A., Drummond A. 2005. Tracer version 1.3. Available from: http://beast.bio.ed.ac.uk/Tracer.
49. Rieseberg L.H., Baird S.J., Gardner K.A. 2000. Hybridization, intro-gression, and linkage evolution. Plant Mol. Biol. 42:205-224.
50. Rokas A., Williams B.L., King N., Carroll S.B. 2003. Genome-scale approaches to resolving incongruence in molecular phylogenies. Nature. 425:798-804.
51. Sanderson M.J., McMahon M.M. 2007. Inferring angiosperm phy-logeny from EST data with widespread gene duplication. BMC Evol. Biol. 7(Suppl 1):S3.
52. Sang T., Ge S. 2007. The puzzle of rice domestication. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 49:760-768.
53. Savard J., Tautz D., Richards S., Weinstock G.M., Gibbs R.A., Werren J.H., Tettelin H., Lercher M.J. 2006. Phylogenomic analysis reveals bees and wasps (Hymenoptera) at the base of the radiation of Holometabolous insects. Genome Res. 16:1334-1338.
54. Semon M., Nielsen R., Jones M.P., McCouch S.R. 2005. The population structure of African cultivated rice Oryza glaberrima (Steud.): evidence for elevated levels of linkage disequilibrium caused by admixture with O. sativa and ecological adaptation. Genetics. 169:1639-1647.
55. Takahata N. 1989. Gene genealogy in 3 related populations consistency probability between gene and population trees. Genetics. 122:957-966.
56. Thompson J.D., Higgins D.G., Gibson T.J. 1994. CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res. 22:4673-4680.
57. Vaughan D., Lu B., Tomooka N. 2008. The evolving story of rice evolution. Plant Sci. 174:394-408.
58. Wiens J. 1998. Does adding characters with missing data increase or decrease phylogenetic accuracy? Syst. Biol. 47:625-640.
59. Wing R., Ammiraju J., Luo M., Kim H., Yu Y., Kudrna D., Goicoechea J., Wang W., Nelson W., Rao K., Brar D., Mackill D., Han B., Soderlund C., Stein L., SanMiguel P., Jackson S. 2005. The Oryza Map Alignment Project: the golden path to unlocking the genetic potential of wild rice species. Plant Mol. Biol. 59:53-62.
60. Zhou H.-F., Zheng X.-M., Wei R.-X., Second G., Vaughan D.A., Ge S. 2008. Contrasting population genetic structure and gene flow between Oryza rufipogon and Oryza nivara. Theor. Appl. Genet. 117:1181-1189.
61. Zhu Q.H., Ge S. 2005. Phylogenetic relationships among A-genome species of the genus Oryza revealed by intron sequences of four nuclear genes. New Phytol. 167:249-265.
62. Zou X.-H., Zhang F.-M., Zhang J.-G., Zang L.-L., Tang L., Wang J., Sang T., Ge S. 2008. Analysis of 142 genes resolves the rapid diversification of the rice genus. Genome Biol. 9:R45.