Species tree discordance traces to phylogeographic clade boundaries in north American Fence lizards (Sceloporus)

Systematic Biology

Volumn 58, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 547-559

  Leaché, Adam D ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Bayesian analysis; Deep coalescence; Gene flow; Gene trees; Introgression; Lineage sorting; Species delimitation; Taxon sampling

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BAYES THEOREM; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CLASSIFICATION; DEMOGRAPHY; DNA SEQUENCE; GENE; GENE FLOW; GENETICS; LIZARD; METHODOLOGY; MOLECULAR GENETICS; NORTH AMERICA; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PHYLOGENY; POPULATION GENETICS; SPECIES DIFFERENCE; PROCEDURES;

ANIMALS; BASE SEQUENCE; BAYES THEOREM; CLASSIFICATION; DEMOGRAPHY; GENE FLOW; GENES; GENETICS, POPULATION; LIZARDS; MODELS, GENETIC; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; NORTH AMERICA; PHYLOGENY; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA; SPECIES SPECIFICITY;

SCELOPORUS; SCELOPORUS UNDULATUS; SQUAMATA;

EID: 70649110122     PISSN: 10635157     EISSN: 1076836X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/sysbio/syp057     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Ané C., Larget B., Baum D.A., Smith S.D., Rokas A. 2007. Bayesian estimation of concordance among gene trees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 24: 412-426.
2. Baum D.A. 2007. Concordance trees, concordance factors, and the exploration of reticulate genealogy. Taxon. 56:417-426.
3. Belfore N.M., Liu L., Moritz C. 2008. Multilocus phylogenetics of a rapid radiation in the genus Thomomys (Rodentia: Geomyidae). Syst. Biol. 57:294-310.
4. Bond J.E., Stockman A.K. 2008. An integrative method for delimiting cohesion species: fnding the population-species interface in a group of Californian trapdoor spiders with extreme genetic divergence and geographic structuring. Syst. Biol. 57(4):628-646.
5. Brito P.H., Edwards S.V. 2009. Multilocus phylogeography and phylo-genetics using sequence-based markers. Genetica. 135(3):439-455.
6. Brumfeld R.T., Beerli P., Nickerson D.A., Edwards S.V. 2003. The utility of single nucleotide polymorphisms in inferences of population history. Trends Ecol. Evol. 18:249-256.
7. Brumfeld R.T., Liu L., Lum D.E., Edwards S.V. 2008. Comparison of species tree methods for reconstructing the phylogeny of bearded manakins (Aves: Pipridae: Manacus) from multilocus sequence data. Syst. Biol. 57:719-731.
8. Bryant D., Moulton V. 2004. Neighbor-net: an agglomerative method for the construction of phylogenetic networks. Mol. Biol. Evol. 21:255-265.
9. Carling M.D., Brumfeld R.T. 2008. Integrating phylogenetic and population genetic analyses of multiple loci to test species divergence hypotheses in passerina buntings. Genetics. 178:363-377.
10. Degnan J.H., Rosenberg N.A. 2006. Discordance of species trees with their most likely gene trees. PLoS Genet. 2:762-768.
11. Dixon J.R., Ketchersid C.A., Lieb C.S. 1972. A new species of Sceloporus (undulatus group; Sauria, Iguanidae) from Mexico. Proc. Biol. Soc. Wash. 84:307-312.
12. Eckert A.J., Carstens B.C. 2008. Does gene fow destroy phylogenetic signal? The performance of three methods for estimating species phylogenies in the presence of gene fow. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 49:832-842.
13. Edgar R.C. 2004. MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res. 32:1792-1797.
14. Edwards S.V. 2009. Is a new and general theory of molecular system-atics emerging? Evolution. 63(1):1-19.
15. Edwards S.V., Liu L., Pearl D.K. 2007. High-resolution species trees without concatenation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 104:5936-5941.
16. Funk D.J., Omland K.E. 2003. Species-level paraphyly and polyphyly: frequency, causes, and consequences, with insights from animal mitochondrial DNA. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 34:397-423.
17. Hasegawa M., Kishino H., Yano T. 1985. Dating the human-ape splitting by a molecular clock of mitochondrial DNA. J. Mol. Evol. 22:160-174.
18. Heath T.A., Hedtke S.M., Hillis D.M. 2008. Taxon sampling and the accuracy of phylogenetic analyses. J. Syst. Evol. 46:239-257.
19. Huson D.H., Bryant D. 2006. Application of phylogenetic networks in evolutionary studies. Mol. Biol. Evol. 23:254-267.
20. Joly S., Bruneau A. 2006. Incorporating allelic variation for reconstructing the evolutionary history of organisms from multiple genes: an example from Rosa in North America. Syst. Biol. 55:623-636.
21. Kluge A.G. 1989. A concern for evidence and a phylogenetic hypothesis of relationships among Epicrates (Boidae, Serpentes). Syst. Zool. 38:7-25.
22. Kubatko L.S., Degnan J.H. 2007. Inconsistency of phylogenetic estimates from concatenated data under coalescence. Syst. Biol. 56: 17-24.
23. Leaché A.D., Cole C.J. 2007. Hybridization between multiple fence lizard lineages in an ecotone: locally discordant variation in mi-tochondrial DNA, chromosomes, and morphology. Mol. Ecol. 16:1035-1054.
24. Leaché A.D., McGuire J.A. 2006. Phylogenetic relationships of horned lizards (Phrynosoma) based on nuclear and mitochondrial data: evidence for a misleading mitochondrial gene tree. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 39:628-644.
25. Leaché A.D., Reeder T.W. 2002. Molecular systematics of the Eastern Fence Lizard (Sceloporus undulatus): a comparison of parsimony, likelihood, and Bayesian approaches. Syst. Biol. 51:44-68.
26. Liu L., Pearl D.K. 2007. Species trees from gene trees: reconstructing Bayesian posterior distributions of a species phylogeny using estimated gene tree distributions. Syst. Biol. 56:504-514.
27. Liu L., Pearl D.K., Brumfeld R.T., Edwards S.V. 2008. Estimating species trees using multiple-allele DNA sequence data. Evolution. 62:2080-2091.
28. Maddison W.P. 1997. Gene trees in species trees. Syst. Biol. 46:523-536.
29. Maddison W.P., Knowles L.L. 2006. Inferring phylogeny despite incomplete lineage sorting. Syst. Biol. 55:21-30.
30. Maddison W.P., Maddison D.R. 2008. Mesquite: a modular system for evolutionary analysis. Version 2.5. Available from: http://mesquiteproject.org.
31. McGuire J.A., Linkem C.W., Koo M.S., Hutchison D.W., Lappin A.K., Orange D.I., Lemos-Espinal J.A., Riddle B.R., Jaeger J.R. 2007. Mi-tochondrial introgression and incomplete lineage sorting through space and time: phylogenetics of crotaphytid lizards. Evolution. 61:2879-2897.
32. McGuire G., Wright F. 2000. TOPAL 2.0: improved detection of mosaic sequences within multiple alignments. Bioinformatics. 16:130-134.
33. Miles D.B., Noecker R., Roosenburg W.M., White M.N. 2002. Genetic relationships among populations of Sceloporus undulatus fail to support present subspecifc designations. Herpetologica. 58: 277-282.
34. Morando M., Avila L.J., Sites J.W. Jr. 2003. Sampling strategies for delimiting species: genes, individuals, and populations in the Liolaemus elongatus-kriegi complex (Squamata: Liolaemidae) in Andean-Patagonian South America. Syst. Biol. 52(2):159-185.
35. Nylander J.A.A. 2004. MrModeltest v2. Evolutionary Biology Centre, Uppsala University. Available from: http://www.abc.se/~ nylander/.
36. Nylander J.A.A., Wilgenbusch J.C., Warren D.L., Swofford D.L. 2008. AWTY (are we there yet?): a system for graphical exploration of MCMC convergence in Bayesian phylogenetics. Bioinformatics. 24(4):581-583.
37. Oliver J.C. 2008. AUGIST: inferring species trees while accommodating gene tree uncertainty. Bioinformatics. 24:2932-2933.
38. Pamilo P., Nei M. 1988. Relationships between gene trees and species trees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 5:568-583.
39. Posada D., Crandall K.A. 2001. Intraspecifc gene genealogies: trees grafting into networks. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16:37-45.
40. Rambaut A., Drummond A.J. 2007. Tracer v1.4. Available from: http://beast.bio.ed.ac.uk/Tracer.
41. Rannala B., Yang Z. 2008. Phylogenetic inference using whole genomes. Annu. Rev. Genomics Hum. Genet. 9:217-231.
42. Rokas A., Williams B.L., King N., Carroll S.B. 2003. Genome-scale approaches to resolving incongruence in molecular phylogenies. Nature. 425:798-804.
43. Ronquist F., Huelsenbeck J.P. 2003. MrBayes 3: Bayesian phy-logenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics. 19: 1572-1574.
44. Rosenblum E.B., Belfore N.M., Moritz C. 2007. Anonymous nuclear markers for the eastern fence lizard, Sceloporus undulatus. Mol. Ecol. Notes. 7:113-116.
45. Stamatakis A. 2006. RAxML-VI-HPC: maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic analysis with thousands of taxa and mixed models. Bioinformatics. 22:2688-2690.
46. Stephens M., Donnelly P. 2003. A comparison of Bayesian methods for haplotype reconstruction from population genotype data. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 73:1162-1169.
47. Swofford D.L. 2001. PAUP*. Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods). Version 4. Sunderland (MA): Sinauer Associates.
48. Wake D.B. 2006. Problems with species: patterns and processes of species formation in salamanders. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 93(1): 8-23.
49. Wiens J.J., Reeder T.W. 1997. Phylogeny of the spiny lizards (Scelo-porus) based on molecular and morphological evidence. Herpetol. Monogr. 11:1-101.