Evolution: Animal evolution and the molecular signature of radiations compressed in time

Science

Volumn 310, Issue 5756, 2005, Pages 1933-1938

  Rokas, Antonis ^a,b   Krüger, Dirk ^a   Carroll, Sean B ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

^b BROAD INSTITUTE OF MIT AND HARVARD   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

APPROXIMATION THEORY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FUNGI; ROBUSTNESS (CONTROL SYSTEMS);

GENE SEQUENCES; METAZON PHYLA;

GENES;

EVOLUTION; PHYLOGENETICS;

ARTICLE; EVOLUTION; GENE SEQUENCE; METAZOON; PALEONTOLOGY; PHYLOGENY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIATION; ANIMAL; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CLASSIFICATION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DNA SEQUENCE; FUNGUS; GENE; GENETICS; HUMAN; INVERTEBRATE; TIME;

ANIMALIA; FUNGI; METAZOA;

COMPLEMENTARY DNA;

ANIMALS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DNA, COMPLEMENTARY; EVOLUTION; FUNGI; GENES; HUMANS; INVERTEBRATES; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PHYLOGENY; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA; TIME;

EID: 29344441657     PISSN: 00368075     EISSN: 10959203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1126/science.1116759     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. T. Rowe, in Assembling the Tree of Life, J. Cracraft, M. J. Donoghue, Eds. (Oxford Univ. Press, New York, 2004), pp. 384-409.
2. G. Giribet, Mol. Phylog. Evol. 24. 345 (2002).
3. A. Adoutte et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 97, 4453 (2000).
4. A. Rokas, N. King, J. Finnerty, S. B. Carroll, Evol. Dev. 5, 346 (2003).
5. K. M. Halanych, Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 35, 229 (2004).
6. D. H. Erwin, Trends Ecol. Evol. 6, 131 (1991).
7. D. M. Raup, Paleobiology 9, 107 (1983).
8. A. Rokas, S. B. Carroll, Mol. Biol. Evol. 22, 1337 (2005).
9. M. S. Rosenberg, S. Kumar, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 98, 10751 (2001).
10. S. Poe, D. L. Swofford, Nature 398, 299 (1999).
11. A. Rokas, B. L. Williams, N. King, S. B. Carroll, Nature 425, 798 (2003).
12. E. Bapteste et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 99, 1414 (2002).
13. H. Philippe et al., Mol. Biol. Evol. 21, 1740 (2004).
14. A. C. Driskell et al., Science 306, 1172 (2004).
15. Materials and methods are available as supporting material on Science Online.
16. M. J. Phillips, F. D. Delsuc, D. Penny, Mol. Biol. Evol. 21, 1455 (2004).
17. M. J. Sanderson, H. B. Shaffer, Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 33, 49 (2002).
18. J. J. Wiens, Syst. Biol. 52, 528 (2003).
19. E. Sober, M. Steel, J. Theor. Biol. 218, 395 (2002).
20. D. Penny, B. J. McComish, M. A. Charleston, M. D. Hendy, J. Mol. Evol. 53, 711 (2001).
21. E. Mossel, M. Steel, in Mathematics of Evolution and Phylogeny, O. Gascuel, Ed. (Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, 2005), pp. 384-412.
22. S. L. Baldauf, A. J. Roger, I. Wenk-Siefert, W. F. Doolittle, Science 290, 972 (2000).
23. X. Yuan, S. Xiao, T. N. Taylor, Science 308, 1017 (2005).
24. A. H. Knoll, S. B. Carroll, Science 284, 2129 (1999).
25. J. W. Valentine, D. H. Erwin, D. Jablonski, Dev. Biol. 173, 373 (1996).
26. S. H. Xiao, Y. Zhang, A. H. Knoll, Nature 391, 553 (1998).
27. C. W. Li, J. Y. Chen, T. E. Hua, Science 279, 879 (1998).
28. S. B. Hedges, J. E. Blair, M. L. Venturi, J. L. Shoe, BMC Evol. Biol. 4, 2 (2004).
29. D. S. Heckman et al., Science 293, 1129 (2001).
30. E. J. Douzery, E. A. Snell, E. Bapteste, F. Delsuc, H. Philippe, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 101, 15386 (2004).
31. F. Lutzoni et al., Am. J. Bot. 91, 1446 (2004).
32. K. I. Fiala, R. R. Sokal, Evolution 39, 609 (1985).
33. J. Y. Chen et al., Dev. Biol. 248, 182 (2002).
34. M. A. Fedonkin, B. M. Waggoner, Nature 388, 868 (1997).
35. H. Philippe, A. Chenuil, A. Adoutte, Dev. Suppl. 1994, 15 (1994).
36. M. S. Springer, W. J. Murphy, E. Eizirik, S. J. O'Brien, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 100, 1056 (2003).
37. C. Ane, J. G. Burleigh, M. M. McMahon, M. J. Sanderson, Mol. Biol. Evol. 22, 914 (2005).
38. We also conducted simulations in which the effect of increasing elapsed time on phylogenetic accuracy was measured, using trees in which all branches are proportionally scaled as time span increases. Results from these simulations show that most internodes are resolved near 100% accuracy, irrespective of time span simulated (fig. 56 and table 58). These results, combined with the lack of resolution within superclades of the metazoan tree, argue against models of metazoan radiation in which the temporal window of diversification is much larger (48).
39. J. A. Clack, Gaining Ground: the Origin and evolution of Tetrapods (Indiana Univ. Press, Bloomington, IN, 2002).
40. N. Takezaki, F. Figueroa, Z. Zaleska-Rutczynska, N. Takahata, J. Klein, Mol. Biol. Evol. 21, 1512 (2004).
41. Y. I. Wolf, I. B. Rogozin, E. V. Koonin, Genome Res. 14, 29 (2004).
42. J. E. Blair, K. Ikeo, T. Gojobori, S. B. Hedges, BMC Evol. Biol. 2, 7 (2002).
43. H. Philippe, N. Lartillot, H. Brinkmann, Mol. Biol. Evol. 22, 1246 (2005).
44. S. L. Baldauf, J, D. Palmer, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 90, 11558 (1993).
45. J. L. Boore, D. Lavrov, W. M. Brown, Nature 393, 667 (1998).
46. A. Rokas, P. W. H. Holland, Trends Ecol. Evol. 15, 454 (2000).
47. A goodness-of-fit test using parametric bootstrapping (15) showed that even the best-fit model of sequence evolution does not adequately describe the evolution of the sequence data from these 32 fungal and metazoan taxa (fig. 58).
48. G. A. Wray, J. S. Levinton, L. H. Shapiro, Science 274, 568 (1996).
49. We thank D. Arendt for providing RNA for Platynereis dumerilii; C. Ané for providing the modified version of the Seq-Gen simulation software with an implementation of a covarion model; and B. Prud'homme, B. Williams, and T. Rokas for comments on the manuscript. A.R. was funded by a Human Frontier Science Program Long-Term Fellowship. This work was funded by the Howard Hughes Medical Institute.