Recent trends in molecular phylogenetic analysis: Where to next?

Journal of Heredity

Volumn 102, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 130-138

  Blair, Christopher ^a   Murphy, Robert W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

alignment; Bayesian; mixture modeling; parsimony; species TREE

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; BAYESIAN LEARNING; DATA ANALYSIS; GENE LOCUS; INFORMATION; MAMMAL; METHODOLOGY; MOLECULAR PHYLOGENY; NONHUMAN; PARSIMONY ANALYSIS; PHYLOGEOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; SPECIES;

ALGORITHMS; DATABASES, GENETIC; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; GENETIC LOCI; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PHYLOGENY; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA; SPECIES SPECIFICITY;

EID: 78650445809     PISSN: 00221503     EISSN: 14657333     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/jhered/esq092     Document Type: Review

References (109)

1. AnéC, Larget B, Baum DA, Smith SD, Rokas A. 2007. Bayesian estimation of concordance among gene trees. Mol Biol Evol. 24:412-426.
2. Baker RH, DeSalle R. 1997. Multiple sources of character information and the phylogeny of Hawaiian drosophilids. Syst Biol. 46:654-673.
3. Barriel V. 1994. Molecular phylogenies and nucleotide insertion-deletion. CR Acad Sci III. 317:693-701.
4. Beiko RG, Keith JM, Harlow TJ, Ragan MA. 2006. Searching for convergence in phylogenetic Markov chain Monte Carlo. Syst Biol. 55:553-565.
5. Brandley MC, Schmitz A, Reeder TW. 2005. Partitioned Bayesian analyses, partition choice, and the phylogenetic relationships of scincid lizards. Syst Biol. 54:373-390.
6. Brito P, Edwards SV. 2009. Multilocus phylogeography and phylogenetics using sequence-based markers. Genetica. 135:439-455.
7. Brown JM, Hedtke SM, Lemmon AR, Lemmon EM. 2010. When trees grow too long: Investigating the causes of highly inaccurate Bayesian branch-length estimates. Syst Biol. 59:145-161.
8. Brown JM, Lemmon AR. 2007. The importance of data partitioning and the utility of Bayes factors in Bayesian phylogenetics. Syst Biol. 56:643-655.
9. Brudno M, Do CB, Cooper GM, Kim MF, Davydov E, NISC Comparative Sequencing Program, Green ED, Sidow A, Batzoglou S. 2003. LAGAN and Multi-LAGAN: Efficient tools for large-scale multiple alignment of genomic DNA. Genome Res. 13:721-731.
10. Carstens BC, Knowles LL. 2007. Estimating species phylogeny from genetree probabilities despite incomplete lineage sorting: An example from Melanoplus grasshoppers. Syst Biol. 56:400-411.
11. Cranston KA, Hurwitz B, Ware D, Stein L, Wing RA. 2009. Species trees from highly incongruent gene trees in rice. Syst Biol. 58:489-500.
12. Darling ACE, Mau B, Blatter FR, Perna NT. 2004. Mauve: Multiple alignment of conserved genomic sequence with rearrangements. Genome Res. 14:1394-1403.
13. Degnan JH, Rosenberg NA. 2006. Discordance of species trees with their most likely gene trees. PloS Genet. 2:762-768.
14. Degnan JH, Rosenberg NA. 2009. Gene tree discordance, phylogenetic inference, and the multispecies coalescent. Trends Ecol Evol. 24:332-340.
15. Doolittle WF. 1999. Lateral genomics. Trends Cell Biol. 9:M5-M8.
16. Edgar RC, Batzoglou S. 2006. Multiple sequence alignment. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 16:368-373.
17. Edwards SV. 2008. Is a new and general theory of molecular systematics emerging? Evolution. 63:1-19.
18. Edwards SV, Liu L, Pearl DK. 2007. High-resolution species trees without concatenation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 104:5936-5941.
19. Farris JS. 1988. Hennig86, version 1.5. Program and documentation. Port Jefferson Station (NY): Distributed by the Author.
20. Farris JS, Kallersjo M, Kluge AG, Bult C. 1994. Testing the significance of incongruence. Cladistics. 10:315-319.
21. Felsenstein J. 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: An approach using the bootstrap. Evolution. 39:783-791.
22. Fitch WM, Markowitz E. 1970. An improved method for determining codon variability in a gene and its application to the rate of fixation of mutations in evolution. Biochem Genet. 4:579-593.
23. Genome10kCommunity of Scientists. 2009.Genome10k: A proposal to obtain whole-genome sequence for 10 000 vertebrate species. J Hered. 100:659-674.
24. Giribet G. 2005. A review of: "TNT: Tree analysis using New Technology.". Syst Biol. 54:176-178.
25. Giribet G, Wheeler WC. 1999. On gaps. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 13:132-143.
26. Goloboff PA. 1994. Nona: A Tree-searching program. Program and documentation [Internet]. Available from: Http://www.zmuc.dk/public /phylogeny/Nona-PeeWee. Published by the author, Tucumán, Argentina.
27. Goloboff PA. 1999. Analyzing large datasets in reasonable times: Solutions for composite optima. Cladistics. 15:415-428.
28. Goloboff PA, Farris J, Nixon K. 2003. T.N.T.: Tree Analysis Using New Technology. Program and documentation [Internet]. Available from: Http://www.zmuc.dk/public/phylogeny/tnt.
29. Goloboff PA, Pol D. 2007. On divide-and-conquer strategies for parsimony analysis of large data sets: Rec-I-dcm3 vs TNT. Syst Biol. 56:485-495.
30. Goloboff PA, Farris JS, Nixon KC. 2008. TNT, a free program for phylogenetic analysis. Cladistics. 24:774-786.
31. Golubchik T, Wise MJ, Easteal S, Jermiin LS. 2007. Mind the gaps: Evidence of bias in estimates of multiple sequence alignments. Mol Biol Evol. 24:2433-2442.
32. Green PJ. 1995. Reversible jump Markov chain Monte Carlo computation and Bayesian model determination. Biometrika. 82:711-732.
33. Heled J, Drummond AJ. 2010. Bayesian inference of species trees from multilocus data. Mol Biol Evol. 27:570-580.
34. Hovenkamp P. 2004. Review of TNT-tree analysis using New Technology, ver. 1.0. Cladistics. 20:378-383.
35. Huelsenbeck JP, Larget B, Alfaro ME. 2004. Bayesian phylogenetic model selection using reversible jump Markov chain Monte Carlo. Mol Biol Evol. 21:1123-1133.
36. Kass RE, Raftery AE. 1995. Bayes factors. J Am Stat Assoc. 90:773-795.
37. Katoh K, Kuma K, Toh H, Miyata T. 2005. MAFFT version 5: Improvement in accuracy of multiple sequence alignment. Nucleic Acids Res. 33:511-518.
38. Katoh K, Misawa K, Kuma K, Miyata T. 2002. MAFFT: A novel method for rapid multiple sequence alignment based on fast Fourier transform. Nucleic Acids Res. 30:3059-3066.
39. Kawakita A, Sota T, Ascher JS, Ito M, Tanaka H, Kato M. 2003. Evolution and phylogenetic utility of alignment gaps within intron sequences of three nuclear genes in bumble bees (Bombus). Mol Biol Evol. 20:87-92.
40. Keightley PD, Johnson T. 2004. MCALIGN: Stochastic alignment of noncoding DNA sequences based on an evolutionary model of sequence evolution. Genome Res. 14:442-450.
41. Kjer KM, Gillespie JJ, Ober KA. 2007. Opinions on multiple sequence alignment, and an empirical comparison of repeatability and accuracy between POY and structural alignment. Syst Biol. 56:133-146.
42. Kluge AG. 1989. A concern for evidence and a phylogenetic hypothesis for relationships among Epicrates (Boidae, Serpentes). Syst Zool. 38:7-25.
43. Knowles LL. 2009. Estimating species trees: Methods of phylogenetic analysis when there is incongruence across genes. Syst Biol. 58:463-467.
44. Kubatko LS. 2009. Identifying hybridization events in the presence of coalescence via model selection. Syst Biol. 58:478-488.
45. Kubatko LS, Carstens BC, Knowles LL. 2009. STEM: Species tree estimation using maximum likelihood for gene trees under coalescence. Bioinformatics. 25:971-973.
46. Lanyon SM. 1985. Detecting internal inconsistencies in distance data. Syst Zool. 38:7-25.
47. Larkin MA, Blackshields G, Brown NP, Chenna R, McGettigan PA, McWilliam H, Valentin F, Wallace IM, Wilm A, Lopez R, et al. 2007. Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0. Bioinformatics. 23:2947-2948.
48. Lassmann T, Sonnhammer ELL. 2002. Quality assessment of multiple alignment programs. FEBS Lett. 529:126-130.
49. Lee MS, Hugall AF. 2003. Partitioned likelihood support and the evaluation of data set conflict. Syst Biol. 52:15-22.
50. Lewis PO. 2001. A likelihood approach to estimating phylogeny from discrete morphological character data. Syst Biol. 50:913-925.
51. Lewis RL, Beckenbach AT, Mooers AØ. 2005. The phylogeny of the subgroups within the melanogaster species group: Likelihood tests on COI and COII sequences and a Bayesian estimate of phylogeny. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 37:15-24.
52. Liu K, Nelesen S, Raghavan S, Linder CR, Warnow T. 2009. Barking up the wrong treelength: The impact of gap penalty on alignment and tree accuracy. IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform. 6:7-21.
53. Liu L. 2008. BEST: Bayesian estimation of species trees under the coalescent model. Bioinformatics. 24:2542-2543.
54. Liu L, Pearl DK. 2007. Species trees from gene trees: Reconstructing Bayesian posterior distributions of a species phylogeny using estimated gene tree distributions. Syst Biol. 56:504-514.
55. Liu L, Yu L, Pearl DK, Edwards SV. 2009. Estimating species phylogenies using coalescence times among sequences. Syst Biol. 58:468-477.
56. Lopez P, Casane D, Philippe H. 2002. Heterotachy, an important process of protein evolution. Mol Biol Evol. 19:1-7.
57. Lunter G, Miklós I, Drummond A, Jensen JL, Hein J. 2005. Bayesian coestimation of phylogeny and sequence alignment. BMC Bioinformatics. 6:83.
58. Maddison WP. 1997. Gene trees in species trees. Syst Biol. 46:523-536.
59. Maddison WP, Knowles LL. 2006. Inferring phylogeny despite incomplete lineage sorting. Syst Biol. 55:21-30.
60. Marshall DC, Simon C, Buckley TR. 2006. Accurate branch length estimation in partitioned Bayesian analyses requires accommodation of among-partition rate variation and attention to branch length priors. Syst Biol. 55:993-1003.
61. McCormack JE, Huang H, Knowles LL. 2009. Maximum likelihood estimates of species trees: How accuracy of phylogenetic inference depends upon the divergence history and sampling design. Syst Biol. 58:501-508.
62. Meier R, Ali F. 2005. The newest kid on the parsimony block: TNT (Tree analysis using new technology). Syst Entomol Am. 30:179-182.
63. Miklós I, Lunter GA, Holmes I. 2004. A "long indel" model for evolutionary sequence alignment. Mol Biol Evol. 21:529-540.
64. Morgenstern B. 2004. DIALIGN: Multiple DNA and protein sequence alignment at BiBiServ. Nucleic Acids Res. 32:W33-W36.
65. Nixon KC. 1999. The parsimony ratchet, a new method for rapid parsimony analysis. Cladistics. 15:407-414.
66. Notredame C, Higgins DG, Heringa J. 2000. T-Coffee: A novel method for fast and accurate multiple sequence alignment. J Mol Biol. 302:205-217.
67. Novák A, Miklós I, Lyngso R, Hein J. 2008. StatAlign: An extendable software package for joint Bayesian estimation of alignments and evolutionary trees. Bioinformatics. 24:2403-2404.
68. Nuin PAS, Wang Z, Tillier ERM. 2006. The accuracy of several multiple sequence alignment programs for proteins. BMC Bioinformatics. 7:471.
69. Nylander JAA, Ronquist F, Huelsenbeck JP, Nieves-Aldrey J. 2004. Bayesian phylogenetic analysis of combined data. Syst Biol. 53:47-67.
70. Ogden TH, Rosenberg MS. 2007a. Alignment and topological accuracy of the direct optimization approach via POY and traditional phylogenetics via ClustalW + PAU.P. Syst Biol. 56:182-193.
71. Ogden TH, Rosenberg MS. 2007b. How should gaps be treated in parsimony? A comparison of approaches using simulation. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 42:817-826.
72. Page RDM, Charleston MA. 1997. From gene to organismal phylogeny: Reconciled trees and the gene tree species tree problem. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 7:231-240.
73. Pagel M, Meade A. 2004. A phylogenetic mixture model for detecting patternheterogeneity in gene sequence or character-state data. Syst Biol. 53:571-581.
74. Pagel M, Meade A. 2005. Mixture models in phylogenetic inference. In: Gascuel O, editor. Mathematics of evolution and phylogeny. Oxford: Clarendon Press. p. 121-142.
75. Pagel M, Meade A. 2008. Modelling heterotachy in phylogenetic inference by reversible-jump Markov chain Monte Carlo. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci. 363:3955-3964.
76. Pamilo P, Nei M. 1988. Relationships between gene trees and species trees. Mol Biol Evol. 5:568-583.
77. Philippe H, Zhou Y, Brinkmann H, Rodrigue N, Delsuc F. 2005. Heterotachy and long-branch attraction in phylogenetics. BMC Evol Biol. 5:50.
78. Raftery AE. 1996. Hypothesis testing and model selection. In: Gilks WR, Richardson S, Spiegelhalter DJ, editors. Markov chain Monte Carlo in practice. London: Chapman Hall. p. 163-188.
79. Redelings BD, Suchard MA. 2005. Joint Bayesian estimation of alignment and phylogeny. Syst Biol. 54:401-418.
80. Redelings BD, Suchard MA. 2007. Incorporating indel information into phylogeny estimation for rapidly emerging pathogens. BMC Evol Biol. 7:40.
81. Rieseberg LH, Baird SJ, Gardner KA. 2000. Hybridization, introgression, and linkage evolution. Plant Mol Biol. 42:205-224.
82. Roberts TE, Sargis EJ, Olson LE. 2009. Networks, trees, and treeshrews: Assessing support and identifying conflict with multiple loci and a problematic root. Syst Biol. 58:257-270.
83. Rokas A, Williams BL, King N, Carroll SB. 2003. Genome-scale approaches to resolving incongruence in molecular phylogenies. Nature. 425:798-804.
84. Ronquist F, Huelsenbeck JP. 2003. MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics. 19:1572-1574.
85. Schulte JAII, Cartwright EM. 2009. Phylogenetic relationships among iguanian lizards using alternative partitioning methods and TSHZ1: A new phylogenetic marker for reptiles. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 50:391-396.
86. Siddall ME. 2001. Philosophy and phylogenetic inference: A comparison of likelihood and parsimony methods in the context of Karl Popper's writings on corroboration. Cladistics. 17:395-399.
87. Siddall ME, Kluge AG. 1997. Probabilism and phylogenetic inference. Cladistics. 13:313-336.
88. Simmons MP. 2004. Independence of alignment and tree search. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 31:874-879.
89. Simmons MP, Müller K, Norton AP. 2007. The relative performance of indel-coding methods in simulation. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 44:724-740.
90. Simmons MP, Ochoterena H. 2000. Gaps as characters in sequence-based phylogenetic analysis. Syst Biol. 49:369-381.
91. Simmons MP, Ochoterena H, Carr TG. 2001. Incorporation, relative homoplasy, and effect of gap characters in sequence-based phylogenetic analyses. Syst Biol. 50:454-462.
92. Stamatakis A. 2006. RAxML-VI-HPC: Maximum-likelihood based phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa and mixed models. Bioinformatics. 22:2688-2690.
93. Struck TH, Purschke G, Halanych KM. 2006. Phylogeny of Eunicida (Annelida) and exploring data congruence using a partition addition bootstrap alteration (PABA) approach. Syst Biol. 55:1-20.
94. Suchard MA, Redelings BD. 2006. Bali-Phy: Simultaneous Bayesian inference of alignment and phylogeny. Bioinformatics. 22:2047-2048.
95. Swofford DL. 2002. PAU.P.* : Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (* and other methods), version 4. Sunderland (MA): Sinauer Associates.
96. Swofford DL, Olsen GJ, Waddell PJ, Hillis DM. 1996. Phylogenetic inference. In: Hillis DM, Moritz C, Mable BK, editors. Molecular systematics. 2nd ed. Sunderland (MA): Sinauer Associates. p. 407-514.
97. Talavera G, Castresana J. 2007. Improvement of phylogenies after removing divergent and ambiguously aligned blocks from protein sequence alignments. Syst Biol. 56:564-577.
98. Thompson JD, Higgins DG, Gibson TJ. 1994. CLUSTAL W: Improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res. 22:4673-4680.
99. Thorne JL, Kishino H, Felsenstein J. 1991. An evolutionary model for maximum likelihood alignment of DNA sequences. J Mol Evol. 33:114-124.
100. Thorne JL, Kishino H, Felsenstein J. 1992. Inching towards reality-an improved likelihood model of sequence evolution. J Mol Evol. 34:3-16.
101. Varón A, Vinh LS, Wheeler WC. 2009. POY version 4: Phylogenetic analysis using dynamic homologies. Cladistics. 26:72-85.
102. Venditti C, Meade A, Pagel M. 2008. Phylogenetic mixture models can reduce node-density artifacts. Syst Biol. 57:286-293.
103. Wallace IM, Blackshields G, Higgins DG. 2005. Multiple sequence alignments. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 15:261-266.
104. Wallace IM, O'Sullivan O, Higgins DG, Notredame C. 2006. M-Coffee: Combining multiple sequence alignment methods with T-Coffee. Nucleic Acids Res. 34:1692-1699.
105. Wheeler W. 1996. Optimization alignment: The end of multiple sequence alignment in phylogenetics. Cladistics. 12:1-9.
106. Yang Z. 1994. Maximum likelihood phylogenetic estimation from DNA sequences with variable rates over sites: Approximate methods. J Mol Evol. 39:306-314.
107. Young ND, Healy J. 2003. GapCoder automates the use of indel characters in phylogenetic analysis. BMC Bioinformatics. 4:6.
108. Zaldivar-Riverón A, Nieto-Montes de Oca A, Manríquez- Morán N, Reeder TW. 2008. Phylogenetic affinities of the rare and enigmatic limbreduced Anelytropsis (Reptilia: Squamata) as inferred with mitochondrial 16S rRNA sequence data. J Herpetol. 42:303-311.
109. Zwickl DJ. 2006. Genetic algorithm approaches for the phylogenetic analysis of large biological sequence datasets under the maximum likelihood criterion [PhD dissertation]. [Austin (TX)]: The University of Texas at Austin.