Combining bioinformatics and phylogenetics to identify large sets of single-copy orthologous genes (COSII) for comparative, evolutionary and systematic studies: A test case in the euasterid plant clade

Genetics

Volumn 174, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 1407-1420

  Wu, Feinan ^a   Mueller, Lukas A ^a   Crouzillat, Dominique ^b   Pétiard, Vincent ^b   Tanksley, Steven D ^a  

^a Department of Obstetrics Gynecology   (United States)

^b NESTLÉ RESEARCH CENTER   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PROTEIN KINASE; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR;

ANGIOSPERM; ARABIDOPSIS; ARTICLE; BIOINFORMATICS; CELL ORGANELLE; CELL WALL; CLADISTICS; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVOLUTIONARY HOMOLOGY; GENE MAPPING; NONHUMAN; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; ORTHOLOGY; PHYLOGENY; PLANT GENETICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN TRANSPORT; RUBIACEAE; SEQUENCE DATABASE; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION;

ARABIDOPSIS; LYCOPERSICON ESCULENTUM; RUBIACEAE; SOLANACEAE;

EID: 33751344142     PISSN: 00166731     EISSN: 00166731     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1534/genetics.106.062455     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. ARABIDOPSIS GENOME INITIATIVE, 2000 Analysis of the genome sequence of the flowering plant Arabidopsis thaliana. Nature 408: 796-815.
2. BERARDINI, T. Z., S. MUNDODI, L. REISER, E. HUALA, M. GARCIA-HERNANDEZ et al., 2004 Functional annotation of the Arabidopsis genome using controlled vocabularies. Plant Physiol. 135: 745-755.
3. BLANC, G., and K. H. WOLFE, 2004 Widespread paleopolyploidy in model plant species inferred from age distributions of duplicate genes. Plant Cell 16: 1667-1678.
4. BLANC, G., A. BARAKAT, R. GUYOT, R. COOKE and M. DELSENY, 2000 Extensive duplication and reshuffling in the Arabidopsis genome. Plant Cell 12: 1093-1101.
5. BLANCHETTE, M., E. D. GREEN, W. MILLER and D. HAUSSLER, 2004 Reconstructing large regions of an ancestral mammalian genome in silico. Genome Res. 14: 2412-2423.
6. BOWERS, J. E., B. A. CHAPMAN, J. RONG and A. H. PATERSON, 2003 Unravelling angiosperm genome evolution by phylogenetic analysis of chromosomal duplication events. Nature 408: 796-815.
7. BREMER, B., K. BREMER, M. W. CHASE, J. L. REVEAL, D. E. SOLTIS et al., 2003 An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG II. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 141: 399-436.
8. BUSTAMANTE, C. D., A. FLEDEL-ALON, S. WILLIAMSON, R. NIELSEN, M. T. HUBISZ et al., 2005 Natural selection on protein-coding genes in the human genome. Nature 437: 1153-1157.
9. CHASE, M. W., D. E. SOLTIS, R. G. OLMSTEAD, D. MORGAN, D. H. LES et al., 1993 Phylogenetics of seed plants: an analysis of nucleotide-sequences from the plastid gene Rbcl. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 80: 528-580.
10. CREPET, W. L., K. C. NIXON and M. A. GANDOLFO, 2004 Fossil evidence and phylogeny: the age of major angiosperm clades based on mesofossil and macrofossil evidence from cretaceous deposits. Am. J. Bot. 91: 1666-1682.
11. DE LA TORRE, J. E., M. G. EGAN, M. S. KATARI, E. D. BRENNER, D. W. STEVENSON et al., 2006 Estimating plant phylogeny: lessons from partitioning. BMC Evol. Biol. 6: 48.
12. DEHAL, P., and J. L. BOORE, 2005 Two rounds of whole genome duplication in the ancestral vertebrate. PLoS Biol. 3: e314.
13. DOGANLAR, S., A. FRARY, M. C. DAUNAY, R. N. LESTER and S. D. TANKSLEY, 2002 Conservation of gene function in the Solanaceae as revealed by comparative mapping of domestication traits in eggplant. Genetics 161: 1713-1726.
14. EISEN, J. A., 1998 Phylogenomics: improving functional predictions for uncharacterized genes by evolutionary analysis. Genome Res. 8: 163-167.
15. FAY, J., 2006 Human genome: Which proteins contribute to human-chimpanzee differences? Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 14: 506.
16. FELSENSTEIN, J., 1978 Cases in which parsimony or compatibility methods will be positively misleading. Syst. Zool. 27: 401-410.
17. FRARY, A., Y. M. XU, J. P. LIU, S. MITCHELL, E. TEDESCHI et al., 2005 Development of a set of PCR-based anchor markers encompassing the tomato genome and evaluation of their usefulness for genetics and breeding experiments. Theor. Appl. Genet. 111: 291-312.
18. FULTON, T. M., R. VAN DER HOEVEN, N. T. EANNETTA and S. D. TANKSLEY, 2002 Identification, analysis, and utilization of conserved ortholog set markers for comparative genomics in higher plants. Plant Cell 14: 1457-1467.
19. GANDOLFO, M. A., K. C. NIXON and W. L. CREPET, 1998 A new fossil flower from the Turonian of New Jersey: Dressiantha bicarpellata gen. et sp. nov. (Capparales). Am. J. Bot. 85: 964-974.
20. GOGARTEN, J. P., and L. OLENDZENSKI, 1999 Orthologs, paralogs and genome comparisons. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 9: 630-636.
21. GOODSPEED, T. H., 1954 The Genus Nicotiana: Originism Relationships and Evolution of Its Species in the Light of Their Distribution, Morphology and Cytogenetics, pp. 283-310. The Chronica Botanica Company, Waltham, MA.
22. GRANT, D., P. CREGAN and R. C. SHOEMAKER, 2000 Genome organization in dicots: genome duplication in Arabidopsis and synteny between soybean and Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97: 4168-4173.
23. GRAYBEAL, A., 1998 Is it better to add taxa or characters to a difficult phylogenetic problem? Syst. Biol. 47: 9-17.
24. HUGHES, A. L., and M. YEAGER, 1997 Comparative evolutionary rates of introns and exons in murine rodents. J. Mol. Evol. 45: 125-130.
25. HUGHES, A. L., R. FRIEDMAN, V. EKOLLU and J. R. ROSE, 2003 Nonrandom association of transposable elements with duplicated genomic blocks in Arabidopsis thaliana. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 29: 410-416.
26. KALENDAR, R., 2001 A computer program "Oligos" for PCR primers design, in The Third Major International Bioinformatics Meeting in Scandinavia:"Bioinformatics 2001." Skovde, Sweden.
27. KU, H. M., T. VISION, J. LIU and S. D. TANKSLEY, 2000 Comparing sequenced segments of the tomato and Arabidopsis genomes: large-scale duplication followed by selective gene loss creates a network of synteny. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97: 9121-9126.
28. LEE, Y., R. SULTANA, G. PERTEA, J. CHO, S. KARAMYCHEVA et al., 2002 Cross-referencing eukaryotic genomes: TIGR Orthologous Gene Alignments (TOGA). Genome Res. 12: 493-502.
29. LI, L., C. J. STOECKERT and D. S. ROOS, 2003 OrthoMCL: identification of ortholog groups for eukaryotic genomes. Genome Res. 13: 2178-2189.
30. LIN, C., L. A. MUELLER, J. MCCARTHY, D. CROUZILLAT, V. PETIARD et al., 2005 Coffee and tomato share common gene repertoires as revealed by deep sequencing of seed and cherry transcripts. Theor. Appl. Genet. 112: 114-130.
31. MADDISON, W. P., 1997 Gene trees in species trees. Syst. Biol. 46: 523-536.
32. MAERE, S., S. DE BODT, J. RAES, T. CASNEUF, M. VAN MONTAGU et al., 2005 Modeling gene and genome duplications in eukaryotes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102: 5454-5459.
33. MARTINS, T. R., and T. J. BARKMAN, 2005 Reconstruction of Solanaceae phylogeny using the nuclear gene SAMT. Syst. Bot. 30: 435-447.
34. NOTREDAME, C., D. G. HIGGINS and J. HERINGA, 2000 T-Coffee: a novel method for fast and accurate multiple sequence alignment. J. Mol. Biol. 302: 205-217.
35. O'BRIEN, K. P., M. REMM and E. L. SONNHAMMER, 2005 Inparanoid: a comprehensive database of eukaryotic orthologs. Nucleic Acids Res. 33: D476-D480.
36. OLMSTEAD, R. G., and J. A. SWEERE, 1994 Combining data in phylogenetic systematics: an empirical approach using 3 molecular data sets in the Solanaceae. Syst. Biol. 43: 467-481.
37. OLMSTEAD, R. G., J. A. SWEERE and R. E. SPANGLER, 1999 Phylogeny and provisional classification of the Solanaceae based on chloroplast DNA, pp. 111-137 in Solanaceae IV, edited by M. NEE, D. E. SYMON, R. N. LESTER and J. P. JESSOP. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, United Kingdom.
38. PATERSON, A. H., J. E. BOWERS, M. D. BUROW, X. DRAYE, C. G. ELSIK et al., 2000 Comparative genomics of plant chromosomes. Plant Cell 12: 1523-1539.
39. PHILIPPE, H., Y. ZHOU, H. BRINKMANN, N. RODRIGUE and F. DELSUC, 2005 Heterotachy and long-branch attraction in phylogenetics. BMC Evol. Biol. 5: 50.
40. POSADA, D., and K. A. CRANDALL, 1998 MODELTEST: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14: 817-818.
41. REMM, M., C. E. V. STORM and E. L. L. SONNHAMMER, 2001 Automatic clustering of orthologs and in-paralogs from pairwise species comparisons. J. Mol. Biol. 314: 1041-1052.
42. RIECHMANN, J. L., and O. J. RATCLIFFE, 2000 A genomic perspective on plant transcription factors. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 3: 423-434.
43. ROKAS, A., B. L. WILLIAMS, N. KING and S. B. CARROLL, 2003 Genome-scale approaches to resolving incongruence in molecular phylogenies. Nature 425: 798-804.
44. SANTIAGO-VALENTIN, E., and R. G. OLMSTEAD, 2003 Phylogenetics of the Antillean Goetzeoideae (Solanaceae) and their relationships within the Solanaceae based on chloroplast and ITS DNA sequence data. Syst. Bot. 28: 452-460.
45. SMALL, R. L., R. C. CRONN and J. F. WENDEL, 2004 Use of nuclear genes for phylogeny reconstruction in plants. Aust. Syst. Bot. 17: 145-170.
46. SMALL, R. L., and J. F. WENDEL, 2000 Copy number lability and evolutionary dynamics of the Adh gene family in diploid and tetraploid cotton (Gossypium). Genetics 155: 1913-1926.
47. SONNHAMMER, E. L. L., and E. V. KOONIN, 2002 Orthology, paralogy and proposed classification for paralog subtypes. Trends Genet. 18: 619-620.
48. SPOONER, D. M., I. E. PERALTA and S. KNAPP, 2005 Comparison of AFLPs with other markers for phylogenetic inference in wild tomatoes. [Solanum L. section Lycopersicon (Mill.) Wettst.] Taxon 54: 43-61.
49. STAM, P., 1993 Construction of integrated genetic linkage maps by means of a new computer package: Joinmap. Plant J. 3: 739-744.
50. SWOFFORD, D. L., 2003 PAUP*. Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and Other Methods), Version 4. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
51. TATUSOV, R. L., M. Y. GALPERIN, D. A. NATALE and E. V. KOONIN, 2000 The COG database: a tool for genome-scale analysis of protein functions and evolution. Nucleic Acids Res. 28: 33-36.
52. VAN OOIJEN, J. W., and R. E. VOORRIPS, 2001 JoinMap version 3.0: software for the calculation of genetic linkage maps. Plant Research International, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
53. WIKSTROM, N., V. SAVOLAINEN and M. W. CHASE, 2001 Evolution of the angiosperms: calibrating the family tree. Proc. Biol. Sci. 268: 2211-2220.
54. WOLFE, K. H., W.-H. LI and P. M. SHARP, 1987 Rates of nucleotide substitution vary greatly among plant mitochondrial chloroplast, and nuclear DNAs. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 84: 9054-9058.