The Tangled Complexity of the EU Constitutional Process: The frustrating knot of Europe

The Tangled Complexity of the EU Constitutional Process: The Frustrating Knot of Europe

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 1-194

  Martinico, Giuseppe ^a,b  

^a Centro de Estudios Politicos y Constitucionales   (Spain)

^b SCUOLA SUPERIORE SANT ANNA   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84905078750     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203082034     Document Type: Book

References (297)

1. Abbagnano (ed.), Dizionario di filosofia, Turin: Utet, 1968.
2. Ackerman, ‘Constitutional Politics/Constitutional Law’, Yale Law Journal, 1989, 453-547.
3. Albi, ‘“Europe” Articles in the Constitutions of the Central and Eastern European Countries’, Common Market Law Review, 2005, 399-423.
4. Albi, EU Enlargement and the Constitutions of Central and Eastern Europe, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.
5. Alter, The European Court’s Political Power: Selected Essays, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.
6. Alter, ‘Explaining national court acceptance of European Court jurisprudence: A critical evaluation of theories of legal integration’, in Slaughter, Stone Sweet and Weiler (eds.), The European Court and national courts - doctrine and jurisprudence. Legal change in its social context, Oxford: Hart, 1997, 227-52.
7. Angner, ’Hayekandnaturallaw’, London: Routledge, 2007.
8. Athanassiou, ‘Withdrawal and expulsion from the EU and EMU. Some reflections’, Legal Working Paper Series, 10/2009, http://www.ecb.int/pub/pdf/scplps/ecblwp10.pdf
9. Avbelj and Komarek (eds.), ‘Four visions of constitutional pluralism’, EUI Working Paper No. 28/2001, available at: http://cadmus.iue.it/dspace/bitstream/1814/ 9372/1/LAW_2008_21.pdf
10. Avbelj, ‘EU constitutional swan song’, 2009, http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1497030
11. Avbelj, ‘Questioning EU Constitutionalisms’, German LawJournal, 2008, 1-26.
12. Azoulai, ‘A comment on the Ruiz Zambrano judgment: a genuine European integration’, EUDO, 2011, http://eudo-citizenship.eu/citizenship-news/457-a-comment-on-the-ruiz-zambrano-judgment-a-genuine-european-integration
13. Azoulai, The Force and Forms of European Legal Integration, EUI Law Working Paper, 2011, http://cadmus.eui.eu/bitstream/handle/1814/16894/LAW_2011_06.pdf?sequence = 1, 9 ff
14. Azoulai and Maduro (eds.), Thepastandthefuture of EU law, Oxford: Hart, 2010.
15. Baez Seara, ‘The practice of European constitutional pluralism’, 2010, http://eui.aca-demia.edu/DavidBaezSeara/Papers/267313/The_Practice_of_European_Constitu-tional_Pluralism._DRAFT
16. Bagehot, The English Constitution, Oxford University Press, 1867, reprinted 2001.
17. Barak-Erez, ‘An International Community of Legislatures?’, in Bauman and Kahana (eds.), The Least Examined Branch: The Role of Legislatures in the Constitutional State, New York: Cambridge University Press, 2006, 532 ff.
18. Barents, The autonomy of community law, The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2004.
19. Bast and Bogdandy, ‘The European Union’s vertical order of competences: the current law and proposals for its reform’, Common Market Law Review, 2002, 39, 227-68.
20. Bast, ‘The Constitutional Treaty as a Reflexive Constitution’, German Law Journal, 2005, 1433-52.
21. Bauböck, ‘ECJ decides that third country national parents of an EU citizen child have rights to residence and access to employment in the child’s country of nationality’, EUDO, 2011, http://eudo-citizenship.eu/citizenship-news/447-ecj-decides-that-third-country-national-parents-of-an-eu-citizen-child-have-rights-to-residence-and-access-to-employment-in-the-childs-country-of-nationality
22. Becchio, ‘Carl Menger and complexity’, paper presented at the Center for the History of Political Economy, Duke University, 4 December 2009, available at: http://hope.econ.duke.edu/node/226
23. Becchio, ‘Carl Menger and the Second edition of his Principles’, 2010, http://econ.as.nyu.edu/docs/I0/l4399/Becchio_20100201.pdf
24. Bellamy, Political Constitutionalism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.
25. Bellamy and Warleigh, ‘Cementing the Union: The role of European citizenship’, in Cerutti and Rudolph (eds.), A Soul for Europe, I, Leuven: Peeters, 2001, 55-72.
26. Besselink, ‘The Notion and Nature of the European Constitution after the Reform Treaty’, WorkingPaper, 2007, http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1086189
27. Besselink, A Composite European Constitution/Een Samengestelde Europese Constitutie, Groningen: Europa Law Publishing, 2007.
28. Bigliazzi Geri, L’ interpretazione. Appunti delle lezioni di teoria generale del diritto, Milan: Giuffrè, 1994, p. 3.
29. Bin, ‘Gli effetti del diritto dell’Unione nell’ordinamento italiano e il principio di entropia’, in AA.VV., Scritti in onore di Franco Modugno, Naples: Jovene, 363-83.
30. Bobek and Kosa, ‘Report on the Czech Republic and Slovakia’, in Martinico, Pollicino (eds.), The National Judicial Treatment of the ECHR and EU Laws: A Comparative Constitutional Perspective, Groningen: Europa Law Publishing, 2010, 121-49.
31. Bodin, On sovereignty, edited by J.H. Franklin, Cambridge University Press, 1992.
32. Bogdandy, Kottmann, Antpöhler, Dickschen, Hentrei and Smrkolj, ‘A Rescue Package for EU Fundamental Rights - Illustrated with Reference to the Example of Media Freedom’, 2012, http://verfassungsblog.de/rescue-package-eu-fundamental-rights-illustrated-reference-media-freedom/
33. Bogdandy, Kottmann, Antpöhler, Dickschen, Hentrei and Smrkolj, ‘Reverse Solange. Protecting the essence of fundamental rights against EU member States’, Common Market Law Review, 2012, 489-520.
34. Bogdandy and Schill, ‘Overcoming absolute primacy: Respect for national identity under the Lisbon Treaty’, Common Market Law, 2011, 1417-53.
35. Bogdandy, ‘The Past and Promise of Doctrinal Constructivism: A Strategy for Responding to the Challenges Facing Constitutional Scholarship in Europe’, International Journal of Constitutional Law, 2009, 364-400.
36. Bogdandy and Bast (eds.), Principles of European Constitutional Law, Oxford: Hart, 2006.
37. Braibant, La Charte des droits fondamentaux de l’Union européenne. Témoignage et commentaires, Paris: Seuil, 2001.
38. Brand, ‘Formalising European constitutionalism; Potential added value or ‘‘death by constitution’’’, in Brunkhorst, ‘A polity without a state? European constitutionalism between evolution and revolution’, in Eriksen, Fossum and Menéndez (eds.), Developing a Constitution for Europe, London, New York: Routledge, 2004, 90-108.
39. Calamandrei, ‘Lettera dedicatoria al prof Enrico Redenti’, in P. Calamandrei, La illegittimità costituzionale delle leggi nel processo civile, Padua: Cedam, 1950, XII.
40. Calamandrei, ‘Appunti sulla sentenza come fatto giuridico’ 1932, in Opere giuridiche, I, Naples: Morano, 1965, 270 ff.
41. Calbucci, ‘La complessità del diritto e il diritto della complessità’, in Calbucci, La complessità del diritto dalla demagogia della semplificazione alla pedagogia della complessità in campo giuridico, Naples: Guida, 2008, 11-32.
42. Calvano, ‘Il caso “Mangold”: la Corte di giustizia afferma (senza dirlo) l’efficacia orizzontale di una direttiva comunitaria non scaduta?’, 2006, www.associazionedeicost ituzionalisti.it/cronache/giurisprudenza_comunitaria/mangold/index.html
43. Carbonell, ‘Coherence and Post-Sovereign Legal Argumentation’, in Menéndez and Fossum, The Post-Sovereign Constellation Law and Democracy in Neil D. MacCormick’s Legal and Political Theory, 2008, www.sv.uio.no/arena/english/research/publica-tions/arena-publications/reports/2008/Report_04_08.pdf, 109-52.
44. Carpentier and Cammaerts, ‘Hegemony, Democracy, Agonism and Journalism: An Interview with Chantal Mouffe’, Journalism Studies, 2006, 964-75; also available at: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/3020/1/Hegemony,_democracy,_agonism_and_journalism_%28LSERO%29.pdf
45. Cartabia, ‘Taking Dialogue Seriously’, Jean Monnet Working Paper, 12/2007. http://centers.law.nyu.edu/jeanmonnet/papers/07/071201.html
46. Cartabia and Weiler, L’Italia in Europa, Bologna: Mulino, 2000.
47. Cartabia ‘Il processo costituzionale: l’iniziativa. Considerazioni sulla posizione del giudice comune di fronte a casi di ‘‘doppia pregiudizialità’’, comunitaria e costituzionale’, Il Foro italiano, 5, 1997, 222.
48. Cartabia, Principi inviolabili e integrazione europea, Milan: Giuffrè, 1995.
49. Cassese “La funzione costituzionale dei giudici non statali. Dallo spazio giuridico globale all’ordine giuridico globale” Rivista Trimestrale di Diritto Pubblico, 2007, 609-26.
50. Chalmers, ‘Constituent Power and the Pluralist Ethic’, in Loughlin and Walker (eds.), The Paradox of Constitutionalism: Constituent Power and Constitutional Form, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008, 291-315.
51. Choudry, ‘Globalization in Search of Justification: Towards a Theory of Comparative Constitutional Interpretation’, Indiana Law Journal, 1999, 819-92, 821 ff.
52. Claes ‘The emergence of a European Constitution: European and national law in a European constitutional space’, paper presented at the III EUNACON Workshop, University of Maastricht, 19-20 May 2011.
53. Claes, ‘ The National Courts’ Mandate in the European Constitution, Oxford: Hart, 2006.
54. Closa, ‘The Convention Method and the Transformation of EU Constitutional Politics’, in Eriksen, Fossum and Menéndez (eds.), Developing a Constitution for Europe, London-New York: Routledge, 2004, 184 ff.
55. Corneloup, ‘Citoyenneté européenne: la Cour de justice apporte une nouvelle pierre à son édifice’, Recueil Le Dalloz, 2011, 1325-8.
56. Corthaut, ‘Plus ça change, plus c’est la même chose? A comparison with the Constitutional Treaty’, Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, 2008, 21-34.
57. Coutinho, ‘Report on Portugal’, in Martinico and Pollicino, The National Judicial Treatment of the ECHR and EU Laws: A Comparative Constitutional Perspective, Groningen: Europa Law Publishing, 2010, 351-68.
58. Coutts, ‘Case C-434-09: Shirley McCarthy v. Secretary of State for the Home Department’, EUDO, 2011, http://eudo-citizenship.eu/citizenship-news/475-case-c-434-09-shirley-mccarthy-v-secretary-of-state-for-the-home-department
59. Craig, ‘Supplementary written evidence’, in House of Lords, Select Committee on the European Union, The euro area crisis. Oral and written evidence, 2012, http://www.parliament.uk/documents/lords-committees/eu-select/euroareacrisis/Evidence volume.pdf
60. Crouch and Pizzorno, Conflitti in Europa, Milan: Etas libri, 1977.
61. Curtin, ‘The Constitutional Structure of the Union: A Europe of Bits and Pieces’, Common Market Law Review, 1993, 17-69.
62. Dahrendorf, Essays in the Theory ofSociety, Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1968.
63. Dahrendorf, ‘Toward a Theory of Social Conflict’, The Journal of Conflict Resolution, 1958, 170-83.
64. D’Alterio, Lafunzione di regolazione delle corti nello spazio amministrativo globale, Milan: Giuffrè, 2010.
65. Dani, ‘Economic and Social Conflicts, Integration and Constitutionalism in Contemporary Europe’, LSE ‘Europe in Question’ Discussion Paper Series, 13/2009, http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id= 1518629
66. Dani, ‘Tracking Judicial Dialogue — The Scope for Preliminary Rulings from the Italian Constitutional Court’, Jean Monnet Working Paper, 10/2008, http://centers.law.nyu.edu/jeanmonnet/papers/08/081001.html
67. de Búrca, ‘The constitutional challenge of new governance’, European Law Review, 2003, 814 ff.
68. de Vergottini, Oltre ildialogofra le Corti, Bologna: Il Mulino, 2010.
69. de Vergottini, ‘Tradizioni costituzionali comuni e Costituzione europea’, 2005, www.forumcostituzionale.it/site/images/stories/pdf/old_pdf/135.pdf
70. de Witte, ‘ The closest thing to a constitutional conversation in Europe: The semipermanent treaty revision process’, in Beaumont et al. (eds.), Convergence anddiver-gence in European public law, Oxford: Hart, 2002, 39-57.
71. Deelen and Deelen, ‘The European Court of Justice as a Federator’, Publius, 1996, 81-97.
72. Dehousse, ‘Comparing National and EC Law: The Problem of Level of Analysis’, American Journal of Comparative Law, 1994, 761 ff.
73. Delmas Marty, ‘Coping with legal pluralism: French & American approaches to the transnational legal world’, part 1, posted on January 11, 2010, http://www.intlawgrrls.com/2010/01/coping-with-legal-pluralism-french.html
74. Delmas Marty, ‘Can we facilitate the transitions between horizontal cooperation and vertical harmonisation necessary to create a universal legal order?’, 2007, http://www.axess.se/english/2006/04/theme_delmasmarty.php
75. Delmas Marty, ‘Comparative law and international law: Methods for ordering pluralism’, p. 3, University of Tokyo Journal of Law and Politics, 2006, 44 ff, an electronic version of the paper can be found at: http://w7.ens-lsh.fr/amrieu/IMG/pdf/Delmas-M_Comp_Int_Law_10-05.pdf
76. Delmas Marty, ‘Comparative legal studies and internationalization of law’, working paper, 2005, http://www.college-de-france.fr/media/en-mireille-delmas-marty/UPL46493_mdm_pt3_pluralism_2004_2005_RevD.pdf
77. Delmas Marty, ‘La tragédie des 3 C’, in ‘Préface’, in Doat, Le Goff and Pédrot (eds.), Droit et complexité Pour une nouvelle intelligence du droit vivant, Rennes: Presses Universitaires de Rennes, 2007, 7-12.
78. Delmas Marty, ‘Where and when transnational law develops’, January 13, 2010, http://www.intlawgrrls.com/2010/01/where-and-when-transnational-law.html
79. Delmas Marty, Le pluralisme ordonné. Les forces imaginantes du droit, Paris: Ed. du Seuil, 2006.
80. Dobuzinskis, ‘The complexities of spontaneous order’, Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society, 1989, 241-66.
81. Donnât, ‘La Cour de Justice et la QPC: chronique d’un arrêt imprévisible et imprévu’, Recueil Dalloz, 2010, 1640-47.
82. Douglas-Scott, ‘The European Union and Human Rights after the Treaty of Lisbon’, Human Rights Law Review, 2011, 645-82.
83. Douglas-Scott, ‘A Tale of Two Courts: Luxembourg, Strasbourg and the Growing European Human Rights Acquis’, Common Market Law Review, 2006, 629-65.
84. Eeckhout, ‘The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights and the Federal Question’, Common Market Law Review, 2002, 945-94.
85. Eijsbouts and Besselink, ‘Editorial: “The Law of Laws” - Overcoming Pluralism’, European Constitutional Law Review, 2008, 395 ff.
86. Eleftheriadis, ‘Pluralism and Integrity’, RatioJuris, 2010, 365-89.
87. Erman, ‘What is Wrong with Agonistic Pluralism? Reflections on Conflict in Democratic Theory’, Philosophy and Social Criticism, 2009, 1039-62.
88. Fabbrini, ‘La Corte di Giustizia si pronuncia sulla “legittimità comunitaria” del nuovo modello di giustizia costituzionale francese’, Quadderni Costituzionali, 2010, 4.
89. Fabbrini, ‘Kelsen in Paris: France’s constitutional reform and the introduction of a posteriori constitutional review of legislation’, German Law Journal, 2008, 1297.
90. Ferrara, ‘Costituzione e Rivoluzione. Riflessioni sul Beruf del costituzionalista’, 2010, www.costituzionalismo.it/articolo.asp?id=352
91. Ferrarese, ‘When National Actors Become Transnational: Transjudicial Dialogue between Democracy and Constitutionalism’, Global Jurist Frontiers, 2009, 1 ff.
92. Ferreres Comella, ‘La Constitución española ante la clausola de primacía del Derecho de la Unión europea. Un comentario a la Declaración 1/2004 del Tribunal Constitucional 1/2004’, in Lopez Castillo, Saiz Arnaiz and Ferreres Comella, Constitución española y constitución europea, Madrid: CEPC, 2005, 77-100.
93. Feus (ed.), The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights. Text and commentaries, Constitution for Europe, Federal Trust Series 1, London: Kogan Page, 2000.
94. Fletcher, ‘Extending ‘‘Indirect Effect’’ to the Third Pillar: the Significance of Pupino’, European Law Review, 2005, 862 ff.
95. Foley, The Silence of Constitutions: Gaps, ‘Abeyances’, and Political Temperament in the Maintenance of Government, Routledge: New York, 1989.
96. Fontanelli and Martinico, ‘Focusing on courts: The techniques of hidden dialogue in the multilevel system’, in F. Snyder (ed.), The Evolution of the European Courts: Institutional Change and Continuity. Proceedings of the 6th International Workshop for Young Scholars (WISH), Brussels: Bruylant, 2010, 37-66.
97. Fontanelli, Martinico and Carrozza C. (eds.), Shaping Rule ofLaw through Dialogue: International and Supranational Experiences, Groningen: Europa Law Publishing, 2009.
98. Fossum and Menéndez, The Constitution’s Gift. A Constitutional Theory for a Democratic European Union, London, Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 2010.
99. Fossum and Menéndez, ‘The theory of constitutional synthesis. A constitutional theory for a democratic European Union’, ARENA Working Paper, 15/2010, www.sv.uio.no/arena/english/research/publications/arena-publications/workingpapers/2010/wp15-10.pdf
100. Fossum, ‘The Transformation of the Nation-State: Why Compare the EU and Canada?’, ARENA Working Paper 01/19, 2001, www.sv.uio.no/arena/english/research/publi-cations/arena-publications/workingpapers/working-papers2002/wp02_28.htm
101. Galetta, “Il principio di proporzionalità comunitario e il suo effetto di spill over negli ordinamenti nazionali’, Nuove autonomie, 2005, 541-57.
102. Galligan, ‘The Paradox of Constitutionalism or the Potential of Constitutional Theory?’, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 2008, 343-67.
103. Gamper, ‘On Loyalty and the (Federal) Constitution’, Vienna Journal on International Constitutional Law, 4(2), 2010, 157-70.
104. Gaus, ‘Social complexity and evolved moral principles’, in McNamara(ed.), Liberalism, conservatism, and Hayek’s idea of spontaneous order, London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007, 149-76, also available electronically at: http://www.gaus.biz/Gaus-SocialCom-plexity.pdf
105. Goldoni, ‘Book review to “G. Martinico, Lo spirito polemico del diritto europeo: Studio sulle ambizioni costituzionali dell’Unione, Aracne, Roma, 2011’’, European Law Review, forthcoming.
106. Goldoni, ‘Constitutional pluralism and the politics of the European common good’, 2010, www.juragentium.unifi.it/topics/rights/en/goldoni.htm#*
107. Griffith, ‘The Political Constitution’, Modern Law Review, 1979, 1-21.
108. Grimm, ‘ Il significato della stesura di un catalogo europeo dei diritti fondamentali nell’ottica della critica dell’ipotesi di una Costituzione europea’, in Zagrebelsky (ed.), Diritti e Costituzione nell’Unione Europea, Rome, Bari: Laterza, 2003, 15 ff.
109. Grimm, ‘Does Europe need a constitution?’, European Law Journal, 1995, 282-302.
110. Grimmel, ‘Integration and the Context of Law: Why the European Court of Justice is not a Political Actor’, 2011, www.cee.sciences-po.fr/fr/component/…/raw
111. Groussot, and Minseen, ‘Res Judicata in the Court of Justice Case-Law: Balancing Legal Certainty with Legality?’, European Constitutional Law Review, 2007, 385-417.
112. Groussot, General principles of Community Law, Europa Law Publishing, 2006.
113. Habermas, ‘Remarks on Dieter Grimm’s ‘‘Does Europe Need a Constitution?’’’, European LawJournal, 1995, 303-7.
114. Habermas, Moral Conciousness and Communicative Action, Cambridge: MIT Press, 2001.
115. Hailbronner and Thym, ‘Casenote’, Common Market Law Review, 48, 2011, 1253-70.
116. Halberstam, ‘Constitutional Heterarchy: The Centrality of Conflict in the European Union and the United States’, in Dunoff and Trachtman (eds.), In Ruling the World? Constitutionalism, International Law and Global Governance, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009, 326-55, also available at: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id= 1147769
117. Haltern, ‘Pathos and patina: The failure and promise of constitutionalism in the European imagination’, European Law Journal, 2003, 14-44.
118. Hatzopoulos, ‘Why the Open Method of Coordination is Bad for You: A Letter to the EU’, European Law Journal, 2007, 309-42.
119. Hayek, Law, Legislation and Liberty, vol. 1, Rules and Order, London: Routledge, 1973.
120. Hayek, ‘The theory of complex phenomena’ now published in his Studies in Philosophy, Politics and Economics, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1967.
121. Herzog and Gerken, ‘[Comment] Stop the European Court of Justice’, 2008, http://euobserver.com/9/26714
122. Hinarejos, ‘Extending Citizenship and the Scope of EU Law’, The Cambridge Law Journal, 2011, 309-12.
123. Hirschl, Towards Juristocracy, the Limits and the Consequence of the New Constitutionalism, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2004.
124. Hoffmann, ‘Wanna Be Starting Something: The Impact of the Convention on the Future of Europe on Member State Positions and the Outcome of the Constitutional Treaty’, TICOM Working Paper, 9/2009, http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1475217
125. House of Lords, ‘The euro area crisis — European Union Committee’, 2012, http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld201012/ldselect/ldeucom/260/26008.htm
126. Ince, ‘The Return of the Schmittian: Radical Democratic Theory at its Limits’, 2009, http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1675583
127. Inglis and Ott (eds.), The Constitutionfor Europe andan enlarging Union: Unity in diversity?, Groningen: Europa Law Publishing, 2005, 3-29.
128. Itzcovich, ‘Closer to the citizens? European constitutional processes, communication policy and publicity’, STALS Research Paper 6/2009, http://www.stals.sssup.it/files/stals_Itzcovich.pdf
129. Itzcovich, ‘Fundamental Rights, Legal Disorder and Legitimacy: The Federfarma Case’, Jean Monnet Working Paper, 12/08, http://centers.law.nyu.edu/jeanmonnet/papers/08/081201.html, 2008.
130. Jacobs, ‘The European Convention on Human Rights, the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights and the European Court of Justice’, 2005, www.ecln.net/elements/con-ferences/book_berlin/jacobs.pdf
131. Jarukaitis, ‘Report on Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania’, in G. Martinico and O. Pollicino (eds.), The NationalJudicial Treatment of the ECHR and EU Laws: A Comparative Constitutional Perspective, Groningen: Europa Law Publishing, 2010, 167-203.
132. Karlsson, ‘The Convention Method Revisited: Does It Have a Future and Does It Matter?’, European Law Journal, 2010, 717-35.
133. Karlsson, ‘Deliberation at the European Convention: The Final Verdict’, European Law Journal, 2008, 604-19.
134. Kay, ‘ Book Review Essay: Canada’s Constitutional Cul De Sac’, American Review of Canadian Studies, 2005, 705 ff.
135. Kelemen, ‘Constitution-making in Hungary — The final stage’, 2011, www.diritticomparati.it/2011/04/constitution-making-in-hungary-the-final-stage.html
136. Kelemen, ‘Hungary is drafting a new constitution’, 2011, www.diritticomparati.it/2011/03/hungary-is-drafting-a-new-constitution.html
137. Kelemen, ‘The new Hungarian constitution and Europe’, 2011, www.diritticomparati.it/2011/07/the-new-hungarian-constitution-and-europe.html
138. Kelsen, The Pure Theory of Law, Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1970.
139. Kelsen, General Theory of Law and State, New York: Russell and Russell, 1945.
140. Khalil and Boulding (eds.), ‘Evolution, order and complexity’, London: Routledge, 1996.
141. Kilpatrick, K. Jr, ‘Complexity, spontaneous order, and Friedrich Hayek: Are spontaneous order and complexity essentially the same thing?’, Complexity, 2011, 16-20.
142. Knight, Institutions and social conflict, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.
143. Komárek, ‘European constitutionalism and the European arrest warrant: In search of the limits of “contrapuntal principles’’’, Common Market Law Review, 2007, 9 ff.
144. Komárek, ‘European constitutionalism and the European Arrest Warrant: In search of the limits of contrapuntal principles’, Jean Monnet Working Paper, 10/05 www.jeanmonnetprogram.org/papers/05/051001.html
145. Krisch, ‘Who is Afraid of Radical Pluralism?’, 2010, www.eui.eu/Documents/MWP/Conferences/NeilMacCormick/PaperKrisch.pdf
146. Krisch, Beyond constitutionalism. The pluralist structure of postnational law, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.
147. Krisch, ‘Europe’s constitutional monstrosity’, Oxford journal ofLegal Studies, 2005, 321-34.
148. Kuhnert, ‘ Bosphorus Double Standards in European Human Rights Protection?’, Utrecht Law Review, 2006, 2(2), 177.
149. Kumm, ‘The Jurisprudence of Constitutional Conflict: Constitutional Supremacy in Europe Before and After the Constitutional Treaty’, European Law Journal, 2005, 262-307.
150. L’Heureux-Dube, ‘The International Judicial Dialogue: When Domestic Constitutional Courts Join the Conversation’, Harvard Law Review, 2001, 2049 ff.
151. Lavranos, ‘Regulating Competing Jurisdictions among International Courts and Tribunals’, 2008, Heidelberg journal of International Law, 575-621.
152. Lavranos, ‘Towards a Solange-Method between international courts and tribunals?’, in Shany and Broude, The Shifting Allocation of Authority in International Law: Considering Sovereignty, Supremacy and Subsidiarity, Oxford: Hart, 2008, 217-35.
153. Le Goff, ‘Le droit du travail, terre d’élection de la complexité’, in Doat, Le Goff and Pédrot (eds.), Droit et complexité.Pour une nouvelle intelligence du droit vivant, Rennes: Presses Universitaires de Rennes, 2007, 106 ff.
154. Lebeck, ‘Sliding Towards Supranationalism? The Constitutional Status of EU Framework Decisions after Pupino’, German Law Journal, 2007, 501-32.
155. Lenaerts, ‘Fundamental rights in the European Union’, European Law Review, 2000, 575 ff.
156. Lindseth, ‘National parliaments in European integration: Europeanization, renation-alization, or reconciliation?’, 2012, http://eutopialaw.com/2012/03/01/national-parliaments-in-european-integration-europeanization-renationalization-or-recon-ciliation/
157. Lock, ‘Walking on a tightrope: the draft accession agreement and the autonomy of the EU legal order’, Common Market Law Review, 2011, 1025-54.
158. Lock, ‘EU Accession to the ECHR: Consequences for the European Court of Justice’, 2011, www.euce.org/eusa/2011/papers/1b_lock.pdf
159. Lock, ‘The ECJ and the ECtHR: The Future Relationship between the Two European Courts’, TheLawandPracticeoflnternationalCourtsandTribunals, 2009, 375-96.
160. Lollini and Palermo, ‘Comparative Law and the ‘‘Proceduralization’’ of Constitution-Building Processes’, in Raue and Sutter (eds.), Facets andPractices ofState-building, Leiden, Boston, MA: Brill/Martinus Nijhoff, 2009, 301 ff.
161. Loreto, ‘Non equilibrio e complessità’, http://www.mosac.com
162. Loughlin, ‘Constituent power subverted: from English constitutional argument to British constitutional practice’, in Loughlin and Walker (eds.), The Paradox of Constitutionalism: Constituent Power and Constitutional Form, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008, 27-48.
163. Luciani, ‘Costituzionalismo irenico e costituzionalismo polemico’, 2006, www.rivistaaic.it/old_site_aic/materiali/anticipazioni/costituzionalismo_irenico/index.html
164. MacCormick, Questioning Sovereignty: Law, State, and Nation in the European Commonwealth, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.
165. MacCormick, ‘Beyond the sovereign state’, Modern Law Review, 1993, 1-18.
166. Maduro, ‘Contrapuntal Europe’s constitutional pluralism in action’, in Walker (ed.), Sovereignty in Transition, Oxford: Hart, 2003, pp. 501-37.
167. Maduro, ‘The Three Claims of Constitutional Pluralism’, paper presented at the Centro de Estudios Politicos y Constitucionales, Madrid, March 2011.
168. Maduro, ‘Courts and pluralism: Essay on a theory of judicial adjudication in the context of legal and constitutional pluralism’, in Dunoff and Trachtman, Ruling the world? Constitutionalism, international law, and global governance, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009, 356-79.
169. Maduro, ‘Interpreting European Law: Judicial adjudication in a context of constitutional pluralism’, European Journal of Legal Studies, 2, 2007, available at: http://ejls.eu/index.php?mode=htmlarticle&filename=/issues/2007-12/MaduroUK.htm
170. Magnette, ‘ In the Name of Simplification: Coping with Constitutional Conflicts in the Convention on the Future of Europe’, European Law Journal, 2005, 432.
171. Maher, ‘Analytical Jurisprudence and Revolution’, 1981, http://www.bibliojuridica.org/libros/1/468/33.pdf
172. Martin, ‘L’actualité de la jurisprudence européenne et internationale. La Cour de justice et les situations internes à un Etat membre: vive la révolution?’, Revue de jurisprudence sociale, 2011, 450-2.
173. Martin and Storr, ‘On perverse emergent’, Studies in Emergent Order, 2008, 73-91.
174. Martinico, ‘Constitutional Failure Or Constitutional Odyssey? What Can We Learn From Canada And Switzerland’, Perspectives on Federalism, 2011, E-51-77.
175. Martinico, ‘Dating Cinderella: On Subsidiarity as a Political Safeguard of Federalism in the European Union’, European Public Law, 2011, 649-60.
176. Martinico, ‘From the Constitution for Europe to the Reform Treaty: a literature survey on European Constitutional Law’, Perspectives on Federalism, 2009, R 13-41.
177. Martinico, ‘Judging in the multilevel legal order: Exploring the techniques of “hidden dialogue”’ King’s Law Journal, 21(2), 2010, 257-81.
178. Martinico, ‘Constructivism, Evolutionism and Pluralism: Europe’s Constitutional Grammar’, King’s Law Journal, 2009, 309-26.
179. Martinico, ‘Preliminary reference and constitutional courts: Are you in the mood for dialogue?’, TICOM Working Paper, 10/2009, http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id= 1483664
180. Martinico and Fontanelli, ‘The Hidden Dialogue: When Judicial Competitors Collaborate’, Global Jurist, 2008.
181. Martinico and Pollicino, ‘Between constitutional tolerance and judicial activism: the “specificity” of the European judicial law’, European Journal of Law Reform, 2008, 97-125.
182. Mayer and Pernice, ‘La costituzione integrata dell’Europa’, in G. Zagrebelsky (ed.), Diritti e Costituzione nell’Unione Europea, Rome, Bari: Laterza, 43-68.
183. Mayer, ‘La Charte européenne des droits fondamentaux et la Constitution européenne’, Revue trimestrielle de droit européen, 2003, 194 ff.
184. Mayer, ‘Rashomon in Karlsruhe - A Reflection on Democracy and Identity in the European Union’, Jean Monnet Working Paper, 5/10, available at http://centers.law.nyu.edu/jeanmonnet/papers/10/100501.pdf
185. Mayer, ‘The European Constitution and the Courts. Adjudicating European Constitutional Law in a Multilevel System’, WHI Paper, 15/03, www.whi-berlin.de/courts.htm
186. McCrudden, ‘A Common Law of Human Rights? Transnational Judicial Conversations on Constitutional Rights’, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 2000, 499 ff.
187. McIlwain, Constitutionalism: ancient and modern, ed. 2005, The Lawbook Exchange, Ltd., Clark, New Jersey, ed. 2005, available on line at: http://www.constitution.org/cmt/mcilw/mcilw.htm
188. Mendez, ‘The Legal Effect of Community Agreements: Maximalist Treaty Enforcement and Judicial Avoidance Techniques’, European Journal of International Law, 2010, 83-104.
189. Menéndez, ‘From Constitutional Pluralism to a Pluralistic Constitution? Constitutional Synthesis as a MacCormickian Constitutional Theory of European Integration’, ARENA Working Paper 01/2011, 17, http://www.sv.uio.no/arena/english/research/publications/arena-publications/workingpapers/working-papers2011/wp-01-11.pdf
190. Menéndez, ‘Democratic constitution-making Reflections on the European experiment’, ARENA WorkingPaper, 18/2005, http://econpapers.repec.org/paper/erpare-nax/p0198.htm
191. Menéndez, ‘Chartering Europe: The Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union’, ARENA Working Paper 01/13, http://www. arena.uio.no/publications/wp01_13.htm
192. Millard, ‘Eléments pour une approche analytique de la complexité’, in Doat, Le Goff and Pédrot (eds.), Droit et complexité(Pour une nouvelle intelligence du droit vivant), Rennes: Presses Universitaires de Rennes, 2007, 141-53.
193. Milne, Tatriation of the Constitution - Canada, Constitutional, Quebec, Amendments, Consent, and Governments’, www.jrank.org/history/pages/7850/patriation-constitution.html#ixzz1DTkhWy00
194. Mirkine-Guetzévitch, Les nouvelles tendances du droit constitutionnel, Paris: Marcel Girard, 1931.
195. Moglen, ‘The Incomplete Burkean: B. Ackerman’s Foundation for Constitutional History’, 1998, http://emoglen.law.columbia.edu/publications/burkean.html
196. Möllers, ‘‘‘We are (afraid of) the people’’: Constituent Power in German Constitutionalism’, in Loughlin and Walker (eds.), The Paradox of Constitutionalism: Constituent Power and Constitutional Form, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008, 87-107.
197. Montuori, ‘Foreword to E. Morin, ‘‘On Complexity’’’, Creskill, NJ: Hampton Press, 2008, I-XLIV.
198. Morin, On complexity, Creskill, NJ: Hampton Press, 2008.
199. Morin, Introduzione alpensiero complesso, Milan: Sperling & Kupfer, 1993.
200. Morin, Conoscenza della conoscenza, Milan: Feltrinelli, 1989.
201. Morin, Pensare l’Europa, Milan: Feltrinelli, 1988.
202. Mouffe, ‘From Antagonistic Politics to an Agonistic Public Space’, 2010, www.re-public.gr/en/?p=2801
203. Mouffe, On the Political, London: Routledge, 2005.
204. Mouffe, ‘Which Public Space for Critical Artistic Practices?’, 2005, http://reading-publicimage.files.wordpress.com/2012/04/chantal_mouffe_cork_caucus.pdf
205. Mouffe, ‘Hearts, Minds and Radical Democracy’, 2001, http://www.redpepper.org.uk/hearts-minds-and-radical-democracy/
206. Mouffe, The Democratic Paradox, London: Verso, 2000.
207. Mouffe (ed.), The Challenge of Carl Schmitt, London: Verso, 1999.
208. Mouffe, The Return of the Political, London: Verso, 1993.
209. Ogus, ‘Law and spontaneous order: Hayek’s contribution to legal theory’, Journal of Law and Society, 1989, 393-409.
210. Paciotti, ‘Introduzione’ in Paciotti (ed.), La Costituzione europea. Luci e ombre, Rome: Meltemi, 2003, 7-13.
211. Peers, ‘Written Evidence’, in House of Lords, Select Committee on the European Union, The euro area crisis. Oral and written evidence, 2012, http://www.parliament.uk/documents/lords-committees/eu-select/euroareacrisis/Evidencevolume.pdf
212. Pernice and Kantiz, Fundamental Rights and Multilevel Constitutionalism in Europe, WHI paper 7/2004.
213. Pernice, ‘Multilevel Constitutionalism and the Treaty of Amsterdam: European Constitution Making Revisited?’, Common Market Law Review, 1999, 703-50.
214. Pernice, ‘Multilevel Constitutionalism in the European Union’, European Law Review, 2002, 511 ff.
215. Peters, ‘The Constitutionalisation of the European Union - Without the Constitutional Treaty’, in Riekmann and Wessels (eds.), The Making of a European Constitution. Dynamics and Limits of the Convention Experience, Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften/GWV Fachverlage GmbH, 2006, 35-67.
216. Pierdominici, ‘Fear of activity, fear of activism, the silence of courts. The docket and the legitimacy of the ECJ and its ‘‘Passive Virtues’’’, paper presented at the seminar ‘Comparative Law and Comparative Institutional Analysis’, European University Institute, 23 April 2012.
217. Pinelli, Il momento della scrittura Contributo al dibattito sulla Costituzione europea, Bologna: Il Mulino, 2002.
218. Piqani, ‘Supremacy of European Law Revisited: New developments in the context of the Treaty Establishing a Constitution for Europe’ (2007) http://www.enelsyn.gr/papers/w4/Paper% 20by% 20Darinka% 20Piqani.pdf
219. Pizzorno, Le radici dellapolitica assoluta, Milan: Feltrinelli, 1993.
220. Pizzorusso, ‘Common constitutional traditions as Constitutional Law of Europe?’, STALS Research Paper, 1/2008, www.stals.sssup.it/files/stals_Pizzorusso.pdf
221. Pizzorusso, Laproduzione normativa in tempi di globalizzazione, 2008, www.associazionedeicostituzionalisti.it
222. Pizzorusso, Sistemigiuridicicomparati, Milan: Giuffrè, 1998.
223. Pizzorusso, ‘Italian and American Models of the Judiciary and of Judicial Review of Legislation: A Comparison of Recent Tendencies’, American Journal of Comparative Law, 1990, 373 ff.
224. Pizzorusso, ‘Fonti politiche e fonti culturali del diritto’ in Studi in onore di T Liebman, I, Milan: Giuffrè, 1979, 32 ff.
225. Pollicino, ‘Il difficile riconoscimento delle implicazioni della supremazia del diritto europeo: una discutibile pronuncia del Consiglio di Stato’, 2005, www.forumcostituzionale.it/site/index3.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=531&Ite mid=91
226. Pollicino, Lallargamento adest dell’Europa e rapporti tra Corti costituzionali e Corti europee. Verso una teoria generale dell’impatto interordinamentale del diritto sovranazionale?, Milan: Giuffrè, 2010.
227. Pollicino, ‘Strasbourg and Luxembourg at the forefront of the Enlargement of Europe: an antithetical judicial approach?’, in Fontanelli and Martinico (eds.), The ECJ under siege, ICFAI, 2009, 109-37.
228. Pollicino, ‘Legal reasoning of the Court of Justice in the context of the principle of equality between judicial activism and self-restraint’, I and II, 2004, German Law Journal, 5 ff.
229. Popelier, ‘Belgium The supremacy dilemma: the Belgian Constitutional Court caught between the European Court of Human Rights and the European Court of Justice’, in Popelier, Van de Heyning and Van Nuffel (eds.), Human rights protection in the European legal order: The interaction between the European and the national courts, Cambridge, Antwerp, Portland: Intersentia, 2011, 149-71.
230. Postema, ‘Nature as First Custom: Hayek on the Evolution of Social Rules’, 2009, http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1505430
231. Rasmussen, ‘Present and future judicial problems after enlargements and the post-2004 ideological revolt’, Common Market Law Review, 2007, 1661 ff.
232. Rodin, ‘A Rescue Package for Fundamental Rights’, 2012, http://pravo-eu.blogspot.com.es/2012/02/rescue-package-for-fundamental-rights.html
233. Rodin, ‘Back to Square One. The Past, the Present and the Future of the Simmenthal Mandate’, paper presented at the 8th ECLN, Madrid, 6-8 October 2010.
234. Rosser, 2010, ‘How complex are the Austrians?’, in Koppl, Horwitz, and Desrochers (eds.), ‘What is so Austrian about Austrian economics?’, Advances in Austrian Economics, Vol. 14, 165-79.
235. Rubio Llorente, ‘A Charter of Dubious Utility’, International journal ofConstitutional Law, 2003, 405-26.
236. Rubio Llorente, Laforma de poder. Estudios sobre la Constitución, Madrid: Centro de Estudios Políticos y Constitucionales, 1997.
237. Ruggeri, ‘Interpretazione conforme e tutela dei diritti fondamentali, tra internazionalizzazione (ed “europeizzazione”) della Costituzione e costituzionalizzazione del diritto internazionale e del diritto eurounitario’, 2010, http://archivio.rivistaaic.it/rivista/2010/00/RUGGERI01.pdf
238. Ruggeri, ‘Le pronunzie della Corte costituzionale come “controlimiti” alle cessioni di sovranità a favore dell’ordinamento comunitario? (A margine di Cons. St., sez. V, n. 4207 del 2005)’, 2005, www.forumcostituzionale.it/site/index3.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=350&Itemid = 91
239. Ruggeri, ‘Tradizioni costituzionali comuni e “controlimiti’’, tra teoria delle fonti e teoria dell’interpretazione’, Diritto Pubblico Comparato ed Europeo, 2003, 102-20.
240. Russell, ‘The End of Mega Constitutional Politics in Canada?’, PS: Political Science and Politics, 1993, 33-7.
241. Russell, Constitutional Odyssey: Can Canadians Become a Sovereign People?, Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1992.
242. Sadurski, ‘Partnering with Strasbourg: Constitutionalisation of the European Court of Human Rights, the Accession of Central and East European States to the Council of Europe, and the Idea of Pilot Judgments’, Human Rights Law Review, 2009, 397-453.
243. Saiz Arnaiz, La apertura constitucional al derecho internacional y europeo de los derechos humanos. El articulo 10.2 de la Constitución española, Madrid: CEPC, 1999.
244. Sandri, ‘La complessità: verità acquisite e falsi miti’, Kéiron, 2001, 98 ff.
245. Sarmiento, ‘L’affaire Melki: esquisse d’un dialogue des juges constitutionnels et européens sur toile de fond française’, Revue trimestrielle de droit européen, 2010, 588 ff.
246. Sarmiento, ‘The Silent Lamb and the Deaf Wolves’, in Avbelj and Komárek, Constitutional Pluralism in the European Union and Beyond, Oxford: Hart, 2012, 285-318.
247. Scheeck, ‘The Relationship between the European Courts and Integration through Human Rights’, 2005, Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht, 837.
248. Sciarabba, ‘Le ‘‘spiegazioni’’ della Carta dei diritti fondamentali dell’Unione’, Diritto pubblico comparato ed europeo, 2005, 59 ff.
249. Sebenico, I Mostri dell’Occidente medievale: Fonti e diffusione di razze umane mostruose, ibridi ed animali fantastici, Trieste, 2005, www.sslmit.units.it/crevatin/Anthropol-ogy.htm
250. Separg, ‘Commission decision on conformity with EU law on 17 January’, 2012, http://www.eur o politics.info/institutions/commission-decision-on-conformity-with-eu-law-on-17-january-art322947-36.html
251. Shany, Regulating Jurisdictional Relations between National and International Courts, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.
252. Shany, The Competing Jurisdictions of International Courts and Tribunals, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.
253. Shapiro, Law and politics in the Supreme Court. New approaches to political jurisprudence, New York: Sage, 1964.
254. Shklar, ‘Obligation, Loyalty, Exile’, Political Theory, 1993, 181-97.
255. Simmel, I conflitti della cultura moderna, Rome: Bulzoni, 1976.
256. Simpson, ‘Peter Russell. Constitutional Odyssey: Can Canadians Become a Sovereign People? Third Edition, University of Toronto Press, Toronto, 2004, Review’, 2004, http://web.uvic.ca/polisci/announcements/bookreviews/simpsonreview.htm
257. Skouris, ‘La protezione dei diritti fondamentali nell’Unione europea nella prospettiva dell’adozione di una Costituzione europea’, in Rossi (ed.), Il progetto di Trattato-Costituzione, verso una nuova architettura dell’Unione europea, Bologna: Il Mulino, 2004, 254 ff.
258. Slaughter, ‘A Global Community of Courts’, Harvard International Law Journal, 2003, 191 ff.
259. Slaughter, ‘Judicial Globalization’, Virginia Journal of International Law, 2000, 1104 ff.
260. Snyder, ‘The unfinished constitution of the European Union’, in Weiler and Wind (eds.), European constitutionalism beyond the state, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.
261. Somek, ‘The Social Question in a Transnational Context’, LSE ‘Europe in Question’ Discussion Paper Series, 39/2011, http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1865720
262. Somek, ‘Postconstitutional Treaty’, German Law Journal, 2007, 1121-32.
263. Spaventa, ‘Opening Pandora’s Box: Some Reflections on the Constitutional Effects of the Ruling in Pupino’, European Constitutional Law Review, 2007, 5-24.
264. Stein, ‘Lawyers, Judges and the Making of a Transnational Constitution’, American Journal of International Law, 1981, 1-27.
265. Stiglitz, Globalization and its Discontents, New York: Norton, 2002.
266. Stone Sweet, On Law, Politics andJudicialization, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.
267. Stone Sweet, Governing with Judges: Constitutional Politics in Europe, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992.
268. Storr, ‘On perverse emergent’, Studies in Emergent Order, 2008, 73-91.
269. Sunstein, Legal reasoning and political conflict, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996.
270. Tacconi, ‘Casenote - Berlusconi at the European Court ofJustice - C-387/02’, German Law Journal, 2006, 313-22.
271. Tate and Vallinder (eds.), The Global Expansion of the Judicial Power, New York: New York University Press, 1995.
272. Torres Pérez, Conflicts of Rights in the European Union: A Theory of Supranational Adjudication, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.
273. Trabucchi, ‘L’effet erga omnes des décision préjudicelles rendues par la Cour de justice des Communautés européennes’, RTDE, 1974, 56-87.
274. Tremblay, The Legitimacy of Judicial Review: The Limits of Dialogue between Courts and Legislatures’, International Journal of Constitutional Law, 2005, 617-48.
275. Turk, ‘Implications of European Disintegration For International Law’, Columbia Journal of European Law, 2011, 395 ff.
276. Tzanakopoulos, ‘ Domestic Courts as the ‘‘Natural Judge’’ of International Law: A Change in Physiognomy’, in Crawford and Nouwen (eds.), Select Proceedings of the European Society of International Law, Vol. 3, Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2011, 155-68.
277. UK House of Commons, ‘Human Rights in the EU: The Charter of Fundamental Rights’, Research Paper 00/32, March 20, 2000.
278. Vasconcelos Vilaga, ‘From Hayek’s Spontaneous Orders to Luhmann’s Autopoietic Systems’, Studies In Emergent Order, 2010, 50-81.
279. Walker, ‘Post-Constituent Constitutionalism? The Case of the European Union’, in Walker and Loughlin (eds.), The Paradox ofConstitutionalism: Constituent Powerand Constitutional Form, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008, 247-69.
280. Walker (ed.), Sovereignty in transition, Oxford: Hart, 2003.
281. Walker, ‘Reconstituting European integration in theory and practice: A comment on Antje Wiener’, 2003, http://www.jeanmonnetprogram.org/papers/03/030901-07.html 2003
282. Walker, ‘The Idea of Constitutional Pluralism’, Modern Law Review, 65, 2002, 317-59.
283. Ward, A critical introduction to European Law, London: Butterworths, 1996.
284. Weiler, ‘In defence of the status quo: Europe’s constitutional Sonderweg,’ in Weiler and Wind (eds.), European cconstitutionalism beyond the state, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003, 7-26.
285. Weiler, Un’ Europa cristiana. Un saggio esplorativo, Milan: Rizzoli, 2003.
286. Weiler, ‘European democracy and the principle of constitutional tolerance: The soul of Europe’, in Cerutti and Rudolph (eds.), A Soul for Europe, I, Leuven: Peeters, 2001, 33-54.
287. Weiler, ‘The transformation of Europe’, in Weiler, The Constitution of Europe, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999, 10-101.
288. Weiler, ‘Journey to an unknown destination: a retrospective and prospective of the European Court of Justice in the arena of political integration’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 1993, 417-46.
289. Weiler, ‘The Dual Character of Supranationalism’, Yearbook of European Law, 1981, 267 ff.
290. Widmann, ‘Identità e diversità’, Il Margine, 4, 2001, http://archivio.il-margine.it/archivio/2001/f4.htm
291. Wiener, ‘Towards a transnational nomos. The role of institutions in the process of constitutionalization’, 2003, at www.jeanmonnetprogram.org/papers/03/030901-06.pdf
292. Wiesbrock, ‘The Zambrano case: Relying on Union citizenship rights in ‘‘internal situations’’’, EUDO, 2011, http://eudo-citizenship.eu/citizenship-news/449-the-zambrano-case-relying-on-union-citizenship-rights-in-internal-situations
293. Wray, ‘Family Life and EU Citizenship: A commentary on McCarthy C-434/09 5 May 2011’, EUDO, 2011, http://eudo-citizenship.eu/citizenship-news/479-family-life-and-eu-citizenship-a-commentary-on-mccarthy-c-43409-5-may-2011
294. Ziller, Il nuovo Trattato europeo, Bologna: Il Mulino, 2008.
295. Zucca, ‘Monism and fundamental rights in Europe and beyond’, paper presented at the workshop ‘How constitutional is Transnational Law?’, Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna, Pisa, 23-24 September 2011.
296. Zucca, Constitutional Dilemmas — Conflicts of Fundamental Legal Rights in Europe and the USA, Oxford: Oxford University Press: 2007.
297. Zvi Baron, ‘The Problem of Dual Loyalty’, Canadian Journal of Political Science, 2009, 1025-44.