Contrapunctual Law: Europe’s Constitutional Pluralism in Action

Sovereignty in Transition

Volumn , Issue , 2003, Pages 501-537

  Maduro, Miguel Poiares ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LISBON   (Portugal)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85190054498     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (26)

1. B De Witte, ‘Direct Effect, Supremacy and the Nature of the Legal Order’, in Craig and de Burca (Eds.), The Evolution of EU Law (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1999), mainly pp. 181 and 209.
2. A M Slaughter, A Stone and J H H Weiler, The European Courts and National Courts—Doctrine and Jurisprudence (Oxford, Hart Publishing, 1998)
3. Mary Volcansek, Judicial Politics in Europe (New York, Peter Lang, 1986)
4. Francisco Lucas Pires, ‘ “Competência das Competências”: Competente mas sem competências?’, Revista de Legislação e Jurisprudência, (1998) n°3885, at 356.
5. Chalmers, D, ‘Judicial Preferences and the Community Legal Order’, (1997) 60 Modern Law Review, 164, at 180.
6. E Stein, ‘Lawyers, Judges and the Making of a Transnational Constitution’ (1981) 75 American Journal of International Law 1.
7. K Lenaerts, ‘Constitutionalism and the Many Faces of Federalism’, American Journal of Comparative Law, vol 38, n 2, 1990, pp. 205–63
8. G F Mancini, ‘The making of a constitution for Europe’, Common Market Law Review, 26, 1989, pp. 595–614
9. Stein, Eric, ‘Giuristi, Giudici e la creazione di una Constituzione Transnazionale’, in Un nuovo diritto per l’Europa, (Milano, Giuffre, 1991)
10. Burley, Anne-Marie and Mattli, Walter, ‘Europe Before the Court: A Political Theory of Legal Integration’, (1993) 47 International Organization, p. 41, at p. 521.
11. Weiler, J H H, ‘Journey to an Unknown Destination: A retrospective and Prospective of the European Court of Justice in the Arena of Political Integration, (1993) 31 Journal of Common Market Studies, 417, at pp. 423 ff
12. Neil Komesar, Law’s Limits—The Rule of Law and the Supply and Demand of Rights, (Cambridge and New York, CUP, 2001).
13. Maduro, Miguel Poiares, We The Court, The European Court of Justice and The European Economic Constitution, (Oxford, Hart Publishing, 1998).
14. Rawlings, Richard, ‘The Eurolaw Game: Deductions from a Saga’, (1993) 20 Journal of Law and Society, 309, at p. 318.
15. Chalmers, D, ‘Judicial Preferences and the Community Legal Order’, (1997) 60 Modern Law Review, 164, at 180.
16. Walker, N, ‘The Idea of Constitutional Pluralism’, (2002) 65 Modern Law Review, no. 3, 317.
17. Chalmers, D, ‘Judicial Preferences and the Community Legal Order’, (1997) 60 Modern Law Review 164, at 180.
18. Kamiel Mortelmans, ‘Community Law: More than a Functional Area of Law, Less than a Legal System’, (1996) Legal Issues of European Integration, 23, at 42–3.
19. Weiler, J H H, ‘The Principle of Constitutional Tolerance’, in Snyder (ed.), The Europeanisation of Law: The Legal Effects of European Integration, (Oxford, Hart Publishing, 2000)
20. K Gunther, ‘The Idea of Impartiality and the Functional Determinacy of the Law’, (1998/89) Northwestern University Law Review, 151, at p. 155.
21. Catherine Richmond, ‘Preserving the Identity Crisis: Autonomy, System and Sovereignty in European Law’, (1998) 16 Law and Philosophy, 377, at 417
22. Joseph Weiler, ‘A Quiet Revolution: The European Court of Justice and Its Interlocutors’, (1994) Comparative Political Studies, 510, at 522.
23. Neil MacCormick, ‘Risking Constitutional Collision in Europe?’, (1998) 18 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 517.
24. J H H Weiler, ‘The European Union Belongs to Its Citizens: Three Immodest Proposals’, (1997) 22 European Law Review 150.
25. D Chalmers, ‘Judicial Preferences and the Community Legal Order’, (1997) 60 Modern Law Review, 164, particularly at 180
26. K Mortelmans, ‘Community Law: More than a Functional Area of Law, Less than a Legal System’, (1996) 1 Legal Issues of European Integration, 23, at 42–43.