In the name of simplification: Coping with constitutional conflicts in the convention on the future of Europe

European Law Journal

Volumn 11, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 432-451

  Magnette, Paul ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34248041266     PISSN: 13515993     EISSN: 14680386     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0386.2005.00269.x     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Baquero Cruz J. (2003).‘Constitutional Gaps in European Community Law’, in Mélanges en hommage à Jean-Victor Louis. Editions de l’Université de Bruxelles, Brussels.
2. Barbier C. (2002).La Convention européenne, Genèse et premiers débats. Courrier hebdomadaire du CRISP, Brussels, pp. 1776–1777.
3. Braibant G. (2001).La charte des droits fondamentaux de l’Union européenne. Le Seuil, Paris.
4. Closa C. (2004).‘The Convention method and the transformation of EU constitutional politics’, in E. O. Eriksen, J. Fossum and A. Menendez (eds), Developing a Constitution for Europe. Routledge, London.
5. Craig P. (2001).‘Constitutions, Constitutionalism and the European Union’, European Law Journal, 7(2), pp. 125–150.
6. Deloche F. (2002).‘La Convention pour l’élaboration de la charte des droits fondamentaux: Une méthode constituante?’, in R. Dehousse (ed.), Une constitution pour l’Europe?, Presses de sciences-po, Paris.
7. Elster J. (1994).‘Argumenter et négocier dans deux assemblées constituantes’, Revue française de science politique, 44(2), pp. 187–256.
8. Elster J. (ed.) (1998a).Deliberative Democracy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
9. Elster J. (1998b).‘Deliberation and Constitution-Making’, in J. Elster (ed.), Deliberative Democracy. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
10. Holmes S. (1988).‘Gag rules or the politics of omission’, in J. Elster and R. Slagstad (eds), Constitutionalism and Democracy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
11. Kohler-Koch B. (2000).‘“Framing”: the bottleneck of constructing legitimate institutions’, Journal of European Public Policy, 7(4), pp. 513–531.
12. Magnette P. (2004).‘Deliberation vs. negotiation? Forging a Constitutional Consensus in the Convention on the Future of Europe’, in E. O. Eriksen, J. Fossum and A. Menendez (eds), Developing a Constitution for Europe. Routledge, London.
13. Magnette P. and Nicolaïdis, K. (2004a).‘Coping with the Lilliput Syndrome, Big vs. Small states in the European Convention’, Politique européenne, 13.
14. Magnette P. and Nicolaïdis, K. (2004b).‘The European Convention: Bargaining in the Shadow of Rhetoric’, West European Politics, 27(3).
15. Moravcsik A. and Nicolaïdis, K. (1999).‘Explaining the Treaty of Amsterdam: Interests, Influence, Institutions’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 37(1), pp. 59–85.
16. Nicolaïdis K. and Howse, R.(eds) (2000).The Federal Vision. Oxford University Press: Oxford.
17. Olsen J. (2002).‘Reforming European Institutions of Governance’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 40(4), pp. 581–602.
18. Perelman C. and Olbrechts-Tyteca, L. (1969).The New Rhetoric, A Treatise on Argumentation. University of Notre Dame Press: Paris.
19. Raz J. (2002).‘On the Authority and Intepretation of Constitutions: Some Preliminaries’, in L. Alexander (ed.), Constitutionalism, Philosophical Foundations. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.
20. Sartori G. (1965).Democratic Theory. Praeger: New York.
21. Shaw J. (2003).‘Process, Responsibility and Inclusion in EU Constitutionalism’, European Law Journal, 9(1), pp. 45–68.
22. Sunstein C. (2002).Designing Democracy, What Constitutions Do. Oxford University Press: Oxford.
23. Weiler J. H. H. (1999).The Constitution of Europe. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.
24. Weiler J. H. H. (2001).‘Federalism without Constitutionalism: Europe’s Sonderweg’, in R. Howse and K. Nicolaïdis (eds), The Federal Vision, Legitimacy and Levels of Governance in the United States and the European Union. Oxford University Press: Oxford.