The Silent Lamb and the Deaf Wolves: Constitutional Pluralism, Preliminary References and the Role of Silent Judgments in EU Law

Constitutional Pluralism in the European Union and Beyond

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 285-318

  Sarmiento, Daniel ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSIDAD COMPLUTENSE DE MADRID   (Spain)

^b Chambers of Advocate General Juliane Kokott   (Luxembourg)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85194821956     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (34)

1. T Jefferson (MD Peterson ed), Writings (New York, Literary Classics of the US, 1984) 1434.
2. K Alter, Establishing the Supremacy of European Law. The Making of an International Rule of Law in Europe (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2001).
3. J Baquero Cruz, ‘The Legacy of the Maastricht-Urteil and the Pluralist Movement’ (2008) 14 European Law Journal 389, 391.
4. M Poiares Maduro, ‘Contrapunctual Law: Europe’s Constitutional Pluralism in Action’ in N Walker (ed), Sovereignty in Transition (Oxford, Hart, 2003) 524.
5. A von Bogdandy, ‘Pluralism, Direct Effect, and the Ultimate Say: On the Relationship between International and Domestic Constitutional Law’ (2008) 6 International Journal of Constitutional Law 397.
6. N Walker, ‘The Idea of Constitutional Pluralism’ (2002) 65 Modern Law Review 317.
7. N Walker, ‘Late Sovereignty in the European Union’ in N Walker (ed), Sovereignty in Transition (Oxford, Hart, 2003) 31.
8. M Rosenfeld, ‘Rethinking Constitutional Ordering in an Era of Legal and Ideological Pluralism’ (2008) 6 International Journal of Constitutional Law 415
9. J Komárek, ‘European Constitutionalism and the European Arrest Warrant: In Search of the Limits of Contrapunctual Principles’ (2007) 44 Common Market Law Review 9, 37–39.
10. N Barber, ‘Legal Pluralism and the European Union’ (2006) 12 European Law Journal 306, 316–18.
11. M Kumm, ‘The Jurisprudence of Constitutional Conflict. Constitutional Supremacy in Europe before and after the Constitutional Treaty’ (2005) 11 European Law Journal 262, 286.
12. C Sunstein, Legal Reasoning and Political Conflict (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1996).
13. M Poiares Maduro, We the Court. The European Court of Justice and the European Economic Constitution. A Critical Reading of Article 30 of the EC Treaty (Oxford, Hart Publishing, 1998).
14. GF Mancini, Democracy and Constitutionalism in the European Union: Collected Essays (Oxford, Hart, 2000) 8.
15. D Armesto, ‘The ECJ’s judgment regarding the Tax Autonomy of the Basque Country’ (2009) 49 European Taxation 11.
16. L Azoulai, ‘The Court of Justice and the Social Market Economy: The Emergence of an Ideal and the Conditions for Its Realizations’ (2008) 45 Common Market Law Review 1335.
17. ‘The Italian Courts’ in A Arnull, T Tridimas and P Eeckhout (eds), Continuity and Change in EU Law: Essays in Honour of Sir Francis Jacobs’ (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2008) 443.
18. G Raiti, La collaborazione giudiziaria nell’esperienza del rinvio pregiudiziale comunitario (Milano, Giuffrè, 2003) 238–53.
19. G Tesauro, Diritto comunitario (CEDAM, Padova, 2005) 167
20. A Barone, ‘A proposito della sentenza Federfarma: fra tutela comunitaria e tutela costituzionale dei diritti fondamentali il Consiglio di Stato smarisce la retta via?’ (2006) 11 Diritto dell’Unione Europea 201
21. G Itzcovich, ‘Fundamental Rights, Legal Disorder and Legitimacy: The Federfarma Case’, Jean Monnet Working Paper No 12/08, http://centers.law.nyu.edu/jeanmonnet/papers/08/081201.html
22. O Pollicino, ‘Il difficile riconoscimento delle implicazioni della supremazia del diritto europeo: una discutibile pronuncia del Consiglio di Stato. (A margine di Cons. St., sez. V, sent. n. 4207/2005)’ (2005) 4 Rivista italiana di diritto pubblico comunitario 1935.
23. E Maganaris, ‘The Principle of Supremacy of Community Law in Greece–From Direct Challenge to Non-application’ (1999) 24 European Law Review 426, at 430–32.
24. CN Kakouris, ‘Do the Member States Possess Judicial Procedural “Autonomy”?’ (1997) 34 Common Market Law Review 1389
25. P Oliver, ‘Le droit communautaire et les voies de recours nationales’ (1992) Cahiers de Droit Européen 348
26. O Dubos, Les juridictions nationales, juge communautaire (Paris, Dalloz, 2001) 253–62.
27. R Dehousse, The European Court of Justice: the politics of judicial integration (London, Macmillan, 1998) 136
28. Stone Sweet, The Judicial Construction of Europe (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2004) 21–22.
29. Bengoetxea N MacCormick and L Moral Soriano, ‘Integration and Integrity in the Legal Reasoning of the European Court of Justice’ in G de Búrca and JHH Weiler (eds), The European Court of Justice (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2001).
30. GF Mancini and DT Keeling, ‘From CILFIT to ERT: The Constitutional Challenge Facing the European Court’ (1991) 11 Yearbook of European Law 6.
31. D Sarmiento, ‘The European Arrest Warrant and the Quest for Constitutional Coherence’ (2008) 6 International Constitutional Law Journal 171.
32. AP Dourado and R da Palma Borges (eds), The Acte Clair in EC Direct Tax Law (Amsterdam, IBFD, 2008).
33. A Pottakis, ‘Higher Education Reform in Greece: Another Missed Opportunity?’ (2008) 4 European Public Law 507, 513–14.
34. M Poiares Maduro, Preface to The Acte Clair in EC Direct Tax Law, n 108, at 2.