Towards a Solange-Method between International Courts and Tribunals?

The Shifting Allocation of Authority in International Law: Considering Sovereignty, Supremacy and Subsidiarity

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 217-236

  Lavranos, Nikolaos ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85193390007     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (18)

1. Y Shany, The Competing Jurisdiction of International Courts and Tribunals (Oxford University Press, 2003)
2. N Lavranos, ‘Concurrence of Jurisdiction between the ECJ and other International Courts and Tribunals’ (2005) 14 European Environmental Law Review, part I, September 2005, 213-25
3. N Lavranos, ‘The MOX Plant and IJzeren Rijn Disputes: Which Court is the Supreme Arbiter?’ (2006) 19 Leiden Journal of International Law 223.
4. N Lavranos, ‘Das So-lange-Prinzip im Verhältnis von EGMR und EuGH’ (2006) 41 Europarecht 79
5. I Canor, ‘Primus Inter Pares-Who is the Ultimate Guardian of Fundamental Rights in Europe?’ (2000) 25 European Law Review 3.
6. N Lavranos, Decisions of IOs in the European and Domestic Legal Orders of Selected EU Member States (Groningen, Europa Law, 2004) 148-154.
7. N Lavranos, ‘The Communitarization of WTO Dispute Settlement Reports: An Exception to the Rule of Law’ (2005) 10 European Foreign Affairs Review 313.
8. I Pernice, ‘Les bananes et les droits fondamentaux: La Cour Constitutionnelle Allemande fait le point’ (2003) 3-4 Cahier de Droit Europeen 427
9. C Grewe, ‘Le ‘traite de paix’ avec la Cour de Luxembourg: L’arret de la Cour Constitutionnelle Allemande du 7.6.2000 Relatif au Reglement du Marche de la Banana’ (2001) 37 Revue trimestrielle de droit européen 1.
10. N Lavranos, ‘Judicial Review of UN Sanctions by the CFI’ (2006) 11 European Foreign Affairs Review 471.
11. F Schorkopf (ed), Der Europäische Haftbefehl vor dem Bundesverfassungsgericht (Tübingen, Mohr Siebeck, 2006).
12. S Douglas-Scott, ‘A Tale of Two Courts: Luxembourg and Strasbourg and the Growing European Human Rights Acquis’ (2006) 43 Common Market Law Review 629.
13. C Dippel, Die Kompetenzabgrenzung in der Rechtsprechung von EGMR und EuGH, Diss, Berlin 2004, http://edoc.hu-berlin.de/dissertationen/dippel-carsten-2004-06-08/ HTML/front.html.
14. D Spielmann, ‘Human Rights Case Law in the Strasbourg and Luxembourg Courts: Conflicts, Inconsistencies and Complementarities’, in Ph Alston (ed), The EU and Human Rights (Oxford University Press, 1999) 757-80.
15. C Costello, ‘The Bosphorus Ruling of the European Court of Human Rights: Fundamental Rights and Blurred Boundaries in Europe’ (2006) 6 Human Rights Law Review 87.
16. G Gonzales, ‘EC Fundamental Freedoms v Human Rights’ (2004) 31 Legal Issues of Economic Integration 219.
17. P-M Dupuy, ‘A Doctrinal Debate in the Globalisation Era: On the ‘Fragmentation’ of International law’ (2007) European Journal of Legal Studies, issue 1, http://www.ejls.eu/.
18. S Peers, ‘Salvation Outside the Church: Judicial Protection in the Third Pillar after the Pupino and Segi Judgments’ (2007) 44 Common Market Law Review 883.