Putting Framing in Perspective: A Review of Framing and Frame Analysis across the Management and Organizational Literature

Academy of Management Annals

Volumn 8, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 181-235

  Cornelissen, Joep P ^a   Werner, Mirjam D ^b  

^a VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84902795625     PISSN: 19416520     EISSN: 19416067     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/19416520.2014.875669     Document Type: Article

References (218)

1. Ansari, S. M., Fiss, P., & Zajac, E. J. (2010). Made to fit: How practices vary as they diffuse. Academy of Management Review, 35(1), 67-92. doi: 10.5465/AMR.2010.45577876
2. Ansari, S. M., Wijen, F. H., & Gray, B. (2013). Constructing a climate change logic: An institutional perspective on the "Tragedy of the commons". Organization Science, 24(4), 1014-1040. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1120.0799
3. Armstrong, E. A. (2005). From struggle to settlement: The crystallization of a field of lesbian/gay organizations in San Francisco, 1969-1973. In G. F. Davis, D. McAdam, W. R. Scott, & M. N. Zald (Eds.), Social movements and organization Theory (pp. 161-188). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
4. Azad, B., & Faraj, S. (2008). Making e-government systems workable: Exploring the evolution of frames. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 17(2), 75-98. doi: 10.1016/j.jsis.2007.12.001
5. Barley, S. R. (1986). Technology as an occasion for structuring: Evidence from observations of CT scanners and the social order of radiology departments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31, 78-108. doi: 10.2307/2392767
6. Barley, S. R. (2008). Coalface institutionalism. In R. Greenwood, O. Christine, K. Sahlin, & R. Suddaby (Eds.), Organizational institutionalism (pp. 491-518). London: Sage Publications.
7. Barrett, M., Heracleous, L., & Walsham, G. (2013). A rhetorical approach to IT diffusion: Reconceptualizing the ideology-framing relationship in computerization movements. MIS Quarterly, 37, 201-220.
8. Barsalou, L. W. (1992). Frames, concepts, and conceptual fields. In E. Kittay & A. Lehrer (Eds.), Frames, fields, and contrasts: New essays in semantic and lexical organization (pp. 21-74). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
9. Barsalou, L. W., & Hale, C. R. (1993). Components of conceptual representation: From feature lists to recursive frames. In I. Van Mechelen, J. Hampton, R. Michalski, & P. Theuns (Eds.), Categories and concepts: Theoretical views and inductive data analysis (pp. 97-144). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
10. Bartunek, J. M. (1993). The multiple cognitions and conflicts associated with second order change. In J. K. Murnighan (Ed.), Social psychology in organizations: Advances in theory and research (pp. 322-349). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
11. Bateson, G. (1955/1972). Steps to an ecology of mind. New York: Ballantine (original work published 1955).
12. Battilana, J., & Dorado, S. (2010). Building sustainable hybrid organizations: The case of commercial microfinance organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 53(6), 1419-1440. doi: 10.5465/AMJ.2010.57318391
13. Battilana, J., Leca, B., & Boxenbaum, E. (2009). How actors change institutions: Towards a theory of institutional entrepreneurship. The Academy of Management Annals, 3, 65-107. doi: 10.1080/19416520903053598
14. Bavelas, J. B., Coates, L., & Johnson, T. (2000). Listeners as co-narrators. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 941-952. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.79.6.941
15. Bechky, B. (2011). Making organizational theory work: Institutions, occupations, and negotiated orders. Organization Science, 22(5), 1157-1167. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1100.0603
16. Bechky, B. A. (2003). Sharing meaning across occupational communities: The transformation of knowledge on a production floor. Organization Science, 14, 312-330. doi: 10.1287/orsc.14.3.312.15162
17. Beckert, J. (2010). How do fields change? The interrelations of institutions, networks, and Cognition in the dynamics of markets. Organization Studies, 31, 605-627. doi: 10.1177/0170840610372184
18. Benford, R. D. (1993a). Frame disputes within the nuclear disarmament movement. Social Forces, 71, 677-701. doi: 10.1093/sf/71.3.677
19. Benford, R. D. (1993b). "You could be the hundredth monkey": Collective action frames and vocabularies of motive within the nuclear disarmament movement. The Sociological Quarterly, 34, 195-216. doi: 10.1111/j.1533-8525.1993.tb00387.x
20. Benford, R. D. (1997). An insider's critique of the social movement framing perspective. Sociological Inquiry, 67, 409-443. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-682X.1997.tb00445.x
21. Benford, R. D., & Snow, D. A. (2000). Framing processes and social movements: An overview and assessment. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 611-639. doi: 10.1146/annurev.soc.26.1.611
22. Benner, M. J., & Tripsas, M. (2012). The influence of prior industry affiliation on framing in nascent industries: The evolution of digital cameras. Strategic Management Journal, 33, 277-302. doi: 10.1002/smj.950
23. Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. Garden City, NY: Doubleday Anchor.
24. Bernerth, J., & Walker, H. J. (2012). Reexamining the workplace justice to outcome relationship: Does frame of reference matter? Journal of Management Studies, 49, 945-969. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2010.00977.x
25. Blumer, H. (1971). Social problems as collective behavior. Social Problems, 18, 298-306. doi: 10.2307/799797
26. Borum, F. (2004). Means-end frames and the politics and myths of organizational fields. Organization Studies, 25, 897-921. doi: 10.1177/0170840604042406
27. Bowdle, B. F., & Gentner, D. (2005). The career of metaphor. Psychological Review, 112(1), 193-216. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.112.1.193
28. Brummans, B. H. J. M., Putnam, L. L., Gray, B., Hanke, R., Lewicki, R. J., & Wiethoff, C. (2008). Making sense of intractable multiparty conflict: A study of framing in four environmental disputes. Communication Monographs, 75, 25-51. doi: 10.1080/03637750801952735
29. Bruner, J. S., & Feldman, C. (1990). Metaphors of consciousness and cognition in the history of psychology. In D. Leary (Ed.), Metaphors in the history of psychology (pp. 230-238). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
30. Burke, K. (1937). Attitudes towards history. New York: New Republic.
31. Burt, R. S. (1997). The contingent value of social capital. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(2), 339-365. doi: 10.2307/2393923
32. Carley, K. M., & Kaufer, D. S. (1993). Semantic connectivity: An approach for analyzing symbols in semantic networks. Communication Theory, 3, 183-213. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2885.1993.tb00070.x
33. Carroll, W. K., & Ratner, R. S. (1996). Master frames and counter-hegemony: Political sensibilities in contemporary social movements. Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology, 33, 407-435. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-618X.1996.tb00955.x
34. Chong, D., & Druckman, J. N. (2007). Framing theory. Annual Review of Political Science, 10, 103-126. doi: 10.1146/annurev.polisci.10.072805.103054
35. Chreim, S. (2006). Managerial frames and institutional discourses of change: Employee appropriation and resistance. Organization Studies, 27, 1261-1287. doi: 10.1177/0170840606064106
36. Clark, H. H. (1996). Using language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
37. Cornelissen, J. P., & Clarke, J. S. (2010). Imagining and rationalizing opportunities: Inductive reasoning, and the creation and justification of new ventures. Academy of Management Review, 35(4), 539-557. doi: 10.5465/AMR.2010.53502700
38. Cornelissen, J. P., & Durand, R. (2012). Beyond novelty: Conceptual blending and causality. Academy of Management Review, 37(1), 152-154.
39. Cornelissen, J. P., Holt, R., & Zundel, M. (2012). The role of analogy and metaphor in the framing and legitimization of strategic change. Organization Studies, 32, 1701-1716. doi: 10.1177/0170840611425729
40. Cornelissen, J. P., Mantere, S., & Vaara, E. (2014). The contraction of meaning: The combined effect of communication, emotions and materiality on sensemaking in the Stockwell shooting. Journal of Management Studies. doi:10.1111/joms.12073
41. Coulson, S. (2001). Semantic leaps: frame-shifting and conceptual blending in meaning construction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
42. Creed, D., DeJordy, R., & Lok, J. (2010). Being the change: Resolving institutional contradiction through identity work. Academy of Management Journal, 53(6), 1335-1364. doi: 10.5465/AMJ.2010.57318357
43. Creed, W. E. D., Langstraat, J. A., & Scully, M. A. (2002). A picture of the frame: Frame analysis as technique and as politics. Organizational Research Methods, 5(1), 34-35. doi: 10.1177/1094428102051004
44. Cyert, R. M., & March, J. G. (1963/1992). A behavioral theory of the firm (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
45. Davidson, E. (2002). Technology frames and framing: A socio-cognitive investigation of requirements determination. MIS Quarterly, 26(4), 329-358. doi: 10.2307/4132312
46. Davidson, E. (2006). A technological frames perspective on information technology and organizational change. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 42(1), 23-39. doi: 10.1177/0021886305285126
47. Dewulf, A., & Bouwen, R. (2012). Issue framing in conversations for change: Discursive interaction strategies for "doing differences". Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 48(2), 168-193. doi: 10.1177/0021886312438858
48. Dewulf, A., Gray, B., Putnam, L., Lewicki, R., Aarts, N., Bouwen, R., & Van Woerkum, C. (2009). Disentangling approaches to framing in conflict and negotiation research: A meta-paradigmatic perspective. Human Relations, 62, 155-193. doi: 10.1177/0018726708100356
49. Diehl, D., & McFarland, D. A. (2010). Towards a historical sociology of situations. American Journal of Sociology, 115(6), 1713-1752. doi: 10.1086/651941
50. DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(1983), 147-160. doi: 10.2307/2095101
51. Donnellon, A., Gray, B., & Bougon, M. G. (1986). Communication, meaning, and organized action. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31(1), 43-55. doi: 10.2307/2392765
52. Donnellon, A. E., & Gray, B. (1990). An interactive theory of reframing in negotiation. Unpublished manuscript, Center for Research in Conflict and Negotiation, Pennsylvania State University, State College, PA.
53. Douglas, M. (1986). How institutions think. Syracuse: Syracuse University Press.
54. Druckman, J. N. (2004). Political preference formation: Competition, deliberation, and the (ir)relevance of framing effects. American Political Science Review, 98, 671-686. doi: 10.1017/S0003055404041413
55. Dunbar, R., Garud, R., & Raghuram, S. (1996). A frame for deframing in strategic analysis. Journal of Management Inquiry, 5, 23-34. doi: 10.1177/105649269651007
56. Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Towards clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43, 51-58. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x
57. Epley, N., & Gilovich, T. (1999). Just going along: Nonconscious priming and conformity to social pressure. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 578-589. doi: 10.1006/jesp.1999.1390
58. Etzion, D., & Ferraro, F. (2010). The role of analogy in the institutionalization of sustainability reporting. Organization Science, 21(5), 1092-1107. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1090.0494
59. Fairhurst, G. T. (2010). The power of framing: Creating the language of leadership. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
60. Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M. (2002). The way we think: Conceptual blending and the mind's hidden complexities. New York: Basic Books.
61. Fay N., Garrod, S., & Roberts, L. (2008). The fitness and functionality of culturally evolved communication systems. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society. B: Biological Sciences, 363, 3553-3561. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2008.0130
62. Fillmore, C. J. (1975). An alternative to checklist theories of meaning. Berkeley Linguistics Society, 1, 123-131.
63. Fillmore, C. J. (1982). Frame semantics. In Linguistic Society of Korea (Ed.), Linguistics in the morning calm (pp. 111-138). Seoul: Hanshin.
64. Fisher, K. (1997). Locating frames in the discursive universe. Sociological Research Online, 2, 1-30. doi: 10.5153/sro.78
65. Fiss, P. C., & Hirsch, P. M. (2005). The discourse of globalization: Framing and sensemaking of an emergent concept. American Sociological Review, 70(1), 29-52. doi: 10.1177/000312240507000103
66. Fiss, P. C., & Zajac, E. J. (2006). The symbolic management of strategic change: Sensegiving via framing and decoupling. Academy of Management Journal, 49(6), 1173-1193. doi: 10.5465/AMJ.2006.23478255
67. Fligstein, N. (1997). Social skill and institutional theory. American Behavioral Scientist, 40(4), 397-405. doi: 10.1177/0002764297040004003
68. Fligstein, N. (2001). Social skill and the theory of fields. Sociological Theory, 19, 105-125. doi: 10.1111/0735-2751.00132
69. Fligstein, N., & McAdam, D. (2011). Toward a general theory of strategic action fields. Sociological Theory, 29, 1-26. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9558.2010.01385.x
70. Fligstein, N., & McAdam, D. (2012). A theory of fields. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
71. Friedland, R., & Alford, R. R. (1991). Bringing society back in: Symbols, practices, and institutional contradictions. In W. W. Powell & P. DiMaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 232-266). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
72. Gamson, W. A. (1988). A constructionist approach to mass media and public opinion. Symbolic Interaction, 11, 161-174. doi: 10.1525/si.1988.11.2.161
73. Gamson, W. A., & Lasch, K. E. (1983). The changing political culture of social welfare policy. In S. E. Spiro & E. Yaar (Eds.), Evaluating the welfare state (pp. 397-415). New York: Academic Press.
74. Garrod, S., & Doherty, G. M. (1994). Conversation, co-ordination and convention: An empirical investigation of how groups establish linguistic conventions. Cognition, 53, 181-215. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(94)90048-5
75. Garvin, D., & Roberto, M. (2005). Change through persuasion. Harvard Business Review, 83(2), 105-112.
76. Gary, M. S., Wood, R. E., & Pillinger, T. (2012). Enhancing mental models, analogical transfer, and performance in strategic decision making. Strategic Management Journal, 33, 1229-1246. doi: 10.1002/smj.1979
77. Gavetti, G. (2012). Toward a behavioral theory of strategy. Organization Science, 23(1), 267-285. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1110.0644
78. Gavetti, G., & Levinthal, D. (2000). Looking forward and looking backward: Cognitive and experiential search. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(1), 113-137. doi: 10.2307/2666981
79. Gavetti, G., Levinthal, D. A., & Rivkin, J. W. (2005). Strategy-making in novel and complex worlds: The power of analogy. Strategic Management Journal, 26(8), 691-712. doi: 10.1002/smj.475
80. Gentner, D., Bowdle, B., Wolff, P., & Boronat, C. (2001). Metaphor is like analogy. In D. Gentner, K. J. Holyoak, & B. N. Kokinov (Eds.), The analogical mind: Perspectives from cognitive science (pp. 199-253). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
81. George, E., Chattopadhyay, P., Sitkin, S. B., & Barden, J. (2006). Cognitive underpinnings of institutional persistence and change: A framing perspective. Academy of Management Review, 31, 347-365. doi: 10.5465/AMR.2006.20208685
82. Gilbert, C. G. (2006). Change in the presence of residual fit: Can competing frames coexist? Organization Science, 17(1), 150-167. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1050.0160
83. Gioia, D. A., & Chittipeddi, K. (1991). Sensemaking and sensegiving in strategic change initiation. Strategic Management Journal, 12, 433-448. doi: 10.1002/smj.4250120604
84. Gioia, D. A., & Poole, P. P. (1984). Scripts in organizational behavior. Academy of Management Review, 9, 449-459.
85. Gioia, D. A., Thomas, J. B., Clark, S. M., & Chittipeddi, K. (1994). Symbolism and strategic change in academia: The dynamics of sensemaking and influence. Organization Science, 5, 363-383. doi: 10.1287/orsc.5.3.363
86. Glaser, V., Fiss, P., & Kennedy, M. T. (2011, August). Rhetoric and resonance: Framing strategies and growth in online advertising. Proceedings of the Seventieth Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, San Antonio, Texas.
87. Glucksberg, S. (2008). How metaphors create categories-quickly. In R. Gibbs (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp. 67-83). New York: Cambridge University Press.
88. Glucksberg, S., McGlone, M. S., & Manfredi, D. A. (1997). Property attribution in metaphor comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 36, 50-67. doi: 10.1006/jmla.1996.2479
89. Glynn, M. A., & Lounsbury, M. (2005). From the critics' corner: Logic blending, discursive change and authenticity in a cultural production system. Journal of Management Studies, 42, 1031-1055. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2005.00531.x
90. Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Boston, MA: North Eastern University Press.
91. Goffman, E. (1981). Forms of talk. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
92. Goldberg, A. (1995). Constructions. A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
93. Granqvist, N., & Laurila, J. (2011). Rage against self-replicating machines: Framing science and fiction in the U.S. nanotechnology field. Organization Studies, 32(2), 253-280.
94. Grégoire, D. A., & Shepherd, D. A. (2012). Technology-market combinations and the identification of entrepreneurial opportunities: An investigation of the opportunity-individual nexus. Academy of Management Journal, 55(4), 753-785. doi: 10.5465/amj.2011.0126
95. Hallett, T. (2010). The myth incarnate: Recoupling processes, turmoil, and inhabited institutions in an urban elementary school. American Sociological Review, 75, 52-74. doi: 10.1177/0003122409357044
96. Haunschild, P. R., & Miner, A. S. (1997). Modes of interorganizational imitation: The effects of outcome salience and uncertainty. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, 472-500. doi: 10.2307/2393735
97. Haveman, H. A., & Rao, H. (1997). Structuring a theory of moral sentiments: Institutional and organizational co-evolution in the early thrift industry. American Journal of Sociology, 102, 1606-1651. doi: 10.1086/231128
98. Henisz, W., & Zelner, B. (2005). Legitimacy, interest group pressures and change in emerging institutions: The case of foreign investors and host country governments. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 361-382. doi: 10.5465/AMR.2005.16387892
99. Hirsch, P. M. (1986). From ambushes to golden parachutes: Corporate takeovers as an instance of cultural framing and institutional integration. American Journal of Sociology, 91(4), 800-837. doi: 10.1086/228351
100. Hirsch, P. M., & Levin, D. Z. (1999). Umbrella constructs versus validity police: A life cycle model. Organization Science, 10(3), 199-212. doi: 10.1287/orsc.10.2.199
101. Hodgkinson, G. P., Bown, N. J., Maule, A. J., Glaister, K. W., & Pearman, A. D. (1999). Breaking the frame: An analysis of strategic cognition and decision making under uncertainty. Strategic Management Journal, 20, 977-985. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199910)20:10<977::AID-SMJ58>3.0.CO;2-X
102. Hudson, R. (1984). Word grammar. Oxford: Blackwell.
103. Huff, A. S. (1990). Mapping strategic thought. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons.
104. Hymes, D. (1974). Foundations of sociolinguistics: An ethnographic approach. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania.
105. Jones, C., Maoret, M., Massa, F. G., & Svejenova, S. (2012). Rebels with a cause: The formation, contestation and expansion of the de novo category Modern Architecture, 1870-1975. Organization Science, 23(6), 1523-1545. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1110.0701
106. Kahl, S., & Bingham, C. (2013). The process of schema emergence: Assimilation, deconstruction, unitization and the plurality of analogies. Academy of Management Journal, 56(1), 14-34. doi: 10.5465/amj.2010.0723
107. Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking fast and slow. New York: Macmillan.
108. Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J. L., & Thaler, R. H. (1986). Fairness and the assumptions of economics. Journal of Business, 59, S285-S300. doi: 10.1086/296367
109. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263-291. doi: 10.2307/1914185
110. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1984). Choices, values and frames. American Psychologist, 39, 341-350. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.39.4.341
111. Kaplan, S. (2008). Framing contests: Strategy making under uncertainty. Organization Science, 19(5), 729-752. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1070.0340
112. Kaplan, S. (2011). Research in cognition and strategy: Reflections on two decades of progress and a look to the future. Journal of Management Studies, 48(3), 665-695. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2010.00983.x
113. Kaplan, S., & Tripsas, M. (2008). Thinking about technology: Applying a cognitive lens to technical change. Research Policy, 37(5), 790-805. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2008.02.002
114. Kellogg, K. C. (2009). Operating room: Relational spaces and micro-institutional change in surgery. American Journal of Sociology, 115, 657-711. doi: 10.1086/603535
115. Kellogg, K. C. (2011). Hot lights and cold steel: Cultural and political toolkits for practice change in surgery. Organization Science, 22(2), 482-502. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1100.0539
116. Kennedy, M. T. (2008). Getting counted: Markets, media and reality. American Sociological Review, 73(2), 270-295. doi: 10.1177/000312240807300205
117. Kennedy, M. T., & Fiss, P. C. (2009). Institutionalization, framing and diffusion: The logic of TQM adoption and implementation decisions among US hospitals. Academy of Management Journal, 52, 897-918. doi: 10.5465/AMJ.2009.44633062
118. Khaire, M., & Wadhwani, R. D. (2010). Changing landscapes: The construction of meaning and value in a new market category-modern Indian art. Academy of Management Journal, 53(6), 1281-1304. doi: 10.5465/AMJ.2010.57317861
119. Koopmans, R., & Statham, P. (1999). Ethnic and civic conceptions of nationhood and the differential success of the extreme right in Germany and Italy. In M. Giugni, D. McAdam, & C. Tilly (Eds.), How social movements matter (pp. 225-251). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
120. Kotter, J. (1996). Leading change. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
121. Krippendorff, K. (2012). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
122. Labianca, G., Gray, B., & Brass, D. (2000). A grounded model of organizational schema change during empowerment. Organization Science, 11(2), 235-257. doi: 10.1287/orsc.11.2.235.12512
123. Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
124. Lefsrud, L. M., & Meyer, R. E. (2012). Science or science fiction? Professionals' discursive construction of climate change. Organization Studies, 33, 1477-1506. doi: 10.1177/0170840612463317
125. Leonardi, P. M. (2011). Innovation blindness: Culture, frames, and cross-boundary problem construction in the development of new technology concepts. Organization Science, 22(2), 347-369. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1100.0529
126. Levinthal, D., & Rerup, C. (2006). Crossing an apparent chasm: Bridging mindful and less-mindful perspectives on organizational learning. Organization Science, 17(4), 502-513. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1060.0197
127. Loewenstein, J., Ocasio, W., & Jones, C. (2012). Vocabularies and vocabulary structure: A new approach linking categories, practices, and institutions. Academy of Management Annals, 6(1), 41-86. doi: 10.1080/19416520.2012.660763
128. Lombardi, W. J., Higgins, E. T., & Bargh, J. A. (1987). The role of consciousness in priming effects on categorization. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 13, 411-429. doi: 10.1177/0146167287133009
129. Louis, M. R., & Sutton, R. I. (1991). Switching cognitive gears: From habits of mind to active thinking. Human Relations, 44, 55-76. doi: 10.1177/001872679104400104
130. Lounsbury, M., Ventresca, M., & Hirsch, P. M. (2003). Social movements, field frames and industry emergence: A cultural-political perspective on US recycling. Socio-economic Review, 1, 71-104. doi: 10.1093/soceco/1.1.71
131. Lovallo, D., Clarke, C., & Camerer, C. (2012). Robust analogizing and the outside view: Two empirical tests of case-based decision making. Strategic Management Journal, 33, 496-512. doi: 10.1002/smj.962
132. Maguire, S., Hardy, C., & Lawrence, T. (2004). Institutional entrepreneurship in emerging fields: HIV/AIDS treatment advocacy in Canada. Academy of Management Journal, 47(5), 657-679. doi: 10.2307/20159610
133. Maitlis, S., & Christianson, M. (2013). Sensemaking in organizations: Taking stock and moving forward. Annals of the Academy of Management. doi:10.1080/19416520.2014.873177
134. Maitlis, S., & Lawrence, T. (2007). Triggers and enablers of sensegiving in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 57-84. doi: 10.5465/AMJ.2007.24160971
135. Maitlis, S., & Sonenshein, S. (2010). Sensemaking in crisis and change: Inspiration and insights from Weick (1988). Journal of Management Studies, 47, 551-580. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2010.00908.x
136. Manning, C., & Schütze, H. (1999). Foundations of statistical natural language processing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
137. Mantere, S., Schildt, H., & Sillince, J. A. A. (2012). Reversal of strategic change. Academy of Management Journal, 55(1), 172-196. doi: 10.5465/amj.2008.0045
138. March, J. C., & Simon, H. A. (1958). Organizations. New York: Wiley.
139. Markowitz, L. P. (2009). How master frames Mislead: The division and eclipse of nationalist movements in Uzbekistan and Tajikistan. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 32, 716-738. doi: 10.1080/01419870801961508
140. Mazmanian, M. (2013). Avoiding the trap of constant connectivity: When congruent frames allow for heterogeneous practices. Academy of Management Journal, 56(5), 1225-1250. doi: 10.5465/amj.2010.0787
141. McCammon, H. (2013). Discursive opportunity structure. In D. A. Snow, D. Della Porta, B. Klandermans, & D. McAdam (Eds.), The Wiley-Blackwell encyclopedia of social and political movements. Oxford: Willey-Blackwell.
142. McCammon, H. J., Sanders Muse, C., Newman, H. D., & Terrell, T. M. (2007). Movement framing and discursive opportunity structures: The political successes of the U.S. Women's Jury movements. American Sociological Review, 72, 725-749. doi: 10.1177/000312240707200504
143. Meyer, R. E., & Höllerer, M. A. (2010). Meaning structures in a contested issue field: A topographic map of shareholder value in Austria. Academy of Management Journal, 53(6), 1241-1262. doi: 10.5465/AMJ.2010.57317829
144. Meyer, R. E., Höllerer, M. A., Jancsary, D., & Van Leeuwen, T. (2013). The visual dimension in organizing, organization, and organization research: Core ideas, current developments, and promising avenues. Academy of Management Annals, 7(1), 489-555. doi: 10.1080/19416520.2013.781867
145. Miller, D., & Sardais, C. (2013). How our frames direct us: A poker experiment. Organization Studies, 34, 1381-1405. doi: 10.1177/0170840612470231
146. Minsky, M. (1975). A framework for representing knowledge. In P. H. Winston (Ed.), The psychology of computer vision (pp. 211-277). New York: McGraw-Hill.
147. Morgan, G., Frost, P., & Pondy, L. R. (1983). Organizational symbolism. In L. R. Pondy, P. Frost, G. Morgan, & T. Dandridge (Eds.), Organizational symbolism (pp. 3-35). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
148. Nadkarni, S., & Narayanan, V. K. (2007). Evolution of collective strategy frames in high and low velocity industries. Organization Science, 18(4), 688-710. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1070.0268
149. Navis, C., & Glynn, M. A. (2010). How new market categories emerge: Temporal dynamics of legitimacy, identity, and entrepreneurship in satellite radio, 1990-2005. Administrative Science Quarterly, 55, 439-471. doi: 10.2189/asqu.2010.55.3.439
150. Neale, M. A., & Bazerman, M. H. (1985). The effects of framing and negotiator overconfidence on bargainer behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 28, 34-49. doi: 10.2307/256060
151. Nutt, P. C. (1998). Framing strategic decisions. Organization Science, 9, 195-216. doi: 10.1287/orsc.9.2.195
152. Ocasio, W. (2005). The opacity of risk: Language and the culture of safety in NASA's space shuttle program. In W. H. Starbuck & M. Farjoun (Eds.), Organization at the limit: Lessons from the Columbia disaster (pp. 101-121). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
153. Oliver, P., & Johnston, H. (2000). What a good idea! Frames and ideologies in social movement research. Mobilization, 5, 1-18.
154. Orlikowski, W. J., & Gash, D. C. (1994). Technological frames-making sense of information technology in organizations. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 12(2), 174-207. doi: 10.1145/196734.196745
155. Pennebaker, J. W., Francis, M. E., & Booth, R. J. (2001). Linguistic inquiry and word count: LIWC 2001. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
156. Perretti, F., Negro, G., & Lomi, A. (2008). E pluribus unum: Domain framing, candidate matching and organizational form emergence in U.S. television broadcasting, 1940-1960. Organization Science, 19, 533-547. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1070.0319
157. Pinkley, R. L., & Northcraft, G. B. (1994). Cognitive interpretations of conflict: Implication for dispute processes and outcome. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 193-205. doi: 10.2307/256777
158. Polletta, F. (2006). It was like a fever. Storytelling in protest and politics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
159. Polletta, F., & Jasper, J. M. (2001). Collective identity and social movements. Annual Review of Sociology, 27(1), 283-305. doi: 10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.283
160. Polletta, F., & Kai Ho, M. (2006). Frames and their consequences. In R. E. Goodin & C. Tilly (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of contextual political analysis (pp. 187-209). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
161. Powell, W. W., & Colyvas, J. A. (2008). Microfoundations of institutional theory. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin-Andersson, & R. Suddaby (Eds.), Handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 276-298). London: Sage.
162. Pratt, M. G. (2000). The good, the bad, and the ambivalent: Managing identification among Amway distributors. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45, 456-493. doi: 10.2307/2667106
163. Rao, H. (1998). Caveat emptor: The construction of non-profit consumer watchdog organizations. American Journal of Sociology, 103, 912-961. doi: 10.1086/231293
164. Rao, H., & Kenney, M. (2008). New forms as settlements. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, R. Suddaby, & K. Sahlin (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 352-371). London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
165. Rao, H., Monin, P., & Durand, R. (2003). Institutional change in de Toqueville: Nouvelle cuisine as an identity movement in French gastronomy. American Journal of Sociology, 108(4), 795-843. doi: 10.1086/367917
166. Reay, T., Chreim, S., Golden-Biddle, K., Goodrick, E., Williams, B. E., Casebeer, A., Hinings, C. R. (2013). Transforming new ideas into practice: An activity based perspective on the institutionalization of practices. Journal of Management Studies, 50, 963-990. doi: 10.1111/joms.12039
167. Roberts, C. W. (1989). Other than counting words: A linguistic approach to content analysis. Social Forces, 68(1), 147-177. doi: 10.1093/sf/68.1.147
168. Ryan, C. (1991). Prime time activism: Media strategies for grassroots organizing. Boston, MA: South End.
169. Saguy, A. C., & Ward, A. (2011). Coming out as fat: Rethinking stigma. Social Psychology Quarterly, 74, 53-75. doi: 10.1177/0190272511398190
170. Schank, R. C., & Abelson, R. P. (1977). Scripts, plans, goals, and understanding. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
171. Scheufele, D. (1999). Framing as a theory of media effects. Journal of Communication, 49, 103-122. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.1999.tb02784.x
172. Schneiberg, M., & Clemens, E. S. (2006). The typical tools for the job: Research strategies in institutional analysis. Sociological Theory, 3, 195-227. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9558.2006.00288.x
173. Scott, W. R. (2003). Institutional carriers: Reviewing modes of transporting ideas over time and space and considering their consequences. Industrial and Corporate Change, 12, 879-894. doi: 10.1093/icc/12.4.879
174. Seo, M., Goldfarb, B., & Barrett, L. F. (2010). Affect and the framing effect within individuals across time: Risk taking in a dynamic investment simulation. Academy of Management Journal, 53, 411-431. doi: 10.5465/AMJ.2010.49389383
175. Sewell, W. F. (1992). A theory of structure: Duality, agency, and transformation. American Journal of Sociology, 98(1), 1-29. doi: 10.1086/229967
176. Sgourev, S. V. (2013). How Paris gave rise to Cubism (and Picasso): Ambiguity and fragmentation in radical innovation. Organization Science, 24(6), 1601-1617. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1120.0819
177. Sherman, S. J., Mackie, D. M., & Driscoll, D. M. (1990). Priming and the differential use of dimensions in evaluation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 16, 405-418. doi: 10.1177/0146167290163001
178. Shrivastava, P., & Mitroff, I. I. (1983). Frames of reference managers use. In R. Lamb (Ed.), Advances in strategic management (Vol. 1, pp. 161-80). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
179. Sitkin, S., & Pablo, A. (1992). Reconceptualizing the determinants of risk behavior. Academy of Management Review, 17, 9-38.
180. Smets, M., Morris, T., & Greenwood, R. (2012). From practice to field: A multi-level model of practice-driven institutional change. Academy of Management Journal, 55(4), 877-904. doi: 10.5465/amj.2010.0013
181. Snook, S. A. (2000). Friendly fire: The accidental shoot down of U.S. Black Hawks over northern Iraq. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
182. Snow, D. A., & Benford, R. D. (1988). Ideology, frame resonance, and participant mobilization. International Social Movement Research, 1, 197-217.
183. Snow, D. A., & Benford, R. D. (1992). Master frames and cycles of protest. In A. D. Morris & C. M. Mueller (Eds.), Frontiers in social movement theory (pp. 133-135). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
184. Snow, D. A., Burke Rochford, E., Jr., Worden, S. K., & Benford, R. D. (1986). Frame alignment processes, micromobilization and movement participation. American Sociological Review, 54, 464-481. doi: 10.2307/2095581
185. Sonenshein, S. (2006). Crafting social issues at work. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 1158-1172. doi: 10.5465/AMJ.2006.23478243
186. Sonenshein, S. (2010). We're changing or are we? Untangling the role of progressive, regressive, and stability narratives during strategic change implementation. Academy of Management Journal, 53, 477-512. doi: 10.5465/AMJ.2010.51467638
187. Starbuck, W., & Milliken, F. (1988). Executive perceptual filters: What they notice and how they make sense. In D. Hambrick (Ed.), The executive effect: Concepts and methods for studying top managers (pp. 35-65). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
188. Starbuck, W. H. (1983). Organizations as action generators. American Sociological Review, 48, 91-102. doi: 10.2307/2095147
189. Steinberg, M. W. (1998). Tilting the frame: Considerations on collective action framing from a discursive turn. Theory and Society, 27, 845-872. doi: 10.1023/A:1006975321345
190. Steinberg, M. W. (1999). The talk and back talk of collective action: A dialogic analysis of repertoires of discourse among nineteenth-century English cotton spinners. American Journal of Sociology, 105(3), 736-780. doi: 10.1086/210359
191. Sternberg, S. (1969). Memory-scanning: Mental processes revealed by reaction-time experiments. American Scientist, 57, 421-457.
192. Strang, D., & Meyer, J. W. (1993). Institutional conditions for diffusion. Theory and Society, 22, 487-511. doi: 10.1007/BF00993595
193. Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571-611.
194. Tannen, D. (1979). What's in a frame? Surface evidence for underlying expectations. In R. O. Freedle (Ed.), New directions in discourse processing (pp. 137-181). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
195. Tannen, D. (1985). Frames and schemas in interaction. Quaderni di Semantica, 6(2), 326-335.
196. Tenbrunsel, A. E., & Messick, D. M. (1999). Sanctioning systems, decision frames, and cooperation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 684-707. doi: 10.2307/2667052
197. Thornton, P. H., & Ocasio, W. (1999). Institutional logics and the historical contingency of power in organizations: Executive succession in the higher education publishing industry, 1958-1990. American Journal of Sociology, 105, 801-843. doi: 10.1086/210361
198. Thornton, P. H., Ocasio, W., & Lounsbury, M. (2012). The institutional logics perspective: A new approach to culture, structure, and process. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
199. Tripsas, M., & Gavetti, G. (2000). Capabilities, cognition, and inertia: Evidence from digital imaging. Strategic Management Journal, 21(10-11), 1147-1161. doi: 10.1002/1097-0266(200010/11)21:10/11<1147::AID-SMJ128>3.0.CO;2-R
200. Turner, M. (2001). Cognitive dimensions of social science: The way we think about politics, economics, law, and society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
201. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1987). Rational choice and the framing of decisions. In R. M. Hogarth & M. W. Reder (Eds.), Rational choice: The contrast between economics and psychology (pp. 67-94). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
202. Vaccaro, A., Brusoni, S., & Veloso, F. M. (2011). Virtual design, problem framing, and innovation: An empirical study in the automotive industry. Journal of Management Studies, 48, 99-122. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2010.00939.x
203. Van Atteveldt, W., Kleinnijenhuis, J., & Ruigrok, N. (2008). Parsing, semantic networks, and political authority using syntactic analysis to extract semantic relations from Dutch newspaper articles. Political Analysis, 16(4), 428-446. doi: 10.1093/pan/mpn006
204. Van Burg, E., Berends, H., & Van Raaij, E. M. (2013). Framing and interorganizational knowledge transfer: A process study of collaborative innovation in the aircraft industry. Journal of Management Studies. doi:10.1111/joms.12055
205. Walsh, J. P. (1995). Managerial and organizational cognition: Notes from a trip down memory lane. Organization Science, 6(3), 280-321. doi: 10.1287/orsc.6.3.280
206. Weber, K. (2005). A toolkit for analyzing corporate cultural toolkits. Poetics, 33, 227-252. doi: 10.1016/j.poetic.2005.09.011
207. Weber, K., & Glynn, M. A. (2006). Making sense with institutions: Context, thought and action in Karl Weick's theory. Organization Studies, 27, 1639-1660. doi: 10.1177/0170840606068343
208. Weber, K., Heinze, K. L., & DeSoucey, M. (2008). Forage for thought: Mobilizing codes in the movement for grass-fed meat and dairy products. Administrative Science Quarterly, 53, 529-567. doi: 10.2189/asqu.53.3.529
209. Weber, K., Patel, H., & Heinze, K. L. (2013). From cultural repertoires to institutional logics: A content-analytic method. In M. Lounsbury & E. Boxenbaum (Eds.), Institutional logics in actiono. Research in the Sociology of Organizations (pp. 351-382). Bingley: Emerald Publications.
210. Weber, K., Rao, H., & Thomas, L. G. (2009). From streets to suites: How the anti-biotech movement affected German pharmaceutical firms. American Sociological Review, 74, 106-127. doi: 10.1177/000312240907400106
211. Weber, L., & Mayer, K. L. (2011). Designing effective contracts; exploring the influence of framing and expectations. Academy of Management Review, 36, 53-75. doi: 10.5465/AMR.2011.55662501
212. Weick, K. E. (1988). Enacted sensemaking in crisis situations. Journal of Management Studies, 25, 305-317. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.1988.tb00039.x
213. Weick, K. E. (1993). The collapse of sensemaking in organizations: The Mann Gulch disaster. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38, 628-652. doi: 10.2307/2393339
214. Weick, K. E. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
215. Weick, K. E. (2010). Reflections on enacted sensemaking in the Bhopal disaster. Journal of Management Studies, 47, 537-550. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2010.00900.x
216. Weick, K. E., Sutcliffe, K. M., & Obstfeld, D. (2005). Organizing and the process of sensemaking. Organization Science, 16, 409-421. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1050.0133
217. Wilensky, R. (1986). Points: A theory of the structure of stories in memory. In B. Grosz, K. Jones, & B. Webber (Eds.), Readings in natural language processing (pp. 459-473). Los Altos, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
218. Zucker, L. G. (1983). Organizations as institutions. In S. Bacharach (Ed.), Research in the sociology of organizations (pp. 1-47). Greenwich, CN: JAI Press.