Property attribution in metaphor comprehension

Journal of Memory and Language

Volumn 36, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 50-67

  Glucksberg, Sam ^a   McGlone, Matthew S ^b   Manfredi, Deanna ^b  

^a PRINCETON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0030641985     PISSN: 0749596X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/jmla.1996.2479     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. ARISTOTLE (1965). Poetics. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.
2. BLACK, M. (1962). Models and metaphors. Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press.
3. BLACK, M. (1979). More about metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought, (pp. 19-43). Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.
4. BRACHMAN, J. R. (1983). What IS-A is and isn't: An analysis of taxonomic links in semantic networks. Computer, 16, 30-36.
5. BROWN, R. (1958). Words and things. New York: Free Press.
6. CLARK, H. H., & HAVILAND, S. E. (1977). Comprehension and the given-new contract. In R. O. Freedle (Ed.), Discourse production and comprehension. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
7. CENTNER, D. (1980). Studies of metaphor and complex analogies. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association. Montreal, Canada.
8. CENTNER, D. (1983). Structure mapping: A theoretical framework for analogy. Cognitive Science, 7, 155-170.
9. GIBBS, R. J. (1984). Literal meaning and psychological theory. Cognitive Science, 8, 275-304.
10. GLUCKSBERG, S., GILDEA, P., & BOOKIN, H. (1982). On understanding nonliteral speech: Can people ignore metaphors? Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 21, 85-98.
11. GLUCKSBERG, S., & KEYSAR, B. (1990). Understanding metaphoric comparisons: Beyond similarity. Psychological Review, 97, 3-18.
12. GOODMAN, N. (1972). Problems and projects. New York: Bobbs-Merrill.
13. HARRIS, R. (1976). Comprehension of metaphor: A test of a two-stage processing model. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 8, 321-324.
14. HARWOOD, D. L., & VERBRUGGE, R. R. (1977). Metaphor and the asymmetry of similarity. Paper presented at the convention of the American Psychological Association.
15. KATZ, A. N. (1982). Metaphoric relationships: The role of feature saliency. Journal of Psyckolinguistic Research, 11, 283-296.
16. KEYSAR, B. (1989). On the functional equivalence of literal and metaphorical interpretations in discourse. Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 375-385.
17. MEDIN, D. L., GOLDSTONE, R. L., & GENTNER, D. (1993). Respects for similarity. Psychological Review, 100, 254-278.
18. MILLER, G. A. (1979). Images and models; Similes and metaphors. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 202-250.
19. MURPHY, G. L. (1988). Comprehending complex concepts. Cognitive Science, 12, 529-562.
20. MURPHY, G. L. (1990). Noun phrase interpretation and conceptual combination. Journal of Memory and Language, 29, 259-288.
21. ORTONY, A. (1979). Beyond literal similarity. Psychological Review, 86, 161-180.
22. ORTONY, A., SCHALLERT, D., REYNOLDS, R., & ANTOS, S. (1978). Interpreting metaphors and idioms: Some effects of context on comprehension. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 17, 465-478.
23. ORTONY, A., VONDRUSKA, R. J., Foss, M. A., & JONES, L. E. (1985). Salience, similes, and the asymmetry of similarity. Journal of Memory and Language, 24, 569-594.
24. TRAGER, G. L. (1936-1939). "Cottonwood-Tree", a southwestern linguistic trait. International Journal of American Linguistics, 9, 117-118.
25. TVERSKY, A. (1977). Features of similarity. Psychological Review, 85, 327-352.
26. VERBRUGGE, R., & MCCARRELL, N. (1977). Metaphoric comprehension: Studies in reminding and resembling. Cognitive Psychology, 9, 494-533.
27. WECHSLER, D. (1958). The measurement and appraisal of adult intelligence (4th ed.). Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins.
28. WOLFF, P., & GENTNER, D. (1992). The time course of metaphor comprehension. Proceedings of the Fourteenth Annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society, (pp. 504-509). Hillsdale, NJ: LEA.