Issue Framing in Conversations for Change: Discursive Interaction Strategies for "Doing Differences"

Journal of Applied Behavioral Science

Volumn 48, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 168-193

  Dewulf, Art ^a   Bouwen, René ^b  

^a WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

Author keywords

change; conversation; discourse; framing; interaction

Indexed keywords

EID: 84861809535     PISSN: 00218863     EISSN: 15526879     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0021886312438858     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Bartunek J. M.The importance of contradictions in social intervention.Intervention Research. 2004;1:103-113.
2. Benford R. D.,Snow D. A.Framing processes and social movements: An overview and assessment.Annual Review of Sociology. 2000;26:611-639.
3. Bouwen R.,Steyaert C.Een toepassing van management of meaning: het ontwikkelen van een common script als opdracht voor het leiden van innovaties.Gedrag en organisatie. 1990;5:443-460.
4. Charmaz K.Handbook of qualitative research. 2000). Grounded theory: Objectivist and constructivist methods. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 509-537). London, England: SAGE.Denzin N. K.Lincoln Y. S., ed. London, England: SAGE; 2000:509-537.
5. Chong D.,Druckman J. N.Framing theory.Annual Review of Political Science. 2007;10:103-126.
6. Davidson E.A technological frames perspective on information technology and organizational change.Journal of Applied Behavioral Science. 2006;42:23-39.
7. Dewulf A.,Craps M.,Dercon G.How issues get framed and reframed when different communities meet: A multi-level analysis of a collaborative soil conservation initiative in the Ecuadorian Andes.Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology. 2004;14:177-192.
8. Dewulf A.,Gray B.,Putnam L.,Lewicki R.,Aarts N.,Bouwen R.,van Woerkum C.Disentangling approaches to framing in conflict and negotiation research: A meta-paradigmatic perspective.Human Relations. 2009;62:155-193.
9. Dewulf A.,Mancero M.,Cárdenas G.,Sucozhañay D.Fragmentation and connection of frames in collaborative water governance: A case study of river catchment management in Southern Ecuador.International Review of Administrative Sciences. 2011;77:50-75.
10. Drake L. E.,Donohue W. A.Communicative framing theory in conflict resolution.Communication Research. 1996;23:297-322.
11. Eco U.Semiotics and the philosophy of language. Bloomington: Indiana UP; 1984:.
12. Edwards D.Discourse and cognition. London, England: SAGE; 1997:.
13. Edwards D.Moaning, whinging and laughing: The subjective side of complaints.Discourse Studies. 2005;7:5-29.
14. Edwards D.,Potter J.Discursive psychology. London, England: SAGE; 1992:.
15. Edwards D.,Potter J.Conversation and cognition. te Molder H.Potter J., ed. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press; 2005:241-260.
16. Entman R. M.Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm.Journal of Communication. 1993;43 (4): 51-58.
17. Fairhurst G. T.,Sarr R. A.The art of framing: Managing the language of leadership. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 1996:.
18. Firth A.The discourse of negotiation: Studies of language in the workplace. Oxford, England: Elsevier Science; 1995:.
19. Ford J. D.,Ford L. W.The role of conversations in producing intentional change in organizations.Academy of Management Review. 1995;20:541-570.
20. Graumann C.The dynamics of dialogue. Markova I.Foppa K., ed. London, England: Harverster Wheatsheaf; 1990:105-126.
21. Heritage J.Qualitative research: Theory, method and practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE; 1997:144-160.
22. Heritage J.,Watson D.Everyday language: Studies in ethnomethodology. Psathas G., ed. New York, NY: Irvington; 1979:123-162.
23. Hovelynck J.,Dewulf A.,François G.,Taillieu T.Interdisciplinary knowledge integration through group model building: Recognizing dualities and triadizing the conversation.Environmental Science & Policy. 2010;13:582-591.
24. Janssens M.,Steyaert C.The world in two and a third way out? The concept of duality in organization theory and practice.Scandinavian Journal of Management. 1999;15:121-139.
25. Kindler H.Managing disagreement constructively: Conflict management in organizations. Los Altos, CA: Crisp; 1988:.
26. Knoblauch H.Asymmetries in dialogue. Markova I.Foppa K., ed. London, England: Harvester Wheatsheaf; 1991:166.
27. Lewis M.Exploring paradox: Toward a more comprehensive guide.Academy of Management Review. 2000;25:760-776.
28. Phillips N.,Hardy C.Discourse analysis: Investigating processes of social construction. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE; 2002:.
29. Pomerantz A.Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis. Atkinson J. M., ed. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press; 1984:57-101.
30. Potter J.,Wetherell M.Discourse and social psychology: Beyond attitudes and behaviour. London, England: SAGE; 1987:.
31. Sacks H.Lectures on conversation. Atkinson J. M.Heritage J., ed. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 1984:215-221.
32. Scheufele D. A.,Tewksbury D.Framing, agenda setting, and priming: The evolution of three media effects models.Journal of Communication. 2007;57 (1): 9-20.
33. Schön D. A.,Rein M.Frame reflection: Toward a resolution of intractable policy controversies. New York, NY: Basic Books; 1994:.
34. Srivastva S.,Obert S.,Neilsen E.Organizational development in the UK and USA: A joint evaluation. Cooper C., ed. New York, NY: Macmillan; 1977:83-111.
35. te Molder H.,Potter J.Conversation and cognition. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press; 2005:.
36. Thomas R.Diversity in organizations: New perspectives for a changing workplace. Chemers M.Oskamp S.Constanzo M., ed. London, England: SAGE; 1995:245-264.
37. Tversky A.,Kahneman D.The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice.Science. 1981;211:453-458.
38. van den Hoonaard W.Working with sensitizing concepts: Analytical field research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE; 1997:.
39. Van Dongen H.,De Laat W.,Maas A.Een kwestie van verschil. Delft, Netherlands: Eburon; 1996:.
40. Van Vuuren M.,Elving W. J. L.Communication, sensemaking and change as a chord of three strands: Practical implications and a research agenda for communicating organizational change.Corporate Communications. 2008;13:349-359.
41. Weick K.The social psychology of organizing. 1979). The social psychology of organizing (2nd ed.). London, England: McGraw-Hill.London, England: McGraw-Hill; 1979:.
42. Weick K.Sensemaking in organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE; 1995:.
43. Weick K. E.,Quinn R.Organizational change and development, episodic and continuous changing.Annual Review of Psychology. 1999;50:361-386.
44. Wood L.,Kroger R.Doing discourse analysis: Methods for studying action in talk and text. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE; 2000:.