Noise and information transmission in promoters with multiple internal states

Biophysical Journal

Volumn 106, Issue 5, 2014, Pages 1194-1204

  Rieckh, Georg ^a   Tkačik, Gašper ^a  

^a INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY AUSTRIA   (Austria)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR;

ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENETIC TRANSCRIPTION; GENETICS; METABOLISM; PROMOTER REGION;

GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; MODELS, GENETIC; PROMOTER REGIONS, GENETIC; TRANSCRIPTION FACTORS; TRANSCRIPTION, GENETIC;

EID: 84901739639     PISSN: 00063495     EISSN: 15420086     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2014.01.014     Document Type: Article

References (93)

1. M. Levine, and E.H. Davidson Gene regulatory networks for development Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102 2005 4936 4942
2. M. Ronen, and R. Rosenberg U. Alon Assigning numbers to the arrows: parameterizing a gene regulation network by using accurate expression kinetics Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99 2002 10555 10560
3. M.B. Elowitz, and A.J. Levine P.S. Swain Stochastic gene expression in a single cell Science 297 2002 1183 1186
4. E.M. Ozbudak, and M. Thattai A. van Oudenaarden Regulation of noise in the expression of a single gene Nat. Genet. 31 2002 69 73
5. J. Paulsson Summing up the noise in gene networks Nature 427 2004 415 418
6. A. Raj, and A. van Oudenaarden Nature, nurture, or chance: stochastic gene expression and its consequences Cell 135 2008 216 226
7. B. Houchmandzadeh, E. Wieschaus, and S. Leibler Establishment of developmental precision and proportions in the early Drosophila embryo Nature 415 2002 798 802
8. G. Tkačik, and A.M. Walczak Information transmission in genetic regulatory networks: a review J. Phys. Condens. Matter 23 2011 153102
9. E. Ziv, I. Nemenman, and C.H. Wiggins Optimal signal processing in small stochastic biochemical networks PLoS ONE 2 2007 e1077
10. G. Tkačik, C.G. Callan Jr.; and W. Bialek Information capacity of genetic regulatory elements Phys. Rev. E Stat. Nonlin. Soft Matter Phys. 78 2008 011910
11. G. Tkačik, A.M. Walczak, and W. Bialek Optimizing information flow in small genetic networks Phys. Rev. E Stat. Nonlin. Soft Matter Phys. 80 2009 031920
12. A.M. Walczak, G. Tkačik, and W. Bialek Optimizing information flow in small genetic networks. II. Feed-forward interactions Phys. Rev. E Stat. Nonlin. Soft Matter Phys. 81 2010 041905
13. G. Tkačik, A.M. Walczak, and W. Bialek Optimizing information flow in small genetic networks. III. A self-interacting gene Phys. Rev. E Stat. Nonlin. Soft Matter Phys. 85 2012 041903
14. G. Tkačik, C.G. Callan Jr.; and W. Bialek Information flow and optimization in transcriptional regulation Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105 2008 12265 12270
15. J.O. Dubuis, and G. Tkačik W. Bialek Positional information, in bits Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110 2013 16301 16308
16. F. Tostevin, and P.R. ten Wolde Mutual information between input and output trajectories of biochemical networks Phys. Rev. Lett. 102 2009 218101
17. F. Tostevin, and P.R. ten Wolde Mutual information in time-varying biochemical systems Phys. Rev. E Stat. Nonlin. Soft Matter Phys. 81 2010 061917
18. R. Cheong, and A. Rhee A. Levchenko Information transduction capacity of noisy biochemical signaling networks Science 334 2011 354 358
19. W.H. de Ronde, F. Tostevin, and P.R. ten Wolde Effect of feedback on the fidelity of information transmission of time-varying signals Phys. Rev. E Stat. Nonlin. Soft Matter Phys. 82 2010 031914
20. W.H. de Ronde, F. Tostevin, and P.R. ten Wolde Feed-forward loops and diamond motifs lead to tunable transmission of information in the frequency domain Phys. Rev. E Stat. Nonlin. Soft Matter Phys. 86 2012 021913
21. W. de Ronde, F. Tostevin, and P.R. ten Wolde Multiplexing biochemical signals Phys. Rev. Lett. 107 2011 048101
22. F. Tostevin, W. de Ronde, and P.R. ten Wolde Reliability of frequency and amplitude decoding in gene regulation Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 2012 108104
23. A. Mugler, F. Tostevin, and P.R. ten Wolde Spatial partitioning improves the reliability of biochemical signaling Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110 2013 5927 5932
24. C.G. Bowsher, and P.S. Swain Identifying sources of variation and the flow of information in biochemical networks Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109 2012 E1320 E1328
25. D. Jost, A. Nowojewski, and E. Levine Regulating the many to benefit the few: role of weak small RNA targets Biophys. J. 104 2013 1773 1782
26. S. Hormoz Cross talk and interference enhance information capacity of a signaling pathway Biophys. J. 104 2013 1170 1180
27. J. Levine, H.Y. Kueh, and L. Mirny Intrinsic fluctuations, robustness, and tunability in signaling cycles Biophys. J. 92 2007 4473 4481
28. J.-B. Lalanne, and P. François Principles of adaptive sorting revealed by in silico evolution Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 2013 218102
29. F. Mancini, and C.H. Wiggins A.M. Walczak Time-dependent information transmission in a model regulatory circuit Phys. Rev. E Stat. Nonlin. Soft Matter Phys. 88 2013 022708
30. Taylor, S. F.; N. Tishby, and W. Bialek, 2007. Information and fitness. arXiv 0712.4382.
31. O. Rivoire, and S. Leibler The value of information for populations in varying environments J. Stat. Phys. 142 2011 1124 1166
32. M.C. Donaldson-Matasci, C.T. Bergstrom, and M. Lachmann The fitness value of information Oikos 119 2010 219 230
33. W. Bialek, and S. Setayeshgar Physical limits to biochemical signaling Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102 2005 10040 10045
34. W. Bialek, and S. Setayeshgar Cooperativity, sensitivity, and noise in biochemical signaling Phys. Rev. Lett. 100 2008 258101
35. T. Gregor, and D.W. Tank W. Bialek Probing the limits to positional information Cell 130 2007 153 164
36. N. van Kampen Stochastic processes in physics and chemistry 1981 North Holland Amsterdam
37. J. Peccoud, and B. Ycart Markovian modeling of gene-products synthesis Theor. Popul. Biol. 48 1995 222 234
38. S. Iyer-Biswas, F. Hayot, and C. Jayaprakash Stochasticity of gene products from transcriptional pulsing Phys. Rev. E Stat. Nonlin. Soft Matter Phys. 79 2009 031911
39. V. Shahrezaei, and P.S. Swain Analytical distributions for stochastic gene expression Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105 2008 17256 17261
40. M. Dobrzynski, and F.J. Bruggeman Elongation dynamics shape bursty transcription and translation Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106 2009 2583 2588
41. T.B. Kepler, and T.C. Elston Stochasticity in transcriptional regulation: origins, consequences, and mathematical representations Biophys. J. 81 2001 3116 3136
42. B. Hu, and D.A. Kessler H. Levine Effects of input noise on a simple biochemical switch Phys. Rev. Lett. 107 2011 148101
43. B. Hu, and D.A. Kessler H. Levine How input fluctuations reshape the dynamics of a biological switching system Phys. Rev. E Stat. Nonlin. Soft Matter Phys. 86 2012 061910
44. L.-H. So, and A. Ghosh I. Golding General properties of transcriptional time series in Escherichia coli Nat. Genet. 43 2011 554 560
45. G. Tkačik, T. Gregor, and W. Bialek The role of input noise in transcriptional regulation PLoS ONE 3 2008 e2774
46. J.M. Raser, and E.K. O'Shea Control of stochasticity in eukaryotic gene expression Science 304 2004 1811 1814
47. A. Raj, and C.S. Peskin S. Tyagi Stochastic mRNA synthesis in mammalian cells PLoS Biol. 4 2006 e309
48. A. Sánchez, and J. Kondev Transcriptional control of noise in gene expression Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105 2008 5081 5086
49. P.S. Gutierrez, D. Monteoliva, and L. Diambra Role of cooperative binding on noise expression Phys. Rev. E Stat. Nonlin. Soft Matter Phys. 80 2009 011914
50. R. Karmakar Conversion of graded to binary response in an activator-repressor system Phys. Rev. E Stat. Nonlin. Soft Matter Phys. 81 2010 021905
51. A. Coulon, O. Gandrillon, and G. Beslon On the spontaneous stochastic dynamics of a single gene: complexity of the molecular interplay at the promoter BMC Syst. Biol. 4 2010 2
52. A. Sanchez, and H.G. Garcia J. Kondev Effect of promoter architecture on the cell-to-cell variability in gene expression PLOS Comput. Biol. 7 2011 e1001100
53. T. Zhou, and J. Zhang Analytical results for a multistate gene model SIAM J. Appl. Math. 72 2012 789 818
54. J. Zhang, L. Chen, and T. Zhou Analytical distribution and tunability of noise in a model of promoter progress Biophys. J. 102 2012 1247 1257
55. P.S. Gutierrez, D. Monteoliva, and L. Diambra Cooperative binding of transcription factors promotes bimodal gene expression response PLoS ONE 7 2012 e44812
56. W.J. Blake, and G. Balázsi J.J. Collins Phenotypic consequences of promoter-mediated transcriptional noise Mol. Cell 24 2006 853 865
57. W.J. Blake, and M. Kærn J.J. Collins Noise in eukaryotic gene expression Nature 422 2003 633 637
58. M. Kandhavelu, and H. Mannerström A.S. Ribeiro In vivo kinetics of transcription initiation of the lar promoter in Escherichia coli. Evidence for a sequential mechanism with two rate-limiting steps BMC Syst. Biol. 5 2011 149
59. D.M. Suter, and N. Molina F. Naef Mammalian genes are transcribed with widely different bursting kinetics Science 332 2011 472 474
60. Y. Setty, and A.E. Mayo U. Alon Detailed map of a cis-regulatory input function Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100 2003 7702 7707
61. C. Shannon A mathematical theory of communication Bell Syst. Tech. J 27 1948 379 423 623-56
62. T. Cover, and J. Thomas Elements of Information Theory 2006 Wiley Interscience New York
63. A.M. Walczak, M. Sasai, and P.G. Wolynes Self-consistent proteomic field theory of stochastic gene switches Biophys. J. 88 2005 828 850
64. D.T. Gillespie The chemical Langevin equation J. Chem. Phys. 113 2000 297
65. P.S. Swain, M.B. Elowitz, and E.D. Siggia Intrinsic and extrinsic contributions to stochasticity in gene expression Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99 2002 12795 12800
66. H.C. Berg, and E.M. Purcell Physics of chemoreception Biophys. J. 20 1977 193 219
67. O.G. Berg, and P.H. von Hippel Diffusion-controlled macromolecular interactions Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biophys. Chem. 14 1985 131 160
68. R.G. Endres, and N.S. Wingreen Accuracy of direct gradient sensing by single cells Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105 2008 15749 15754
69. L.B. Carey, and D. van Dijk E. Segal Promoter sequence determines the relationship between expression level and noise PLoS Biol. 11 2013 e1001528
70. W.H. de Ronde, and B.C. Daniels I. Nemenman Mesoscopic statistical properties of multistep enzyme-mediated reactions IET Syst. Biol. 3 2009 429 437
71. A. Sanchez, S. Choubey, and J. Kondev Regulation of noise in gene expression Annu. Rev. Biophys 42 2013 469 491
72. I. Golding, and J. Paulsson E.C. Cox Real-time kinetics of gene activity in individual bacteria Cell 123 2005 1025 1036
73. M. Geertz, D. Shore, and S.J. Maerkl Massively parallel measurements of molecular interaction kinetics on a microfluidic platform Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109 2012 16540 16545
74. J. Viñuelas, and G. Kaneko O. Gandrillon Quantifying the contribution of chromatin dynamics to stochastic gene expression reveals long, locus-dependent periods between transcriptional bursts BMC Biol. 11 2013 15
75. A. Sanchez, and M.L. Osborne J. Gelles Mechanism of transcriptional repression at a bacterial promoter by analysis of single molecules EMBO J. 30 2011 3940 3946
76. H.G. Garcia, and A. Sanchez R. Phillips Operator sequence alters gene expression independently of transcription factor occupancy in bacteria Cell Rep 2 2012 150 161
77. H.-T. Yang, and M.S.H. Ko Stochastic modeling for the expression of a gene regulated by competing transcription factors PLoS ONE 7 2012 e32376
78. T.M. Earnest, and E. Roberts Z. Luthey-Schulten DNA looping increases the range of bistability in a stochastic model of the lac genetic switch Phys. Biol. 10 2013 026002
79. L.A. Mirny Nucleosome-mediated cooperativity between transcription factors Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 107 2010 22534 22539
80. E. Segal, and J. Widom What controls nucleosome positions? Trends Genet. 25 2009 335 343
81. G.-W. Li, O. Berg, and J. Elf Effects of macromolecular crowding and DNA looping on gene regulation kinetics Nat. Phys. 5 2009 294 297
82. A. Grönlund, P. Lötstedt, and J. Elf Transcription factor binding kinetics constrain noise suppression via negative feedback Nat. Commun 4 2013 1864
83. B. Lehner Conflict between noise and plasticity in yeast PLoS Genet. 6 2010 e1001185
84. D. Bajić, and J.F. Poyatos Balancing noise and plasticity in eukaryotic gene expression BMC Genomics 13 2012 343
85. D.S. Parker, and M.A. White S. Barolo The cis-regulatory logic of Hedgehog gradient responses: key roles for gli binding affinity, competition, and cooperativity Sci. Signal. 4 2011 ra38
86. M.A. White, and D.S. Parker B.A. Cohen A model of spatially restricted transcription in opposing gradients of activators and repressors Mol. Syst. Biol. 8 2012 614
87. B. Müller, and K. Basler The repressor and activator forms of Cubitus interruptus control Hedgehog target genes through common generic gli-binding sites Development 127 2000 2999 3007
88. D.R. Larson What do expression dynamics tell us about the mechanism of transcription? Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 21 2011 591 599
89. N. Yosef, and A. Regev Impulse control: temporal dynamics in gene transcription Cell 144 2011 886 896
90. D. Zenklusen, D.R. Larson, and R.H. Singer Single-RNA counting reveals alternative modes of gene expression in yeast Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 15 2008 1263 1271
91. E. Dessaud, A.P. McMahon, and J. Briscoe Pattern formation in the vertebrate neural tube: a sonic hedgehog morphogen-regulated transcriptional network Development 135 2008 2489 2503
92. J.M. Pedraza, and J. Paulsson Effects of molecular memory and bursting on fluctuations in gene expression Science 319 2008 339 343
93. G. Aquino, and R.G. Endres Increased accuracy of ligand sensing by receptor internalization Phys. Rev. E Stat. Nonlin. Soft Matter Phys. 81 2010 021909