Balancing noise and plasticity in eukaryotic gene expression

BMC Genomics

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 2012, Pages

  Bajić, Djordje ^a   Poyatos, Juan F ^a  

^a CENTRO NACIONAL DE BIOTECNOLOGÍA   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; EVOLUTIONARY ADAPTATION; FUNGAL GENE; GENE EXPRESSION; GENE FUNCTION; GENE REPRESSION; NOISE; NONHUMAN; PHENOTYPIC PLASTICITY; PROMOTER REGION; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; TRANSCRIPTION REGULATION;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; CHROMATIN; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENES; HISTONES; NUCLEOSOMES; PROMOTER REGIONS, GENETIC; RNA, MESSENGER; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SPECIES SPECIFICITY; STOCHASTIC PROCESSES;

EUKARYOTA;

EID: 84864206630     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712164     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-13-343     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Enard W, Khaitovich P, Klose J, Zöllner S, Heissig F, Giavalisco P, Nieselt-Struwe K, Muchmore E, Varki A, Ravid R, Doxiadis GM, Bontrop RE, Pääbo S. Intra- and interspecific variation in primate gene expression patterns. Sci (New York, N.Y.) 2002, 296(5566):340-343. [http://www.sciencemag.org/content/296/5566/340.abstract].
2. Fraser HB, Hirsh AE, Giaever G, Kumm J, Eisen MB. Noise minimization in eukaryotic gene expression. PLoS Biol 2004, 2(6):e137. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15124029], 10.1371/journal.pbio.0020137, 400249, 15124029.
3. Newman JRS, Ghaemmaghami S, Ihmels J, Breslow DK, Noble M, DeRisi JL, Weissman JS. Single-cell proteomic analysis of S. cerevisiae reveals the architecture of biological noise. Nat 2006, 441(7095):840-846. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16699522].
4. Tirosh I, Weinberger A, Carmi M, Barkai N. SUPL-A genetic signature of interspecies variations in gene expression. Nat Genet 2006, 38(7):830-834. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16783381], 10.1038/ng1819, 16783381.
5. Blake WJ, Kaern M, Cantor CR, Collins JJ. Noise in eukaryotic gene expression. Nat 2003, 422(6932):633-637. [http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=400249&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract].
6. Landry CR, Lemos B, Rifkin S, Dickinson WJ, Hartl DL. Genetic properties influencing the evolvability of gene expression. Sci(New York, N.Y.) 2007, 317(5834):118-121. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17525304].
7. Lee W, Tillo D, Bray N, Morse RH, Davis RW, Hughes TR, Nislow C. high-resolution atlas of nucleosome occupancy in yeast. Nat Genet 2007, 39(10):1235-1244. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17873876], 10.1038/ng2117, 17873876.
8. Tirosh I, Barkai N. Two strategies for gene regulation by promoter nucleosomes. Genome Res 2008, 18(7):1084-1091. [http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=2493397&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract], 10.1101/gr.076059.108, 2493397, 18448704.
9. Choi JK, Kim YJ. Epigenetic regulation and the variability of gene expression. Nat Genet 2008, 40(2):141-147. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18227874], 10.1038/ng.2007.58, 18227874.
10. Choi JK, Kim YJ. Intrinsic variability of gene expression encoded in nucleosome positioning sequences. Nat Genet 2009, 41(4):498-503. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19252489], 10.1038/ng.319, 19252489.
11. Warner JR. The economics of ribosome biosynthesis in yeast. Trends Biochem Sci 1999, 24(11):437-440. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10542411], 10.1016/S0968-0004(99)01460-7, 10542411.
12. Basehoar AD, Zanton SJ, Pugh BF. Identification and distinct regulation of yeast TATA box-containing genes. Cell 2004, 116(5):699-709. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15006352], 10.1016/S0092-8674(04)00205-3, 15006352.
13. Kim SC, Choi JK. Controlling transcriptional programs for cellular adaptation by chromatin regulation. Mol BioSyst 2011, 7(5):1713-9. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21412562], 10.1039/c0mb00319k, 21412562.
14. Lehner B. Conflict between noise and plasticity in yeast. PLoS Genet 2010, 6(11):e1001185. [http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1001185], 10.1371/journal.pgen.1001185, 2973811, 21079670.
15. Batada NN, Hurst LD. Evolution of chromosome organization driven by selection for reduced gene expression noise. Nat Genet 2007, 39(8):945-949. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17660811], 10.1038/ng2071, 17660811.
16. Wang GZ, Lercher MJ, Hurst LD. Transcriptional coupling of neighboring genes and gene expression noise: evidence that gene orientation and noncoding transcripts are modulators of noise. Genome Biol Evol 2011, 3:320-331. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21402863], 10.1093/gbe/evr025, 21402863.
17. Woo YH, Li WH. Gene clustering pattern, promoter architecture, and gene expression stability in eukaryotic genomes. Proc National Acad Sci U S A 2011, 108(8):3306-3311. [http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=3044413&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract].
18. Steinfeld I, Shamir R, Kupiec M. A genome-wide analysis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae demonstrates the influence of chromatin modifiers on transcription. Nat Genet 2007, 39(3):303-309. 10.1038/ng1965, 17325681.
19. Zenklusen D, Larson DR, Singer RH. Single-RNA counting reveals alternative modes of gene expression in yeast. Nat Struct Mol Biol 2008, 15(12):1263-1271. [http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=3154325&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract], 10.1038/nsmb.1514, 3154325, 19011635.
20. López-Maury L, Marguerat S, Bähler J. Tuning gene expression to changing environments: from rapid responses to evolutionary adaptation. Nat Rev Genet 2008, 9(8):583-593. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18591982].
21. Angus-Hill ML, Schlichter A, Roberts D, Erdjument-Bromage H, Tempst P, Cairns BR. A Rsc3/Rsc30 zinc cluster dimer reveals novel roles for the chromatin remodeler RSC in gene expression and cell cycle control. Mol cell 2001, 7(4):741-751. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11336698], 10.1016/S1097-2765(01)00219-2, 11336698.
22. Huisinga KL, Pugh BF. A genome-wide housekeeping role for TFIID and a highly regulated stress-related role for SAGA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell 2004, 13(4):573-585. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14992726], 10.1016/S1097-2765(04)00087-5, 14992726.
23. Durant M, Pugh BF. Genome-Wide Relationships between TAF1 and Histone Acetyltransferases in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Soc 2006, 26(7):2791-2802.
24. Ozbudak EM, Thattai M, Kurtser I, Grossman AD, van Oudenaarden A. Regulation of noise in the expression of a single gene. Nat Genet 2002, 31:69-73. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11967532], 10.1038/ng869, 11967532.
25. Raser JM, O'Shea EK. Noise in gene expression: origins, consequences, and control. Sci (New York, N.Y.) 2005, 309(5743):2010-2013. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16179466].
26. MacKay VL, Li X, Flory MR, Turcott E, Law GL, Serikawa KA, Xu XL, Lee H, Goodlett DR, Aebersold R, Zhao LP, Morris DR. Gene expression analyzed by high-resolution state array analysis and quantitative proteomics: response of yeast to mating pheromone. Mol Cell Proteomics : MCP 2004, 3(5):478-489. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14766929], 10.1074/mcp.M300129-MCP200, 14766929.
27. Arava Y, Wang Y, Storey JD, Liu CL, Brown PO, Herschlag D. Genome-wide analysis of mRNA translation profiles in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc National Acad Sci U S A 2003, 100(7):3889-3894. [http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=153018&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract].
28. Lackner DH, Beilharz TH, Marguerat S, Mata J, Watt S, Schubert F, Preiss T, Bähler J. A network of multiple regulatory layers shapes gene expression in fission yeast. Mol Cell 2007, 26:145-155. [http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=1885965&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract], 10.1016/j.molcel.2007.03.002, 1885965, 17434133.
29. Warringer J, Blomberg A. Evolutionary constraints on yeast protein size. BMC Evolutionary Biol 2006, 6:61. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16911784].
30. Xu Z, Wei W, Gagneur J, Perocchi F, Clauder-Münster S, Camblong J, Guffanti E, Stutz F, Huber W, Steinmetz LM. Bidirectional promoters generate pervasive transcription in yeast. Nat 2009, 457(7232):1033-1037. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19169243].
31. Golding I, Paulsson J, Zawilski SM, Cox EC. Real-time kinetics of gene activity in individual bacteria. Cell 2005, 123(6):1025-1036. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16360033], 10.1016/j.cell.2005.09.031, 16360033.
32. Lee MV, Topper SE, Hubler SL, Hose J, Wenger CD, Coon JJ, Gasch AP. A dynamic model of proteome changes reveals new roles for transcript alteration in yeast. Mol Syst Biol 2011, 7:514. [http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=3159980&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract], 3159980, 21772262.
33. Raser JM, O'Shea EK. Control of stochasticity in eukaryotic gene expression. Sci (New York, N.Y.) 2004, 304(5678):1811-1814. [http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=1410811&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract].
34. Tirosh I, Berman J, Barkai N. The pattern and evolution of yeast promoter bendability. Trends Genet: TIG 2007, 23(7):318-321. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17418911], 10.1016/j.tig.2007.03.015, 17418911.
35. Holstege FC, Jennings EG, Wyrick JJ, Lee TI, Hengartner CJ, Green MR, Golub TR, Lander ES, Young R. Dissecting the regulatory circuitry of a eukaryotic genome. Cell 1998, 95(5):717-28. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9845373], 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81641-4, 9845373.
36. Wang H, Kakaradov B, Collins SR, Karotki L, Fiedler D, Shales M, Shokat KM, Walther TC, Krogan NJ, Koller D. A complex-based reconstruction of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae interactome. Mol cell Proteomics : MCP 2009, 8(6):1361-1381. [http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=2690481&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract], 10.1074/mcp.M800490-MCP200, 2690481, 19176519.
37. Deutschbauer AM, Jaramillo DF, Proctor M, Kumm J, Hillenmeyer ME, Davis RW, Nislow C, Giaever G. Mechanisms of haploinsufficiency revealed by genome-wide profiling in yeast. Genet 2005, 169(4):1915-1925. [http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=1449596&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract].