Mapping the intramolecular signal transduction of G-protein coupled receptors

Proteins: Structure, Function and Bioinformatics

Volumn 82, Issue 5, 2014, Pages 727-743

  Lee, Yoonji ^a,b   Choi, Sun ^a,b   Hyeon, Changbong ^c  

^a National Leading Research Lab (NLRL) of Molecular Modeling and Drug Design College of Pharmacy Division of Life and Pharmaceutical Sciences   (South Korea)

^b Ewha Womans University   (South Korea)

^c Korea Institute for Advanced Study   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Adenosine receptors; Allostery; Betweenness centrality; GPCR; Network theory

Indexed keywords

ADENOSINE A2 RECEPTOR; G PROTEIN COUPLED RECEPTOR; RHODOPSIN; ADENOSINE A2 RECEPTOR AGONIST; ADENOSINE A2A RECEPTOR;

ALLOSTERISM; ARTICLE; BINDING SITE; CONFORMATIONAL TRANSITION; HUMAN; HYDROGEN BOND; LIGAND BINDING; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; POINT MUTATION; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; ANIMAL; BOVINAE; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CHEMISTRY; METABOLISM; PROTEIN TERTIARY STRUCTURE;

BOVINAE; PYRONIA TITHONUS;

ADENOSINE A2 RECEPTOR AGONISTS; ALLOSTERIC REGULATION; ANIMALS; CATTLE; HUMANS; MODELS, MOLECULAR; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, TERTIARY; RECEPTOR, ADENOSINE A2A; RHODOPSIN; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION;

EID: 84898048030     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: 10970134     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/prot.24451     Document Type: Article

References (77)

1. Rosenbaum D, Rasmussen S, Kobilka B. The structure and function of G-protein-coupled receptors. Nature 2009;459:356-363.
2. Jensen A, Spalding T. Allosteric modulation of G-protein coupled receptors. Eur J Pharm Sci 2004;21:407-420.
3. Wess J. G-protein-coupled receptors: molecular mechanisms involved in receptor activation and selectivity of G-protein recognition. FASEB J 1997;11:346-354.
4. Kjelsberg M, Cotecchia S, Ostrowski J, Caron M, Lefkowitz R. Constitutive activation of the alpha 1B-adrenergic receptor by all amino acid substitutions at a single site. Evidence for a region which constrains receptor activation. J Biol Chem 1992;267:1430-1433.
5. Bond RA, Ijzerman AP. Recent developments in constitutive receptor activity and inverse agonism, and their potential for GPCR drug discovery. Trends Pharmacol Sci 2006;27:92-96.
6. Yun CH, Mengwasser KE, Toms AV, Woo MS, Greulich H, Wong KK, Meyerson M, Eck MJ. The T790M mutation in EGFR kinase causes drug resistance by increasing the affinity for ATP. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2008;105:2070-2075.
7. Yonath A. Antibiotics targeting ribosomes: Resistance, selectivity, synergism, and cellular regulation. Annu Rev Biochem 2005;74:649-679.
8. Galzi JL, Changeux JP. Neurotransmitter-gated ion channels as unconventional allosteric proteins. Curr Opin Struct Biol 1994;4:554-565.
9. Changeux JP. Allostery and the Monod-Wyman-Changeux model after 50 years. Annu Rev Biophys 2012;41:103-133.
10. Liu W, Chun E, Thompson A, Chubukov P, Xu F, Katritch V, Han G, Roth C, Heitman L, IJzerman A, Cherezov V, Stevens R. Structural basis for allosteric regulation of GPCRs by sodium ions. Science 2012;337:232-236.
11. Lockless SW, Ranganathan R. Evolutionarily conserved pathways of energetic connectivity in protein families. Science 1999;286:295-299.
12. Süel G, Lockless S, Wall M, Ranganathan R. Evolutionarily conserved networks of residues mediate allosteric communication in proteins. Nat Struct Mol Biol 2002;10:59-69.
13. Dima RI, Thirumalai D. Determination of network of residues that regulate allostery in protein families using sequence analysis. Protein Sci 2006;15:258-268.
14. Morcos F, Pagnani A, Lunt B, Bertolino A, Marks D, Sander C, Zecchina R, Onuchic J, Hwa T, Weigt M. Direct-coupling analysis of residue coevolution captures native contacts across many protein families. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2011;108:E1293-E1301.
15. Zheng W, Brooks BR, Doniach S, Thirumalai D. Network of dynamically important residues in the open/closed transition in polymerases is strongly conserved. Structure 2005;13:565-577.
16. Zheng W, Brooks BR, Thirumalai D. Low-frequency normal modes that describe allosteric transitions in biological nanomachines are robust to sequence variations. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2006;103:7664-7669.
17. Chennubhotla C, Bahar I. Markov propagation of allosteric effects in biomolecular systems: Application to GroEL-GroES. Mol Syst Biol 2006;2:msb4100075.
18. Balabin I, Yang W, Beratan D. Coarse-grained modeling of allosteric regulation in protein receptors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2009;106:14253-14258.
19. Lee Y, Jeong LS, Choi S, Hyeon C. Link between allosteric signal transduction and functional dynamics in a multisubunit enzyme: S-adenosylhomocysteine hydrolase. J Am Chem Soc 2011;133:19807-19815.
20. Nygaard R, Frimurer T, Holst B, Rosenkilde M, Schwartz T. Ligand binding and micro-switches in 7TM receptor structures. Trends Pharmacol Sci 2009;30:249-259.
21. Freeman L. Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification. Soc Networks 1979;1:215-239.
22. Newman M. A measure of betweenness centrality based on random walks. Soc Networks 2005;27:39-54.
23. Jeong H, Mason SP, Barabasi A-L, Oltvai ZN. Lethality and centrality in protein networks. Nature 2001;411:41-42.
24. Del Sol A, Fujihashi H, Amoros D, Nussinov R. Residues crucial for maintaining short paths in network communication mediate signaling in proteins. Mol Sys Biol 2006;2:2006.0019.
25. Edgar R. MUSCLE: A multiple sequence alignment method with reduced time and space complexity. BMC Bioinformatics 2004;5:113.
26. Xu F, Wu H, Katritch V, Han G, Jacobson K, Gao Z, Cherezov V, Stevens R. Structure of an agonist-bound human A2A adenosine receptor. Science 2011;332:322.
27. Jaakola V, Griffith M, Hanson M, Cherezov V, Chien E, Lane J, IJzerman A, Stevens R. The 2.6 angstrom crystal structure of a human A2A adenosine receptor bound to an antagonist. Science 2008;322:1211-1217.
28. Deupi X, Standfuss J. Structural insights into agonist-induced activation of G-protein-coupled receptors. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2011;21:541-551.
29. Lebon G, Warne T, Edwards P, Bennett K, Langmead C, Leslie A, Tate C. Agonist-bound adenosine A2A receptor structures reveal common features of GPCR activation. Nature 2011;474:521-525.
30. Buck M, Bouguet-Bonnet S, Pastor RW, MacKerell AD, Jr. Importance of the CMAP correction to the CHARMM22 protein force field: dynamics of hen lysozyme. Biophys J 2006;90:L36-L38.
31. da Silveira C, Pires D, Minardi R, Ribeiro C, Veloso C, Lopes J, Meira W, Jr Neshich G, Ramos C, Habesch R, Marcelo M. Protein cutoff scanning: A comparative analysis of cutoff dependent and cutoff free methods for prospecting contacts in proteins. Proteins 2009;74:727-743.
32. Watts DJ, Strogatz SH. Collective dynamics of 'small-world' netoworks. Nature 1998;393:440-442.
33. Albert R, Jeong H, Barabási A. Error and attack tolerance of complex networks. Nature 2000;406:378-382.
34. Jeong H, Tombor B, Albert R, Oltvai Z, Barabási A. The large-scale organization of metabolic networks. Nature 2000;407:651-654.
35. Balazsi G, Barabási A, Oltvai Z. Topological units of environmental signal processing in the transcriptional regulatory network of Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005;102:7841-7846.
36. Vendruscolo M, Dokholyan N, Paci E, Karplus M. Small-world view of the amino acids that play a key role in protein folding. Phys Rev E 2002;65:061910.
37. Atilgan A, Akan P, Baysal C. Small-world communication of residues and significance for protein dynamics. Biophys J 2004;86:85-91.
38. Greene L, Higman V. Uncovering network systems within protein structures. J Mol Biol 2003;334:781-791.
39. Amitai G, Shemesh A, Sitbon E, Shklar M, Netanely D, Venger I, Pietrokovski S. Network analysis of protein structures identifies functional residues. J Mol Biol 2004;344:1135-1146.
40. Bagler G, Sinha S. Assortative mixing in Protein Contact Networks and protein folding kinetics. Bioinformatics 2007;23:1760-1767.
41. Brinda K, Vishveshwara S. A network representation of protein structures: implications for protein stability. Biophys J 2005;89:4159-4170.
42. Dokholyan N, Li L, Ding F, Shakhnovich E. Topological determinants of protein folding. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2002;99:8637.
43. Sethi A, Eargle J, Black AA, Luthey-Schulten Z. Dynamical networks in tRNA:protein complexes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2009;106:6620-6625.
44. Yao X-Q, Grant BJ. Domain-opening and dynamic coupling in the¡ i¿ α¡/i¿-subunit of heterotrimeric G proteins. Biophys J. 2013;105:L08-L10.
45. Miao Y, Nichols SE, Gasper PM, Metzger VT, McCammon JA. Activation and dynamic network of the M2 muscarinic receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2013;110:10982-10987.
46. Dijkstra EW. A note on two problems in connection with graphs. Numerische Math 1959;1:269-271.
47. Brandes U. A faster algorithm for betweenness centrality. J Math Soc 2001;25:163-177.
48. Atilgan AR, Turgut D, Atilgan C. Screened nonbonded interactions in native proteins manipulate optimal paths for robust residue communication. Biophys J 2007;92:3052-3062.
49. Park K, Kim D. Modeling allosteric signal propagation using protein structure networks. BMC Bioinformatics 2011;12(Suppl 1):S23.
50. Daily MD, Gray JJ. Allosteric communication occurs via networks of tertiary and quaternary motions in proteins. PLoS Comput Biol 2009;5:e1000293.
51. 2 adrenergic receptor-Gs protein complex. Nature 2011;477:549-555.
52. Katritch V, Cherezov V, Stevens RC. Structure-function of the G protein-coupled receptor superfamily. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 2013;53:531-556.
53. Hofmann K, Scheerer P, Hildebrand P, Choe H, Park J, Heck M, Ernst O. AG protein-coupled receptor at work: The rhodopsin model. Trends Biochem Sci 2009;34:540-552.
54. Suwa M, Sugihara M, Ono Y. Functional and structural overview of G-protein-coupled receptors comprehensively obtained from genome sequences. Pharmaceuticals 2011;4:652-664.
55. Ballesteros J, Weinstein H. Integrated methods for modeling G-protein coupled receptors. Methods Neurosci 1995;25:366-428.
56. Trzaskowski B, Latek D, Yuan S, Ghoshdastider U, Debinski A, Filipek S. Action of molecular switches in GPCRs-Theoretical and experimental studies. Curr Med Chem 2012;19(8):1090-1109.
57. 2A adenosine receptor and its agonists. Chem Biol 2005;12:237-247.
58. Kim S, Gao Z, Van Rompaey P, Gross A, Chen A, Van Calenbergh S, Jacobson K. Modeling the adenosine receptors: comparison of the binding domains of A2A agonists and antagonists. J Med Chem 2003;46:4847-4859.
59. Horn F, Bettler E, Oliveira L, Campagne F, Cohen F, Vriend G. GPCRDB information system for G protein-coupled receptors. Nucleic Acids Res 2003;31:294-297.
60. Angel TE, Gupta S, Jastrzebska B, Palczewski K, Chance MR. Structural waters define a functional channel mediating activation of the GPCR, rhodopsin. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2009;106:14367-14372.
61. Halabi N, Rivoire O, Leibler S, Ranganathan R. Protein sectors: evolutionary units of three-dimensional structure. Cell 2009;138:774-786.
62. McLaughlin RN, Poelwijk FJ, Raman A, Gosal WS, Ranganathan R. The spatial architecture of protein function and adaptation. Nature 2012;138:138-142.
63. Shi L, Liapakis G, Xu R, Guarnieri F, Ballesteros J, Javitch J. β2 adrenergic receptor activation. J Biol Chem 2002;277:40989-40996.
64. Fritze O, Filipek S, Kuksa V, Palczewski K, Hofmann K, Ernst O. Role of the conserved NPxxY (x) 5, 6F motif in the rhodopsin ground state and during activation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2003;100:2290.
65. Katritch V, Cherezov V, Stevens R. Diversity and modularity of G protein-coupled receptor structures. Trends Pharmacol Sci 2011;33:17-27.
66. Rosenkilde MM, Benned-Jensen T, Frimurer TM, Schwartz TW. The minor binding pocket: A major player in 7TM receptor activation. Trends Pharmacol Sci 2010;31:567-574.
67. del Sol A, Tsai C-J, Ma B, Nussinov R. The origin of allosteric functional modulation: multiple pre-existing pathways. Structure 2009;17:1042-1050.
68. Cui Q, Karplus M. Allostery and cooperativity revisited. Protein Sci 2008;17:1295-1307.
69. Onuchic JN, Luthey-Schulten Z, Wolynes PG. Theory of protein folding: The energy landscape perspective. Ann Rev Phys Chem 1997;48:539-600.
70. Alm E, Baker D. Prediction of protein-folding mechanisms from free-energy landscapes derived from native structures. Proc Natl Acad Sci 1999;96:11305-11310.
71. Klimov DK, Thirumalai D. Native topology determines force-induced unfolding pathways in globular proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2000;97:7254-7259.
72. Ferrara P, Caflisch A. Native topology or specific interactions: What is more important for protein folding? J Mol Biol 2001;306:837-850.
73. Swain J, Gierasch L. The changing landscape of protein allostery. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2006;16:102-108.
74. Goodey N, Benkovic S. Allosteric regulation and catalysis emerge via a common route. Nat Chem Biol 2008;4:474-482.
75. Hardy J, Wells J. Searching for new allosteric sites in enzymes. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2004;14:706-715.
76. Hyeon C, Lorimer GH, Thirumalai D. Dynamics of allosteric transition in GroEL. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2006;103:18939-18944.
77. Hyeon C, Onuchic JN. A structural perspective on the dynamics of Kinesin motors. Biophys J 2011;101:2749-2759.