Small-World Communication of Residues and Significance for Protein Dynamics

Biophysical Journal

Volumn 86, Issue 1 I, 2004, Pages 85-91

  Atilgan, Ali Rana ^a   Akan, Pelin ^b   Baysal, Canan ^b  

^a BOGAZICI UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b SABANCI UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; MOLECULAR SIZE; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN LOCALIZATION; PROTEIN STABILITY;

EID: 0346057951     PISSN: 00063495     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0006-3495(04)74086-2     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Amaral, L. A. N., A. Scala, M. Barthelemy, and H. E. Stanley, 2000. Classes of small-world networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 97:11149-11152.
2. Ansari, A., J. Berendzen, S. F. Bowne, H. Frauenfelder, I. E. T. Iben, T. B. Sauke, E. Shyamsunder, and R. D. Young. 1985. Protein states and protein quakes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 82:5000-5004.
3. Atilgan, A. R., S. R. Durell, R. L. Jemigan, M. C. Demirel, O. Keskin, and I. Bahar. 2001. Anisotropy of fluctuation dynamics of proteins with an elastic network model. Biophys. J. 80:505-515.
4. Baase, W. A., N. C. Gassner, X.-J. Zhang, R. Kuroki, L. H. Weaver, D. E. Tronrud, and B. W. Matthews. 1999. How much sequence variation can the functions of biological molecules tolerate? In Simplicity and Complexity in Proteins and Nucleic Acid. H. Frauenfelder, J. Deisenhofer, and P. G. Wolynes, editors. Dahlem University Press, Berlin, Germany.
5. Bagci, Z., R. L. Jernigan, and I. Bahar. 2002. Residue packing in proteins: uniform distribution on a coarse-grained scale. J. Chem. Phys. 116:2269-2276.
6. Bahar, I., A. R. Atilgan, M. C. Demirel, and B. Erman. 1998a. Vibrational dynamics of folded proteins: significance of slow and fast modes in relation to function and stability. Phys. Rev. Lett. 80:2733-2736.
7. Bahar, I., A. R. Atilgan, and B. Erman. 1997. Direct evaluation of thermal fluctuations in proteins using a single parameter harmonic potential. Fold. Des. 2:173-181.
8. Bahar, I., B. Erman, R. L. Jernigan, A. R. Atilgan, and D. G. Covell. 1999. Collective dynamics of Hiv-1 reverse transcriptase: examination of flexibility and enzyme function. J. Mol. Biol. 285:1023-1037.
9. Bahar, I., A. Wallqvist, D. G. Covell, and R. L. Jernigan. 1998b. Correlation between native-state hydrogen exchange and cooperative residue fluctuations from a simple model. Biochemistry. 37:1067-1075.
10. Baysal, C., and A. R. Atilgan. 2001a. Coordination topology and stability for the native and binding conformers of chymotrypsin inhibitor 2. Proteins. 45:62-70.
11. Baysal, C., and A. R. Atilgan. 2001b. Elucidating the structural mechanisms for biological activity of the chemokine family. Proteins. 43:150-160.
12. Baysal, C., and A. R, Atilgan. 2002. Relaxation kinetics and the glassiness of proteins: the case of bovine pancreatic trypsin inhibitor. Biophys. J. 83:699-705.
13. Berman, H. M., J. Westbrook, Z. Feng, G. Gilliland. T. N. Bhat, H. Weissig, I. N. Shindyalov, and P. E. Bourne. 2000. The protein data bank. Nucleic Acids Res. 28:235-242.
14. Carlson, J. M., and J. Doyle. 2000. Highly optimized tolerance: robustness and design in complex systems. Phys. Rev. Lett. 84:2529-2532.
15. Chakravarty, S., and R. Varadarajan. 1999. Residue depth: a novel parameter for the analysis of protein structure and stability. Structure. 7:723-732.
16. Davidsen, J., H. Ebel, and S. Bornholdt. 2002. Emergence of a small world from local interactions: modeling acquaintance networks. Phys. Rev. Lett. 88:128701.
17. de Prat Gay, G., J. Ruiz-Sanz, J. L. Neira, F. J. Corrales, D. E. Otzen, A. G. Ladurner, and A. R. Fersht. 1995. Conformational pathway of the polypeptide chain of chymotrypsin inhibitor-2 growing from its n terminus in vitro. Parallels with the protein folding pathway. J. Mol. Biol. 254:968-979.
18. Dokholyan, N. V., L. Li, F. Ding, and E. I. Shakhnovich. 2002. Topological determinants of protein folding. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 99:8637-8641.
19. Fariselli, P., and R. Casadio. 1999. A neural network based predictor of residue contacts in proteins. Protein Eng, 12:15-21.
20. Fersht, A. R. 2000. Transition-state structure as a unifying basis in protein folding mechanisms: contact order, chain topology, stability, and the extended nucleus mechanism. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 97:1525-1529.
21. Jeong, H., S. P. Mason, A.-L. Barabasi, and Z. N. Oltvai. 2001. Lethality and centrality in protein networks. Nature. 411:41-42.
22. Keskin, O., S. R. Durell, I. Bahar, R. L. Jernigan, and D. G. Covell. 2002. Relating molecular flexibility to function: a case study of tubulin. Biophys. J. 83:663-680.
23. Kriegl, J. M., K. Nienhaus, P. Deng, J. Fuchs, and G. U. Nienhaus. 2003. Ligand dynamics in a protein internal cavity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 100:7069-7074.
24. Kumar, S., B. Ma, C.-J. Tsai, N. Sinha, and R. Nussinov. 2000. Folding and binding cascades: dynamic landscapes and population shifts. Protein Sci. 9:10-19.
25. Liang, J., and K. A. Dill. 2001. Are proteins well packed? Biophys. J. 81:751-766.
26. McPhalen, C. A., I. Svendsen, I. Jonassen, and M. N. G. James. 1985. Crystal and molecular structure of chymotrypsin inhibitor 2 from barley seeds in complex with subtilisin novo. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 82:7242-7246.
27. Ming, D., Y. Kong, Y. Wu, and J. Ma. 2003. Substructure synthesis method for simulation large molecular complexes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 100:104-109.
28. Miyazawa, S., and R. L. Jernigan. 1996. Residue-residue potentials with a favorable contact pair term and an unfavorable high packing density term, for simulation and threading. J. Mol. Biol. 256:623-644.
29. Newman, M. E. J. 2000. Models of the small world. J. Stat. Phys. 101:819-841.
30. Newman, M. E. J., M. Girvan, and J. D. Farmer. 2002. Optimal design, robustness, and risk aversion. Phys. Rev. Lett. 89:028301.
31. Newman, M. E. J., S. H. Strogatz, and D. J. Watts. 2001. Random graphs with arbitrary degree distributions and their applications. Phys. Rev. E 64:026118.
32. Pal, S. K., J. Peon, and A. H. Zewail. 2002. Biological water at the protein surface: dynamical solvation probed directly with femtosecond resolution. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 99:1763-1768.
33. Raghunathan, G., and R. Jernigan. 1997. Ideal architecture of residue packing and its observation in protein structures. Protein Sci. 6:2072-2083.
34. Soyer, A., J. Chomilier, J.-P. Mornon, R. Jullien, and J.-F. Sadoc. 2000. Voronoi tessellation reveals the condensed matter character of folded proteins. Phys. Rev. Lett. 85:3532-3535.
35. Strogatz, S. H. 2001. Exploring complex networks. Nature. 410:268-276.
36. Tsai, A. M., D. A. Neumann, and L. N. Bell. 2000. Molecular dynamics of solid-state lysozyme as affected by glycerol and water: a neutron scattering study. Biophys. J. 79:2728-2732.
37. Tsai, C.-J., P. P. de Laureto, A. Fontana, and R. Nussinov. 2002. Comparison of protein fragments identified by limited proteolysis and by computational cutting of proteins. Protein Sci. 11:1753-1770.
38. Tsai, C.-J., B. Ma, and R. Nussinov. 1999. Folding and binding cascades: shifts in energy landscapes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 96:9970-9972.
39. Vendruscolo, M., N. V. Dokholyan, E. Paci, and M. Karplus. 2002. Small-world view of the amino acids that play a key role in protein folding. Phys. Rev. E 65:061910.
40. Watts, D. J. 1999. Small Worlds. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
41. Watts, D. J., and S. H. Strogatz. 1998. Collective dynamics of "small-world" networks. Nature. 393:440-442.
42. Woodcock, L. V. 1997. Entropy difference between the face-centered cubic and hexagonal close-packed structures. Nature. 385:141-143.
43. Yilmaz, L. S., and A. R. Atilgan. 2000. Identifying the adaptive mechanism in globular proteins: fluctuations in densely packed regions manipulate flexible parts. J. Chem. Phys. 113:4454-4464.
44. Zaccai, G. 2000. How soft is a protein? A protein dynamics force constant measured by neutron scattering. Science. 288:1604-1607.