Intra- and post-operative accuracy assessments of two different patient-specific instrumentation systems for total knee replacement

Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy

Volumn 22, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 621-629

  Ensini, Andrea ^a   Timoncini, Antonio ^a   Cenni, Francesco ^a   Belvedere, Claudio ^a   Fusai, Francesca ^a   Leardini, Alberto ^a   Giannini, Sandro ^a  

^a RIZZOLI ORTHOPAEDIC INSTITUTE   (Italy)

Author keywords

Patient specific instrumentation; Radiograph measurements; Surgical navigation system; Total knee replacement

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; EQUIPMENT; FEMUR; HUMAN; INTRAOPERATIVE PERIOD; KNEE; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS; KNEE PROSTHESIS; METHODOLOGY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; RADIOGRAPHY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; TIBIA; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; FEMUR; HUMANS; INTRAOPERATIVE PERIOD; KNEE JOINT; KNEE PROSTHESIS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; OSTEOARTHRITIS, KNEE; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; TIBIA; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84893966138     PISSN: 09422056     EISSN: 14337347     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00167-013-2667-9     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Bae DK, Song SJ (2011) Computer assisted navigation in knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Surg 3: 259-267.
2. Bae DK, Song SJ, Yoon KH, Noh JH, Lee CH (2012) Intraoperative assessment of resected condyle thickness in total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20(10): 2039-2046.
3. Bali K, Walker P, Bruce W (2012) Custom-fit total knee arthroplasty: our initial experience in 32 knees. J Arthroplasty 27: 1149-1154.
4. Bäthis H, Shafizadeh S, Paffrath T, Simanski C, Grifka J, Lüring C (2006) Are computer assisted total knee replacements more accurately placed? A meta-analysis of comparative studies. Orthopade 35: 1056-1065.
5. Belvedere C, Ensini A, Leardini A, Bianchi L, Catani F, Giannini S (2007) Alignment of resection planes in total knee replacement obtained with the conventional technique, as assessed by a modern computer-based navigation system. Int J Med Robot 3: 117-124.
6. Blakeney WG, Khan RJ, Wall SJ (2011) Computer-assisted techniques versus conventional guides for component alignment in total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 93: 1377-1389.
7. Bonner TJ, Eardley WG, Patterson P, Gregg PJ (2011) The effect of post-operative mechanical axis alignment on the survival of primary total knee replacements after a follow-up of 15 years. J Bone Joint Surg Br 93: 1217-1222.
8. Burnett RS, Barrack RL (2013) Computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty is currently of no proven clinical benefit: a systematic review. Clin Orthop Relat Res 471: 264-276.
9. Chan KY, Teo YH (2012) Patient-specific instrumentation for total knee replacement verified by computer navigation: a case report. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 20: 111-114.
10. Chin PL, Yang KY, Yeo SJ, Lo NN (2005) Randomized control trial comparing radiographic total knee arthroplasty implant placement using computer navigation versus conventional technique. J Arthroplasty 20: 618-626.
11. Conteduca F, Iorio R, Mazza D, Caperna L, Bolle G, Argento G, Ferretti A (2012) Are MRI-based, patient matched cutting jigs as accurate as the tibial guides? Int Orthop 36: 1589-1593.
12. Conteduca F, Iorio R, Mazza D, Caperna L, Bolle G, Argento G, Ferretti A (2012) Evaluation of the accuracy of a patient-specific instrumentation by navigation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. doi: 10. 1007/s00167-012-2098-z.
13. Ensini A, Catani F, Leardini A, Romagnoli M, Giannini S (2007) Alignments and clinical results in conventional and navigated total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 457: 156-162.
14. Seo SS, Seo JH, Sohn MW, Kim YJ (2012) Differences in measurement of lower limb alignment among different registration methods of navigation and radiographs in TKA using the OrthoPilot system. Orthopedics 35(10 Suppl): 50-55.
15. Fu Y, Wang M, Liu Y, Fu Q (2012) Alignment outcomes in navigated total knee arthroplasty: a metaanalysis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20(6): 1075-1082.
16. Hernández-Vaquero D, Suarez-Vazquez A, Iglesias-Fernandez S (2011) Can computer assistance improve the clinical and functional scores in total knee arthroplasty? Clin Orthop Relat Res 469: 3436-3442.
17. Hernández-Vaquero D, Suarez-Vazquez A, Sandoval-Garcia MA, Noriega-Fernandez A (2010) Computer assistance increases precision of component placement in total knee arthroplasty with articular deformity. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468: 1237-1241.
18. Hetaimish BM, Khan MM, Simunovic N, Al-Harbi HH, Bhandari M, Zalzal PK (2012) Meta-analysis of navigation vs conventional total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 27(6): 1177-1182.
19. Hoffart HE, Langenstein E, Vasak N (2012) A prospective study comparing the functional outcome of computer-assisted and conventional total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 94: 194-199.
20. Iorio R, Bolle G, Conteduca F, Valeo L, Conteduca J, Mazza D, Ferretti A (2012) Accuracy of manual instrumentation of tibial cutting guide in total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. doi: 10. 1007/s00167-012-2005-7.
21. Kim YH, Park JW, Kim JS (2012) Computer-navigated versus conventional total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 94: 2017-2024.
22. Klatt BA, Goyal N, Austin MS et al (2008) Custom-fit total knee arthroplasty (OtisKnee) results in malalignment. J Arthroplasty 23(11): 26-29.
23. Krackow KA, Phillips MJ, Bayers-Thering M, Serpe L, Mihalko WM (2003) Computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty: navigation in TKA. Orthopedics 26(10): 1017-1023.
24. Lombardi AV Jr, Berend KR, Ng VY (2011) Neutral mechanical alignment: a requirement for successful TKA: affirms. Orthopedics 34(9): 504-506.
25. Lundblad H, Kreicbergs A, Söderlund V, Ulfgren AK, Stiller CO, Jansson KA (2012) The value of preoperative grade of radiographic and histological changes in predicting pain relief after total knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20(9): 1815-1821.
26. Lüring C, Bäthis H, Tingart M, Perlick L, Grifka J (2006) Computer assistance in total knee replacement-a critical assessment of current health care technology. Comput Aided Surg 11(2): 77-80.
27. Lustig S, Scholes CJ, Oussedik SI, Kinzel V, Coolican MR, Parker DA (2012) Unsatisfactory accuracy as determined by computer navigation of VISIONAIRE patient-specific instrumentation for total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 29(3): 469-473.
28. Lützner J, Günther KP, Kirschner S (2010) Functional outcome after computer-assisted versus conventional total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 18(10): 1339-1344.
29. Magnussen RA, Weppe F, Demey G, Servien E, Lustig S (2011) Residual varus alignment does not compromise results of TKAs in patients with preoperative varus. Clin Orthop Relat Res 469: 3443-3450.
30. Mason JB, Fehring TK, Estok R, Banel D, Fahrbach TK (2007) Meta-analysis of alignment outcomes in computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty surgery. J Arthroplasty 22(8): 1097-1106.
31. Matsumoto T, Kubo S, Muratsu H, Tsumura N, Ishida K, Matsushita T, Takayama K, Sasaki H, Oka S, Kurosaka M, Kuroda R (2011) Differing prosthetic alignment and femoral component sizing between 2 computer-assisted CT-free navigation systems in TKA. Orthopedics 34(12): 860-865.
32. Mehrotra C, Remington PL, Naimi TS, Washington W, Miller R (2005) Trends in total knee replacement surgeries and implications for public health, 1990-2000. Public Health Rep 120(3): 278-282.
33. Moon YW, Ha CW, Do KH, Kim CY, Han JH, Na SE, Lee CH, Kim JG, Park YS (2012) Comparison of robot-assisted and conventional total knee arthroplasty: a controlled cadaver study using multiparameter quantitative three-dimensional CT assessment of alignment. Comput Aided Surg 17(2): 86-95.
34. Ng VY, DeClaire JH, Berend KR, Gulick BC, Lombardi AV Jr (2012) Improved accuracy of alignment with patient-specific positioning guides compared with manual instrumentation in TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res 470: 99-107.
35. Noble JW Jr, Moore CA, Liu N (2012) The value of patient-matched instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 27(1): 153-155.
36. Nogler M, Hozack W, Collopy D, Mayr E, Deirmengian G, Sekyra K (2012) Alignment for total knee replacement: a comparison of kinematic axis versus mechanical axis techniques. A cadaver study. Int Orthop 36(11): 2249-2253.
37. Nunley RM, Ellison BS, Ruh EL, Williams BM, Foreman K, Ford AD, Barrack RL (2012) Are patient specific cutting blocks cost-effective for total knee arthroplasty? Clin Orthop Relat Res 470: 889-894.
38. Nunley RM, Ellison BS, Zhu J, Ruh EL, Howell SM, Barrack RL (2012) Do patient-specific guides improve coronal alignment in total knee arthroplasty? Clin Orthop Relat Res 470: 895-902.
39. Oswald MH, Jakob RP, Schneider E, Hoogewoud HM (1993) Radiological analysis of normal axial alignment of femur and tibia in view of total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 8(4): 419-426.
40. Seo JG, Moon YW, Park SH, Shim JW, Kim SM (2012) An alternative method to create extramedullary references in total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20(7): 1339-1348.
41. Song EK, Seon JK, Yim JH, Netravali NA, Bargar WL (2012) Robotic-assisted TKA reduces postoperative alignment outliers and improves gap balance compared to conventional TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res 470: 118-126.
42. Spencer JM, Chauhan SK, Sloan K, Taylor A, Beaver RJ (2007) Computer navigation versus conventional total knee replacement: no difference in functional results at two years. J Bone Joint Surg Br 89: 477-480.
43. Spencer BA, Mont MA, McGrath MS, Boyd B, Mitrick MF (2009) Initial experience with custom-fit total knee replacement: intra-operative events and long-leg coronal alignment. Int Orthop 33(6): 1571-1575.
44. Stulberg SD (2003) How accurate is current TKR instrumentation? Clin Orthop Relat Res 416: 177-184.
45. Stulberg SD, Loan P, Sarin V (2002) Computer-assisted navigation in total knee replacement: results of an initial experience in thirty-five patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84-A(Suppl 2): 90-98.
46. Tibesku CO, Innocenti B, Wong P, Salehi A, Labey L (2012) Can CT-based patient-matched instrumentation achieve consistent rotational alignment in knee arthroplasty? Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 132(2): 171-177.
47. van der Linden-van der Zwaag HM, Bos J, van der Heide HJ, Nelissen RG (2011) A computed tomography based study on rotational alignment accuracy of the femoral component in total knee arthroplasty using computer-assisted orthopaedic surgery. Int Orthop 35(6): 845-850.
48. Victor J (2009) Rotational alignment of the distal femur: a literature review. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 95(5): 365-372.
49. Victor J, Hoste D (2004) Image-based computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty leads to lower variability in coronal alignment. Clin Orthop Relat Res 428: 131-139.
50. Zhang XL, Zhang W, Shao JJ (2012) Rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty: nonimage-based navigation system versus conventional technique. Chin Med J (Engl) 125(2): 236-243.