A prospective study comparing the functional outcome of computer-assisted and conventional total knee replacement

Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - Series B

Volumn 94 B, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 194-199

  Hoffart, H E ^a,b   Langenstein, E ^a,c   Vasak, N ^a,d  

^a Kreiskrankenhaus ^*  (Germany)

^b Kreisklinik Jugenheim   (Germany)

^c Asklepios Hirschpark Klinik Alsbach Hähnlein   (Germany)

^d ASKLEPIOS HOSPITAL BARMBEK   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANEMIA; ARTICLE; BLEEDING; BONE MALFORMATION; CALCIFICATION; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; CONFUSION; DEEP VEIN THROMBOSIS; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HEART ARRHYTHMIA; HEMATOMA; HEMIPARESIS; HUMAN; INFECTION; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KNEE SOCIETY SCORE; LUNG EMBOLISM; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL INSTRUMENTATION; OSTEOLYSIS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; SCORING SYSTEM; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; WOUND HEALING IMPAIRMENT;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; BONE MALALIGNMENT; FEMALE; HUMANS; KNEE JOINT; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOARTHRITIS, KNEE; PAIN, POSTOPERATIVE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84856898766     PISSN: 0301620X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.94B2.27454     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Kim KK, Heo YM, Won YY, Lee WS. Navigation-assisted total knee arthroplasty for the knee retaining femoral intramedullary nail, and distal femoral plate and screws. Clin Orthop Surg 2011;3:77-80.
2. Longstaff LM, Sloan K, Stamp N, Scaddan M, Beaver R. Good alignment after total knee arthroplasty leads to faster rehabilitation and better function. J Arthroplasty 2009;24:570-578.
3. Cheng T, Zhang G, Zhang X. Clinical and radiographic outcomes of image-based computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty: an evidence-based evaluation. Surg Innov 2011;18:15-20.
4. Lützner J, Krummenauer F, Wolf C, Günther KP, Kirschner S. Computer-assisted and conventional total knee replacement: a comparative, prospective, randomised study with radiological and CT evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2008;90-B:1039-1044.
5. Peterlein CD, Schofer MD, Fuchs-Winkelmann S, Scherf FG. Clinical outcome and quality of life after computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty: results from a prospective, single-surgeon study and review of the literature. Chir Organi Mov 2009;93:115-122.
6. Insall JN, Dorr LD, Scott RD, Scott WN. Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop 1989;248:13-14. (Pubitemid 20204775)
7. Ewald FC. The Knee Society total knee arthroplasty roentgenographic evaluation and scoring system. Clin Orthop 1989;248:9-12. (Pubitemid 20204774)
8. Mahaluxmivala J, Bankes MJ, Nicolai P, Aldam CH, Allen PW. The effect of surgeon experience on component positioning in 673 Press Fit Condylar posterior cruciate- sacrificing total knee arthroplasties. J Arthroplasty 2001;16:635-640. (Pubitemid 32751451)
9. Moreland JR. Mechanisms of failure in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 198;226:49-64.
10. Chin PL, Yang KY, Yeo SJ, Lo NN. Randomized control trial comparing radiographic total knee arthroplasty implant placement using computer navigation versus conventional technique. J Arthroplasty 2005;20:618-626. (Pubitemid 41073476)
11. Rand JA, Coventry MB. Ten-year evaluation of geometric total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 1988;232:168-173.
12. Ritter MA, Faris PM, Keating EM, Meding JB. Postoperative alignment of total knee replacement: its effect on survival. Clin Orthop 1994;299:153-156. (Pubitemid 24051713)
13. Stevens F, Conditt MA, Kulkarni N, et al. Minimizing electromagnetic interference from surgical instruments on electromagnetic surgical navigation. Clin Orthop 2010;468:2244-2250.
14. Lenth R. Some practical guidelines for effective sample size determination. Am Stat 2001;55:187-193.
15. Verbeke G, Molenberghs G. Linear mixed models for longitudinal data. New York: Springer, 2000:31-34.
16. Choong PF, Dowsey MM, Stoney JD. Does accurate anatomical alignment result in better function and quality of life? Comparing conventional and computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2009;24:560-569.
17. Hernández-Vaquero D, Suarez-Vazquez A, Sandoval-Garcia MA, Noriega- Fernandez A. Computer assistance increases precision of component placement in total knee arthroplasty with articular deformity. Clin Orthop 2010;468:1237-1241.
18. Babazadeh S, Dowsey MM, Swan JD, Stoney JD, Choong PF. Joint line position correlates with function after primary total knee replacement: a randomised controlled trial comparing conventional and computer-assisted surgery. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2011;93-B:1223-1231.
19. Mason JB, Fehring TK, Estok R, Banel D, Fahrbach K. Meta-analysis of alignment outcomes in computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty surgery. J Arthroplasty 2007;22:1097-1106. (Pubitemid 350216994)
20. Brin YS, Nikolaou VS, Joseph L, Zukor DJ, Antoniou J. Imageless computer assisted versus conventional total knee replacement: a Bayesian meta-analysis of 23 comparative studies. Int Orthop 2011;35:331-339.
21. Bauwens K, Matthes G, Wich M, et al. Navigated total knee replacement: a meta-analysis. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2007;89-A:261-269. (Pubitemid 46214342)
22. Matziolis G, Krocker D, Weiss U, Tohtz S, Perka C. A prospective, randomized study of computer-assisted and conventional total knee arthroplasty: three-dimensional evaluation of implant alignment and rotation. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2007;89- A:236-243.
23. Desai AS, Dramis A, Kendoff D, Board TN. Critical review of the current practice for computer-assisted navigation in total knee replacement surgery: cost-effectiveness and clinical outcome. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 2011;4:11-15.
24. Bonutti PM, Dethmers D, Ulrich SD, Seyler TM, Mont MA. Computer navigation- assisted versus minimally invasive TKA: benefits and drawbacks. Clin Orthop 2008;466:2756-2762.
25. Nicoll D, Rowley DI. Internal rotational error of the tibial component is a major cause of pain after total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2010;92-B:1238-1244.
26. Czurda T, Fennema P, Baumgartner M, Ritschl P. The association between component malalignment and post-operative pain following navigation-assisted total knee arthroplasty: results of a cohort/nested case-control study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2010;18:863-869.
27. Restrepo C, Hozack WJ, Orozco F, Parvizi J. Accuracy of femoral rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty using computer assisted navigation. Comput Aided Surg 2008;13:167-172. (Pubitemid 351574471)
28. Beckmann J, Stengel D, Tingart M, et al. Navigated cup implantation in hip arthroplasty. Acta Orthop 2009;80:538-544.