Improved accuracy of alignment with patient-specific positioning guides compared with manual instrumentation in TKA

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research

Volumn 470, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 99-107

  Ng, Vincent Y ^a   DeClaire, Jeffrey H ^b   Berend, Keith R ^a,c,d   Gulick, Bethany C ^c   Lombardi Jr , Adolph V ^c,d,e  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b The DeClaire Knee and Orthopaedic Institute   (United States)

^c Mount Carmel Health System ^*  (United States)

^d MOUNT CARMEL HEALTH SYSTEM   (United States)

^e THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY WEXNER MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS; CONFERENCE PAPER; EXTRAMEDULLARY TIBIAL GUIDE; HUMAN; INTRAMEDULLARY FEMORAL GUIDE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MEASUREMENT ACCURACY; MEDICAL RECORD REVIEW; ORTHOPEDIC SURGEON; PATIENT SPECIFIC POSITIONING GUIDE; POSITIONING DEVICE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; X RAY FILM; AGED; ARTICLE; BONE MALFORMATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONVALESCENCE; FEMALE; FEMUR; FOLLOW UP; INSTRUMENTATION; JOINT CHARACTERISTICS AND FUNCTIONS; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS; KNEE PROSTHESIS; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT POSITIONING; PEROPERATIVE CARE; PHYSIOLOGY; RADIOGRAPHY; RISK ASSESSMENT; TIBIA; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; BONE MALALIGNMENT; FEMALE; FEMUR; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; INTRAOPERATIVE CARE; KNEE PROSTHESIS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOARTHRITIS, KNEE; PATIENT POSITIONING; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; RISK ASSESSMENT; TIBIA; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84865102501     PISSN: 0009921X     EISSN: 15281132     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11999-011-1996-6     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (89)

1. Anderson KC, Buehler KC, Markel DC. Computer assisted navigation in total knee arthroplasty: Comparison with conventional methods. J Arthroplasty. 2005;20:132-138.
2. Bartel DL, Burstein AH, Santavicca EA, Insall JN. Performance of the tibial component in total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1982;64:1026-1033.
3. Bathis H, Perlick L, Tingart M, Luring C, Grifka J. CT-free computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty versus the conventional technique: Radiographic results of 100 cases. Orthopedics. 2004; 27:476-480.
4. Bathis H, Perlick L, Tingart M, Luring C, Zurakowski D, Grifka J. Alignment in total knee arthroplasty: A comparison of computer-assisted surgery with the conventional technique. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004;86:682-687.
5. Berend ME, Ritter MA, Meding JB, Faris PM, Keating EM, Redelman R, Faris GW, Davis KE. Tibial component failure mechanisms in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;428:26-34.
6. Berger RA, Crossett LS. Determining rotation of the femoral and tibial components in total knee arthroplasty: A computer tomography technique. Operative Tech Orthop. 1998;8:128-133.
7. Bertsch C, Holz U, Konrad G, Vakili A, Oberst M. Early clinical outcome after navigated total knee arthroplasty. Comparison with conventional implantation in TKA: A controlled and prospective analysis. Orthopade. 2007;36:739-745.
8. Biasca N, Wirth S, Bungartz M. Mechanical accuracy of navigated minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty (MIS TKA). Knee. 2009;16:22-29.
9. Bohling U, Schamberger H, Grittner U, Scholz J. Computerised and technical navigation in total knee-arthroplasty. J Orthop Traumatol. 2005;6:69-75.
10. Bonutti P, Dethmers D, Stiehl JB. Case report: Femoral shaft fracture resulting from femoral tracker placement in navigated TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008;466:1499-1502.
11. Bonutti PM, Dethmers D, Ulrich SD, Seyler TM, Mont MA. Computer navigation-assisted versus minimally invasive TKA: Benefits and drawbacks. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008;466: 2756-2762.
12. Bonutti PM, Dethmers DA, McGrath MS, Ulrich SD, Mont MA. Navigation did not improve the precision of minimally invasive knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008;466:2730-2735.
13. Chang CW, Yang CY. Kinematic navigation in total knee replacement-experience from the first 50 cases. J Formos Med Assoc. 2006;105:468-474.
14. Chauhan S, Clark G, Lloyd S, Scott R, Breidahl W, Sikorski J. Computer-assisted total knee replacement: A controlled cadaver study using a multi-parameter quantitative CT assessment of alignment (the Perth CT protocol). J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004; 86:818-823.
15. Cheung KW, Chiu KH. Imageless computer navigation in total knee arthroplasty. Hong Kong Med J. 2009;15:353-358.
16. Chin PL, Yang KY, Yeo SJ, Lo NN. Randomized control trial comparing radiographic total knee arthroplasty implant placement using computer navigation versus conventional technique. J Arthroplasty. 2005;20:618-626.
17. Choong PF, Dowsey MM, Stoney JD. Does accurate anatomical alignment result in better function and quality of life? Comparing conventional and computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2009;24:560-569.
18. Chotanaphuti T, Ongnamthip P, Teeraleekul K, Kraturerk C. Comparative study between computer assisted-navigation and conventional technique in minimally invasive surgery total knee arthroplasty, prospective control study. J Med Assoc Thai. 2008;91: 1382-1388.
19. Chung BJ, Kang YG, Chang CB, Kim SJ, Kim TK. Differences between sagittal femoral mechanical and distal reference axes should be considered in navigated TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467:2403-2413.
20. Confalonieri N, Manzotti A, Pullen C, Ragone V. Computerassisted technique versus intramedullary and extramedullary alignment systems in total knee replacement: A radiological comparison. Acta Orthop Belg. 2005;71:703-709.
21. Daubresse F, Vajeu C, Loquet J. Total knee arthroplasty with conventional or navigated technique: Comparison of the learning curves in a community hospital. Acta Orthop Belg. 2005;71: 710-713.
22. Dennis DA, Channer M, Susman MH, Stringer EA. Intramedullary versus extramedullary tibial alignment systems in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 1993;8:43-47.
23. Dutton AQ, Yeo SJ, Yang KY, Lo NN, Chia KU, Chong HC. Computer-assisted minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty compared with standard total knee arthroplasty: A prospective, randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90:2-9.
24. Ek ET, Dowsey MM, Tse LF, Riazi A, Love BR, Stoney JD, Choong PF. Comparison of functional and radiological outcomes after computer-assisted versus conventional total knee arthroplasty: A matched-control retrospective study. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2008;16:192-196.
25. Engh GA, Peterson TL. Comparative experience with intramedullary and extramedullary alignment in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 1990;5:1-8.
26. Ensini A, Catani F, Leardini A, Romagnoli M, Giannini S. Alignments and clinical results in conventional and navigated total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007;457:156-162.
27. Fang DM, Ritter MA, Davis KE. Coronal alignment in total knee arthroplasty: Just how important is it? J Arthroplasty. 2009;24: 39-43.
28. Green GV, Berend KR, Berend ME, Glisson RR, Vail TP. The effects of varus tibial alignment on proximal tibial surface strain in total knee arthroplasty: The posteromedial hot spot. J Arthroplasty. 2002;17:1033-1039.
29. Haaker RG, Stockheim M, Kamp M, Proff G, Breitenfelder J, Ottersbach A. Computer-assisted navigation increases precision of component placement in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;433:152-159.
30. Han HS, Seong SC, Lee S, Lee MC. Rotational alignment of femoral components in total knee arthroplasty: Nonimage-based navigation system versus conventional technique. Available at: Https://www.orthosupersite.com/print.aspx? rid=18743. Accessed July 5, 2011.
31. Hasegawa M, Yoshida K, Wakabayashi H, Sudo A. Minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty: Comparison of jig-based technique versus computer navigation for clinical and alignment outcome. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2011;19:904-910.
32. Hernandez-Vaquero D, Suarez-Vazquez A, Sandoval-Garcia MA, Noriega-Fernandez A. Computer assistance increases precision of component placement in total knee arthroplasty with articular deformity. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468:1237-1241.
33. Howell SM, Kuznik K, Hull ML, Siston RA. Results of an initial experience with custom-fit positioning total knee arthroplasty in a series of 48 patients. Orthopedics. 2008;31:857-863.
34. Ishida K, Matsumoto T, Tsumura N, Kubo S, Kitagawa A, Chin T, Iguchi T, Kurosaka M, Kuroda R. Mid-term outcomes of computerassisted total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2011;19:1107-1112.
35. Jeffery RS, Morris RW, Denham RA. Coronal alignment after total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1991;73:709-714.
36. Jenny JY, Boeri C. Computer-assisted implantation of total knee prostheses: A case-control comparative study with classical instrumentation. Comput Aided Surg. 2001;6:217-220.
37. Jenny JY, Clemens U, Kohler S, Kiefer H, Konermann W, Miehlke RK. Consistency of implantation of a total knee arthroplasty with a non-image-based navigation system: A case-control study of 235 cases compared with 235 conventionally implanted prostheses. J Arthroplasty. 2005;20:832-839.
38. Katz JN, Barrett J, Mahomed NN, Baron JA, Wright RJ, Losina E. Association between hospital and surgeon procedure volume and the outcomes of total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86:1909-1916.
39. Kim SJ, MacDonald M, Hernandez J, Wixson RL. Computer assisted navigation in total knee arthroplasty: Improved coronal alignment. J Arthroplasty. 2005;20:123-131.
40. Kim YH, Kim JS, Choi Y, Kwon OR. Computer-assisted surgical navigation does not improve the alignment and orientation of the components in total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91:14-19.
41. Kim YH, Kim JS, Yoon SH. Alignment and orientation of the components in total knee replacement with and without navigation support: A prospective, randomised study. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007;89:471-476.
42. Klatt BA, Goyal N, Austin MS, Hozack WJ. Custom-fit total knee arthroplasty (OtisKnee) results in malalignment. J Arthroplasty. 2008;23:26-29.
43. Lee DH, Park JH, Song DI, Padhy D, Jeong WK, Han SB. Accuracy of soft tissue balancing in TKA: Comparison between navigationassisted gap balancing and conventional measured resection. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2010;18:381-387.
44. Liau JJ, Cheng CK, Huang CH, Lo WH. The effect of malalignment on stresses in polyethylene component of total knee prostheses-a finite element analysis. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2002;17:140-146.
45. Lombardi AV Jr, Berend KR, Adams JB. Patient-specific approach in total knee arthroplasty. Orthopedics. 2008;31:927-930.
46. Lombardi AV Jr, Emerson RH Jr, Pietrzak WS. Signature Personalized Patient Care for total knee arthroplasty: A mechanical alignment cadaveric study. Internal Study. 2008:1-3.
47. Longstaff LM, Sloan K, Stamp N, Scaddan M, Beaver R. Good alignment after total knee arthroplasty leads to faster rehabilitation and better function. J Arthroplasty. 2009;24:570-578.
48. Lotke PA, Ecker ML. Influence of positioning of prosthesis in total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1977;59:77-79.
49. Luring C, Beckmann J, Haibock P, Perlick L, Grifka J, Tingart M. Minimal invasive and computer assisted total knee replacement compared with the conventional technique: A prospective, randomised trial. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2008;16: 928-934.
50. Lutzner J, Krummenauer F, Wolf C, Gunther KP, Kirschner S. Computer-assisted and conventional total knee replacement: A comparative, prospective, randomised study with radiological and CT evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008;90:1039-1044.
51. Macule-Beneyto F, Hernandez-Vaquero D, Segur-Vilalta JM, Colomina-Rodriguez R, Hinarejos-Gomez P, Garcia-Forcada I, Seral Garcia B. Navigation in total knee arthroplasty: A multicenter study. Int Orthop. 2006;30:536-540.
52. Mahoney OM. The role of alignment in TKR survivorship. Presented at Orthopedics Today Hawaii 2010. January 10-13, 2010. Kohala Coast, HI.
53. Martin A, Wohlgenannt O, Prenn M, Oelsch C, von Strempel A. Imageless navigation for TKA increases implantation accuracy. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007;460:178-184.
54. Mason JB, Fehring TK, Estok R, Banel D, Fahrbach K. Metaanalysis of alignment outcomes in computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty surgery. J Arthroplasty. 2007;22:1097-1106.
55. Massai F, Conteduca F, Vadala A, Iorio R, Basiglini L, Ferretti A. Tibial stress fracture after computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Traumatol. 2010;11:123-127.
56. Matsumoto T, Tsumura N, Kurosaka M, Muratsu H, Kuroda R, Ishimoto K, Tsujimoto K, Shiba R, Yoshiya S. Prosthetic alignment and sizing in computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty. Int Orthop. 2004;28:282-285.
57. Matziolis G, Adam J, Perka C. Varus malalignment has no influence on clinical outcome in midterm follow-up after total knee replacement. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2010;130:1487-1491.
58. Matziolis G, Krocker D, Weiss U, Tohtz S, Perka C. A prospective, randomized study of computer-assisted and conventional total knee arthroplasty: Three-dimensional evaluation of implant alignment and rotation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89:236-243.
59. Mizu-uchi H, Matsuda S, Miura H, Okazaki K, Akasaki Y, Iwamoto Y. The evaluation of post-operative alignment in total knee replacement using a CT-based navigation system. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008;90:1025-1031.
60. Moreland JR, Bassett LW, Hanker GJ. Radiographic analysis of the axial alignment of the lower extremity. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1987;69:745-749.
61. Mullaji A, Kanna R, Marawar S, Kohli A, Sharma A. Comparison of limb and component alignment using computer-assisted navigation versus image intensifier-guided conventional total knee arthroplasty: A prospective, randomized, single-surgeon study of 467 knees. J Arthroplasty. 2007;22:953-959.
62. Novak EJ, Silverstein MD, Bozic KJ. The cost-effectiveness of computer-assisted navigation in total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89:2389-2397.
63. Oberst M, Bertsch C, Konrad G, Lahm A, Holz U. CT analysis after navigated versus conventional implantation of TKA. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2008;128:561-566.
64. Oberst M, Bertsch C, Wurstlin S, Holz U. [CT analysis of leg alignment after conventional vs. navigated knee prosthesis implantation: Initial results of a controlled, prospective and randomized study] [in German]. Unfallchirurg. 2003;106:941-948.
65. Pang CH, Chan WL, Yen CH, Cheng SC, Woo SB, Choi ST, Hui WK, Mak KH. Comparison of total knee arthroplasty using computer-assisted navigation versus conventional guiding systems: A prospective study. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2009;17: 170-173.
66. Park SE, Lee CT. Comparison of robotic-assisted and conventional manual implantation of a primary total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2007;22:1054-1059.
67. Parratte S, Pagnano MW, Trousdale RT, Berry DJ. Effect of postoperative mechanical axis alignment on the fifteen-year survival of modern, cemented total knee replacements. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010;92:2143-2149.
68. Perlick L, Bathis H, Lerch K, Luring C, Tingart M, Grifka J. [Navigated implantation of total knee endoprostheses in secondary knee osteoarthritis of rheumatoid arthritis patients as compared to conventional technique] [in German]. Z Rheumatol. 2004;63:140-146.
69. Perlick L, Bathis H, Tingart M, Perlick C, Grifka J. Navigation in total-knee arthroplasty: CT-based implantation compared with the conventional technique. Acta Orthop Scand. 2004;75:464-470.
70. Ritter MA, Faris PM, Keating EM, Meding JB. Postoperative alignment of total knee replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994;299:153-156.
71. Rosenberger R, Hoser C, Quirbach S, Attal R, Hennerbichler A, Fink C. Improved accuracy of component alignment with the implementation of image-free navigation in total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2008;16:249-257.
72. Saragaglia D, Picard F, Chaussard C, Montbarbon E, Leitner F, Cinquin P. [Computer-assisted knee arthroplasty: Comparison with a conventional procedure: Results of 50 cases in a prospective randomized study] [in French]. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 2001;87:18-28.
73. Schmitt J, Hauk C, Kienapfel H, Pfeiffer M, Efe T, Fuchs-Winkelmann S, Heyse TJ. Navigation of total knee arthroplasty: Rotation of components and clinical results in a prospectively randomized study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2011;12:16.
74. Seon JK, Park SJ, Lee KB, Li G, Kozanek M, Song EK. Functional comparison of total knee arthroplasty performed with and without a navigation system. Int Orthop. 2009;33:987-990.
75. Seon JK, Song EK. Navigation-assisted less invasive total knee arthroplasty compared with conventional total knee arthroplasty: A randomized prospective trial. J Arthroplasty. 2006;21:777-782.
76. Seon JK, Song EK, Yoon TR, Park SJ, Bae BH, Cho SG. Comparison of functional results with navigation-assisted minimally invasive and conventional techniques in bilateral total knee arthroplasty. Comput Aided Surg. 2007;12:189-193.
77. Sikorski JM. Alignment in total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008;90:1121-1127.
78. Skowronski J, Bielecki M, Hermanowicz K, Skowronski R. The radiological outcomes of total knee arthroplasty using computer assisted navigation ORTHOPILOT. Chir Narzadow Ruchu Ortop Pol. 2005;70:5-8.
79. SooHoo NF, Lieberman JR, Ko CY, Zingmond DS. Factors predicting complication rates following total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88:480-485.
80. Sparmann M, Wolke B, Czupalla H, Banzer D, Zink A. Positioning of total knee arthroplasty with and without navigation support: A prospective, randomised study. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2003;85:830-835.
81. Spencer BA, Mont MA, McGrath MS, Boyd B, Mitrick MF. Initial experience with custom-fit total knee replacement: Intraoperative events and long-leg coronal alignment. Int Orthop. 2009;33:1571-1575.
82. Stulberg SD, Picard F, Saragaglia D. Computer-assisted total knee replacement arthroplasty. Oper Tech Orthop. 2000;10:25-39.
83. Swank ML, Alkire M, Conditt M, Lonner JH. Technology and cost-effectiveness in knee arthroplasty: Computer navigation and robotics. Am J Orthop. 2009;38:32-36.
84. Tew M, Waugh W. Tibiofemoral alignment and the results of knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1985;67:551-556.
85. Tingart M, Luring C, Bathis H, Beckmann J, Grifka J, Perlick L. Computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty versus the conventional technique: How precise is navigation in clinical routine? Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2008;16:44-50.
86. Victor J, Hoste D. Image-based computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty leads to lower variability in coronal alignment. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;428:131-139.
87. Yau WP, Chiu KY, Zuo JL, Tang WM, Ng TP. Computer navigation did not improve alignment in a lower-volume total knee practice. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008;466:935-945.
88. Yehyawi TM, Callaghan JJ, Pedersen DR, O'Rourke MR, Liu SS. Variances in sagittal femoral shaft bowing in patients undergoing TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007;464:99-104.
89. Zorman D, Etuin P, Jennart H, Scipioni D, Devos S. Computerassisted total knee arthroplasty: Comparative results in a preliminary series of 72 cases. Acta Orthop Belg. 2005;71:696-602.