Rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty: Nonimage-based navigation system versus conventional technique

Chinese Medical Journal

Volumn 125, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 236-243

  Zhang, Xian Long ^a   Zhang, Wen ^a   Shao, Jun Jie ^a  

^a SHANGHAI JIAO TONG UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (China)

Author keywords

Arthroplasty; Computer assisted; Rotation; Surgery; Total knee replacement

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; COMPUTER NAVIGATION ASSISTED TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEEP VEIN THROMBOSIS; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; JOINT MOBILITY; KNEE DISEASE; KNEE FUNCTION; KNEE MALALIGNMENT; KNEE RADIOGRAPHY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PREVALENCE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SURGICAL APPROACH; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TIBIA TORSION; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT;

ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; FEMALE; FEMUR; HUMANS; KNEE JOINT; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; TIBIA;

EID: 84862913060     PISSN: 03666999     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0366-6999.2012.02.014     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Incavo SJ, Wild JJ, Coughlin KM, Beynnon BD. Early revision for component malrotation in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2007; 458: 131-136.
2. Sharkey PF, Hozack WJ, Rothman RH, Shastri S, Jacoby SM. Insall Awardpaper: Why are total knee arthroplasties failing today? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002; 404: 7-13.
3. Goodman SB, Patel JJ, Delp SL, Giori NJ. The high variability of tibial rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 2006; 452: 65-69.
4. Griffin FM, Math K, Scuderi GR, Insall JN, Poilvache PL. Rotational landmarks and sizing of the distal femur in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2000; 15: 354-359.
5. Berger RA, Crossett LS, Jacobs JJ, Rubash HE. Malrotation causing patellofemoral complications after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 1998; 356: 144-153.
6. Chowdhury EA, Porter ML. A study of the effect of tibial tray rotation on a specific mobile bearing total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2005; 20: 793-797.
7. Miller MC, Berger RA, Petrella AJ, Karmas A, Rubash HE. Optimizing femoral component rotation in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2001; 392: 38-45.
8. Insall JN, Scuderi GR, Komistek RD, Math K, Dennis DA, Anderson DT. Correlation between condylar lift-off and femoral component alignment. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2002; 403: 143-152.
9. Lutzner J, Krummenauer F, Gunther KP, Kirschner S. Rotational alignment of the tibial component in total knee arthroplasty is better at the medial third of tibial tuberosity than at the medial border. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2010; 11: 57.
10. Cheung KW, Chiu KH. Imageless computer navigation in total knee arthroplasty. Hong Kong Med J 2009; 15: 353-358.
11. Bathis H, Perlick L, Tingart M, Luring C, Zurakowski D, Grifka J. Alignment in total knee arthroplasty. A comparison of computer-assisted surgery with the conventional technique. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2004; 86: 682-687.
12. Chin PL, Yang KY, Yeo SJ, Lo NN. Randomized control trial comparing radiographic total knee arthroplasty implant placement using computer navigation versus conventional technique. J Arthroplasty 2005; 20: 618-626.
13. Scuderi GR, Komistek RD, Dennis DA, Insall JN. The impact of femoral component rotational alignment on condylar lift-off. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2003; 410: 148-154.
14. Barrack RL, Schrader T, Bertot AJ, Wolfe MW, Myers L. Component rotation and anterior knee pain after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2001; 392: 46-55.
15. Anouchi YS, Whiteside LA, Kaiser AD, Milliano MT. The effects of axial rotational alignment of the femoral component on knee stability and patellar tracking in total knee arthroplasty demonstrated on autopsy specimens. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1993; 287: 170-177.
16. Akagi M, Matsusue Y, Mata T, Asada Y, Horiguchi M, Iida H, et al. Effect of rotational alignment on patellar tracking in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1999; 366: 155-163.
17. Uehara K, Kadoya Y, Kobayashi A, Ohashi H, Yamano Y. Bone anatomy and rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2002; 402: 196-201.
18. Kim YH, Kim JS, Yoon SH. Alignment and orientation of the components in total knee replacement with and without navigation support. a prospective, randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2007; 89: 471-476.
19. Cheng T, Zhang GY, Zhang XL. Imageless navigation system does not improve component rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty. J Surg Res 2011; 171: 590-600.
20. Chauhan SK, Scott RG, Breidahl W, Beaver RJ. Computer-assisted knee arthroplasty versus a conventional jig-based technique. A randomised, prospective trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2004; 86: 372-377.
21. Stockl B, Nogler M, Rosiek R, Fischer M, Krismer M, Kessler O. Navigation improves accuracy of rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 2004; 426: 180-186.
22. Matziolis G, Krocker D, Weiss U, Tohtz S, Perka C. A prospective, randomized study of computer-assisted and conventional total knee arthroplasty. Three-dimensional evaluation of implant alignment and rotation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007; 89: 236-243.
23. Benjamin J. Determining femoral component position using CAS and measured resection. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2008; 466: 2745-2750.
24. Manzotti A, Cerveri P, De Momi E, Pullen C, Confalonieri N. Relationship between cutting errors and learning curve in computer-assisted total knee replacement. Int Orthop 2010; 34: 655-662.
25. Stulberg SD. How accurate is current TKR instrumentation. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2003; 416: 177-184.
26. Molfetta L, Caldo D. Computer navigation versus conventional implantation for varus knee total arthroplasty: a case-control study at 5 years follow-up. Knee 2008; 15: 75-79.
27. Spencer JM, Chauhan SK, Sloan K, Taylor A, Beaver RJ. Computer navigation versus conventional total knee replacement: no difference in functional results at two years. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2007; 89: 477-480.
28. Ensini A, Catani F, Leardini A, Romagnoli M, Giannini S. Alignments and clinical results in conventional and navigated total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2007; 457: 156-162.
29. Fang DM, Ritter MA, Davis KE. Coronal alignment in total knee arthroplasty: just how important is it? J Arthroplasty 2009; 24(6 Suppl): 39-43.
30. Sharkey PF, Hozack WJ, Rothman RH, Shastri S, Jacoby SM. Insall Award paper. Why are total knee arthroplasties failing today? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2002; 404: 7-13.
31. Callaghan JJ, O'rourke MR, Saleh KJ. Why knees fail: lessons learned.J Arthroplasty 2004; 19(4 Suppl 1): 31-34.
32. Jeffery RS, Morris RW, Denham RA. Coronal alignment after total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1991; 73: 709-714.
33. Shao JJ, Zhang XL, Wang Q, Chen YS, Shen H, Jiang Y. Total knee arthroplasty using computer assisted navigation in patients with severe valgus deformity of the knee. Chin Med J 2010; 123: 2666-2670.
34. Biasca N, Wirth S, Bungartz M. Mechanical accuracy of navigated minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty (MIS TKA). Knee 2009; 16: 22-29.