Computer assistance in total knee replacement - A critical assessment of current health care technology

Computer Aided Surgery

Volumn 11, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 77-80

  Luring C ^a   Bathis H ^a   Tingart, M ^a   Perlick, L ^a   Grifka, J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF REGENSBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Computer assisted surgery; Health care technology; Navigation; Total knee replacement

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIOMEDICAL TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; DEVICE; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; GERMANY; HUMAN; IMPLANTATION; LONGEVITY; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTHESIS LOOSENING; REPRODUCIBILITY; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT;

ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; HUMANS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED;

EID: 33745300174     PISSN: 10929088     EISSN: 10970150     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10929080600578925     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Font-Rodriguez DE, Scuderi GR, Insall JN. Survivorship of cemented total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 1997;345:79-86.
2. Bäthis H, Tingart M, Perlick L, Lüring C, Anders S, Grifka J. Total knee arthroplasty and high tibial osteotomy in osteoarthritis - results of a survey in traumatic surgery and orthopedic clinics. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 2005;143(1):19-24.
3. Rand JA, Coventry MB. Ten-year evaluation of geometric total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 1988;232:168-173.
4. Ritter MA, Faaris PM, Keating EM, Meding JB. Postoperative alignment of total knee replacement. Its effect on survival. Clin Orthop 1994;299:153-156.
5. Engh GA. The difficult knee. Severe varus and valgus. Clin Orthop 2003;416:58-63.
6. Mihalko WM, Whiteside LA, Krackow KA. Comparison of ligament-balancing techniques during total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 2003;85:132-135.
7. Hood RW, Vanni M, Insall JN. The correction of knee alignment in 225 consecutive total condylar knee replacements. Clin Orthop 1981;160:94-105.
8. Bäthis H, Perlick L, Tingart M, Lüring C, Zurakowski D, Grifka J. Alignment in total knee arthroplasty: a comparison of computer-assisted implantation with the conventional technique. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2004;86:682-687.
9. Evaluation of Image Guided Surgery Systems. Official Report of the Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency. Department of Health, UK. MDA 01025. 2002.
10. Krackow KA, Bayers-Thering M, Phillips MJ, Mihalko WM. A new technique for determining proper mechanical axis alignment during total knee arthroplasty: progress toward computer-assisted TKA. Orthopedics 1999;22:698-702.
11. Perlick L, Bäthis H, Lerch K, Lüring C, Tingart M, Grifka J. Navigated implantation of total knee endoprostheses in secondary knee osteoarthritis of rheumatoid arthritis patients as compared to conventional technique. Z Rheumatol 2004;63:1-7.
12. Cummins RO, Hazinski MF. The most important changes in the international ECC and CPR guidelines 2000. Circulation 2000;102(Suppl I): I-371-I-376.
13. Chauhan SK, Scott RG, Breidahl W, Beaver RJ. Computer-assisted knee arthroplasty versus conventional jig-based technique. A randomised, prospective trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2004;86:372-377.
14. Hart R, Janecek M, Chaker A, Bucek P. Total knee arthroplasty implanted with and without kinematic navigation. Int Orthop 2003;27:366-369.
15. Jenny JY, Boeri C. Computer-assisted implantation of a total knee arthroplasty: a case-controlled study in comparison with classical instrumentation. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 2001;87:645-652.
16. Mielke RK, Clemens U, Jens JH, Kershally S. Navigation in der Knieendoprothetik - vorläufige klinische Erfahrungen und prospektiv vergleichende Studie gegenüber konventioneller Implantationstechnik. Z Orthop 2001;139:109-116.
17. Sparmann M, Wolke B, Czupalla H, Banzer D, Zink A. Positioning of total knee arthroplasty with and without navigation support. A prospective randomised study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2003;85:830-835.
18. Kienapfel H, Springorum HP, Ziegler A, Klose KJ, Georg C, Griss P. Der Einfluss der Femur- und Tibiakomponentenrotation auf das patellofemorale Versagen beim künstlichen Kniegelenkersatz. Orthopäde 2003;32:312-318.
19. Kohn D, Rupp S. Knieendoprothetik - Operationstechnische Aspekte. Orthopäde 2000;29:697-707.
20. Stulberg SD, Loan P, Sarin V. Computer-assisted navigation in total knee replacements: results of an initial experience in thirty-five patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2002;84:90-98.
21. Saragaglia D, Picard F, Chaussard C, Montbarbon E, Leitner F, Cinquin P. Computer-assisted knee arthroplasty: comparison with a conventional procedure. Results of 50 cases in a prospective randomized study. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 2001;87:18-28.
22. Lüring C, Hüfner T, Kendoff D, Perlick L, Bäthis H, Grifka J, Krettek C. The effect of medial soft tissue release in total knee arthroplasty: A navigation controlled cadaver study. J Arthroplasty (in press).
23. Lüring C, Hüfner T, Kendoff D, Perlick L, Grifka J, Krettek C. Influence of the surgical approach in total knee arthroplasty on ligament tension. A navigation-controlled cadaver study. Unfallchirurg 2005;108(4):274-278.
24. Lüring C, Hüfner T, Kendoff D, Perlick L, Grifka J, Krettek C. Eversion or subluxation of patella in soft tissue balancing of total knee arthroplasty? Results of a cadaver experiment. Knee 2006;13(1):15-18.