Functional outcome after computer-assisted versus conventional total knee arthroplasty: A randomized controlled study

Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy

Volumn 18, Issue 10, 2010, Pages 1339-1344

  Lützner, Jörg ^a   Günther, Klaus Peter ^a   Kirschner, Stephan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL CARL GUSTAV CARUS   (Germany)

Author keywords

Navigation; Osteoarthritis; Results; Total knee arthroplasty; Total knee replacement

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CONVALESCENCE; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; JOINT CHARACTERISTICS AND FUNCTIONS; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS; KNEE PROSTHESIS; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PHYSIOLOGY; RADIOGRAPHY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REFERENCE VALUE; RISK ASSESSMENT; TIME; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

AGED; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; KNEE PROSTHESIS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOARTHRITIS, KNEE; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; REFERENCE VALUES; RISK ASSESSMENT; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 77957190522     PISSN: 09422056     EISSN: 14337347     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00167-010-1153-x     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Bauwens K, Matthes G, Wich M, Gebhard F, Hanson B, Ekkernkamp A, Stengel D (2007) Navigated total knee replacement. A meta-analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89A: 261-269.
2. Berend ME, Ritter MA, Meding JB, Faris PM, Keating EM, Redelman R, Faris GW, Davis KE (2004) Tibial component failure mechanisms in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 428: 26-34.
3. Cerha O, Kirschner S, Gunther KP, Lützner J (2009) Cost analysis for navigation in knee endoprosthetics. Orthopäde 38: 1235-1240.
4. Dattani R, Patnaik S, Kantak A, Tselentakis G (2009) Navigation knee replacement. Int Orthop 33: 7-10.
5. DesJardins JD, Banks SA, Benson LC, Pace T, LaBerge M (2007) A direct comparison of patient and force-controlled simulator total knee replacement kinematics. J Biomech 40: 3458-3466.
6. Ewald FC (1989) The Knee Society total knee arthroplasty roentgenographic evaluation and scoring system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 248: 9-12.
7. Hakki S, Coleman S, Saleh K, Bilotta VJ, Hakki A (2009) Navigational predictors in determining the necessity for collateral ligament release in total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 91B: 1178-1182.
8. Harman MK, Banks SA, Kirschner S, Lützner J (2009) Axial alignment of mobile-bearing TKR: does it affect knee rotation and bearing motion? 10th EFORT Congress, http://www. efort. org/cdrom2009/FreePaperContent. asp?Pid=F208.
9. Insall JN, Dorr LD, Scott RD, Scott WN (1989) Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 248: 13-14.
10. Jeffery RS, Morris RW, Denham RA (1991) Coronal alignment after total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 73B: 709-714.
11. Kamat YD, Aurakzai KM, Adhikari AR, Matthews D, Kalairajah Y, Field RE (2009) Does computer navigation in total knee arthroplasty improve patient outcome at midterm follow-up? Int Orthop 33: 1567-1570.
12. Kim YH, Kim JS, Choi Y, Kwon OR (2009) Computer-assisted surgical navigation does not improve the alignment and orientation of the components in total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 91A: 14-19.
13. Krackow KA, Pepe CL, Galloway EJ (1990) A mathematical analysis of the effect of flexion and rotation on apparent varus/valgus alignment at the knee. Orthopedics 13: 861-868.
14. Lee DH, Park JH, Song DI, Padhy D, Jeong WK, Han SB Accuracy of soft tissue balancing in TKA: comparison between navigation-assisted gap balancing and conventional measured resection. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc (Epub ahead of print). doi: 10. 1007/s00167-009-0983-x.
15. Lotke PA, Ecker ML (1977) Influence of positioning of prosthesis in total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 59: 77-79.
16. Lützner J, Krummenauer F, Wolf C, Günther K-P, Kirschner S (2008) Computer-assisted and conventional total knee arthroplasty-a prospective, randomized study with radiographic and CT evaluations. J Bone Joint Surg Br 90B: 1039-1044.
17. Molfetta L, Caldo D (2008) Computer navigation versus conventional implantation for varus knee total arthroplasty: a case-control study at 5 years follow-up. Knee 15: 75-79.
18. IH N (2004) NIH Consensus Statement on total knee replacement. J Bone and Joint Surg Am 86A: 1328-1335.
19. Novak EJ, Silverstein MD, Bozic KJ (2007) The cost-effectiveness of computer-assisted navigation in total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89A: 2389-2397.
20. Oberst M, Bertsch C, Wurstlin S, Holz U (2003) CT analysis of leg alignment after conventional vs. navigated knee prosthesis implantation. Initial results of a controlled, prospective and randomized study. Unfallchirurg 106: 941-948.
21. Oppe M, Rabin R, De Charro F (2008) EQ-5D User Guide. www euroqol org.
22. Rasanen P, Paavolainen P, Sintonen H, Koivisto AM, Blom M, Ryynanen OP, Roine RP (2007) Effectiveness of hip or knee replacement surgery in terms of quality-adjusted life years and costs. Acta Orthop 78: 108-115.
23. Rhoads DD, Noble PC, Reuben JD, Tullos HS (1993) The effect of femoral component position on the kinematics of total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 286: 122-129.
24. Ritter MA, Faris PM, Keating EM, Meding JB (1994) Postoperative alignment of total knee replacement. Its effect on survival. Clin Orthop Relat Res 299: 153-156.
25. Slover JD, Tosteson AN, Bozic KJ, Rubash HE, Malchau H (2008) Impact of hospital volume on the economic value of computer navigation for total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 90A: 1492-1500.
26. Spencer JM, Chauhan SK, Sloan K, Taylor A, Beaver RJ (2007) Computer navigation versus conventional total knee replacement: no difference in functional results at two years. J Bone Joint Surg Br 89: 477-480.
27. Yaffe MA, Koo SS, Stulberg SD (2008) Radiographic and navigation measurements of TKA limb alignment do not correlate. Clin Orthop Relat Res 466: 2736-2744.