Custom-Fit Total Knee Arthroplasty: Our Initial Experience in 32 Knees

Journal of Arthroplasty

Volumn 27, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 1149-1154

  Bali, Kamal ^a   Walker, Peter ^a   Bruce, Warwick ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

Author keywords

Custom fit technique; Total knee arthroplasty

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BLEEDING; BODY HEIGHT; BODY MASS; BODY WEIGHT; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CUSTOM FIT TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; FEMALE; HUMAN; KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; OPERATION DURATION; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; BLOOD LOSS, SURGICAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; KNEE JOINT; KNEE PROSTHESIS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOARTHRITIS, KNEE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; WEIGHT-BEARING;

EID: 84861188144     PISSN: 08835403     EISSN: 15328406     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2011.12.006     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Garg A., Walker P.S. Prediction of total knee motion using a three-dimensional computer-graphics model. J Biomech 1990, 23:45.
2. Piazza S.J., Delp S.L., Stulberg S.D., et al. Posterior tilting of the tibial component decreases femoral rollback in posterior-substituting knee replacement: a computer simulation study. J Orthop Res 1998, 16:264.
3. Jeffery R.S., Morris R.W., Denham R.A. Coronal alignment after total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1991, 73:709.
4. Bolognesi M., Hofmann A. Computer navigation versus standard instrumentation for TKA: a single-surgeon experience. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2005, 440:162.
5. Perillo-Marcone A., Barrett D.S., Taylor M. The importance of tibial alignment: finite element analysis of tibial malalignment. J Arthroplasty 2000, 15:1020.
6. Bankes M.J., Back D.L., Cannon S.R., et al. The effect of component malalignment on the clinical and radiological outcome of the Kinemax total knee replacement. Knee 2003, 10:55.
7. Mahaluxmivala J., Bankes M.J., Nicolai P., et al. The effect of surgeon experience on component positioning in 673 Press Fit Condylar posterior cruciate-sacrificing total knee arthroplasties. J Arthroplasty 2001, 16:635.
8. Choong P.F., Dowsey M.M., Stoney J.D. Does accurate anatomical alignment result in better function and quality of life? Comparing conventional and computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2009, 24:560.
9. Mason J.B., Fehring T.K., Estok R., et al. Meta-analysis of alignment outcomes in computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty surgery. J Arthroplasty 2007, 22:1097.
10. Rosenberger R.E., Hoser C., Quirbach S., et al. Improved accuracy of component alignment with the implementation of image-free navigation in total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2008, 16:249.
11. Kalairajah Y., Simpson D., Cossey A.J., et al. Blood loss after total knee replacement: effects of computer-assisted surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2005, 87:1480.
12. Kalairajah Y., Cossey A.J., Verrall G.M., et al. Are systemic emboli reduced in computer-assisted knee surgery? A prospective, randomised, clinical trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2006, 88:198.
13. Stulberg S.D. How accurate is current TKR instrumentation?. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2003, 177.
14. Chauhan S.K., Clark G.W., Lloyd S., et al. Computer-assisted total knee replacement. A controlled cadaver study using a multi-parameter quantitative CT assessment of alignment (the Perth CT Protocol). J Bone Joint Surg Br 2004, 86:818.
15. Anderson K.C., Buehler K.C., Markel D.C. Computer assisted navigation in total knee arthroplasty: comparison with conventional methods. J Arthroplasty 2005, 20(7 Suppl 3):132.
16. Chin P.L., Yang K.Y., Yeo S.J., et al. Randomized control trial comparing radiographic total knee arthroplasty implant placement using computer navigation versus conventional technique. J Arthroplasty 2005, 20:618.
17. Decking R., Markmann Y., Fuchs J., et al. Leg axis after computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized trial comparing computer-navigated and manual implantation. J Arthroplasty 2005, 20:282.
18. Lombardi A.V., Berend K.R., Adams J.B. Patient-specific approach in total knee arthroplasty. Orthopedics 2008, 31:927.
19. Hafez M.A., Chelule K.L., Seedhom B.B., et al. Computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty using patient-specific templating. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006, 444:184.
20. Harrysson O.L., Hosni Y.A., Nayfeh J.F. Custom-designed orthopedic implants evaluated using finite element analysis of patient-specific computed tomography data: femoral-component case study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2007, 8:91.
21. Spencer B.A., Mont M.A., McGrath M.S., et al. Initial experience with custom-fit total knee replacement: intra-operative events and long-leg coronal alignment. Int Orthop 2009, 33:1571.
22. Howell S.M., Kuznik K., Hull M.L., et al. Results of an initial experience with custom-fit positioning total knee arthroplasty in a series of 48 patients. Orthopedics 2008, 31:857.
23. Klatt B.A., Goyal N., Austin M.S., et al. Custom-fit total knee arthroplasty (OtisKnee) results in malalignment. J Arthroplasty 2008, 23:26.
24. Davis J.J., Bono J.V., Lindeque B.G. Surgical strategies to achieve a custom-fit TKA with standard implant technique. Orthopedics 2010, 33:569.
25. Matziolis G., Krocker D., Weiss U., et al. Prospective, randomized study of computer-assisted and conventional total knee arthroplasty. Three-dimensional evaluation of implant alignment and rotation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007, 89:236.
26. Stulberg S.D., Yaffe M.A., Koo S.S. Computer-assisted surgery versus manual total knee arthroplasty: a case-controlled study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2006, 88(Suppl 4):47.
27. Pang C.H., Chan W.L., Yen C.H., et al. Comparison of total knee arthroplasty using computer-assisted navigation versus conventional guiding systems: a prospective study. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 2009, 17:170.
28. Sofka C.M., Potter H.G., Figgie M., et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2003, 129.