Alignment outcomes in navigated total knee arthroplasty: A meta-analysis

Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy

Volumn 20, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 1075-1082

  Fu, Yonghui ^a   Wang, Mingming ^a   Liu, Yifeng ^a   Fu, Qin ^a  

^a CHINA MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Alignment; Computer assisted; Navigation; Randomized controlled trial; Total knee arthroplasty

Indexed keywords

BONE MALFORMATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; HUMAN; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; META ANALYSIS; METHODOLOGY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; REVIEW; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; BONE MALALIGNMENT; HUMANS; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84861348169     PISSN: 09422056     EISSN: 14337347     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00167-011-1695-6     Document Type: Review

References (33)

1. Bathis H, Perlick L, Tingart M et al (2004) Alignment in total knee arthroplasty. A comparison of computer-assisted surgery with the conventional technique. J Bone Joint Surg Br 86: 682-687.
2. Bauwens K, Matthes G, Wich M et al (2007) Navigated total knee replacement: a meta-analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89: 261-269.
3. Beneyto FM, Vaquero DH, Vilalta JMS et al (2006) Navigation in total knee arthroplasty. A multicenter study. Int Orthop 30: 536-540.
4. Berger RA, Rubash HE, Seel MJ et al (1993) Determining the rotational alignment of the femoral component in total knee arthroplasty using the epicondylar axis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 286: 40-47.
5. Bhandari M, Morrow F, Kulkarni AV et al (2001) Meta-analysis in orthopedic surgery: a systematic review of the methodologies. J Bone Joint Surg Am 83: 15-24.
6. Bohling U, Schamberger H, Grittner U et al (2005) Computerized and technical navigation in total knee-arthroplasty. J Orthop Traumatol 5: 69-75.
7. Chauhan SK, Scott RG, Breidahl W et al (2004) Computerassisted knee arthroplasty versus a conventional jigbased technique. A randomized, prospective trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br 86: 372-377.
8. Chin PL, Yang KY, Yeo SJ, Lo NN (2005) Randomized control trial comparing radiographic total knee arthroplasty implant placement using computer navigation versus conventional technique. J Arthroplast 20: 618-626.
9. Decking R, Markmann Y, Fuchs J et al (2005) Leg axis after computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized trial comparing computer-navigated and manual implantation. J Arthroplast 20: 282-288.
10. Dutton AQ, Yeo SJ, Yang KY et al (2008) Computer-assisted minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty compared with standard total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 90: 2-9.
11. Ensini A, Catani F, Leardini A et al (2007) Alignments and clinical results in conventional and navigated total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 457: 156-162.
12. Garg A, Walker PS (1990) Prediction of total knee motion using a three dimensional computer-graphics model. J Biomech 23: 45-58.
13. Hart R, Janecek M, Chaker A, Bucek P (2003) Total knee arthroplasty implanted with and without kinematic navigation. Int Orthop 27: 366-369.
14. Hernández-Vaquero D, Suarez-Vazquez A, Sandoval-Garcia MA et al (2010) Computer assistance increases precision of component placement in total knee arthroplasty with articular deformity. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468: 1237-1241.
15. Hsu WH, Hsu RW, Weng YJ (2010) Effect of preoperative deformity on postoperative leg axis in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 18: 1323-1327.
16. Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D et al (1996) Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary? Control Clin Trials 17: 1-12.
17. Jenny JY, Boeri C (2001) Computer-assisted implantation of total knee prostheses: a case-control comparative study with classical instrumentation. Comput Aided Surg 6: 217-220.
18. Kim YH, Kim JS, Choi Y, Kwon OR (2009) Computer-assisted surgical navigation does not improve the alignment and orientation of the components in total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 91: 14-19.
19. Krackow KA, Pepe CL, Galloway EJ (1990) A mathematical analysis of the effect of flexion and rotation on apparent varus/valgus alignment at the knee. Orthopedics 13: 861-868.
20. Lützner J, Krummenauer F, Wolf C et al (2008) Computer-assisted and conventional total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 90: 1039-1044.
21. Mason JB, Fehring TK, Estok R et al (2007) Meta-analysis of alignment outcomes in computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty surgery. J Arthroplast 22: 1097-1106.
22. Matziolis G, Krocker D, Weiss U et al (2007) A prospective, randomized study of computer-assisted and conventional total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89: 236-242.
23. Mullaji A, Kanna R, Marawar S et al (2007) Comparison of limb and component alignment using computer-assisted navigation versus image intensifier-guided conventional total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 22: 953-959.
24. Oberst M, Bertsch C, Wurstlin S, Holz U (2003) CT analysis of leg alignment after conventional vs. navigated knee prosthesis implantation. Initial results of a controlled, prospective, and randomized study. Unfallchirurg 106: 941-948.
25. Oswald MH, Jakob RP, Schneider E et al (1993) Radiological analysis of normal axial alignment of femur and tibia in view of total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 8: 419-426.
26. Saragaglia D, Picard F, Chaussard C et al (2001) Computer-assisted knee arthroplasty: comparison with a conventional procedure. Results of 50 cases in a prospective randomized study. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 87: 18-28.
27. Schmitt J, Hauk C, Kienapfel H, Pfeiffer M, Efe T, Fuchs-Winkelmann S, Heyse TJ (2011) Navigation of total knee arthroplasty: rotation of components and clinical results in a prospectively randomized study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 12: 16.
28. Seon JK, Song EK (2006) Navigation-assisted less invasive total knee arthroplasty compared with conventional total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 21: 777-782.
29. Sparmann J, Wolke B, Czupalla H et al (2003) Positioning of total knee arthroplasty with and without navigation support. J Bone Joint Surg Br 85: 830-835.
30. Stulberg SD, Picard F, Saragaglia D (2003) Computer-assisted total knee replacement arthroplasty. Oper Tech Orthop 10: 25-39.
31. van Strien T, der Zwaag E, Kaptein B et al (2009) Computer assisted versus conventional cemented total knee prostheses alignment accuracy and micromotion of the tibial component. Int Orthop 33: 1255-1261.
32. Victor J, Hoste D (2004) Image-based computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty leads to lower variability in coronal alignment. Clin Orthop Relat Res 428: 131-139.
33. Wasielewski RC, Galante JO, Leighty R et al (1994) Wear patterns on retrieved polyethylene tibial inserts and their relationship to technical considerations during total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 299: 31-43.