Accuracy of manual instrumentation of tibial cutting guide in total knee arthroplasty

Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy

Volumn 21, Issue 10, 2013, Pages 2296-2300

  Iorio, R ^a   Bolle, G ^a   Conteduca, F ^a   Valeo, L ^a   Conteduca, J ^a   Mazza, D ^a   Ferretti, A ^a  

^a SAPIENZA UNIVERSITY OF ROME   (Italy)

Author keywords

Accuracy; Component placement; Tibial resection; Total knee arthroplasty

Indexed keywords

AGED; ANATOMIC LANDMARK; ARTICLE; BONE MALFORMATION; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; EQUIPMENT; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS; KNEE PROSTHESIS; MEDICAL ERROR; METHODOLOGY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; TIBIA; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VERY ELDERLY;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ANATOMIC LANDMARKS; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; BONE MALALIGNMENT; HUMANS; KNEE PROSTHESIS; MEDICAL ERRORS; OSTEOARTHRITIS, KNEE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; TIBIA; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84884530685     PISSN: 09422056     EISSN: 14337347     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00167-012-2005-7     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Akagi M, Ueo T, Matsusue Y, Akiyama H, Nakamura T (1997) Improved range of flexion after total knee arthroplasty. The total condylar knee versus the KU knee. Bull Hosp Jt Dis 56(4): 225-232.
2. Bargren JH, Blaha JD, Freeman MA (1983) Alignment in total knee arthroplasty. Correlated biomechanical and clinical observations. Clin Orthop Relat Res 173: 178-183.
3. Bäthis H, Perlick L, Tingart M, Lüring C, Zurakowski D, Grifka J (2004) Alignment in total knee arthroplasty. A comparison of computer-assisted surgery with the conventional technique. J Bone Joint Surg Br 86(5): 682-687.
4. Bellemans J, Robijns F, Duerinckx J, Banks S, Vandenneucker H (2005) The influence of tibial slope on maximal flexion after total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 13(3): 193-196.
5. Berger RA, Crossett LS, Jacobs JJ, Rubash HE (1998) Malrotation causing patellofemoral complications after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 356: 144-153.
6. Catani F, Biasca N, Ensini A, Leardini A, Bianchi L, Digennaro V, Giannini S (2008) Alignment deviation between bone resection and final implant positioning in computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 90(4): 765-771.
7. Cheng T, Pan XY, Mao X, Zhang GY, Zhang XL (2011) Little clinical advantage of computer-assisted navigation over conventional instrumentation in primary total knee arthroplasty at early follow-up. Knee. doi: 10. 1016/j. knee. 2011. 10. 001.
8. Cheng T, Zhao S, Peng X, Zhang X (2011) Does computer-assisted surgery improve postoperative leg alignment and implant positioning following total knee arthroplasty? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials? Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. doi: 10. 1007/s00167-011-1588-8.
9. Chin PL, Yang KY, Yeo SJ, Lo NN (2005) Randomized control trial comparing radiographic total knee arthroplasty implant placement using computer navigation versus conventional technique. J Arthroplasty 20(5): 618-626.
10. Ek ET, Dowsey MM, Tse LF, Riazi A, Love BR, Stoney JD, Choong PF (2008) Comparison of functional and radiological outcomes after computer-assisted versus conventional total knee arthroplasty: a matched-control retrospective study. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 16(2): 192-196.
11. Haaker RG, Stockheim M, Kamp M, Proff G, Breitenfelder J, Ottersbach A (2005) Computer-assisted navigation increases precision of component placement in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 433: 152-159.
12. Hasegawa M, Yoshida K, Wakabayashi H, Sudo A (2011) Minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty: comparison of jig-based technique versus computer navigation for clinical and alignment outcome. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19(6): 904-910.
13. Hernández-Vaquero D, Suarez-Vazquez A, Iglesias-Fernandez S (2011) Can computer assistance improve the clinical and functional scores in total knee arthroplasty? Clin Orthop Relat Res 469: 3436-3442.
14. Ishida K, Matsumoto T, Tsumura N, Kubo S, Kitagawa A, Chin T, Iguchi T, Kurosaka M, Kuroda R (2011) Mid-term outcomes of computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19(7): 1107-1112.
15. Kim JM, Moon MS (1995) Squatting following total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 313: 177-186.
16. Magnussen RA, Weppe F, Demey G, Servien E, Lustig S (2011) Residual varus alignment does not compromise results of TKAs in patients with preoperative varus. Clin Orthop Relat Res 469: 3443-3450.
17. Moreland JR (1988) Mechanisms of failure in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 226: 49-64.
18. Schmitt J, Hauk C, Kienapfel H, Pfeiffer M, Efe T, Fuchs-Winkelmann S, Heyse TJ (2011) Navigation of total knee arthroplasty: rotation of components and clinical results in a prospectively randomized study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 15: 12-16.
19. Schurman DJ, Parker JN, Ornstein D, Total condylar knee replacement (1985) A study of factors influencing range of motion as late as 2 years after arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 67(7): 1006-1014.
20. Seon JK, Song EK, Yoon TR, Park SJ, Bae BH, Cho SG (2007) Comparison of functional results with navigation-assisted minimally invasive and conventional techniques in bilateral total knee arthroplasty. Comput Aided Surg 12(3): 189-193.
21. Tingart M, Lüring C, Bäthis H, Beckmann J, Grifka J, Perlick L (2008) Computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty versus the conventional technique: how precise is navigation in clinical routine? Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 16(1): 44-50.
22. Walker PS, Garg A (1991) Range of motion in total knee arthroplasty. A computer analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 262: 227-235.