Unsatisfactory Accuracy as Determined by Computer Navigation of VISIONAIRE Patient-Specific Instrumentation for Total Knee Arthroplasty

Journal of Arthroplasty

Volumn 28, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 469-473

  Lustig, Sébastien ^a,b   Scholes, Corey J ^a,c   Oussedik, Sam I ^a   Kinzel, Vera ^a   Coolican, Myles R J ^a   Parker, David A ^a  

^a Level 1 The Gallery   (Australia)

^b HOSPICES CIVILS DE LYON   (France)

^c NONE   (Australia)

Author keywords

Accuracy; Navigation; Patient specific instrumentation; Total knee arthroplasty

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; AGED; ARTHROTOMY; ARTICLE; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; COMPUTER SYSTEM; FEMALE; FEMUR; HUMAN; KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; RANGE OF MOTION; SURGICAL EQUIPMENT; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TIBIA; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT;

EID: 84874562813     PISSN: 08835403     EISSN: 15328406     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2012.07.012     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Green G.V., Berend K.R., Berend M.E., et al. The effects of varus tibial alignment on proximal tibial surface strain in total knee arthroplasty: the posteromedial hot spot. J Arthroplasty 2002, 17:1033.
2. Jeffery R.S., Morris R.W., Denham R.A. Coronal alignment after total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1991, 73:709.
3. Ritter M.A., Faris P.M., Keating E.M., et al. Postoperative alignment of total knee replacement. Its effect on survival. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1994, 299:153.
4. Fang D.M., Ritter M.A., Davis K.E. Coronal alignment in total knee arthroplasty: just how important is it?. J Arthroplasty 2009, 24:39.
5. Lombardi A.V., Berend K.R., Adams J.B. Patient-specific approach in total knee arthroplasty. Orthopedics 2008, 31:927.
6. Ng V.Y., DeClaire J.H., Berend K.R., et al. Improved accuracy of alignment with patient-specific positioning guides compared with manual instrumentation in TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2012, 470:99.
7. Doro L.C., Hughes R.E., Miller J.D., et al. The reproducibility of a kinematically-derived axis of the knee versus digitized anatomical landmarks using a knee navigation system. Open Biomed Eng J 2008, 2:52.
8. Dennis D.A., Channer M., Susman M.H., et al. Intramedullary versus extramedullary tibial alignment systems in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 1993, 8:43.
9. Engh G.A., Petersen T.L. Comparative experience with intramedullary and extramedullary alignment in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 1990, 5:1.
10. Mason J.B., Fehring T.K., Estok R., et al. Meta-analysis of alignment outcomes in computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty surgery. J Arthroplasty 2007, 22:1097.
11. Hetaimish B.M., Khan M.M., Simunovic N., et al. Meta-analysis of navigation vs conventional total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2012, 27(6):1177.
12. Ishii Y., Matsuda Y., Ishii R., et al. Sagittal laxity in vivo after total knee arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2005, 125:249.
13. Del Gaizo D.J., Della Valle C.J. Instability in primary total knee arthroplasty. Orthopedics 2011, 34:519.
14. Pietsch M., Hofmann S. Early revision for isolated internal malrotation of the femoral component in total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2012, 20(6):1057.
15. Kessler O., Patil S., Colwell C.W., et al. The effect of femoral component malrotation on patellar biomechanics. J Biomech 2008, 41:3332.
16. Thompson J.A., Hast M.W., Granger J.F., et al. Biomechanical effects of total knee arthroplasty component malrotation: a computational simulation. J Orthop Res 2011, 29:969.
17. Klatt B.A., Goyal N., Austin M.S., et al. Custom-fit total knee arthroplasty (OtisKnee) results in malalignment. J Arthroplasty 2008, 23:26.
18. Howell S.M., Hodapp E.E., Kuznik K., et al. In vivo adduction and reverse axial rotation (external) of the tibial component can be minimized. Orthopedics 2009, 32:319.
19. Bali K., Walker P., Bruce W. Custom-fit total knee arthroplasty: our initial experience in 32 knees. J Arthroplasty 2012, 27(6):1149.
20. Noble J.W., Moore C.A., Liu N. The value of patient-matched instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2012, 27:153.
21. Nunley R.M., Ellison B.S., Ruh E.L., et al. Are patient-specific cutting blocks cost-effective for total knee arthroplasty?. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2012, 470:889.
22. Nunley R.M., Ellison B.S., Zhu J., et al. Do patient-specific guides improve coronal alignment in total knee arthroplasty?. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2012, 470:895.
23. Hashemi J., Chandrashekar N., Gill B., et al. The geometry of the tibial plateau and its influence on the biomechanics of the tibiofemoral joint. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2008, 90:2724.
24. Jenny J.Y., Boeri C., Picard F., et al. Reproducibility of intra-operative measurement of the mechanical axes of the lower limb during total knee replacement with a non-image-based navigation system. Comput Aided Surg 2004, 9:161.
25. Lustig S., Fleury C., Goy D., et al. The accuracy of acquisition of an imageless computer-assisted system and its implication for knee arthroplasty. Knee 2012, 18:15.
26. Pitto R.P., Graydon A.J., Bradley L., et al. Accuracy of a computer-assisted navigation system for total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2006, 88:601.
27. Hirschmann M.T., Konala P., Amsler F., et al. The position and orientation of total knee replacement components: a comparison of conventional radiographs, transverse 2D-CT slices and 3D-CT reconstruction. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2011, 93:629.
28. Victor J., Van Doninck D., Labey L., et al. How precise can bony landmarks be determined on a CT scan of the knee?. Knee 2009, 16:358.
29. Conteduca F., Iorio R., Mazza D., et al. Are MRI-based, patient matched cutting jigs as accurate as the tibial guides?. Int Orthop 2012, 36(8):1589.