Are MRI-Based, patient matched cutting jigs as accurate as the tibial guides?

International Orthopaedics

Volumn 36, Issue 8, 2012, Pages 1589-1593

  Conteduca, Fabio ^a   Iorio, Raffaele ^a   Mazza, Daniele ^a   Caperna, Ludovico ^a   Bolle, Gabriele ^a   Argento, Giuseppe ^a   Ferretti, Andrea ^a  

^a SAPIENZA UNIVERSITY OF ROME   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANALYTICAL EQUIPMENT; ANTERIOR POSTERIOR AXIS; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONAL PLANE; DATA ANALYSIS; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; EXTRAMEDULLARY TIBIAL INSTRUMENTATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KNEE PROSTHESIS; KNEE RADIOGRAPHY; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PATIENT MATCHED CUTTING JIGS; POSITION; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RELIABILITY; SAGITTAL PLANE; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TIBIA; WEIGHT BEARING;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; BONE MALALIGNMENT; HUMANS; INCIDENCE; KNEE JOINT; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SOFTWARE; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; TIBIA; WEIGHT-BEARING;

EID: 84866712897     PISSN: 03412695     EISSN: 14325195     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00264-012-1522-9     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Lundblad H, Kreicbergs A, Söderlund V, Ulfgren AK, Stiller CO, Jansson KA (2011) The value of preoperative grade of radiographic and histological changes in predicting pain relief after total knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. [Epub ahead of print]
2. Ishida K, Matsumoto T, Tsumura N, Kubo S, Kitagawa A, Chin T, Iguchi T, Kurosaka M, Kuroda R (2011) Mid-term outcomes of computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19(7):1107-1112
3. van der Linden-van der Zwaag HM, Bos J, van der Heide HJ, Nelissen RG (2011) A computed tomography based study on rotational alignment accuracy of the femoral component in total knee arthroplasty using computer-assisted orthopaedic surgery. Int Orthop 35(6):845-850
4. Magnussen RA, Weppe F, Demey G, Servien E, Lustig S (2011) Residual varus alignment does not compromise results of TKAs in patients with preoperative varus. Clin Orthop Relat Res 469 (12):3443-3450
5. Hernández-Vaquero D, Suarez-Vazquez A, Iglesias-Fernandez S (2011) Can computer assistance improve the clinical and functional scores in total knee arthroplasty? Clin Orthop Relat Res 469 (12):3436-3442
6. Rottman SJ, Dvorkin M, Gold D (2005) Extramedullary versus intramedullary tibial alignment guides for total knee arthroplasty. Orthopedics 28(12):1445-1448
7. Jenny JY (1999) Influence of intramedullary versus extramedullary alignment: Guides on final total knee arthroplasty component position by Antonio Maestro et al. (pp 552-558). J Arthroplasty 14 (7):898-899
8. Yang SH, Liu TK (1998) Intramedullary versus extramedullary tibial alignment guides in total knee arthroplasty. J Formos Med Assoc 97(8):564-568
9. Tigani D, Masetti G, Sabbioni G, Ben Ayad R, Filanti M, Fosco M (2012) Computer-assisted surgery as indication of choice: Total knee arthroplasty in case of retained hardware or extra-articular deformity. Int Orthop. [Epub ahead of print]
10. Cheng T, Zhao S, Peng X, Zhang X (2011) Does computer-assisted surgery improve postoperative leg alignment and implant positioning following total knee arthroplasty? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials? Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. [Epub ahead of print]
11. Blakeney WG, Khan RJ, Wall SJ (2011) Computer-assisted techniques versus conventional guides for component alignment in total knee arthroplasty: A randomized controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 93(15):1377-1384
12. Brin YS, Nikolaou VS, Joseph L, Zukor DJ, Antoniou J (2011) Imageless computer assisted versus conventional total knee replacement. A Bayesian meta-analysis of 23 comparative studies. Int Orthop 35(3):331-339
13. Seon JK, Park SJ, Lee KB, Li G, Kozanek M, Song EK (2009) Functional comparison of total knee arthroplasty performed with and without a navigation system. Int Orthop 33(4):987-990
14. Ishii Y, Ohmori G, Bechtold JE, Gustilo RB (1995) Extramedullary versus intramedullary alignment guides in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 318:167-175
15. Dennis DA, Channer M, Susman MH, Stringer EA (1993) Intramedullary versus extramedullary tibial alignment systems in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 8(1):43-47
16. Hafez MA, Chelule KL, Seedhom BB, Sherman KP (2006) Computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty using patient-specific templating. Clin Orthop Relat Res 444:184-192
17. Klatt BA, Goyal N, Austin MS, Hozack WJ (2008) Custom-fit total knee arthroplasty (OtisKnee) results in malalignment. J Arthroplasty 23(1):26-29
18. Spencer BA, Mont MA, McGrath MS, Boyd B, Mitrick MF (2009) Initial experience with custom-fit total knee replacement: Intraoperative events and long-leg coronal alignment. Int Orthop 33 (6):1571-1575
19. Noble JW Jr, Moore CA, Liu N (2012) The value of patientmatched instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 27(1):153-155